94 A.2d 665
Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued February 2, 1953 —
Decided February 9, 1953.
Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Mr. Laurie J. Carpenter, in propria persona, argued the cause.
Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Cox and Walburg, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The appeal must be dismissed because of lack of jurisdiction, as pointed out in the opinion of the Appellate Division.
We have nevertheless examined the meritorious questions sought to be raised and find them to be without substance.
The appeal is dismissed, without costs.
For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.
For reversal — None.
Page 373
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…