GERSTLEY v. BEST, 108 N.J.L. 189 (1931)

156 A. 377

ROSA E. GERSTLEY, RESPONDENT, v. DAVID H. BEST ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted February 13, 1931 —
Decided October 19, 1931.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 8 N.J. Mis. R. 661.

For the respondent, Cassman Gottlieb.

For the appellants, Babcock Champion.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Page 190