EAGER v. HACKENSACK, 119 N.J.L. 430 (1938)

196 A. 739

THE STATE, EX REL. ALICE EAGER, RESPONDENT, v. THE CITY OF HACKENSACK ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted October 29, 1937 —
Decided January 26, 1938.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed i 15 N.J. Mis. R. 371.

For the appellants, Donald M. Waesche.

For the respondent, Warren Dixon, Jr.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 11.

For reversal — HEHER, J. 1.

Page 431