HENRY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 204 N.J. 320 (2010)

9 A.3d 882

LULA M. HENRY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; HON. CLARK E. BRUNO, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF HUMAN SERVICES; TRENTON STATE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL; GREGORY P. ROBERTS, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FOR TRENTON STATE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

No. A-69 September Term 2009.Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued September 28, 2010.
Decided December 10, 2010.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Law Division, Mercer County.

Page 321

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Page 322

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Page 323

[EDITORS’ NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Page 324

John A. Klamo argued the cause for appellant.

Jacqueline A. Augustine, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents (Paula T. Dow, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Lewis A. Scheindlin, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Judge STERN (temporarily assigned) delivered the opinion of the Court.

In Montells v. Haynes, 133 N.J. 282, 627 A.2d 654 (1993), the Court held that the two-year statute of limitations applies to all claims filed under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1
to -49(LAD), in Superior Court. The complaint must be filed within two years of the date on which the cause of action “accrued.” N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2. Montells, supra, 133 N.J. at 285, 627 A.2d 654. In this case we examine the impact of the “discovery rule” on LAD claims, and affirm the dismissal of plaintiffs retaliation claim against her former employer, the New

Page 325

Jersey Department of Human Services (DHS) and officials thereof, [1] but remand for a hearing with respect to the date of accrual of the claim of racial discrimination.

I.
On July 24, 2007, plaintiff, Lula Henry, an African American, filed a complaint against defendants alleging racial discrimination in “hiring practice” and retaliation in violation of the LAD, resulting in her resignation from her position at DHS. Defendants moved for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations. The motion judge determined that plaintiffs action accrued in 2004, and was not tolled by the discovery rule. The case was, therefore, barred by the two-year statute of limitations, and the complaint was dismissed. The Appellate Division affirmed the judgment, and we granted certification. Henry v. Dep’t of Human Servs. 202 N.J. 348, 997 A.2d 232 (2010).

II.
Because this case arises on a motion for summary judgment, we consider the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am. 142 N.J. 520, 540, 666 A.2d 146 (1995) R. 4:46-2.

Plaintiff obtained an Associate in Applied Science Degree in Nursing from Mercer County Community College in 1995 and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Nursing from Delaware State University in 2000. While pursuing a Master of Science Degree in Nursing from Wilmington College, she worked part time at Anne Klein Forensic Hospital in Trenton. When she finished her master’s degree in 2004, plaintiff was licensed to practice in New

Page 326

Jersey and other states, and resigned from Anne Klein after being advised that she was “too qualified” for a full-time position there.

In April 2004, plaintiff secured a full-time entry-level nursing position at Trenton State. She asserts that the reason she was only given an entry level position and not reclassified thereafter was due to race. According to plaintiffs certification in opposition to the motion for summary judgment:

7. I developed initial concerns, uncorroborated by any firm evidence, in or about late Spring/early Summer 2004 when I was working at Trenton State, that racial discrimination was occurring. All state agencies post job vacancies, and any individual interested in same can make application. During this time period, I began exploring employment opportunities outside Trenton State by submitting various applications for posted vacancies.
10. During the Summer of 2004, while I was conversing with another individual as to my concerns in advancing within state service, a human resource representative, Marybeth Longo, overheard the conversation. She stormed out of her office yelling that I “could not seem to get it through my head that I have to be in the position for one year” in order to obtain advancement.
11. In late Summer 2004, 1 wrote a letter to the Director of Nursing at Trenton State, Lenny Seeman, requesting that I be reclassified according to my qualifications. This letter was drafted in response to my conversation with Ms. Seeman’s secretary who told me that there were only three nurses in the entire division possessing a Masters Degree in Nursing at the time, none of whom were then assigned entry level positions. When I wrote such letter, I did not then believe that I was the victim of racial discrimination; and instead, I believed the matter was merely an oversight which could be administratively remedied. I copied this letter to both John Lubitsky, Trenton State’s Human Resource Manager, and to State Assemblyman Herb Conoway.
12. No response was received by me for over one (1) month. I then had occasion to inadvertently meet Mr. Lubitsky at a water fountain in the hall at Trenton State. I inquired as to whether Mr. Lubitsky received the copy of my letter addressed to Ms. Seeman. Mr. Lubitsky acknowledged, in a very nasty manner, that he had received such copy adding that I had stood a good chance of being reclassified “until he received a letter from some bureaucrat downtown.” When I inquired as to when I could expect a formal response, I was told by Mr. Lubitsky to “consider this your reply.”
13. Shortly thereafter, circa November 2004, I became discouraged and sought transfer from Trenton State to the New Jersey Juvenile Commission (hereinafter “Juvenile Justice”). In connection therewith, I had understood that it was necessary for me to resign from Trenton State in order to obtain employment position with Juvenile Justice; and I took such action.

Page 327

Plaintiff accepted a nursing position at the Juvenile Justice Commission (“JJC”) but had to “start all over again as a new hire.” The plaintiffs certification also stated:

16. In Spring 2006, during a conversation with my union representative, Ray Marks, I learned that a black/Nigerian nurse, Okechi Ikpeama, had commenced (or threatened) litigation contesting the placement of a less qualified Caucasian nurse into a job position. Although Mr. Marks indicated to me that this litigation was, upon information and belief, settled out of court, he opined that racism was very widespread throughout Trenton State with allegations of impropriety only then being presented to him. The bargaining unit represented by Mr. Parks includes Trenton State employees.[2]
17. I also learned in or about Spring 2006 that Ellen Gelker, a Caucasian nurse with the same credentials as I, did not have to start as charge nurse with Trenton State; and instead, she had been immediately hired into a higher job classification. This was directly contrary to the representations made to me concerning my initial placement; and I can only conclude that the discriminating factor involved race. Prior to Spring 2006, I had no[t] known of any individual, possessing qualifications equal to myself, having been hired by Trenton State into a non-entry level position. Consequently, there was no factual basis to substantiate any previous suspicion that I, too, should have been hired by Trenton State into a “non-entry level” position.
20. I incurred personal injuries while working at Juvenile Justice circa January 27, 2005. Following that date, I required periods of hospitalization and recuperation causing me grave anxiety and clinical depression. Hence, I did not pursue this matter in a more timely manner after Spring 2006.[3]

The Law Division granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The motion judge determined that plaintiffs complaint

Page 328

was barred by the two-year statute of limitations. In the court’s oral decision, the judge determined that plaintiff “developed concerns” of racial discrimination in 2004, but waited until 2007 to file the complaint. The court also found that plaintiffs action was not tolled by the discovery rule, citing Lopez v. Swyer, 62 N.J. 267, 300 A.2d 563 (1973). The court concluded that plaintiffs cause of action accrued in 2004 when she had a “reasonable suspicion” of racial discrimination and should have taken action to investigate and determine whether she had a basis for legal action.

The Appellate Division affirmed the Law Division’s grant of summary judgment. Reviewing the trial court’s decision de novo, because the “determination of the accrual of a cause of action is an issue for the court,” Baird v. Am. Med Optics, 155 N.J. 54, 65, 713 A.2d 1019 (1998), the panel in an unpublished opinion concluded that “there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the trial court properly determined that [plaintiffs] LAD claims were barred by the statute of limitations.” The panel found that the cause of action accrued upon the alleged “discrete act” of “disparate treatment” that occurred in April 2004 when plaintiff was hired in an entry-level position, and “[s]ince appellant had suspicions of discrimination while working at the Hospital, she should have investigated further . . . because she was aware of or should have been aware of the possible injury caused to her.”

Similarly, the panel concluded that any adverse employment action taken by the hospital in response to plaintiffs requests and complaints concerning her circumstances occurred while she was working at Trenton State, and her retaliation claim accrued, at the latest, “when she resigned her position” from Trenton State in 2004. In affirming the trial court, the Appellate Division also determined that the discovery rule did not apply because plaintiff “knew enough, or should have known through reasonable diligence, back in the spring or summer of 2004, that she had a cause of action for racial discrimination,” and “should have investigated further.”

Page 329

III.
Plaintiff contends that her cause of action against defendants for violations of the LAD did not accrue until 2006, and thus her complaint filed on July 24, 2007 was not timebarred, that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because there exists a genuine issue of material fact as to when she discovered she had a cause of action, and that had she pursued her claim in 2004 upon a mere “suspicion of racial discrimination,” she could not have made out a prima facie case of discrimination because she was not aware of that fact until 2006. Therefore, plaintiff argues that the statute of limitations should not have begun to run until she had some measure of corroboration of her concerns in 2006.

Defendants counter that the trial court and Appellate Division correctly held both plaintiffs discrimination and retaliation claims were time-barred. They further contend that the discovery rule should not apply to LAD cases, but that even if it does, it would not be appropriate to apply it to the facts of this case. Defendants assert that plaintiffs certification in opposition to summary judgment demonstrates that she had sufficient “knowledge” of racial discrimination in 2004 and that any adverse employment action occurred while she was employed at Trenton State Hospital before she resigned in November 2004.

A.
It is well established that summary judgment must be granted if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact challenged and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment or order as a matter of law.” R. 4:46-2. The “judge’s function is not himself [or herself] to weigh the evidence and determine the truth of the matter but to determine whether there is a genuine issue for trial” in viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., supra, 142 N.J. at 540, 66 A.2d 146 (citation omitted). “An issue of fact is genuine

Page 330

only if, considering the burden of persuasion at trial, the evidence submitted by the parties on the motion, together with all legitimate inferences therefrom favoring the non-moving party, would require submission of the issue to the trier of fact.” R. 4:46-2(c).

In an appeal of an order granting summary judgment, appellate courts “employ the same standard [of review] that governs the trial court.” Busciglio v. DellaFave 366 N.J.Super. 135, 139, 840 A.2d 897 (App.Div. 2004). As only a legal issue is involved in the absence of a genuine factual dispute, that standard is de novo, and the trial court rulings “are not entitled to any special deference.” Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Manalapan Twp. Comm., 140 N.J. 366, 378, 658 A.2d 1230 (1995). See also Baird, supra, 155 N.J. at 65, 713 A.2d 1019 (“the determination of the accrual of a cause of action is an issue for the court”). Thus, the appellate court should first decide whether there was a genuine issue of material fact, and if none exists, then decide whether the trial court’s ruling on the law was correct. Prudential Prop. Cos. Ins. Co. v. Boylan 307 N.J.Super. 162, 167, 704 A.2d 597 (App.Div.) certif. denied, 154 N.J. 608, 713 A.2d 499 (1998).

B.
As already noted, plaintiff alleges violations of the LAD based on racial discrimination and retaliation. Due to the inherent “difficulty of proving discriminatory intent,” this Court has adopted the McDonnell Douglas “procedural burden-shifting methodology” to determine whether an employer has engaged in unlawful discrimination when there is only “circumstantial evidence” of that discrimination. Zive v. Stanley Roberts, Inc., 182 N.J. 436, 446-47, 867 A.2d 1133 (2005); see McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802, 93 S.Ct 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). See also, e.g., Gerety v. Atl. City Hilton Casino Resort, 184 N.J. 391, 399, 877 A.2d 1233 (2005) (discussing McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework as applied to LAD disparate impact claim); Jansen v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc., 110 N.J. 363, 380, 541 A.2d 682 (1988) (directing use of McDonnell

Page 331

Douglas methodology where “employee alleges discrimination in hiring because of race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry, age, marital status, or sex”). Under that burden-shifting procedure:

(1) the plaintiff must come forward with sufficient evidence to constitute a prima facie case of discrimination; (2) the defendant then must show a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for its decision; and (3) the plaintiff must then be given the opportunity to show that defendant’s stated reason was merely a pretext or discriminatory in its application. [Dixon v. Rutgers, The State Univ. of N.J., 110 N.J. 432, 442, 541 A.2d 1046 (1988) (citations omitted).]

The first step in the McDonnell-Douglas methodology requires that the plaintiff establish a prima facie case of discrimination, the elements of which will “vary depending on the particular employment discrimination claim being made.”Victor v. State, 203 N.J. 383, 409-10, 4 A.3d 126 (2010). In the context of a claim alleging discrimination in hiring and placement, the plaintiff may establish a prima facie case by showing:

(1) that she is a member of a class protected by the anti-discrimination law; (2) that she was qualified for the position or rank sought; (3) that she was denied promotion, reappointment, or tenure; and (4) that others . . . with similar or lesser qualifications achieved the rank or position.
[Dixon, supra, 110 N.J. at 443, 541 A.2d 1046.]

The evidentiary burden at the prima facie stage is “`rather modest: it is to demonstrate to the court that plaintiffs factual scenario is compatible with discriminatory intent — i.e., that discrimination could be a reason for the employer’s action.'” Zive, supra, 182 N.J. at 447, 867 A.2d 1133 (citations omitted). “The establishment of the prima facie case creates an inference of discrimination [after which] . . . the burden of production shifts to the employer to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the employer’s action.”Id. at 449, 867 A.2d 1133. Subsequently, “the burden of production shifts back to the employee to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the reason articulated by the employer was merely a pretext for discrimination and not the true reason for the employment decision.” Ibid. To do so, the plaintiff must show that the employer’s reason was both false and “motivated by discriminatory intent.”Ibid. The burden of

Page 332

proof “remains with the employee at all times,”Id. at 450, 867 A.2d 1133, and if the plaintiff cannot meet his or her obligation under th McDonnell Douglas methodology, the employer will prevail on summary judgment. Id. at 456, 86 A.2d 1133.

