POLLACK v. BOWMAN, 139 N.J. Eq. 47 (1946)

49 A.2d 40 STELLA POLLACK and WILLIAM F. HOSEK, as executrix and executor of the last will and testament of Joseph Hosek, appellants-respondents, v. HAROLD H. BOWMAN and THE PATERSON SAVINGS INSTITUTION, individually and as executors and trustees under the last will and testament of Andrew T. Fletcher, respondents-appellants, and LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR […]

Read More

EVERS v. JACOBSEN, 129 N.J.L. 89 (1942)

28 A.2d 89 CHARLOTTE E. EVERS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARRY JACOBSEN, ALSO KNOWN AS HENRY JENETT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted May 29, 1942 — Decided September 18, 1942. To constitute a promise to pay sufficient to remove the bar of the statute of limitations the promise must be unconditional and Page 90 unqualified. A […]

Read More

STATE v. MILLER, 83 N.J. 402 (1980)

416 A.2d 821 STATE OF NEW JERSEY (BY THE BOROUGH OF MILLTOWN), PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DONALD L. MILLER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued October 23, 1979 — Decided July 8, 1980. Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division. Page 403 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE […]

Read More

MATTER OF NORTON, 130 N.J. 425 (1992)

616 A.2d 521 IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT T. NORTON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. Supreme Court of New Jersey. December 1, 1992. ORDER This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that ROBERT T. NORTON of WESTFIELD, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1972, and who was […]

Read More

ROE v. KERVICK, 42 N.J. 191 (1964)

199 A.2d 834 ROBERT A. ROE, COMMISSIONER, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOHN A. KERVICK, STATE TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued January 20, 21, 1964 — Decided April 20, 1964. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Page 192 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE […]

Read More

STATE v. HUTCHINS, 43 N.J. 85 (1964)

202 A.2d 678 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS HUTCHINS, A/K/A “HUTCH,” ULYSSES WALLS, NORMAN PRINCE AND ERNEST HERNDON, A/K/A “JABO,” DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued April 21, 1964 — Decided July 7, 1964. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Page 86 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN […]

Read More

STATE v. WITTE, 13 N.J. 598 (1953)

100 A.2d 754 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HENRY R. WITTE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued September 28, 1953 — Decided November 23, 1953. Page 599 On certified appeal from the Law Division of the Superior Court to the Appellate Division. Page 600 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN […]

Read More

McNAMARA v. NICKOLOPOULOS, 110 N.J. 257 (1988)

540 A.2d 1256 KEVIN MCNAMARA, APPELLANT, v. LOUIS NICKOLOPOULOS, CHAIRMAN OF THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, RESPONDENT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued December 1, 1987 — Decided April 13, 1988. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Daniel V. Gautieri, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Defender). […]

Read More

METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO. v. N. R. BLDG. CO., 110 N.J. Eq. 316 (1932)

159 A. 792 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, complainant, v. N. R. BUILDING COMPANY et al., defendants. Court of Chancery. Decided April 14th, 1932. 1. The rule with regard to multifariousness, as recognized prior to the new rules adopted in 1915, whether arising from misjoinder of causes of action, or of defendants therein, was not an […]

Read More

STATE v. BYNES, 55 N.J. 408 (1970)

262 A.2d 408 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL E. BYNES, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued February 16, 1970 — Decided March 2, 1970. On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Mr. John Anthony Lombardi argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Arthur J. Timins argued the cause for […]

Read More

INGANNAMORT v. FAIR LAWN, 133 N.J.L. 194 (1945)

43 A.2d 684 ROMANA INGANNAMORT, PROSECUTOR, v. BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued July 24, 1945 — Decided July 30, 1945. Under the conditions in this case, as revealed by the testimony, held that an ordinance, as amended, classifying property as “D” residential zone limited to multiple […]

Read More