96 A.2d 795
Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued May 18, 1953 —
Decided May 25, 1953.
Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. O’Brien, Brett O’Brien, attorneys).
Mr. Mortimer Wald argued the cause for the respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conlon in the court below.
HEHER, J., concurring in result.
For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 6.
For reversal — None.
Page 362
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…