A claim of retaliation follows essentially the same burden-shifting approach, Jamison v. Rockaway Bd. of Ed., 242 N.J.Super. 436, 4457, 577 A.2d 177 (App.Div. 1990), and requires the following three traditional elements to establish a prima facie case: “(1) [plaintiff] engaged in a protected activity known by the employer; (2) thereafter [the] employer unlawfully retaliated against [her]; and (3) [her] participation in the protected activity caused the retaliation.” Tartaglia v. UBS PaineWebber, Inc. 197 N.J. 81, 125, 961 A.2d 1167 (2008) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Now, “a plaintiff must also bear the burden of proving that he or she had a good faith, reasonable basis for complaining about the workplace behavior.” Ibid. See also Victor v. State, supra, 203 N.J. at 409, 4 A.3d 126 (setting forth “prima facie elements of a retaliation claim under the LAD”).

C.
As already noted, this Court has determined that the appropriate statute of limitations for filing a LAD claim in Superior Court is two years. Montells v. Haynes, supra, 133 N.J. at 292, 627 A.2d 654.[4] The purpose behind the two-year statute of

Page 333

limitations is to encourage prompt resolution of claims, particularly in discrimination cases where evidence may be “vulnerable to the passage of time.” Id. at 291, 293, 627 A.2d 654. However, there is no dispute that the “discovery rule” has long been part of our jurisprudence in applying a statute of limitations, see Lopez, supra, 62 N.J. at 274, 300 A.2d 563, and that:

[u]nswerving, mechanistic application of statutes of limitations would at times inflict obvious and unnecessary harm upon individual plaintiffs without advancing these legislative purposes. On numerous occasions we have found such particular circumstances as to dictate not the harsh approach of literally applying the statute of limitations but the application of the more equitable and countervailing considerations of individual justice. A just accommodation of individual justice and public policy requires that in each case the equitable claims of opposing parties must be identified, evaluated and weighed. Whenever dismissal would not further the Legislature’s objectives in prescribing the limitation, the plaintiff should be given an opportunity to assert his claim.
[Galligan v. Westfield Ctr. Serv., 82 N.J. 188, 192-93, 412 A.2d 122 (1980) (internal quotation marks, footnotes, and citations omitted).]

There is nothing new about applying equitable principles to toll the statute of limitations for LAD claims, just as it has been done in other areas of the law, see Roa v. Roa 200 N.J. 555, 566, 985 A.2d 1225 (2010) (applying discovery rule to retaliation claim); Shepherd v. Hunterdon Dev. Ctr., 174 N.J. 1, 6-7, 803 A.2d 611 (2002) (applying “continuing violation doctrine” in LAD action); see also, e.g., Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 113 122 S.Ct. 2061, 2072, 153 L.Ed.2d 106, 122 (2002) (applying same concept in Title VII cases); Martinez v. Cooper Hospital, 163 N.J. 45, 747 A.2d 266 (2000) Mancuso v. Neckles, 163 N.J. 26, 747 A.2d 255 (2000); Baird v. Am. Med. Optics, supra, 155 N.J. at 54, 713 A.2d 1019; Lynch v. Rubacky, 85 N.J. 65, 424 A.2d 1169 (1981); Lopez v. Swyer, supra, 62 N.J. at 267, 300 A.2d 563; Fernandi v. Strully 35 N.J. 434, 173 A.2d 277 (1961) (medical malpractice cases); Lamb v. Global Landfill Reclaiming 111 N.J. 134, 543 A.2d 443 (1988) (Tort Claims Act); O’Keeffe v. Snyder, 83 N.J. 478, 492, 416 A.2d 862 (1980) (replevin action); Burd v. New Jersey Tel. Co., 76 N.J. 284, 386 A.2d 1310 (1978) (products liability).

With respect to LAD claims, Roa, supra, decided earlier this year, involved a retaliation case: In Roa, supra, we confronted

Page 334

the question of whether the two-year statute of limitations barred an employee’s claims of retaliatory discharge and post-discharge retaliation brought under the anti-retaliation provision of the LAD, N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(d). 200 N.J. at 561, 985 A.2d 1225. The plaintiff claimed that his employer unlawfully retaliated against him by discharging him for exposing his employer’s extramarital affairs. Id. at 562-64, 985 A.2d 1225. Additionally, the plaintiff alleged a post-discharge claim of retaliation based on the employer’s specific act of canceling his health insurance. Id. at 563-65, 985 A.2d 1225. The plaintiff argued that the cancellation of insurance was both “independently actionable” and “constitute] the last act in a continuing violation, thus reviving his otherwise moribund termination claim.” Id. at 565, 98 A.2d 1225.

The Court held first that the continuing violation theory did not encompass the plaintiffs retaliatory discharge claim Id. at 570, 985 A.2d 1225. That is because “the doctrine does not permit . . . the aggregation of discrete discriminatory acts for the purpose of reviving an untimely act of discrimination that the victim knew or should have known was actionable.” Id. at 569, 985 A.2d 1225. The Court differentiated continuing violations from discrete acts for statute of limitations purposes, explaining that discrete acts include primarily “termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire.” Id. at 566-67, 98 A.2d 1225. Upon the discrete act of discharge, the plaintiff in Roa “clearly knew, or should have known, that he had been the subject of retaliation by defendants, and should have filed his complaint within two years thereof,” despite the additional unlawful acts that occurred after the discharge. 200 N.J. at 566-67, 985 A.2d 1225. Similarly, a discrete act of resignation also terminates the employment relationship and obligates the former employee to take action relevant to any retaliatory cause of the resignation.

IV.
In light of the Roa principles, we affirm the Appellate Division’s holding with respect to the retaliation claim.

Page 335

Here, plaintiff questioned her classification and requested reclassification;[5] in response she remained assigned to her entry-level position despite her comparative qualifications. However, plaintiff resigned from her position in November 2004, in light of the failure to re-classify her, or in the absence of a satisfactory response to her concerns; and she did so after being told that had she not complained to others in the State bureaucracy, she may have been reclassified. Therefore, any retaliation had to have occurred before, and her cause of action had to have accrued at or before, the date of resignation. Accordingly, there is no equitable basis on which to toll or extend the statute of limitations on the retaliation claim. Id. at 569-70, 985 A.2d 1225; Coda v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 920 F.2d 446, 453
(7th Cir. 1990) (equitable tolling and discovery rule not applicable in Age Discrimination in Employment Act case where plaintiff did not exercise “due diligence” by investigating or pursuing remedies before statute of limitations ran), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1261, 111 S.Ct. 2916, 115 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1991).

V.
However, the discrimination claim cannot be similarly viewed, and is subject to evaluation by established “discovery rule” principles.

The discovery rule seeks to remedy inequity resulting when “an injured person, unaware that he has a cause of action, [is] denied his day in court solely because of his ignorance, if he is

Page 336

otherwise blameless.” Lopez, supra, 62 N.J. at 273-74, 300 A.2d 563. “The discovery rule is essentially a rule of equity.” Ibid. See also Grunwald v. Bronkesh, 131 N.J. 483, 492, 621 A.2d 459 (1993); O’Keeffe v. Snyder, supra, 83 N.J. at 491, 416 A.2d 862. It evolved in the medical malpractice context and, as already noted, has since been extended to other causes of action. See Lopez, supra, 62 N.J. at 273-74, 300 A.2d 563 (noting expansion of discovery rule to torts beyond medical malpractice involving foreign objects left in patient’s body) see also Pressler Verniero, Current N.J. Court Rules, comment 36.2.3 to R. 4:5-4 (2011). The rule applies where a plaintiff is unaware of his or her injury until after the limitation period would otherwise expire or where the damage was apparent, but the plaintiff was unable to attribute the cause to another. Lopez, supra, 62 N.J. at 274, 300 A.2d 563. Thus, “[t]he discovery rule prevents the statute of limitations from running when injured parties reasonably are unaware that they have been injured or, although aware of an injury, do not know that the injury is attributable to the fault of another.” Baird, supra, 155 N.J. at 66, 713 A.2d 1019 see also, e.g., Grunwald, supra, 131 N.J. at 493, 621 A.2d 459; Viviano v. CBS, Inc. 101 N.J. 538, 547, 503 A.2d 296 (1986).

Typically, triggered by a defendant’s motion for summary judgment or answer asserting a statute of limitations defense, the court will determine at a Lopez hearing prior to trial, when the plaintiff reasonably should have discovered that he or she had a cause of action.[6] Lopez, supra, 62 N.J. at 267, 300 A.2d 563. See also Parete v. Mully, 316 N.J.Super. 100, 102-03, 719 A.2d 702 (App.Div. 1998). The plaintiff need only allege facts that tend to show that a “reasonable person” could not have previously discovered a basis for a cause of action with the exercise of “ordinary diligence” and intelligence Savage v. Old Bridge-Sayreville Med.

Page 337

Group, 134 N.J. 241, 248, 633 A.2d 514 (1993); see also Martinez, supra, 163 N.J. at 52, 747 A.2d 266 (2000) Lapka v. Porter Hayden Co., 162 N.J. 545, 556, 745 A.2d 525 (2000); Andritz Sprout-Bauer v. Beazer East, 12 F.Supp.2d 391, 415 (M.D.Pa. 1998) (explaining that if plaintiff alleges no facts that “could reasonably support a finding that the plaintiff acted with reasonable diligence . . . [summary] judgment in favor of the defendant is appropriate”). The standard for making the discovery determination is essentially “an objective one.”Szczuvelek v. Harborside Healthcare Woods Edge 182 N.J. 275, 281, 865 A.2d 636 (2005).

The discovery rule thus delays the accrual of the action until the plaintiff “discovers, or by exercise of reasonable diligence and intelligence should have discovered, facts which form the basis of a cause of action,” O’Keeffe v. Snyder, supra, 83 N.J. at 491, 416 A.2d 862, or provide “a basis for an actionable claim.” Lopez, supra, 62 N.J. at 272, 300 A.2d 563.

In Roa, we stated “[t]here is simply nothing about a LAD case that would militate against applying the equitable principles informing the discovery rule to allow pursuit of a claim of which the party was reasonably unaware.” Roa, supra, 200 N.J. at 572, 985 A.2d 1225. Although holding that plaintiffs retaliatory discharge claim was time-barred by the two-year statute of limitations, but the post-discharge claim regarding insurance was not, we said:

[w]hen a plaintiff knows or has reason to know that he has a cause of action against an identifiable defendant and voluntarily sleeps on his rights so long as to permit the customary period of limitations to expire, the pertinent considerations of individual justice as well as the broader considerations of repose, coincide to bar his action. Where, however, the plaintiff does not know or have reason to know that he has a cause of action against an identifiable defendant until after the normal period of limitations has expired, the considerations of individual justice and the considerations of repose are in conflict and other factors may fairly be brought into play. [Id. at 571, 985 A.2d 1225 (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Caravaggio v. D’Agostini 166 N.J. 237, 245, 765 A.2d 182 (2001) (quoting Farrell v. Votator Div. of Chemetron Corp., 62 N.J. Ill, 115, 299 A.2d 394 (1973); Fernandi v. Strully, 35 N.J. 434, 438, 173 A.2d 277 (1961))).]

Thus, we explained that “[a]t the heart of the discovery rule is the fundamental unfairness of barring claims of which a party is

Page 338

unaware.” Ibid. The rule should apply in situations where “`equity and justice . . . call for its application.'” Ibid, (quoting Lopez, supra, 62 N.J. at 273, 300 A.2d 563); see also R.A.C. v. P.J.S., 192 N.J. 81, 98, 927 A.2d 97 (2007); Mancuso v. Neckles 163 N.J. 26, 29, 747 A.2d 255 (2000). Applied to the factual circumstances in Roa, we determined that, although the plaintiffs health benefits were cancelled by virtue of the post-discharge retaliatory act more than two years before the plaintiff filed his complaint, he did not become aware that his insurance had been cancelled until a later date, which fell within the two-year period. 200 N.J. at 570, 985 A.2d 1225. Therefore, the plaintiffs post-discharge retaliation claim was timely Ibid.

