HUGHES v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, 128 N.J.L. 480 (1942)

27 A.2d 13 EDWARD HUGHES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, RESPONDENT-PROSECUTOR. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Submitted May 5, 1942 — Decided July 9, 1942. Held, that writ of certiorari be allowed. On application for writ of certiorari. Before Justices CASE, DONGES and COLIE. For the petitioner-respondent, Strong Strong (Theodore Strong, of counsel). For the respondent-prosecutor, […]

Read More

STATE v. DI FRISCO, 118 N.J. 253 (1990)

571 A.2d 914 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY DI FRISCO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued May 9, 1989 — Decided March 12, 1990. Appeal from the Superior Court, Law Division, Essex County. Page 254 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE […]

Read More

IN RE TOTH, 200 N.J. 217 (2009)

978 A.2d 914 IN THE MATTER OF EMERY Z. TOTH, JUDGE OF THE MUNICIPAL COURT. Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 14, 2009. ORDER The Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct having filed with the Court pursuant to Rule 2:15-15(a), a presentment recommending that EMERY Z. TOTH, Judge of the Municipal Court of the Borough of […]

Read More

LA RUE v. LA RUE, 123 N.J. Eq. 229 (1938)

197 A. 44 EDWARD LA RUE, petitioner-appellant, v. GRACE C. LA RUE, defendant-respondent. Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court.Argued October 29th, 1937. Decided February 10th, 1938. On appeal from the court of chancery. Mr. Leo E. Duff (Mr. Louis Bort, of counsel), for the appellant. Mr. Harold E. Watson (Mr. Milton Rosenblum, of counsel), for […]

Read More

PRINCETON INS. CO. v. CHUNMUANG, 151 N.J. 80 (1997)

698 A.2d 9 PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PRASERT CHUNMUANG, M.D., DEFENDANT, AND JUNE DAVIS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued April 28, 1997 — Decided August 8, 1997. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division, Kole, J.A.D. Page 81 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, […]

Read More

STATE v. MONTELEONE, 36 N.J. 93 (1961)

175 A.2d 207 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH MONTELEONE, DOROTHY MILLER AND MARGARET VAN SCIVER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued September 26, 1961 — Decided November 6, 1961. Page 94 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 95 […]

Read More

CENTRAL R. CO. v. BD. OF PUBLIC UTILITY COM’RS., 10 N.J. 255 (1952)

90 A.2d 1 IN THE MATTER OF THE TARIFFS FILED ON INCREASED LOCAL AND JOINT PASSENGER COMMUTATION FARES IN INTRASTATE TRAFFIC EFFECTIVE JULY 5, 1948 — THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY AND THE NEW YORK LONG BRANCH RAILROAD COMPANY. THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY AND THE NEW YORK LONG BRANCH RAILROAD […]

Read More

STATE v. R.T., 205 N.J. 493 (2011)

16 A.3d 365 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. R.T., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. No. A-73 September Term 2009.Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued January 18, 2011. Decided April 28, 2011. On appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Leslie-Ann M. Justus, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Paula T. Dow, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney). […]

Read More

NATIONAL SECURITY BANK v. BLUMBERG, 96 N.J. Eq. 270 (1924)

NATIONAL SECURITY BANK, a corporation, complainant, v. JACOB BLUMBERG et al., defendants. Court of Chancery.Submitted June 30th, 1924. Decided July 2d 1924. 1. Strong and cogent proofs are required to clear away a very powerful prima facie case of fraud. 2. When an existing creditor shows that his debt was existing when a conveyance was […]

Read More

BURLEIGH v. SARTAIN, 114 N.J.L. 151 (1935)

176 A. 169 LEE R. BURLEIGH, APPELLANT, v. PAUL J. SARTAIN AND JOHN V. RICE, JR., RESPONDENTS. Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted October 26, 1934 — Decided January 10, 1935. An order for attachment, based on an affidavit entitled in a cause which at the time of making the affidavit was non-existent, cannot be supported […]

Read More

IN THE MATTER OF LASKY, 174 N.J. 554 (2002)

810 A.2d 562 IN THE MATTER OF HARVEY L. LASKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No. 24676-1968). D-29 September Term 2002Supreme Court of New Jersey. November 25, 2002 DISCIPLINARY ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 02-217, concluding that by way of reciprocal discipline, HARVEY L. LASKY of […]

Read More