162 A. 590
Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted May 27, 1932 —
Decided October 17, 1932.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion by Mr. Justice Parker is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 295.
For the appellant, Louise Ruth Shapiro.
For the respondent, I. Ezra Newmark.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment, in favor of the plaintiff below, in an action of ejectment, entered upon the striking out, upon notice, by a justice of the Supreme Court, of the answer, as sham and frivolous. The answer was, in our judgment, properly stricken out and the judgment under review is therefore affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…