Accordingly, the Court has approved use of the discovery rule in LAD cases when and where appropriate. This may well be such a case. Here, plaintiff discussed her concerns regarding her status as an entry-level nurse and desire for reclassification with her employer, and was informed, albeit informally and antagonistically by a human resources representative who had overheard plaintiffs complaints, that plaintiff needed to serve the requisite time period of one year before she would be considered for a higher level position. In addition, after making a request for reclassification commensurate with her qualifications, plaintiff was informed that she had been considered for reclassification to a higher level position until she sent a letter not only within Trenton State’s Human Resources Department but also to a member of the State Assembly. In other words, she was given a reason — albeit an unsatisfactory one — that had nothing to do with racial discrimination. That, in turn, may have led plaintiff not to pursue the issue, thereby requiring the tolling of her cause of action. “[E]quitable tolling of a statute of limitations occurs when a plaintiff is misled as to the real reason for [the job action] and as a result fails to act within the prescribed time limit.” Villalobos v. Fava 342 N.J.Super. 38, 50, 775 A.2d 700 (App.Div.) certif. denied, 170 N.J. 210, 785 A.2d 438 (2001); see also Abboud v. Viscomi 111 N.J. 56, 64, 543 A.2d 29 (1988) (remanding for “a new Lopez hearing” to “evaluate or weigh [plaintiffs] claim that defendant’s

Page 339

various representations reasonably induced her not to sue within the normal limitations period”); Lynch v. Rubacky, 85 N.J. 65, 74-76, 424 A.2d 1169 (1981) (applying discovery rule where treating professional did not “discredit or cast [defendant] in a professionally unfavorable light” within two years of the complaint); Parete v. Mully, supra, 316 N.J.Super. at 108-09, 719 A.2d 702 (same); Oshiver v. Levin Fishbein, 38 A.3d 1380, 1387 (3d Cir. 1994) (affirming dismissal of failure to hire claim for lack of reasonable diligence but reversing dismissal of discriminatory discharge claim because alleged facts warranted equitable tolling where plaintiff female was replaced by male as hourly employee).

No Lopez hearing was conducted in this case, but one is required to consider the issues presented on the discrimination claim. Plaintiff is entitled to assert that she had no “reasonable suspicion” of racial discrimination, even by the exercise of reasonable diligence, until 2006 when she learned that less qualified Caucasian nurses were hired into advanced positions, and was told by her union representative about other claims of racial discrimination at Trenton State and that racism pervaded that institution. Accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to demonstrate the facts as she alleges them and show that she acted reasonably in pursuing her claim of discrimination. See Lopez, 62 N.J. at 274-76, 300 A.2d 563 (procedure with burden on plaintiff). In that context the judge at the Lopez
hearing must evaluate the employer’s proffered reasons for denying reclassification in terms of any impact on plaintiffs duty to investigate the reasons for her classification. On the other hand, the totality of circumstances must be evaluated in assessing the reasonableness of plaintiffs conduct and determining when the cause of action “accrued.” Accordingly, we remand for consideration of these issues at a Lopez
hearing.

VI.
The judgment of the Appellate Division affirming the dismissal of the retaliation claim is affirmed. The judgment affirming the

Page 340

dismissal of the discrimination claim is reversed, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

[1] Henry’s complaint named the following defendants: the Department of Human Services (DHS); Clark Bruno, Acting Commissioner of Human Services; Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital; Gregory Roberts, Chief Executive Officer of Trenton State Hospital; and unknown managers/representatives for DHS and Trenton State.
[2] The last sentence of this paragraph is taken from a footnote in the certification.
[3] At oral argument on the motion for summary judgment, defense counsel maintained that the JJC was not part of the same department of government as Trenton State Hospital and, therefore, any hiring practices at the JJC were irrelevant to the current action. Indeed, Trenton State is within the Department of Human Service, whereas the JJC is part of the Department of Law and Public Safety. See The State of New Jersey, Department of Human Services, Division of Mental Health Services, http://www.N.J.gov/humanservices/dmhs/oshm/tph/; The State of New Jersey, Department of Law Public Safety, Office of the Attorney General, http://www.state.nj.us/lps/jjc/index.html. Thus, because the JJC is not a party to this action, the claims against the JJC are noted herein only to the extent they are related to plaintiff’s claims against Trenton State because the same bargaining unit representative is involved.
[4] N.J.S.A. 10:5-13 provides that an employee aggrieved by unlawful employment discrimination may file a complaint with the Division on Civil Rights (Division) or municipal office, as well as the Superior Court. The LAD specifies that any complaint filed with the Division or municipality must be accomplished within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. N.J.S.A. 10:5-18. We need not address the administrative alternatives and procedures which were not pursued in this case. While not raised by the parties, however, we do note that Henry also could have endeavored to appeal the denial of her reclassification to the Merit System Board in the Department of Personnel (now the Civil Service Commission) N.J.S.A. 11A:3-1, 11A:11-1; N.J.A.C. 4A:3-3.9. By doing so plaintiff could have claimed her classification was inappropriate and sought to ascertain the reason for her treatment by an independent classification review.
[5] Plaintiff’s complaint in the Law Division alleges she was “damaged by Trenton State’s retaliatory actions taken in response to plaintiff’s inquiry concerning disparate hiring practice-retaliatory treatment which the plaintiff initially understood as involving perhaps a personality conflict, but which the plaintiff now believes was motivated by racial antagonism contra the LAD.” However, as plaintiff’s complaints to her employer about her classification were not premised on her treatment as an African American, there is a question as to whether her complaints constituted “protected activity” resulting in retaliation. See N.J.S.A. 10:5-12d See also Tartaglia, 197 N.J. at 126-27, 96 A.2d 1167. In light of our disposition, however, we need not develop this concern.
[6] A Lopez hearing is only required when the facts concerning the date of the discovery are in dispute. Dunn v. Borough of Mountainside, 301 N J.Super. 262, 274, 693 A.2d 1248 (App.Div. 1997), certif. denied, 153 N.J. 402, 709 A.2d 795 (1998).

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring.

By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion.

Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution and Rule 2:13-2(a) authorized Judge Stern’s temporary assignment. His service on the Supreme Court is consistent with more than 800 similar assignments made by Chief Justices over the course of four decades. All of those assignments find support in not only the plain language of the modern Constitution but also the recorded intent of the Framers who drafted it.

Now for the first time, there is a dissent to a temporary assignment, in the form of an abstaining opinion, which claims that such assignments are only permissible when needed to make a quorum. But the Framers rejected draft constitutions that would have limited temporary assignments in that manner. They instead adopted a broader approach that allows for greater discretion in making temporary assignments. It was therefore entirely appropriate for Chief Justices to use that authority in the past when there were vacancies on the Court, and it is proper to do so now again.

The Court today has only six members — one short of its full complement — and it is unclear when that will change. In the interim, the current assignment is necessary to address the Court’s substantial workload and meet the needs of the public.

About two thousand matters and issues requiring action will be presented to the Court for consideration this term. Each involves real parties and actual people who are trying to vindicate their rights as they await justice. To meet their needs fairly and

Page 341

expeditiously, the assignment of a judge to serve temporarily on the Supreme Court is necessary.

I.
The relevant language of both the Constitution and the court rule provides the proper starting point for the assignment. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 reads as follows:

The Supreme Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and six Associate Justices. Five members of the court shall constitute a quorum. When necessary, the Chief Justice shall assign the Judge or Judges of the Superior Court, senior in service, as provided by rules of the Supreme Court, to serve temporarily in the Supreme Court.
[N.J. Const. art. VI, § 2, ¶ 1
(third sentence hereafter referred to as Temporary Assignment clause).]

Pursuant to that clause, and consistent with the Court’s “exclusive and plenary power over the governance of the judiciary,” In re P.L. 2001, Chapter 362 186 N.J. 368, 382, 895 A.2d 1128 (2006) (citations omitted), the Supreme Court has adopted the following current rule relating to temporary assignments:

Five members of the court shall constitute a quorum. When necessary to constitute a quorum, to replace a justice who is absent or unable to act, or to expedite the business of the court, the presiding justice may assign one or more retired justices of the Supreme Court who are not engaged in the practice of law and who consent thereto or the judge or judges of the Appellate Division, senior in length of service therein, to serve temporarily in the Supreme Court. [R. 2:13-2(a).]

The current rule regarding temporary assignments has been in effect since 1978, after multiple prior iterations. See R.R. 1:1-3 (1948); R.R. 1:1-5 (1953) R.R. 1:1-5(b) (1967); R. 2:13-2(a) (1978).

For more than forty years, Chief Justices have consistently interpreted and used the above provisions to allow for temporary assignments to the Supreme Court in order to fill vacancies or replace an unavailable Justice. The extensive history of temporary assignments to the Court has been used in a variety of situations. It has not been limited to assignments for quorum purposes, which comprise only a minority of such assignments.

Page 342

Indeed, Chief Justices have made hundreds of temporary assignments even when they were not needed to create a quorum.

Examples of the longstanding practice abound. The lengthiest assignment occurred in the mid-1970s. Beginning on March 31, 1975, when Justice Frederick W. Hall retired, there was a two-year vacancy on the Court until Justice Alan Handler took the oath of office on March 23, 1977. During that period, Appellate Division Judge Milton B. Conford was assigned temporarily to the Court and participated in about 215 matters.[1] He authored more than forty majority, concurring, and dissenting opinions. E.g., Clayton v. Freehold Twp. Bd. of Educ., 67 N.J. 249, 337 A.2d 361 (1975) (Conford, P.J.A.D., temporarily assigned, writing for unanimous seven-person Court). Chief Justice Richard J. Hughes also intermittently called on Appellate Division Judges Harold Kolovsky, Lawrence A. Carton, Jr., and Joseph Halpern to join Judge Conford and ensure that the Court had a full complement of seven members. E.g., Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Sec. Ins. Co. of Hartford, 72 N.J. 63, 367 A.2d 864 (1976) (Kolovsky, P.J.A.D., temporarily assigned, writing for majority); Gallo Asphalt Co. v. Sagner, 71 N.J. 405, 365 A.2d 932 (1976) (Carton, P.J.A.D., temporarily assigned, dissenting); State v. Fearick, 69 N.J. 32, 350 A.2d 227 (1975) (Halpern, P.J.A.D., temporarily assigned, writing for unanimous Court that included Judge Kolovsky). Judge Donald G. Collester, Sr., was also temporarily assigned to several cases E.g., Anderson v. Somberg, 67 N.J. 291, 338 A.2d 1 (1975) (Collester, P.J.A.D., temporarily assigned, joining in dissent on seven-person Court). During this period, in only about a dozen instances out of more than 240 was a temporary assignment necessary for a quorum.

Several years before, during the 1972 term, the retirements of Justices John J. Francis and C. Thomas Schettino created two vacancies in September 1972. The vacancies lasted for six months

Page 343

until Justices Pierre P. Garven and Mark A. Sullivan were sworn in on March 23, 1973. During that sixth-month period, Chief Justice Joseph Weintraub temporarily assigned a number of Appellate Division judges — primarily, Judges Conford, Arthur W. Lewis, and then-Judge Sullivan — to participate in dozens of cases. Collectively, the three judges were assigned temporarily approximately 150 times, and in only one-third of those instances was the assignment needed to make a quorum. E.g., S.S. O. Corp. v. Twp. of Bernards Sewerage Autk, 62 N.J. 369, 301 A.2d 738 (1973) (Lewis, P.J.A.D., temporarily assigned, writing for a seven-person, unanimous Court that included Judges Conford and Sullivan); Wicks v. Cent. R.R. Co. of N.J. 61 N.J. 553, 296 A.2d 649 (1972) (Sullivan, P.J.A.D., temporarily assigned, writing for a seven-person, unanimous Court that included Judge Conford); Russell v. Salem Transp. Co., 61 N.J. 502, 295 A.2d 862 (1972) (Conford, P.J.A.D., temporarily assigned, writing for a seven-person, unanimous Court that included Judge Sullivan).

Many other Appellate Division judges have been temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court over the years on a more sporadic basis, when a sitting Justice was not participating for some reason. For example, from late-March 1973 through late-March 1975, when there were no vacancies on the Court, five Appellate Division judges were assigned about 210 times in total. Roughly eighty percent of those assignments were not for quorum purposes. From late-March 1977 to the present, multiple Appellate Division judges have been assigned about 250 times in total. About eighty-five percent of those assignments were not related to quorum needs. Some examples from the past two decades include the temporary assignments of Appellate Division Judges Stern, Michael Patrick King, Sylvia B. Pressler, Stephen Skillman, and others.

It is important to review statistics of temporary assignments in context and not just as an aggregate accumulation of data. The meaning of the data becomes apparent when considered in that way: faced with long-term vacancies, Chief Justices have responded

Page 344

with long-term, temporary assignments to enable the Court to function at full strength. Faced with isolated vacancies in sporadic cases, Chief Justices have not always filled them. In those instances, they simply did not exercise the authority they possessed. In neither situation, though, have Chief Justices accepted the narrow quorum-only rule voiced in the abstaining opinion. The flexible language in the Constitution, as discussed below, provides support for the historical approaches taken and also for the September 8, 2010 assignment order.

