187 A. 36
Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted May 29, 1936 —
Decided October 2, 1936.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported i 114 N.J.L. 594.
For the appellant, Thomas G. Haight, John A. Hartpence an Charles W. Hulst.
For the respondents, F. Hamilton Reeve.
PER CURIAM.
Examination of the proofs taken in this case leads us to the conclusion that it is controlled by the decision of this court i Carteret Academy v. State Board, 104 N.J.L. 165, and, the Supreme Court so ruling, the judgment is affirmed, in the opinion of Mr. Justice Heher in that court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…