101 A.2d 554
Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued December 21, 1953 —
Decided January 4, 1954.
Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Cox Walburg, attorneys).
Mr. John H. Yauch, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Gilhooly, Yauch and Fagan, attorneys).
Page 173
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Superior Court, Appellate Division 26 N.J. Super. 194
For affirmance — Justices HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 5.
For reversal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justice OLIPHANT — 2.
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…