In the hundreds of instances when Chief Justices have made temporary assignments to the Court, the practice has never been challenged. See McNeil v. Legislative Apportionment Comm’n, 111 N.J. 364, 391, 828 A.2d 840 (2003) (noting reliance, inter alia, on long and unchallenged usage of constitutional provision). Even today, the parties have neither objected to the temporary assignment nor presented arguments for the Court to consider. Nonetheless, in a departure from recognized practice, the abstaining Justice has raised a constitutional issue on his own — at the same time, ironically, that he notes the virtue of judicial restraint. See post
at 370, 9 A.3d at 913 (Rivera-Soto, J., abstaining); see also Randolph Town Ctr., L.P. v. County of Morris 186 N.J. 78, 80, 891 A.2d 1202 (2006) (“Courts should not reach a constitutional question unless its resolution is imperative to the disposition of litigation.” (citations omitted)); Comm. to Recall Robert Menendez from the Office of U.S. Senator v. Wells, 204 N.J. 79, 96, 7 A.3d 720 (2010) (Rivera-Soto Hoens, JJ., dissenting) (same).[2]

Page 345

To be sure, historical practice alone rarely proves the correctness of a legal proposition. Ultimately, the Court’s longstanding use of temporary assignments depends on the meaning and purpose of the Temporary Assignment clause.

II.
To determine the meaning of a constitutional provision, courts look first “to the precise language used by the drafters.”State v. Trump Hotels Casino Resorts, Inc. 160 N.J. 505, 527, 734 A.2d 1160 (1999). If the language is unclear, courts may consider any relevant constitutional history to help ascertain the meaning of the language used. Id. at 527-28, 734 A.2d 1160. Here, the plain language of the Temporary Assignment clause provides the Chief Justice discretionary authority to make temporary assignments to the Supreme Court. Relevant constitutional history confirms that the Framers intended the broad language they chose to use.

Article VI of the New Jersey Constitution pertains to the Judiciary. It declares at the outset that “[t]he judicial power shall be vested in a Supreme Court, a Superior Court, and other courts of limited jurisdiction.” N.J. Const, art. VI, § 1, ¶ 11. That provision, and Article VI as a whole, reflect the “clear intent” of the modern Constitution “to give to the judiciary the power and thus to impose on them the responsibility for seeing that the judicial system function[s] effectively in the public interest.” Winberry v. Salisbury, 5 N.J. 240, 244, 74 A.2d 406 (1950).

The Temporary Assignment clause appears as the very next provision in the Constitution. Its first two sentences declare that the Court shall consist of seven members and that five members shall constitute a quorum. N.J. Const, art. VI, § 2, 11. The next sentence provides that “[w]hen necessary, the Chief Justice shall assign the Judge or Judges of the Superior Court, senior in service, as provided by rules of the Supreme Court, to serve temporarily in the Supreme Court.” Ibid.

The plain wording of the phrase “when necessary” affords discretion to decide when temporary assignments are appropriate. The text is not limited to particular situations. Notably, it does

Page 346

not limit assignments to occasions when they are needed to create a quorum. Instead, the language is deliberately broad — consistent with the Judiciary’s broad obligation to serve the public through wise and effective administration of the judicial branch. The precise language in the Constitution about temporary assignments thus provides flexibility to meet that aim.

One legal commentator has argued that the authority to make temporary assignments is not discretionary because the constitutional provision directs that Chief Justices “shall assign” a judge when necessary. See Edward A. Hartnett Ties in the Supreme Court of New Jersey, 32 Seton Hall L.Rev. 735, 745-46 (2003). Professor Hartnett submits that “[t]here is little sense in imposing a mandatory duty on someone while leaving the determination of when that duty is triggered to that person’s discretion.” Id. at 745. Yet, at various places in the Constitution including elsewhere in Article VI, the Framers did precisely that. See N.J. Const, art. VI, § 3, ¶ 4 (“[T]he Law Division and the Chancery Division shall each exercise the powers and functions of the other division when the ends of justice so require.” (emphasis added)); see also N.J. Const, art. IV, § 6, ¶ 4 (“The Legislature, in order to insure continuity of State, county and local governmental operations in periods of emergency . . shall have the power and the immediate and continuing duty by legislation . . . to adopt such other measures as may be necessary and proper for insuring the continuity of governmental operations.” (emphasis added)). In those instances, the text of the Constitution imposes a duty to act once the actor determines that its responsibility is triggered. The Temporary Assignment clause similarly affords discretion but requires action when necessary.

Because the unadorned language of the Temporary Assignment clause provides discretionary authority to decide when to make such assignments, it is not necessary to look further for guidance.

III.
The abstaining opinion suggests that the phrase “when necessary” is limited to assignments needed to meet the quorum

Page 347

requirement. Post at 355, 9 A.3d at 903 (Rivera-Soto, J., abstaining) (quoting N.J. Const, art. VI, § 2, ¶ 1). In support of that view, the opinion notes that the phrase follows a sentence that establishes five as a quorum and thus arguably refers only to meeting quorum needs. Ibid.

In essence, the abstaining opinion inserts additional language into the actual text of the Constitution and would have it read as follows: “When necessary to make the quorum, the Chief Justice shall assign . . .” But the precise words in the Constitution do not support that reading. Had the Framers intended to limit temporary assignments to meeting quorum needs, they would have said so. Instead, they considere and rejected the very language inserted above. We cannot add it back.

A “quorum-only” rule finds support in early drafts of the Constitution, which were rejected in favor of the current broad language. A May 1942 draft prepared by the Commission on Revision of the New Jersey Constitution would have allowed for temporary assignments only “when necessary to constitute a quorum.” 4 Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1947, at 561. Identical language appeared in a proposed constitution that was submitted to the voters and defeated in November 1944. Id. at 567. At the 1947 Constitutional Convention, the Committee on the Judiciary invited public comment on a tentative draft of the judicial article dated July 24, 1947, which specified that temporary assignments should occur “[w]hen necessary to make the quorum.” 2 Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1947, supra, at 1167.

The restrictive language did not appear in the Committee’s revised report and proposal dated the following week, July 31, 1947. Instead, the new draft eliminated the quorum-only phrase and recommended the discretionary language that ultimately became part of the Constitution: “When necessary, the Chief Justice shall assign [a judge] to serve temporarily in the Supreme Court.” 2 Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1947, supra, at 1190. Thus, the evolution of the modern Constitution demonstrates

Page 348

the Framers’ intent not to limit temporary assignments to when a quorum was needed.

It has been suggested that the switch in the wording of the Temporary Assignment clause was “merely a stylistic change.” Hartnett, supra, 32 Seton Hall L.Rev. at 744 see also Earl M. Maltz, The Federalist Soc’y for Law Pub. Policy Studies, Temporary Assignments to Fill Vacancies on the New Jersey Supreme Court 5 (2010) available at http://www.fed-soc.org/doclib/20100920_NewJerseyWP.pdf. The accompanying report of the Committee on the Judiciary reveals otherwise. In Appendix A to the report, titled “Annotation of Judicial Article,” the Committee specifically addressed the change to Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1. The Committee explained that “[t]he provision for supplementing the membership of the Supreme Court is operative whenever a Justice is unavailable at the time a case is argued or submitted.” 2 Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1947, supra, at 1190 (Judiciary Committee Report) (emphasis added). Not only does that language reject a quorum-only approach, but it also favors the opposite practice of replacing all unavailable justices regardless of the reason for their absence. Next, the report specifically noted that “[p]rovisions of this general character are found in several state constitutions, notably that of New York, to which it was added in 1915 upon recommendation of the Court of Appeals.” Ibid.

The reference to the New York model is instructive. During a constitutional convention in New York in 1915, a proposed amendment to the judicial article provided that the highest court may make temporary assignments for a period of time “[i]n case of the temporary absence or inability to act of any judge of that court.[3] State of N.Y. Comm. on Revision and Engrossment, Present

Page 349

Constitution of State of N.Y., with Amendments Thereto (1915), in Documents of the Constitutional Convention of the State of New York, 1915 No. 52, at 33 (J.B. Lyon Co. 1915). The New York Committee to the Judiciary explained the reason for the provision in a report to the ratifying convention: “For the purpose of enabling the Court to retain its maximum strength at all times, provision is further made for calling in Justices of the [lower courts] to take the places of Judges of the [highest Court] temporarily disqualified by absence or illness” for a period of time. State of N. Y. Comm. on the Judiciary, Report Relative to the Proposed Amended Judiciary Article (Aug. 13, 1915), in Documents of the Constitutional Convention of the State of New York, 1915, supra, No. 42, at 10 (emphasis added).

By referencing New York’s plan, the 1947 Judiciary Committee Report sheds light on why “when necessary to make the quorum” was replaced with the broader phrase “when necessary”: the power to make temporary appointments was not meant to be confined to establishing a quorum but could be used “whenever a Justice is unavailable at the time a case is argued or submitted,” in order to reach the Court’s maximum strength. 2 Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1947, supra, at 1190.[4] The

Page 350

relevant history therefore reveals that the phrase “when necessary” was not a shorthand reference to the rule of necessity, as the abstaining opinion suggests. Post
at 355, 9 A.3d at 903-04 (Rivera-Soto, J., abstaining).

Not only does the historical record demonstrate that the Temporary Assignment clause was not intended as a quorum-only rule, but a simple, practical concern tied to the purpose of the Judicial Article also leads to the same conclusion. Imagine a six-member Court evenly divided over an issue for which the Supreme Court’s review constitutes the first instance of judicial review, for example, a continuing matter in which the court expressly retained jurisdiction and for which there is no underlying trial or appellate ruling. Six Justices hearing the matter would constitute a quorum, and an evenly-divided Court would ordinarily result in an affirmance of the Appellate Division. E.g., State v. Basil, 202 N.J. 570, 577, 998 A. 2d 472 (2010) (affirming judgment of Appellate Division because Court divided 3-3); Reyes v. Egner 201 N.J. 417, 419, 991 A.2d 216 (2010) (same); Northvale Bd. of Educ. v. Northvale Educ. Ass’n, 192 N.J. 501, 501, 933 A.2d 596 (2007) (same). But with no existing appellate ruling, a “quorum-only” rule would mean, in effect, that there would be no meaningful judicial review.

Page 351

Similar problems would arise in evaluating applications for admission to the bar and disciplinary matters — areas in which the Constitution invests the Supreme Court “with exclusive responsibility.” State v. Rush 46 N.J. 399, 411, 217 A.2d 441 (1966) (citin N.J. Const, art. VI, § 2, ¶ 3). Certain candidates cannot be admitted to the bar without the Supreme Court’s review and approval. Committee on Character Regulation
304:3. Likewise, only the Supreme Court can temporarily suspend or disbar an attorney. See, e.g., R. 1:20-11, -16(a). In addition, only the Court can review a presentment by the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct and discipline a judge R. 2:15-15, -17. An evenly divided Court’s ruling in any of those areas would not resolve anything.

The appropriate solution, of course, is not to do without judicial review or decisions altogether — the very reasons animating Article VI — but rather to assign a judge temporarily to the Court, even though a quorum exists. The flexible language in the Constitution provides the authority to do so.

IV.
The relevant court rule outlines certain parameters for temporary assignments. Rule 2:13-2(a) in its current form provides that assignments may be made “[w]hen necessary to constitute a quorum, to replace a justice who is absent or unable to act, or to expedite the business of the court.”

As has happened before on a number of occasions, the Court now faces the prospect of proceeding with fewer than seven members for a potentially long period. That prospect needs to be considered in light of the Court’s responsibilities.

During the 2009-2010 court term, a seven-member Court was required to address a significant number of matters. The Court resolved 1, 140 petitions for certification, 462 motions, and 177 disciplinary and character matters. It also heard arguments in eighty-eight appeals and thirty-four attorney and judicial disciplinary matters. The Court filed 115 majority, per curiam, concurring,

Page 352

and dissenting opinions. Individual Justices decided seventy-eight emergent applications. By any measure, that workload is substantial, and there is no reason to expect it will be materially different in the term that is under way. The temporary assignment of a judge is therefore necessary at this time to conduct the work of the Court and attempt to dispense justice expeditiously.

V.
The order entered on September 8, 2010 temporarily assigns the judge of the Appellate Division who is senior in service there, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern. His assignment is consistent with the Constitution and the court rule.

The Constitution provides for the temporary assignment of a judge “of the Superior Court, senior in service, as provided by rules of the Supreme Court.” N.J. Const, art. VI, § 2, 111. Rule 2:13-2(a), in turn, parses among different parts of the Superior Court and specifies that “the judge or judges of the Appellate Division, senior in length of service therein” can “serve temporarily in the Supreme Court.” The Rule also outlines what should occur in the event the senior judge is unable to serve or if two judges have equal seniority. R. 2:13-2(a).

The Rule properly amplifies the Constitution, as contemplated. It is also consistent with the Court’s duty to “make rules governing the administration of all courts.”N.J. Const, art. VI, § 2, § 3. Judge Stern is senior in length of service in the Appellate Division and, as presiding judge for administration, is also the senior-most Appellate Division judge. The September 8, 2010 order therefore rightly calls upon him for temporary assignment to the Supreme Court.

VI.
A dubitante opinion raises a different concern. It contends that a “true constitutional crisis” would arise if a temporarily assigned member of the Court were to cast a deciding, or outcomedeterminative,

Page 353

vote in a case. Post at 527, 9 A.3d at 1001 (Hoens, J., dubitante). Nothing in the text or history of the modern Constitution, though, supports that position.

