CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY v. NEW JERSEY ECON. DEV. AUTH., 6 N.J. Tax 344 (1984)

CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Tax Court of New Jersey.Submitted February 22, 1984.
Decided February 29, 1984.

Before Judges BOTTER, PRESSLER and O’BRIEN.

Appeal from the Tax Court of New Jersey.

Page 345

Matthew H. Powals, City Solicitor, attorney for appellant.

No brief was filed by respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Rimm in his opinion reported a 5 N.J. Tax 137 (Tax Ct. 1983).

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago