154 A. 626
Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued February 5, 1931 —
Decided April 24, 1931.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 8 N.J. Mis. R. 547.
For the appellant, Russell L. Bradford (of the New York bar) Walter E. Cooper (on the brief).
For the respondents, William A. Stevens, attorney-general.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, so far as it treats of the matters argued on this appeal. The point relating to the method of valuation, which is discussed by the Supreme Court, is not argued here and we have not considered it.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, DEAR, JJ. 8.
For reversal — BODINE, KAYS, JJ. 2.
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…