The critical question under Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 is whether a temporary appointment is necessary. Once that threshold is crossed, a temporary appointee serves as a member of the Court. The plain language of the Constitution does not limit the authority of an assigned judge. The constitutional text does not set up two classes of jurists: one with the power to cast tie-breaking votes and another without. Instead, the Temporary Assignment clause simply states that the Chief Justice, when necessary, and as provided by the rules of the Court, shall assign the senior judge “to serve
temporarily in the Supreme Court.” N.J. Const, art. VI, § 2, ¶ 1 (emphasis added).

The argument presented misperceives the nature of a temporary assignment to the Supreme Court. The many distinguished Appellate Division judges who have filled that role have not sat in a second tier. Once on the Court, they have functioned as full voting members — for only a temporary period of time — consistent with the authority in the Constitution itself.

VII.
A dispute about the meaning of a constitutional provision, like the Temporary Assignment clause, is properly informed by the language and history of the Constitution. The abstaining Justice’s perception of the current political situation is irrelevant to that analysis. As a result, the baseless claims insinuated in section V of the abstaining opinion have no place in this discussion.

VIII.
The Supreme Court is responsible “for the overall performance of the judicial branch” and has the obligation “to see that the public interest is fully served by the proper functioning of this vital branch of our government.” Thurber v. City of Burlington, 191 N.J. 487, 499, 924 A.2d 533 (2007) (citing In re Mattera,

Page 354

34 N.J. 259, 272, 168 A.2d 38 (1961), and Passaic County Probation Officers’ Assn. v. County of Passaic 73 N.J. 247, 253, 374 A.2d 449 (1977)) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Behind the statistics that summarize the Court’s workload are people, businesses, organizations, and others hoping to get relief. They are entitled to thoughtful and prompt consideration in each of the approximately two thousand matters and items they will present to the Court this term. To serve them best, a temporary assignment of a judge is once again necessary to enable the Court to perform its constitutional duties.

Justice RIVERA-SOTO, abstaining.

Today, while constituted as one Chief Justice, five Associate Justices and a Judge of the Appellate Division selected unilaterally by the Chief Justice, the Court has rendered a decision in this matter. The Court as so constituted is unconstitutional and its acts are ultra vires for three principal reasons. First, the Constitution allows the assignment of a Superior Court Judge to serve on the Supreme Court only “when necessary,” and any such assignment at this juncture simply is not necessary. Further, the methodology this Court has adopted for the selection of who is to serve on assignment to the Supreme Court does not comport with the clear constitutional mandate. Finally, the assignment of a Superior Court Judge to serve on this Court to fill a vacancy resulting from a political impasse between the Executive and the Legislative Branches thrusts the Judiciary into that political thicket, all the while improperly advancing one side’s views in preference over the other’s. For each of those reasons, I abstain.

I.
In language virtually identical to that originally proposed during the Constitutional Convention of 1947 by the Committee on the Judiciary, [1] Article VI, Section II, Paragraph I of the New Jersey Constitution provides, in relevant part, as follows:

Page 355

The Supreme Court shall consist of a Chief Justice and six Associate Justices. Five members of the court shall constitute a quorum. When necessary, the Chief Justice shall assign the Judge or Judges of the Superior Court, senior in service, as provided by rules of the Supreme Court, to serve temporarily in the Supreme Court.
[N.J. Const, art. VI, § II, ¶ 1
(emphasis supplied).]

Although the Report of the Committee on the Judiciary noted that “[t]he provision for supplementing the membership of the Supreme Court is operative whenever a Justice is unavailable at the time a case is argued or submitted[,]” Committee on the Judiciary, Report at Appendix “A”, reprinted in II N.J. Const. Conv. 1190 (Aug. 26, 1947), that expansive interpretation was withheld from the citizenry who was asked to vote on that provision. See Summary and Address to the People of New Jersey by the Constitutional Convention of 1947, What the Proposed New State Constitution Means to You, reprinted in II N.J. Const. Conv. 1321 (1947) (explaining solely that “A New Supreme Court is Established [—] The new high court, with a Chief Justice and six Associate Justices, replaces the old 16-member Court of Errors and Appeals[,]” without reference to any mechanism for augmenting Court membership).

The provisions of Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 — allowing “[w]hen necessary” the “assignment of] the Judge or Judges of the Superior Court, senior in service, as provided by rules of the Supreme Court, to serve temporarily in the Supreme Court” — appears on the heels of the quorum clause, a clause requiring that the Supreme Court be constituted by no fewer than “[f]ive members of the court[.]” That juxtaposition is not accidental and allows only one constitutionally permissible interpretation: that the need for any such assignment can arise only by the absence of a quorum, that is, by invoking of the Rule of Necessity, a Rule long recognized in our jurisprudence. As the Supreme Court of

Page 356

the United States explained in describing the quandary that arises when a court cannot convene a quorum,

[i]t was precisely considerations of this kind that gave rise to the Rule of Necessity, a well-settled principle at common law that, as Pollack put it, “although a judge had better not, if it can be avoided, take part in the decision of a case in which he has any personal interest, yet he not only may but must do so if the case cannot be heard otherwise.”
[United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 213, 101 S.Ct 471, 480, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 405 (1980) (quoting F. Pollack, A First Book of Jurisprudence 270 (6th ed. 1929)).]

The Court further noted that “[t]he Rule of Necessity had its genesis at least five and a half centuries ago. Its earliest recorded invocation was in 1430 [and e]arly cases in this country confirmed the vitality of the Rule.” Id.
at 213-14, 101 S.Ct. at 480, 66 L.E.2d at 405 (footnotes omitted). It emphasized that “[t]he Rule of Necessity has been consistently applied in this country in both state and federal courts.” Ibid., 449 U.S. at 214, 101 S.Ct at 480, 66 L.Ed.2d at 405.

In line with that consistency in application, New Jersey long ago defined its version of the Rule of Necessity as follows: “[t]o justify a violation of the maxim [in this case, the constitutional mandate that five members of the Court and only five members of the Court are necessary to constitute a quorum], there should be an imperative reason for it, in order to prevent a failure of justice, and in determining that, the greatest care should be exercised,” State ex rel. Wynans v. Crane, 36 N.J.L. 394, 399 (Sup.Ct. 1873). That interpretive restriction arising from the Rule of Necessity — limiting the power to assign a Superior Court Judge to serve on the Supreme Court only “when necessary” to constitute a quorum — is echoed by a respected legal scholar, who unqualifiedly asserts that, specifically in respect of Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constitution, “[t]he text, its context and its interpretation for the first two decades of practice under the 1947 Constitution demonstrate that this assignment power is available only when the Court would otherwise lack a quorum and that only Superior Court judges may be assigned.” Edward A. Hartnett Conventional Wisdom is Wrong on N.J.

Page 357

Supreme Court Appointments, 201 N.J.L.J. 631 (Aug. 23, 2010) (emphasis supplied).[2]

No doubt, as a result of the recent retirement of a Justice of this Court and the resulting legislative/executive stalemate in confirming his successor, [3] presently there is a vacancy on this Court; hence, the Court currently is constituted by a Chief Justice and five — not six — Associate Justices. The question, then, is whether that vacancy, standing alone, suffices to trigger the “when necessary” condition precedent required by Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the Constitution to permit the rightful and constitutional assignment of a Superior Court Judge for service on the Supreme Court. It does not.

II.
Our present circumstances are not new: there have been vacancies on the Court and this Court nevertheless has continued its work. That much has remained self-evident throughout this Court’s published history. Addressing exclusively appeals heard and determined[4] since this Court was constituted following the

Page 358

adoption of the 1947 Constitution, the Court has heard and determined nearly five hundred appeals in which only five Justices participated, [5] and nearly eighteen hundred appeals in which only six Justices participated.[6] In contrast, this Court has heard and determined (1) sixty appeals in which it has assigned a Superior Court Judge or Judges “to serve temporarily in the Supreme Court” for purposes of establishing a quorum;[7] (2) seventy-two cases in which, although there was an absence of a quorum of Supreme Court Justices, more Superior Court Judges were assigned than the minimum needed to meet the quorum requirements;[8] and (3) five hundred seventy-two cases in which, although there already was a quorum of at least five Supreme Court Justices, a Superior Court Judge or Judges nevertheless were assigned “to serve temporarily in the Supreme Courtf;]”[9] in respect of that third category, the vast majority of those instances occurred when Superior Court Judges were assigned to serve on the Supreme Court during the early 1970’s, due to the death or the extended illness of several Justices. See, e.g., Justices of the Supreme Court, 64 N.J. VII n. 1 2 (1974) (noting that Judge Conford was “temporarily assigned to serve October 9, 1973 to December 18, 1973, in the absence of Justice Mountain” and that Judge Collester was “temporarily assigned to serve October 18, 1973 to December 18, 1973, in the absence of Chief Justice Garvin due to his illness and death; December 19, 1973 to January 2,

Page 359

1974, in the absence of Justice Mountain”); Justices of the Supreme Court, 65 N.J. VII n. 1 2 (1974) (noting that Judge Kolovsky was “temporarily assigned to serve September 10, 1974 to October 4, 1974, in the absence of Justice Mountain” and that Judge Conford was “temporarily assigned to serve October 7, 1974 to October 11, 1974, in the absence of Justice Mountain”); Edward A. Hartnett, Ties in the Supreme Court of New Jersey, 32 Seton Hall L.Rev. 735, 752 n. 78 (2003) (noting that “temporary assignment of Judge Conford terminated upon appointment of Justice Handler, except to permit him to participate in disposition of matters presented during his temporary assignment”).

The lesson of those compilations is clear: in this Court’s history, it has rendered decisions in more than two thousand one hundred appeals where five or six — but fewer than seven — Justices participated but no Superior Court Judge was assigned to serve on the Supreme Court. Extrapolated to today, it is equally clear that, so long as a quorum is present, it simply is not “necessary” to assign a Superior Court Judge to fill the current vacancy.

That view is supported in the legal academy’s analysis of Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of our Constitution. Professor Hartnett, the Richard J. Hughes Professor for Constitutional and Public Law and Service at Seton Hall University School of Law, has explained the quorum and assignment provision of the Constitution as follows:

Five members’, of the court shall constitute a quorum. If a quorum does not attend a session of the court, the senior justice attending may adjourn the court, or, in the absence of all the justices, the clerk may adjourn the court from day to day. When necessary to make a quorum the presiding justice shall assign the senior judge or judges of the Superior Court to serve temporarily. Seniority shall be determined by the order of their appointment to the Superior Court[.] [Hartnett, supra, 32 Seton Hail L.Rev. at 749.]

Asserting that “the temporary assignment provision should be interpreted as a narrow, mandatory duty applicable only when the court would otherwise lack a quorum,” he concludes that such “interpretation is in accord with the original Rules of Court promulgated under the New Jersey Constitution of 1947.”Ibid.

Page 360

He has noted that “Arthur Vanderbilt was the Chief Justice when these original rules were promulgated by the New Jersey Supreme Court.” Ibid. Describing Chief Justice Vanderbilt as “a man who did not blush easily when asserting power he thought desirable,” id. at 750, Professor Hartnett emphatically has observed that “even Arthur Vanderbilt did not claim that he had the power to temporarily assign judges to the Supreme Court, except to make a quorum.”Ibid. As empirical proof of those conclusions, Professor Hartnett highlights that “on its very first day of issuing decisions, October 4, 1948, the new Supreme Court decided several cases with a bare quorum of five[,]”ibid, (footnote omitted), and that “within its first months, the new Supreme Court promulgated a rule that temporary assignments to the Supreme Court would be made when necessary to make the quorum, decided cases with the bare quorum of five, and decided cases with six justices, even where those six were evenly divided.” Ibid.

Likewise, Professor Earl M. Maltz, a Distinguished Professor of Law at Rutgers-Camden School of Law, has noted that “the text and legislative history of the relevant constitutional provisions raise serious questions about whether the constitution endows the chief justice with the authority to” temporarily assign either a retired justice or a senior judge of the Superior Court to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Earl M. Maltz, Temporary Assignments to Fill Vacancies on the New Jersey Supreme Court, available at
http://www.fed-soc.org/doclib/20100920_NewJerseyWP.pdf. In Professor Maltz’s view, the difficulty in application of the constitutional provision allowing the assignment of a Superior Court Judge to serve temporarily on the Supreme Court arises because “the provision does not explicity state how one determines when it is `necessary’ to make a temporary assignment.” Ibid. Acknowledging that the Court in the past has assigned Superior Court Judges to serve “temporarily” on the Supreme Court for extended periods, Professor Maltz notes that, “despite its relatively long pedigree, this regime faces significant constitutional problems.” Ibid.

Page 361

Analytically, Professor Maltz notes that “[c]learly, the constitution provides for such assignments when necessary to create a quorum of five justices to decide a case.”Ibid. He correctly crystallizes the issue as follows: “whether a temporary assignment is constitutional in situations where five or six of the permanent members of the court remain available to hear and decide a case.” Ibid. He notes that “[a]n earlier draft of the relevant constitutional provision would have made the proper resolution of this issue crystal clear.” Ibid. He explains that

[a]s initially proposed by the committee charged with drafting the judiciary article, the provision had read “[w]hen necessary to make the quorum, the Chief Justice shall assign the Judge or Judges of the Superior Court, senior in service, as provided by the rules of the Supreme Court, to serve temporarily in the Supreme Court.”
[Ibid, (citing Tentative Draft of Judicial Article, § 2, ¶ 1, 2 N.J. Const. Conv. 1167 (July 24, 1947) (emphasis added by author)).]

