HARRISON v. STANTON, 14 N.J. 172 (1954)

101 A.2d 554

E. DONALD HARRISON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD H. STANTON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued December 21, 1953 —
Decided January 4, 1954.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Cox Walburg, attorneys).

Mr. John H. Yauch, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Gilhooly, Yauch and Fagan, attorneys).

Page 173

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Superior Court, Appellate Division 26 N.J. Super. 194
For affirmance — Justices HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 5.

For reversal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justice OLIPHANT — 2.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 101 A.2d 554

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago