ECKMAN v. BEIHL, 116 N.J.L. 308 (1936)

184 A. 430 LYMAN ECKMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. RUSSELL BEIHL AND HARRY MORGAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Submitted October 11, 1935 — Decided April 9, 1936. 1. A tenant, unless he terminates his estate through his own fault or misconduct, has a right to emblements, or way-going crops, whether his term be certain or uncertain, […]

Read More

PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. v. CLIFTON, 109 N.J. Eq. 349 (1931)

157 A. 443 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a corporation, complainant, v. CLIFTON BUILDERS SUPPLY COMPANY et al., defendants. Court of Chancery. Decided December 11th, 1931. 1. The constitutional judicial officers of this state are not subject to suit, as such, in the courts of this state, without their consent, in the absence of constitutional […]

Read More

CIERPIAL v. FORD MOTOR CO., 16 N.J. 561 (1954)

109 A.2d 666 FRANK CIERPIAL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued November 22, 1954 — Decided December 6, 1954. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Page 562 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Page 563 […]

Read More

KANZLER v. SMITH, 125 N.J. Eq. 466 (1939)

6 A.2d 200 GEORGE KANZLER, complainant-appellant, v. MARY A. SMITH et al., defendants-respondents, and SMITH KANZLER, INC., a corporation, defendant-appellant. Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued February 10th, 1939. Decided May 15th, 1939. 1. Where, on appeal in equity, a decree of the court below is modified or reversed in the appellate court, care should be […]

Read More

DAVIDSON v. CITY OF NEWARK, 40 N.J. 504 (1963)

193 A.2d 139 HAROLD R. DAVIDSON, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. CITY OF NEWARK ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Supreme Court of New Jersey. July 1, 1963. On petition for certification to Superior Court, Appellate Division. Messrs. Fox, Yanoff Fox for the petitioner. Mr. Norman N. Schiff and Mr. Joseph A. Ward for respondent City of Newark. Denied.

Read More

BERNDT v. HOBOKEN BANK FOR SAVINGS, 103 N.J.L. 478 (1927)

135 A. 818 AUGUSTE BERNDT, RESPONDENT, v. THE HOBOKEN BANK FOR SAVINGS, IN THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, APPELLANT. Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted October 29, 1926 — Decided January 31, 1927. 1. When a depositor’s pass-book of a savings bank shows an entry of a payment of money by the bank and the depositor testifies […]

Read More

IN RE MISCI, 203 N.J. 429 (2010)

3 A.3d 1221 IN THE MATTER OF JOHN A. MISCI, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. Supreme Court of New Jersey. October 6, 2010. ORDER The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-101, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that JOHN […]

Read More