He describes that “[t]his language plainly would have limited the appointment authority of the chief justice to cases in which an appointment is necessary to create a quorum of five justices.” Ibid. Describing it as “the key question[,]” Professor Maltz states the crux of the issue starkly: “whether the elimination of the explicit reference to the necessity of the quorum was simply stylistic or was instead designed to significantly expand the power of the chief justice to make temporary appointments.” Ibid.

Conceding that “[t]here is no record of the reasons for the change[,]” Professor Maltz notes that

the contemporaneous rules adopted by the Supreme Court to implement this provision in 1947 were based on the view that the change in language was only stylistic, made in response to the admonition of Governor Alfred E. Driscoll that the Judiciary Committee should make the constitution “brief and very much to the point.” [Ibid, (citing 4 N.J. Const Conv. 430 (July 10, 1947)).]

He emphasizes that those contemporaneously adopted rules “did provide that the chief justice would have the authority to temporarily appoint the most senior Superior Court Judge if the appointment was necessary to create a quorum of five justices to hear a case[,]” noting that “the rules di not provide for temporary appointments in any other circumstances.” Ibid, (citing N.J.

Page 362

Rev. R. 1:1-3 (1948); emphasis supplied). He additionally explains that “[i]n 1953, while still focusing only on appointments necessary to create a quorum, the rule was revised to track the language of the constitution itself more closely[,]” describing that “[t]he revised rule stated that `[f]ive members of the court shall constitute a quorum. If a quorum does not attend a session of the court . . . [w]hen necessary, the presiding judge shall assign the senior judge or judges of the Superior Court to serve temporarily.'”Ibid, (citing NJ Rev. R. 1:1-5 (Gann 1953)). In vivid contrast, he notes that “[i]t was not until 1967 — twenty years after the state constitution was adopted — that the rules were changed to allow the chief justice to make temporary assignments despite the presence of a quorum[,]” explaining that “[t]he 1967 amendment transformed the temporary assignment power from one which the chief justice was required to exercise in a specific, narrowly-defined set of circumstances to one in which he has discretion to make such an appointment in a wide variety of amorphous situations.”Ibid.

Professor Maltz also has acknowledged that

[t]he strongest support for a broad reading of the temporary assignment authority is found in the appendix to the report of the Judiciary Committee accompanying the proposed constitution in 1947. The report avers that
[t]he provision for supplementing the membership of the Supreme Court is operative whenever a Justice is unavailable at the time a case is argued or submitted. Provisions of this general character are found in several state constitutions, notably that of New York, to which it was added in 1915 upon recommendation of the Court of Appeals.
[Ibid, (citing Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, 2 N.J. Const. Conv. 1190 (Aug. 26, 1947)).]

He promptly debunks that notion, however, observing that “[i]f in fact Article VI was designed to allow for temporary assignments `whenever a Justice is unavailable,’ then it would provide constitutional support for a far broader use of such assignments than was allowed prior to 1967.” Ibid. He further notes that “the language of the report is not necessarily dispositive.” Ibid. Supported by the clear and ringing language of this Court’s seminal decision i Winberry v. Salisbury, 5 N.J. 240, 74 A.2d 406 (1950), he notes

Page 363

that “the members of the Constitutional Convention did not have access to the committee report when voting on the language of Article VI.” Ibid, (citing Winberry, supra, 5 N.J. at 248, 74 A.2d 406). In this context, Winberry is both prophetic and instructive; it explains plainly and without room for debate that

this report of the Judiciary Committee, though dated August 26, 1947, was not handed to the members of the Convention until August 28th, I Convention Proceedings Record 809, two days after
the Judicial Article had been adopted by the Convention on August 26th, I Convention Proceedings Record 793. The report of the Judiciary Committee therefore cannot be deemed a part of the parliamentary history of the Constitution, for it was not known to and was not acted upon by the members of the Constitutional Convention in voting in favor of Article VI, creating a new judicial system. The report, moreover, while signed by all of the members of the Committee, concludes by saying, “Although the foregoing is the report of the Judiciary Committee, it is not necessarily to be inferred that the comments therein contained express the views of all members.” Thus not only was the report of the Judiciary Committee from which we have quoted not before the Convention at the time that it acted on Article VI, but a search of the entire proceedings fails to disclose any debate on the meaning of the phrase [“when necessary”]. The chief debate on the Judicial Article was between the merits of the proposal submitted by the Judiciary Committee and another proposal submitted from the floor.
[Winberry, supra, 5 N.J. at 248-49, 74 A.2d 406 (emphasis supplied).]

Or, in Professor Maltz’s words, “the report fails to come to grips with the differences between the language of the New Jersey constitution and that of many state constitutions that the report describes as being of the same `general character.'” Maltz, supra.

Professor Maltz aptly notes that “by its terms the language of the New Jersey constitution seems consciously designed to limit the discretion of the chief justice.” Ibid. He explains that “Article VI vests him with the authority to make temporary assignments only when `necessary’ and the requires him to make assignments in those circumstances.” Ibid, (emphasis in original). He posits that “[b]y its nature, the term `necessary’ must mean necessary for something[,]” and straightforwardly reasons that “[g]iven that the phrase `[w]hen necessary’ follows directly after the description of the requirements for a quorum (rather than after the more general description of the makeup of the court), the most logical reading of the phrase is that it refers to the creation of a quorum.” Ibid. He notes that, “at most, `[w]hen necessary’ should be read as

Page 364

`when necessary to the fulfillment of the court’s constitutional responsibilities.'” Ibid.

He concludes — and I wholeheartedly concur — that when “[m]easured against this standard, the practice of making temporary assignments cannot be justified in cases where five or six justices are available to hear appeals.” Ibid.
He states, quite reasonably, that because “the court has a quorum, the appeals can be heard, considered, and adjudicated.”Ibid. He addresses those instances where an even number of justices may result in a tie, noting that:

To be sure, when six justices hear a case, they will at times be divided three to three. But while this situation might not be optimal, the appeal will nonetheless have been heard and adjudicated. The only difference between a decision by an equally-divided court and one in which a clear majority of the justices vote to affirm a judgment of the lower court is that no binding precedent will have been created to govern future, similar cases. However, if the legal issue presented by an appeal in fact recurs with any frequency, that issue will probably soon be resolved in some case in which none of the judges feel compelled to recuse themselves. [Ibid]

That history and analysis leads directly to the question of tie votes.

III.
It cannot be said that whenever the Supreme Court operates at less than full strength but at equal to or more than a quorum of five, it is somehow “necessary” to assign a Superior Court Judge or Judges to serve on the Supreme Court in order to avoid a tie vote; the notion of a “tie” vote — resulting in an affirmance of the decision of the Appellate Division by an equally divided Court — has been accepted both in respect of entire cases or portions of cases.[10] Therefore, the fact that an aggregate of six Justices presently sit on the Court — with the looming specter of “tie” votes — is of no constitutional moment.

Page 365

Vigorously condemning the practice of assigning a Superior Court Judge to “break a tie” in the Supreme Court as “wrong,” Professor Hartnett exposes the inherent evil of that practice as follows:

The danger, of course, is particularly great in a case where the Supreme Court is otherwise equally divided. Moreover, using a temporary judge to break a tie in the Supreme Court in a case from the Appellate Division is peculiarly misguided when one compares the alternative: Since an equally divided Supreme Court affirms the judgment below, in effect, those judges who decided the case in the Appellate Division (and there will always be at least two) serve as tie-breakers. In contrast, if the Chief Justice temporarily assigns a particular judge to the Supreme Court in order to break the tie, that single judge is the tie-breaker. Is there any reason at all to prefer a single tie-breaking judge designated by the Chief Justice to the two (or three) tie-breaking judges that decided the case in the Appellate Division?
[Hartnett, supra, 32 Seton Hall L.Rev. at 761-62.]

The answer, of course, is that, in these circumstances, there is no reason — absolutely no reason at all — to prefer a single tie-breaking judge designated by the Chief Justice to the judges who decided the case in the Appellate Division. Stated differently, unless needed for a quorum (thereby triggering the Rule of Necessity), there simply is no constitutionally permissible reason to empower a single Superior Court Judge to determine the outcome of a Supreme Court appeal.

Although not of constitutional dimension, there are segments of the Bar who object to “tie” votes. As one group recently editorialized, tie votes “are not good for either litigants or the Court as an institution!.]” Editorial, Three’s Not a Charm, 201 N.J.L.J. 394 (Aug. 2, 2010). That group noted that “[s]ome respected scholars, like Professor Edward Hartnett of Seton Hall Law School, have construed this provision [allowing, “when necessary,” the assignment of a Superior Court Judge to serve on the Supreme Court] to apply only when it is needed for the Court to maintain a quorum, which is five members.” Ibid. It further noted that “that construction appears consistent with the practice of the current chief justice and has a reasonable basis in light of the context in which the provision appears in Article VI, [Section II, P]aragraph 1.” Ibid. However, it also bemoaned that “[o]ver the years, the

Page 366

Court has not been uniform in how it has treated temporary appointments.” Ibid.[11]

In short, however, whether the result of a six-member Court is to be a tie vote is of no constitutional moment; such a vote results in an affirmance based on an equally divided Court, a result, as earlier noted, that this Court has produced any number of times in the past.

Furthermore, as a practical matter, even the September 8, 2010 assignment order that assigns a specific Superior Court Judge “temporarily to the Supreme Court effective September 8, 2010, and until further Order, to participate in new matters presented for the Court’s consideration” has not, standing alone, avoided cases in which less than seven members have heard an appeal. Since the start of the 2010 Term through mid-November, this Court has heard argument in several cases in which either the assigned Superior Court Judge has been unable to sit, or other members of the Court have had to recuse themselves and less than seven members have heard the appeal. For example, during this Court’s first argument sitting of the Term, on September 13-14, 2010, the Court heard six appeals; of these, the assigned Superior Court Judge did not participate in two — or a third — of the argued cases. Yet, the Court has managed to function well enough to hear the remaining four cases and, in fact, to issue already its opinion in some of them. Likewise, in the Court’s second argument cycle of the Term, on September 27-28, the Court again heard six appeals; of these, the assigned Superior Court Judge again did not participate in two — or a third — of those argued cases. And so on. Yet, the machinery of the Judiciary

Page 367

has not come to a halt, and the Republic still stands. In those circumstances, then, why is the assignment of a Superior Court Judge to the Supreme Court, in the words of the Constitution, “necessary”?

IV.
Even if the Chief Justice in fact possesses the authority to appoint a Superior Court Judge to fill a vacancy on the Court despite the presence of a quorum, the methodology followed in this case in making that appointment violates the Constitution.

Obviously, the drafters of the Constitution sought to avoid any claim of favoritism or any tilting of the Court’s direction in any such appointment. They achieved that goal by stripping away any discretion in respect of that appointment; they required that “the Chief Justice shall assign the Judge or Judges of the Superior Court, senior in service, as provided by rules of the Supreme Court, to serve temporarily in the Supreme Court.” N.J. Const. art. VI, § II, ¶ 11 (emphasis supplied). That language is clear and unequivocal; its purpose is sound, transparent, and fundamentally honest.

Yet, this Court has adopted Rule 2:13-2(a), Rule that both unconstitutionally expands and contracts the power of appointment. It provides as follows:

Five members of the court shall constitute a quorum. When necessary to constitute a quorum, to replace a justice who is absent or unable to act, or to expedite the business of the court, the presiding justice may assign one or more retired justices of the Supreme Court who are not engaged in the practice of law and who consent thereto or the judge or judges of the Appellate Division, senior in length of service therein, to serve temporarily in the Supreme Court. If the judge of the Appellate Division senior in service is unable to serve or shall waive assignment, the presiding justice may assign the judge next senior in service; and if 2 or more judges have equal seniority, the presiding justice may assign either or any of them. [R. 2:13-2(a).]

From the plainly stated constitutional restriction that appointments may be made to the Supreme Court only “when necessary” and then only from the Superior Court Judges “senior in service,”

Page 368

the Rule unconstitutionally expands the power of appointment to also include when a justice “is absent or unable to act” or, in an exception that swallows up the constitutional restrictions whole, “to expedite the business of the court[.]” That expansion is not anchored anywhere in the Constitution.

