PERCELLO v. OCEAN GROVE, 100 N.J.L. 407 (1924)

126 A. 533 CARMINE PERCELLO, APPELLANT, v. OCEAN GROVE CAMP MEETING ASSOCIATION OF THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH, RESPONDENT. Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted June 6, 1924 — Decided October 20, 1924. On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed: “The question raised in this case is whether the Ocean […]

Read More

DIXON v. HOLLEY SMITH, 35 N.J. 594 (1961)

174 A.2d 477 CLINTON DIXON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. HOLLEY SMITH, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued October 9, 1961 — Decided October 23, 1961. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Mr. Frederick Klaessig argued the cause for the appellant. Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Stanley U. Phares, attorney). PER CURIAM. […]

Read More

MATTER OF MUSICK, 143 N.J. 206 (1996)

670 A.2d 11 IN THE MATTER OF IRENE MUSICK, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued October 11, 1995 — Decided February 1, 1996. Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division. Page 207 Lewis A. Scheindlin, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant, Merit System Board (Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, […]

Read More

BOORSTEIN v. BOORSTEIN, 138 N.J. Eq. 143 (1946)

47 A.2d 319 WILLIAM BOORSTEIN, petitioner-appellant, v. RUTH BOORSTEIN, defendant-respondent. Court of Errors and Appeals. Decided May 20th, 1946. Decree dismissing husband’s petition for divorce, awarding custody of the child of the marriage to the wife with the right of the husband to visitation privileges, and directing him to pay the wife $30 weekly for […]

Read More

PENNSYLVANIA GREYHOUND LINES, INC. v. ROSENTHAL, 14 N.J. 372 (1954)

102 A.2d 587 PENNSYLVANIA GREYHOUND LINES, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. IRVING ROSENTHAL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued October 5, 1953 — Decided January 11, 1954. Page 373 Appeal from the Superior Court, Law Division. Page 374 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE […]

Read More

CITRIN v. TANSEY, 107 N.J.L. 368 (1931)

153 A. 523 PHILIP CITRIN AND SAMUEL ELKIN, TRADING AS CITRIN ELKIN, RESPONDENTS, v. MICHAEL J. TANSEY, APPELLANT. Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted May 29, 1930 — Decided February 2, 1931. 1. Testimony by a defendant in a suit on a promissory note that he talked over the telephone with a man who said his […]

Read More

VANDERMADE v. APPERT, 125 N.J. Eq. 366 (1939)

5 A.2d 868 ABRAM VANDERMADE et ux., complainants, v. LORETTA J. APPERT, defendant. Court of Chancery. Decided May 1st, 1939. 1. There is quite a distinction between the words “adequate” and “all.” They do not mean the same thing, nor do they convey the same thought. The word “all” signifies “the whole of;” while “adequate” […]

Read More

N.J. DIV. OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERV. v. G.M., 192 N.J. 290 (2007)

927 A.2d 1289 NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. G.M., DEFENDANT-PETITIONER, AND A.F.M., DEFENDANT. IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF M.M. AND C.R., MINORS. Supreme Court of New Jersey. July 30, 2007. ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division […]

Read More

STATE v. TAFFARO, 195 N.J. 442 (2008)

950 A.2d 860 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MICHAEL TAFFARO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. No. A-8 September Term 2007.Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued February 19, 2008. Decided July 1, 2008. Appeal from the Superior Court, Law Division, Bergen County. Page 443 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE […]

Read More

IBACK v. ELEVATOR SUPPLIES CO., INC., 118 N.J. Eq. 90 (1935)

177 A. 458 JOSEPHINE M. IBACK, complainant, v. ELEVATOR SUPPLIES COMPANY, INCORPORATED, defendant. Court of Chancery. Decided March 13th, 1935. 1. The president of a corporation, entrusted with the sale of shares of its stock, has no implied authority to bind the company to repurchase the stock at the vendee’s option. 2. Resolution of the […]

Read More

IN RE FORKIN, 167 N.J. 154 (2001)

770 A.2d 252 IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS J. FORKIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 27, 2001 ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decisions in DRB 99-293 and DRB 99-335 concluding that THOMAS J. FORKIN of NORTHFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this […]

Read More