BURSTINER v. EAST ORANGE, 103 N.J.L. 174 (1926)

134 A. 916

JOSEPH BURSTINER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted May 28, 1926 —
Decided October 18, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 280.

For the appellants, Aaron Marder.

For the respondents, Walter C. Ellis.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Page 175