Further, instead of restricting the universe of eligible assignments to the constitutional limitation of “the Judge or Judges of the Superior Court, senior in service, as provided by rules of the Supreme Court,” that Rule allows the assignment of either retired Justices or “the judge or judges of the Appellate Division, senior in length of service therein,” all without even mentioning the limitations on who may be assigned to serve on the Supreme Court the Constitution so clearly and explicitly imposes. Because it was the Constitution that created the Appellate Division as a division of the Superior Court in the first instance, see N.J. Const. art. VI, § IV, H 3, and the drafters of the Constitution did not restrict the universe of those eligible for assignment to the Supreme Court solely to Superior Court Judges assigned to a specific division of that Court — the Appellate Division — the Rule’s limitation of potential assignees, a limitation that appears nowhere in the Constitution, is without any basis in the Constitution. In that same vein, the provisions of the Rule that allow retired Justices to serve on assignment to the Supreme Court far exceeds that which the Constitution, on its face, allows See, generally, Hartnett, supra, 32 Seton Hall L.Rev. at 752 (describing Rule 2:13-2 as “lawless”).

V.
Finally, in assigning a Superior Court Judge, albeit one from the Appellate Division who may not be the Superior Court Judge “senior in service,” this Court inadvertently is thrust squarely into an impossibly muddled political thicket.[12] As noted earlier, the

Page 369

Legislative and the Executive Branches of our state government are at an impasse: the Governor has nominated a candidate for appointment and confirmation to fill the current vacancy on this Court, and the Legislature has refused to provide its constitutionally required “advice and consent.”See N.J. Const, art. VI, § VI, ¶ 1 (“The Governor shall nominate and appoint, with the advice and consent of the Senate, the Chief Justice and associate justices of the Supreme Court[.]”).

Professor Maltz succinctly states the relevant and operative concerns, and deserves citation at length:

Temporary assignments are especially problematic where the assigned judge is filling a vacancy on the court rather than simply replacing a sitting justice who has recused himself or is temporarily absent from the bench for some other reason. Strikingly, the committee report that took a broad reading of the temporary assignment power did not mention vacancies at all; instead, the report refers only to situations where “a Justice is unavailable at the time a case is argued or submitted.” While the two cases might seem similar on their face, the implications for the separation of powers are radically different.
When a sitting justice is temporarily unavailable for any reason, the New Jersey constitution does not vest either the governor or the state legislature with the power to replace him. Thus, if one takes the view that the assignment of a replacement is “necessary,” the chief justice would be the only person with the authority to make the necessary appointment. But when a justice leaves the court permanently, the constitution clearly vests the power to name a replacement not with the chief justice, but rather with the Governor and the state senate.
Of course, a political deadlock between the Governor and the state senate might in theory leave the court short-handed for an extended period of time. But even if this concern is considered to be of constitutional magnitude, the power to deal with the problem is not vested in the chief justice. Instead, the state constitution provides the Governor with the authority to deal with the problem. [Maltz, supra,]

By indefinitely assigning a judge to serve on the Supreme Court, the Court invariably will be seen as having chosen sides in that impasse;[13] its actions will be interpreted as having cast its

Page 370

lot — and that of the Judiciary as a whole — with the Legislature. That election essentially further will empower the Legislature to withhold, for whatever period it deems appropriate, consideration of any candidate nominated by the Governor, thereby also frustrating that nomination and the exercise of executive power granted in the Constitution to the Governor and the Governor alone.

In doing so, this Court “indicates how far — and how unwisely — it has strayed from the appropriate bounds of its authority.” Reynolds v. Sims 377 U.S. 533, 615, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1409, 12 L.Ed.2d 506, 558 (1964) (Harlan, J., dissenting). Indeed, “the Court is not just entering a `political thicket’; it is entering a vast wonderland of judicial review of political activity.”Rogers v. Lodge, 458 U.S. 613, 649 102 S.Ct. 3272, 3292, 73 L.Ed.2d 1012, 1038 (1982) (Stevens, J., dissenting). No doubt, the allure of trespassing into grounds our Constitution has preserved for other, co-equal branches of government is as strong as it is vexing. See also De Vesa v. Dorsey 134 N.J. 420, 423, 426, 634 A.2d 493 (1993) (affirming, by an equally divided court, dismissal of complaint challenging exercise of “senatorial courtesy,” defining practice as “an unwritten, informal, and unofficial procedure allowing a single senator who resides in or represents any portion of the county in which a nominee is domiciled to veto the appointment without further action by the Senate[,]” and explaining that “[t]his case

Page 371

implicates three principles that define the role of the judiciary in a democracy: judicial review, judicial restraint, and judicial independence”). That, however, provides no cogent excuse for this Court to enter headlong into a broiling political contest of wills between those co-equal branches of government, and then be seen as choosing sides. For a branch of government sustained only by its moral authority, that course of conduct is an unpardonable mistake.

VI.
Professor Hartnett has summed up the issue well: “it is wrong for the Supreme Court to take license with the constitution, particularly with those provisions designed to cabin its own members’ power.” Hartnett, supra, 32 Seton Hall L.Rev. at 761. Our Constitution is clear, both in its words and in its context: a Judge of the Superior Court may be assigned to serve on the Supreme Court only “when necessary” and that term can be understood meaningfully only in the context of when needed to satisfy the quorum requirement. Because, in the absence of any additional recusals, there is a quorum of duly and constitutionally nominated, confirmed and appointed Justices of the Supreme Court, the addition of a Superior Court Judge is not necessary and, hence, unconstitutional. Further, throughout its history, this Court repeatedly has acted — and acted well — with fewer than seven Justices. Moreover, the methodology in place to select who will be assigned to serve on the Supreme Court contravenes the clear dictates of the Constitution and the salutary bulwarks against favoritism and potential bias the framers of that charter wisely incorporated within its borders. Finally, the unseemly rush to appoint a specific Superior Court Judge to serve on the Supreme Court places this Court, and the entire Judiciary, precisely where it ought to avoid: taking sides in a partisan battle between the other governmental branches.

The Constitution, sober and reflective Court practice, and everyday common sense each counsels against the foolhardy steps

Page 372

the Court today takes. For each of those reasons, I abstain; I will continue to abstain from all decisions of this Court for so long as it remains unconstitutionally constituted.

[1] All numerical statistics in this opinion are approximate and are based on reported matters.
[2] The abstaining Justice previously participated, without objecting, in cases involving temporary assignments when there was no need to establish a quorum. See Rowe v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 189 N.J. 615, 917 A.2d 767 (2007) (decided by five Justices plus Judges Stern and Steven L. Lefelt, temporarily assigned); Maimone v. City of Atl. City, 188 N.J. 221, 903 A.2d 1055 (2006) (decided by six Justices plus Judge Skillman, temporarily assigned); State v. Arthur, 184 N.J. 307, 877 A.2d 1183 (2005) (decided by six Justices plus Judge Skillman, temporarily assigned); Bd. of Educ. of Passaic v. N.J. Dep’t of Educ., 183 N.J. 281, 872 A.2d 1062 (2005) (decided by six Justices plus Judge Stern, temporarily assigned).
[3] Although the 1915 draft constitution was rejected by the electorate, Edward J. Breuer, Constitutional Developments in New York 1777-1958, at 43 (1958), the quoted portion of the 1915 temporary assignment provision was later approved for inclusion in the New York Constitution (without a limitation on the length of assignments), and it remains in force today N.Y. Const, art. VI, § 2.a.
[4] Professor Hartnett discredits the annotations in the appendix to the Judiciary Committee Report, citing Chief Justice Vanderbilt’s “explicit[] rejection of] that Report as an authoritative guide to interpreting the Constitution” i Winberry v. Salisbury, 5 N.J. 240, 74 A.2d 406 (1950). Hartnett, supra, 32 Seton Hall L.Rev. at 748; see also Maltz supra, at 5. While it is true that Chief Justice Vanderbilt, in Winberry, supra, 5 N.J. at 248-49, 74 A.2d 406, criticized reliance on the Judiciary Committee Report as a source of constitutional intent — specifically, its discussion of the “Principles Underlying the Judicial Article,” which is not implicated in this matter — only three years later he looked to the annotations appended to the same Committee Report to identify the intent behind another constitutional provision Donnelly v. Ritzendollar, 14 N.J. 96, 103, 101 A.2d 1 (1953) (citing Committee Report, 2 Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1947, at 1192). Since Donnelly, the Court has often relied on the Judiciary Committee Report as an authoritative source See, e.g., State v. Loftin, 157 N.J. 253, 281-82, 724 A.2d 129 (1999); Cogdell v. Hosp. Ctr. at Orange, 116 N.J. 7, 15, 560 A.2d 1169 (1989); In re Appeal of Pa. R.R. Co. 20 N.J. 398, 406, 120 A.2d 94 (1956). In the latter case, Justice Nathan L. Jacobs wrote for a unanimous Court. He was well-qualified to comment on the import of the Report in that he served not only as a delegate to the 1947 Constitutional Convention but also as vice-chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary. See 2 Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1947, supra, at 1197. The relevant and enlightening annotations to the Committee Report should therefore not be overlooked.

The abstaining opinion concedes that the Judiciary Committee Report contains an “expansive interpretation” for supplementing the Court’s membership, post at 355, 9 A.3d at 903 (Rivera-Soto, J., abstaining), but declares that that interpretation “was withheld from the citizenry.”Ibid. As proof, the opinion cites to an eight-page summary report prepared by the delegates for “the people of New Jersey,” titled “What the Proposed New State Constitution Means to You.” 2 Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1947, supra, at 1320. Not surprisingly, the record of the Constitutional Convention fills five lengthy volumes. See Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of 1947, supra. Using the abstaining opinion’s logic, all but eight pages were “withheld” from the voters, including the text of the Constitution itself. It is wrong to disregard historical evidence on that slim basis.

[1] The sole difference between the language initially proposed by the Committee on the Judiciary and the language ultimately adopted by the Convention is the Committee’s reference to the “General Court,” a term later changed by the Convention to “Superior Court.” See Committee on the Judiciary, Tentative Draft of Judicial Article, reprinted in II N.J. Const. Conv. 1198 (July 24, 1947).
[2] Other contemporary commentary does not dispute Professor Hartnett’s analysis and conclusions, restricting any reservations to qualified statements such as “[t]he Constitution says the chief justice can assign a senior Superior Court judge for temporary service on the Court. Bu it is not clear whether that can be done for a purpose other than to meet the quorum requirement of five justices.” Mary Pat Gallagher, Constitution, Rules in Conflict Over Way to Temporarily Fill Court Seat, 201 N.J.L.J. 553 (Aug. 16, 2010) (emphasis supplied).
[3] See, e.g., Lisa Fleisher, “N.J. Senate Refuses to Hold Confirmation Hearings for Gov. Christie’s Supreme Court Nominee,” The Star-Ledger, May 4, 2010.
[4] In each cited instance, only appeals that were fully briefed, argued and resulted in a disposition by the Court are considered. Because votes tallied on petitions for certification and motions are not published, the almost innumerable petitions for certification and motions which have been handled by the Court with fewer than seven Justices are not addressed; in those petitions for certification and motions where no quorum of five Justices has been available, that is, “when necessary,” the Court traditionally has assigned as many Superior Court Judges as are needed to reach the quorum number of five.
[5] A compendium of those cases is attached as Appendix “A” infra at 371, 9 A.3d at 914.
[6] A compendium of those cases is attached as Appendix “B” infra at 394, 9 A.3d at 926.
[7] A compendium of those cases is attached as Appendix “C” infra at 475, 9 A.3d at 972.
[8] A compendium of those cases is attached as Appendix “D” infra at 479, 9 A.3d at 975.
[9] A compendium of those cases is attached as Appendix “E” infra at 484, 9 A.3d at 978.
[10] A compendium of those cases is attached as Appendix “F” infra at 523, 9 A.2d at 999.
[11] That editorial further advocated that “the time has come for the chief justice to announce publicly a uniform policy” and that “(YJhat policy should provide that, as a matter of course, the state Supreme Court always will operate with seven members, even when a tie vote in a given matter is not anticipated.” Ibid. It further asserted that “the number [of participants] should always be seven. That number should apply to all aspects of the Court’s work, including evaluating petitions for certification, motions and the merits of appeals.” Ibid.
[12] According to the concurrence, this section consists of “baseless claims insinuated [that] have no place in this discussion.” Ante at 353, 9, 4.3d at 902. Regrettably, name-calling is not substitute for reasoned discourse; as this section clearly points out, the question of whether the Court has chosen to enter the quintessential “political thicket” cannot be ignored, regardless of anyone’s contrary wishes.
[13] That already has occurred. See Matt Friedman and Robin Mascarenhas, “Appellate judge gets a temporary seat on top court — Edwin Stern to fill in as standoff over John Wallace vacancy drags on,” The Star-Ledger, Sept. 9, 2010, at 17 (“Though temporary appointments are common when justices get sick or recuse themselves from certain cases, the appointment of Stern is significant because it comes amid a bruising political fight over a vacancy on the state’s highest court that could drag on until 2012.”); Matt Friedman, “N.J. appellate judge to temporarily fill controversial Supreme Court seat,” available at http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/ 2010/09/nj_top_appellate_judge_tempora.html. Indeed, some say that the Court’s actions have been the catalyst for a proposed constitutional amendment requiring that the Senate vote on advice-and-consent nominations within sixty days, see Michael Booth, “Proposed Constitutional Change Would Require Advice and Consent in 60 Days,”available at http://www.law.com/jsp/nj/PubArticleNJ.jsp?id=1202472365064, while others have editorialized that what is needed is a vote on the Governor’s nominee, and not a constitutional amendment See Editorial, “We need a vote on Patterson, not an amendment,” available at
http://www.dailyrecord.com/fdcp/PI285339388176.

