INGANNAMORT v. FAIR LAWN, 133 N.J.L. 194 (1945)

43 A.2d 684 ROMANA INGANNAMORT, PROSECUTOR, v. BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued July 24, 1945 — Decided July 30, 1945. Under the conditions in this case, as revealed by the testimony, held that an ordinance, as amended, classifying property as “D” residential zone limited to multiple […]

Read More

AUTO LENDERS v. GENTILINI FORD, 181 N.J. 245 (2004)

854 A.2d 378 AUTO LENDERS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. GENTILINI FORD, INC., DEFENDANT AND THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JOHN DOES 1-10, RANDY CARPENTER, RICHARD BAKER, SHAWN HAMILTON, SHANDA BODDIE, SEAN MURRAY, THOMAS EIDELL, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, TAMIKA FORTUNE, STARR BARNUM, CASSANDRA BROCK, LATOYA SAVAGE, KENYATTA SAUNDERS, KENNETH GRAHAM, CORNEILIA THROWER, JOYCE TAYLOR, […]

Read More

BURKE v. AUTO MART, INC., 20 N.J. 304 (1956)

WILLIAM BURKE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS, v. AUTO MART, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Supreme Court of New Jersey. January 9, 1956. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Mr. Robert C. Gruhin for the petitioner. Mr. John C. Stockel for the respondent. Denied. Page 305

Read More

MYERS v. SAUER, 117 N.J.L. 144 (1936)

187 A. 135 MARION MYERS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN H. SAUER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued June 1, 1936 — Decided October 2, 1936. On appeal from the Supreme Court. For the plaintiff-respondent, John J. Cuneo (Andrew O. Wittreich, of counsel). Page 145 For the defendant-appellant, Edwards, Smith Dawson (Raymond Dawson, of counsel). PER CURIAM. […]

Read More

FRIEDLANDER v. LEHR, 99 N.J. Eq. 680 (1926)

DAVID FRIEDLANDER, complainant, v. GUSTAVE A. LEHR et al., defendants. Court of Chancery.Submitted August 18th, 1926. Determined August 18th, 1926. Where a real estate agent, acting under authority of the complainant, neglected to make payment to the defendant on a contract for sale of land, the principal was bound to see that the payment was […]

Read More

STATE v. SEPULVEDA, 130 N.J. 589 (1992)

617 A.2d 1215 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. NOEL SEPULVEDA. Supreme Court of New Jersey. October 28, 1992. CORRECTED ORDER It is ORDERED that the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily modified to provide that if defendant’s probation is revoked, resentencing shall be in accordance with State v. Raymond Vasquez, 129 N.J. 189, 609 […]

Read More

MATTER OF LAVINE, 86 N.J. 645 (1981)

In the Matter of IVINS N. LAVINE, an attorney at law. Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 19, 1981. DISCIPLINARY MATTERS ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report charging IVINS N. LAVINE of Trenton with misusing trust funds and failing to maintain proper books and records and the Court having reviewed the entire […]

Read More

ACAMPORA v. VALLEY HOSPITAL, 161 N.J. 146 (1999)

735 A.2d 570 RICHARD ACAMPORA, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. VALLEY HOSPITAL, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Supreme Court of New Jersey. June 9, 1999. ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration and disposition of the appeal on the merits consistent with the requirements of Rule 2:11-3(a).

Read More

BLOOMER v. BLOOMER, 98 N.J. Eq. 576 (1925)

CATHARINE BLOOMER, complainant, v. CATHARINE BLOOMER et al., executors, c., defendants. Court of Chancery. Decided December 28th, 1925. Where a testator left a fund, the income of which was to be paid to a person for life, and on the death of the life tenant the principal should be used and devoted towards assisting the […]

Read More

IN RE FEUERSTEIN, 162 N.J. 1 (1999)

737 A.2d 681 IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN H. FEUERSTEIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 28, 1999. ORDER This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that STEPHEN H. FEUERSTEIN of MANALAPAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, and who was […]

Read More

SPANGLER v. KARTZMARK, 121 N.J. Eq. 64 (1936)

187 A. 770 MYRTLE SPANGLER, complainant, v. ROY M. KARTZMARK and NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation of New York, defendants. Court of Chancery. Decided October 31st, 1936. 1. In order to invalidate a release on account of mutual mistake, the mistake must relate to a past or present fact material to the contract and […]

Read More

GUTERMAN v. GUTERMAN, 66 N.J. 69 (1974)

328 A.2d 233 CARL GUTERMAN, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ISAAC GUTERMAN, PLAINTIFF, AND ISAAC GUTERMAN, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STUART GUTERMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND EVA GUTERMAN, DEFENDANT. EVA GUTERMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. STUART GUTERMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued November 6, 1974 — Decided November 20, 1974. Appeal from Superior Court, Law Division. Page […]

Read More