IN RE KELLER, 25 N.J. 130 (1957)

135 A.2d 321 IN THE MATTER OF SAUL A. KELLER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued October 14, 1957 — Decided October 21, 1957. Page 131 For the order: Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof. PER CURIAM. The respondent Saul A. Keller was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of […]

Read More

ZAVESKI v. KISH, 138 N.J. Eq. 61 (1946)

46 A.2d 665 THERESA D. HORWATH ZAVESKI and JOHN ZAVESKI, complainants, v. HELEN KISH, defendant. Docket 148/160Court of Chancery. Decided April 26th, 1946. 1. Where a confidential relationship exists, and the grantors have stripped themselves of all of their property, the law proceeding upon the theory that, irrespective of undue influence, the grantors did not […]

Read More

CARTERET SAV. AND LOAN ASS’N, F.A. v. DAVIS, 105 N.J. 344 (1987)

521 A.2d 831 CARTERET SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, F.A., A FEDERALLY CHARTERED SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFF, v. BURTON R. DAVIS AND MOZELL Y. DAVIS, HIS WIFE, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NEW JERSEY, RUTGERS MINORITY INVESTMENT COMPANY AND THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS, AND THE MONEY STORE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued October […]

Read More

MAYER v. FAIRLAWN JEWISH CENTER AND RANDALL CONSTRUCTION, 37 N.J. 90 (1962)

EDWIN L. MAYER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FAIRLAWN JEWISH CENTER AND RANDALL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS. Supreme Court of New Jersey. March 26, 1962. Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division. Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd Griggs, Mr. J. Chester Massinger and Mr. James B. Emory for the petitioners. Messrs. Gross Stavis and Miss Mabel L. Richardson for the respondent. […]

Read More

WITCO CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. JOHANSEN COMPANY, 85 N.J. 134 (1980)

425 A.2d 289 WITCO CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. THE JOHANSEN COMPANY. Supreme Court of New Jersey. July 21, 1980. Leave to appeal is granted and the matter is summarily remanded to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, with direction to reinstate plaintiff’s cross-appeal and response and to permit the filing of a brief and appendix on the […]

Read More

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BAUER, 97 N.J. 372 (1984)

478 A.2d 773 CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RALPH E. BAUER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued April 30, 1984 — Decided August 2, 1984. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Page 373 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page […]

Read More

AMENDMENT OF CIVIL PRACTICE RULE 4:3-2 (N.J. 7-17-2003)

AMENDMENT OF CIVIL PRACTICE RULE 4:3-2. Supreme Court of New Jersey. July 17, 2003 ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that, in the matter of all pending and future litigation involving damages or other relief arising out of the manufacture, sale, distribution and/or use of the diet drugs Redux and Phen-Fen, all complaints that have been […]

Read More

STATE v. BURT, 55 N.J. 588 (1970)

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD A. BURT, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER. Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 14, 1970. On petition for certification to Appellate Division, Superior Court. Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness and Mr. Arthur Penn for the petitioner. Mr. A. Donald Bigley and Mr. I Michael Heine for the respondent. Granted. Page 589

Read More