BROWN v. GENERAL ANILINE AND FILM CORP., 65 N.J. 555 (1974)

325 A.2d 689

ELOISE BROWN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. GENERAL ANILINE AND FILM CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued September 24, 1974 —
Decided October 8, 1974.

Appeal from the Superior Court Appellate Division.

Mr. Anthony J. LaRusso argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Lindabury, McCormick Estabrook, attorneys).

Mr. Otto C. Staubach argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Weiner, Mirabelli Glennon, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD, and Judge KOLOVSKY — 6.

For reversal — None.

Page 556

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 325 A.2d 689

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago