ZIPKIN v. HENDLER, 116 N.J.L. 137 (1936)

182 A. 843

GOLDIE ZIPKIN, RESPONDENT, v. MEYER HENDLER ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted October 25, 1935 —
Decided January 31, 1936.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 13 N.J. Mis. R. 684, sub nom. Hendler v Meadows.

For the respondent, Louis Spiegel and Emanuel Ehrenkranz.

For the appellants, McCarter English.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.