Tax Court of New Jersey.Argued February 23, 1984.
Decided March 30, 1984.
Before Judges FURMAN and DEIGHAN.
Page 348
Appeal from Tax Court.
Edward M. Bernstein argued the cause for appellant (Levy, Levy Albert, attorneys).
Mary R. Hamill, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Atty. Gen. of N.J., attorney James J. Ciancia, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel).
PER CURIAM.
We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Conley in his opinion reported at 5 N.J. Tax 73 (1982).
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…