WALNUT REALTY CO. v. DIRECTOR OF DIV. OF TAXATION, 36 N.J. 365 (1962)

177 A.2d 745 WALNUT REALTY COMPANY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION AND DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS IN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued October 10, 1961 — Decided January 22, 1962. Page 366 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, […]

Read More

HIGHLAND LAKES COUNTRY CLUB v. NICASTRO, 201 N.J. 123 (2009)

988 A.2d 90 HIGHLAND LAKES COUNTRY CLUB AND COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFF, v. FRANK W. NICASTRO, SR. AND LISA ANN NICASTRO, DEFENDANTS/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. SUBURBAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. AND MARTIN SIKORSKI, P.L.S., THIRD-PARTY/DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. No. A-10 September Term 2009.Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued October 27, 2009. Decided December 8, 2009. Appeal from the Superior Court, Chancery Division, […]

Read More

TAYLOR v. McCLAVE, 128 N.J. Eq. 109 (1940)

15 A.2d 213 SARA F. TAYLOR, complainant, v. WILKES McCLAVE et al., defendants. Court of Chancery. Decided September 16th, 1940. 1. Where the construction of a will is left to the decision of executors and trustees, such decision may not be contrary to the plain intention of the testator, or contrary to a clear provision […]

Read More

IN THE MATTER OF McKENNA, 179 N.J. 414 (2004)

846 A.2d 590 IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD J. McKENNA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 034741990) Supreme Court of New Jersey. April 23, 2004 ORDER The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Supreme Court pursuant to Rule 1:20-11 and Rule 1:20-3(g), recommending thatEDWARD J. McKENNA of FREEHOLD, who was admitted […]

Read More

MATTER OF COSGROVE, 151 N.J. 488 (1997)

700 A.2d 1236 IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD T. COSGROVE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW. Supreme Court of New Jersey. October 22, 1997. The Disciplinary Review Board on August 1, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that EDWARD T. COSGROVE of PEQUANNOCK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1962, […]

Read More

MATTER OF PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW PROJECT, 122 N.J. 345 (1990)

585 A.2d 358 IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW PROJECT. Supreme Court of New Jersey. July 24, 1990. This matter having come before the Court on the application of the Attorney General for a preliminary determination, prior to submission of the final report of the Court’s Special Master, of the appropriate “universe” of cases […]

Read More

OSBUN v. DE YOUNG, 99 N.J.L. 204 (1923)

122 A. 809 ALFRED OSBUN, RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL W. DE YOUNG AND CHARLES GARLIMUND, PARTNERS, TRADING UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF DE YOUNG GARLIMUND, AND LESTER WELSH, APPELLANTS. Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted July 9, 1923 — Decided November 19, 1923. 1. Where the testimony whether or not the servant of the defendant […]

Read More

MEADOWBROOK CARTING CO. v. ISLAND HEIGHTS BOROUGH, 138 N.J. 307 (1994)

650 A.2d 748 MEADOWBROOK CARTING COMPANY, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF ISLAND HEIGHTS AND CONSOLIDATED WASTE SERVICES, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued September 27, 1994 — Decided December 7, 1994. Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division. Page 308 [EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN […]

Read More

TABER v. STATE BOARD, c., DENTISTRY, 137 N.J.L. 161 (1948)

59 A.2d 231 SYDNEY A. TABER, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. STATE BOARD OF REGISTRATION AND EXAMINATION IN DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued February 3, 1948 — Decided May 13, 1948. So much of R.S. 45:6-7 subdivision (h) as provides that “Any license to practice dentistry may be revoked or suspended by the […]

Read More

TRAUTWEIN v. TRAUTWEIN, 129 N.J. Eq. 90 (1941)

18 A.2d 265 JESSIE TRAUTWEIN, complainant-respondent, v. ROBERT E. TRAUTWEIN, defendant; FRANKLIN STRAUCH, appellant. Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued October 21st, 1940. Decided February 4th, 1941. 1. On application to hold a person in contempt of the Court of Chancery for failure to pay a sum specified in a previous order of the court, an […]

Read More