ALLIANCE v. CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES, 185 N.J. 331 (2005)

885 A.2d 952

ALLIANCE FOR DISABLED IN ACTION, INC., (ADA), A NEW JERSEY NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION, ON ITS OWN BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF THE CLASS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES AND EDISON TYLER VILLAGES, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellants, AND CONSTRUCTION OFFICIAL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON AND SULLIVAN ASSOCIATES, INC., ARCHITECTS AND PLANNERS, DEFENDANTS.

A-87 September Term 2004Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued May 2, 2005
Decided December 1, 2005

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 371 N.J.Super. 398, 853 A.2d 328
(2004).

David M. Hutt argued the cause for appellants (Hutt
Shimanowitz, attorneys; Mr. Hutt, Stewart M. Hutt and Jonathan G. Burnham, on the briefs).

David J. Popiel argued the cause for respondent (Harold B. Garwin, President, Community Health Law Project, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Wefing’s written opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 371 N.J.Super. 398, 853 A.2d 328
(2004).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE, and RIVERASOTO — 7.

Opposed — None.

Page 332