161 A.2d 475
Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued June 7, 1960 —
Decided June 13, 1960.
Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Mr. John J. O’Donnell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Egan, O’Donnell Hanley, attorneys).
Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Jacob Siegal, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Freund in the court below.
BURLING, J., concurring in result.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 7.
For reversal — None.
Page 79
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…