ROE v. KERVICK, 42 N.J. 191 (1964)

199 A.2d 834 ROBERT A. ROE, COMMISSIONER, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOHN A. KERVICK, STATE TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued January 20, 21, 1964 — Decided April 20, 1964. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Page 192 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE […]

Read More

MATTER OF LAVINE, 86 N.J. 645 (1981)

In the Matter of IVINS N. LAVINE, an attorney at law. Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 19, 1981. DISCIPLINARY MATTERS ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report charging IVINS N. LAVINE of Trenton with misusing trust funds and failing to maintain proper books and records and the Court having reviewed the entire […]

Read More

ACAMPORA v. VALLEY HOSPITAL, 161 N.J. 146 (1999)

735 A.2d 570 RICHARD ACAMPORA, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. VALLEY HOSPITAL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 9, 1999. ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration and disposition of the appeal on the merits consistent with the requirements of Rule 2:11-3(a).

Read More

BLOOMER v. BLOOMER, 98 N.J. Eq. 576 (1925)

CATHARINE BLOOMER, complainant, v. CATHARINE BLOOMER et al., executors, c., defendants. Court of Chancery. Decided December 28th, 1925. Where a testator left a fund, the income of which was to be paid to a person for life, and on the death of the life tenant the principal should be used and devoted towards assisting the […]

Read More

IN RE FEUERSTEIN, 162 N.J. 1 (1999)

737 A.2d 681 IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN H. FEUERSTEIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 28, 1999. ORDER This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that STEPHEN H. FEUERSTEIN of MANALAPAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, and who was […]

Read More

SPANGLER v. KARTZMARK, 121 N.J. Eq. 64 (1936)

187 A. 770 MYRTLE SPANGLER, complainant, v. ROY M. KARTZMARK and NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation of New York, defendants. Court of Chancery. Decided October 31st, 1936. 1. In order to invalidate a release on account of mutual mistake, the mistake must relate to a past or present fact material to the contract and […]

Read More

GUTERMAN v. GUTERMAN, 66 N.J. 69 (1974)

328 A.2d 233 CARL GUTERMAN, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ISAAC GUTERMAN, PLAINTIFF, AND ISAAC GUTERMAN, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STUART GUTERMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND EVA GUTERMAN, DEFENDANT. EVA GUTERMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STUART GUTERMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued November 6, 1974 — Decided November 20, 1974. Appeal from Superior Court, Law Division. Page […]

Read More

MATTER OF DOGAN, 126 N.J. 281 (1991)

597 A.2d 84 IN THE MATTER OF BIROL JOHN DOGAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. Supreme Court of New Jersey. October 22, 1991. ORDER BIROL JOHN DOGAN, of NEW YORK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, having been ordered to show cause on October 21, 1991, why this Court’s […]

Read More