132 A.2d 28
Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued May 20, 1957 —
Decided June 3, 1957.
On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Mr. Burtis W. Horner argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Stryker, Tams Horner, attorneys).
Mr. Harry Lane, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and WEINTRAUB — 6.
For reversal — Justice HEHER — 1.
Page 391
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…