ROMULUS DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN, 9 N.J. Tax 90 (1987)

ROMULUS DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ROMULUS DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWN OF WEST NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Tax Court of New Jersey.Submitted February 19, 1987.
Decided March 5, 1987.

Appeal from the Tax Court of New Jersey.

Venino Venino, attorneys for the appellant Township of Weehawken (Richard Venino of counsel and on the brief).

Sidney I. Turtz, attorney for the appellant Town of West New York.

McCarter English, attorneys for respondent (William T. Reilly of counsel; Frank E. Ferruggia on the brief).

Before Judges FURMAN, DREIER and SHEBELL.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Lasser in his opinion published at 7 N.J. Tax 305 (Tax Ct. 1985).

Page 91