CASAVALO v. D’AURIA, 113 N.J.L. 328 (1934)

174 A. 506

MATTALINA CASAVALO, APPELLANT, v. SALVATORE D’AURIA ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued May 19, 1934 —
Decided September 27, 1934.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 12 N.J. Mis. R. 81.

For the appellant, Harold Simandl.

For the respondents, Coult, Satz Tomlinson.

Page 329

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 8.

For reversal — PERSKIE, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 3.