Appendix “ACompendium of cases in which only five Justices participated

Abbott ex rel. Abbott v. Burke, 199 N.J. 140, 971 A.2d 989 (2009).

Educ. Law Ctr. v. N.J. Dep’t of Educ. 198 N.J. 274, 966 A.2d 1054 (2009).

Penn Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Costa, 198 N.J. 229, 966 A.2d 1028 (2009).

Jen Elec, Inc. v. County of Essex 197 N.J. 627, 964 A.2d 790 (2009).

Abbott v. Burke, 196 N.J. 544, 960 A.2d 360 (2008).

Cutler v. Dorn, 196 N.J. 419, 955 A.2d 917 (2008).

In re Virtua-West Jersey Hosp. Voorhees for a Certificate of Need, 194 N.J. 413, 945 A.2d 692 (2008).

Sensient Colors, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co. 193 N.J. 373, 939 A.2d 767 (2008).

In re Liquidation of Integrity Ins. Co. 193 N.J. 86, 935 A.2d 1184 (2007).

Basil v. Wolf, 193 N.J. 38, 935 A.2d 1154 (2007).

In re Micheletti 192 N.J. 588, 934 A.2d 633 (2007).

In re Contest of the November 8, 2005 General Election for Mayor of Parsippany-Troy Hills, 192 N.J. 546, 934 A.2d 607 (2007).

In re Ordinance 04-75, 192 N.J. 446, 931 A.2d 595 (2007).

Acuna v. Turkish, 192 N.J. 399, 930 A.2d 416 (2007).

Int’l Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. Merck Co., 192 N.J. 372, 929 A.2d 1076 (2007).

Richardson v. Bd. of Trs., 192 N.J. 189, 927 A.2d 543 (2007).

In re Rivera-Soto, 192 N.J. 109, 927 A.2d 112 (2007).

Page 373

N.J. Tpk. Auth. v. Local 196, I.F.P.T.E. 190 N.J. 283, 920 A.2d 88 (2007).

In re Opinion 39 of Comm. on Attorney Adver. 190 N.J. 250, 919 A.2d 845 (2007).

Twp. of Holmdel v. N.J. Highway Auth 190 N.J. 74, 918 A.2d 603 (2007).

In Re Supreme Court Advisory Comm. on Prof’l Ethics Opinion No. 697, 188 N.J. 549, 911 A.2d 51 (2006).

Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Nowell Amoroso, P.A. 189 N.J. 436, 916 A.2d 440 (2007).

Malinowski v. Jacobs, 189 N.J. 345, 915 A.2d 513 (2007).

Simon v. Rando, 189 N.J. 339, 915 A.2d 509 (2007).

Simon v. Cronecker, 189 N.J. 304, 915 A.2d 489 (2007).

In re Supreme Court Advisory Comm. on Profl Ethics Opinion No. 697, 188 N.J. 549, 911 A.2d 51 (2006).

Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J. 394, 895 A.2d 1143 (2006).

State v. Castagna, 187 N.J. 293, 901 A.2d 363 (2006).

Thomsen v. Mercer-Charles, 187 N.J. 197, 901 A.2d 303 (2006).

Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J. 394, 895 A.2d 1143 (2006).

Weinberg v. Bergen County Democratic Org. 185 N.J. 287, 884 A.2d 1259 (2005).

In re Fitchett, 184 N.J. 289, 877 A.2d 263 (2005).

Yurick v. State, 184 N.J. 70, 875 A.2d 898 (2005).

DKM Residential Props. Corp. v. Twp. of Montgomery 182 N.J. 296, 865 A.2d 649 (2005).

Brodsky v. GrinneU Haulers, Inc. 181 N.J. 102, 853 A.2d 940 (2004).

Lance v. McGreevey, 180 N.J. 590, 853 A.2d 856 (2004).

Abbott v. Burke, 180 N.J. 444, 852 A.2d 185 (2004).

Page 374

Asbury Park Bd. of Educ. v. N.J. Dep’t of Educ. 180 N.J. 108, 849 A.2d 158 (2004).

Galvao v. G.R. Robert Constr. Co. 179 N.J. 462, 846 A.2d 1215 (2004).

State v. Spivey, 179 N.J. 229, 844 A.2d 512 (2004).

Abbott v. Burke, 177 N.J. 578, 832 A.2d 891 (2003).

Sacharow v. Sacharow, 177 N.J. 62, 826 A.2d 710 (2003).

In re Niles Trust, 176 N.J. 282, 823 A.2d 1 (2003).

Azurak v. Corporate Prop. Investors 175 N.J. 110, 814 A.2d 600 (2003).

State v. S.R., 175 N.J. 23, 811 A.2d 439 (2002).

State v. Carty, 174 N.J. 351, 806 A.2d 798 (2002).

State v. Nelson, 173 N.J. 171, 803 A.2d 1 (2002).

Carpenter Tech. Corp. v. Admiral Ins. Co. 172 N.J. 504, 800 A.2d 54 (2002).

State Dep’t of Envtl. Prot. v. Caldeira 171 N.J. 404, 794 A.2d 156 (2002).

State v. Carty, 170 N.J. 632, 790 A.2d 903 (2002).

Abbott ex rel. Abbott v. Burke, 170 N.J. 537, 790 A.2d 842 (2002).

Fertile v. St. Michael’s Med. Ctr. 169 N.J. 481, 779 A.2d 1078 (2001).

State v. Stovall, 170 N.J. 346, 788 A.2d 746 (2002).

Camden County Energy Recovery Assocs. v. N.J. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot, 170 N.J. 246, 786 A.2d 105 (2001).

Fertile v. St. Michael’s Med. Ctr. 169 N.J. 481, 779 A.2d 1078 (2001).

Borough of Princeton v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer, 169 N.J. 135, 777 A.2d 19 (2001).

Roman Check Cashing v. N.J. Dep’t of Banking Ins., 169 N.J. 105, 77 A.2d 1 (2001).

Page 375

McCann v. Clerk of Jersey City, 168 N.J. 285, 773 A.2d 1151 (2001).

R.J. Gaydos Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Nat’l Consumer Ins. Co., 168 N.J. 255, 773 A.2d 1132 (2001).

Stryker Corp. v. Dir, Div. of Taxation 168 N.J. 138, 773 A.2d 674 (2001).

State v. Timmendequas, 168 N.J. 20, 773 A.2d 18 (2001).

Nobrega v. Edison Glen Assocs., 167 N.J. 520, 772 A.2d 368 (2001).

In re Registrant J.M., 167 N.J. 490, 772 A.2d 349 (2001).

In re Public Serv. Elec. Gas Co.’s Rate Unbundling, 167 N.J. 377, 771 A.2d 1163 (2001).

McCann v. Clerk of Jersey City, 167 N.J. 311, 771 A.2d 1123 (2001).

State v. Thomas, 166 N.J. 560, 767 A.2d 459 (2001).

Conestoga Title Ins. Co. v. Premier Title Agency 166 N.J. 2, 763 A.2d 746 (2000).

Planned Parenthood of Cent. N.J. v. Farmer 165 N.J. 609, 762 A.2d 620 (2000).

DeLisa v. County of Bergen, 165 N.J. 140, 755 A.2d 578 (2000).

In re Grant of the Charter Sch. Application of Englewood 164 N.J. 316, 753 A.2d 687 (2000).

In re Grant of the Charter Sch. Application of the Greater Brunswick Charter Sch., 164 N.J. 314, 753 A.2d 686 (2000).

Abbott v. Burke, 164 N.J. 84, 751 A.2d 1032 (2000).

Crews v. Crews, 164 N.J. 11, 751 A.2d 524 (2000).

State v. Oliver, 162 N.J. 580, 745 A.2d 1165 (2000).

Summit Bank v. Thiel, 162 N.J. 51, 740 A.2d 139 (1999).

Earl v. Johnson Johnson, 158 N.J. 155, 728 A.2d 820 (1999).

State v. Locurto, 157 N.J. 463, 724 A.2d 234 (1999).

Payton v. N.J. Tpk. Auth., 148 N.J. 524, 691 A.2d 321 (1997).

Page 376

Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp. 146 N.J. 442, 680 A.2d 750 (1996).

State v. Hessen, 145 N.J. 441, 678 A.2d 1082 (1996).

Bahrle v. Exxon Corp., 145 N.J. 144, 678 A.2d 225 (1996).

N.J. Tpk. Auth. v. N.J. Tpk. Supervisors Ass’n 143 N.J. 185, 670 A.2d 1 (1996).

DiTrolio v. Antiles, 142 N.J. 253, 662 A.2d 494 (1995).

State v. Petties, 139 N.J. 310, 654 A.2d 979 (1995).

Jacobs v. Stephens, 139 N.J. 212, 652 A.2d 712 (1995).

Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp., 139 N.J. 110, 651 A.2d 1002 (1995).

Becker v. Baron Bros., 138 N.J. 145, 649 A.2d 613 (1994).

Contey v. N.J. Bell Tel. Co., 136 N.J. 582, 643 A.2d 1005 (1994).

Cravm v. Campo, 136 N.J. 494, 643 A.2d 600 (1994).

State v. Smith, 136 N.J. 245, 642 A.2d 978 (1994).

Horosz v. Alps Estates, 136 N.J. 124, 642 A.2d 384 (1994).

In re Estate of Dawson, 136 N.J. 1, 641 A.2d 1026 (1994).

Morton Int’l v. General Accident Ins. Co. 134 N.J. 1, 629 A.2d 831 (1993).

In re Seaman, 133 N.J. 67, 627 A.2d 106 (1993).

Strumph v. Schering Corp., 133 N.J. 33, 626 A.2d 1090 (1993).

Williams v. Bell Tel. Labs. Inc. 132 N.J. 109, 623 A.2d 234 (1993).

Brady v. N.J. Redistricting Comm’n 131 N.J. 594, 622 A.2d 843 (1992).

Save Our Shore Dist. v. N.J. Redistricting Comm’n 131 N.J. 159, 619 A.2d 1005 (1992).

Weichert Co. Realtors v. Ryan, 128 N.J. 427, 608 A.2d 280 (1992).

In re Bock, 128 N.J. 270, 607 A.2d 1307 (1992).

Benda v. Benda, 122 N.J. 174, 584 A.2d 238 (1990).

Benda v. Benda, 122 N.J. 149, 584 A.2d 220 (1990).

Page 377

In re Lunetta, 118 N.J. 443, 572 A.2d 586 (1989).

In re Disciplinary Procedures of Phillips 117 N.J. 567, 569 A.2d 807 (1990).

Shaner v. Horizon Bancorp., 116 N.J. 433, 561 A.2d 1130 (1989).

In re Petition of South Jersey Gas Co. 116 N.J. 251, 561 A.2d 561 (1989).

Market St. Mission v. Bureau of Rooming Boarding House Standards, 110 N.J. 335, 541 A.2d 668 (1988).

Largey v. Rothman, 110 N.J. 204, 540 A.2d 504 (1988).

P.T. L. Constr. Co. v. State, Dep’t of Transp. 108 N.J. 539, 531 A.2d 1330 (1987).

First Family Mortg. Corp. v. Durham 108 N.J. 277, 528 A.2d 1288 (1987).

In re Rigolosi 107 N.J. 192, 526 A.2d 670 (1987).

In re Conway, 107 N.J. 168, 526 A.2d 658 (1987).

Vanchieri v. N.J. Sports Exposition Auth. 104 N.J. 80, 514 A.2d 1323 (1986).

Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp. 103 N.J. 643, 512 A.2d 466 (1986).

Meglino v. Twp. Comm. of Eagleswood 103 N.J. 144, 510 A.2d 1134 (1986).

Lukas v. State, Dep’t of Human Services 103 N.J. 126, 510 A.2d 1123 (1986).

Garfield Trust Co. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 102 N.J. 420, 508 A.2d 1104 (1986).

Lang v. Baker, 101 N.J. 147, 50 A.2d 153 (1985).

Kolitch v. Lindedahl, 100 N.J. 485, 497 A.2d 183 (1985).

In re Weinroth, 100 N.J. 343, 495 A.2d 417 (1985).

Dunkin’ Donuts of Am., Inc. v. Middletown Donut Corp. 100 N.J. 166, 495 A.2d 66 (1985).

Page 378

Avco Fin. Servs. Consumer Disc. Co. One v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 100 N.J. 27, 494 A.2d 788 (1985).

In re Templeton, 99 N.J. 365, 492 A.2d 1001 (1985).

Old Bridge Bd. of Educ. v. Old Bridge Educ. Ass’n 98 N.J. 523, 489 A.2d 159 (1985).

In re Sadofski, 98 N.J. 434, 487 A.2d 700 (1985).

Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell Bonello 97 N.J. 37, 477 A.2d 1224 (1984).

Knesz v. Cent. Jersey Bank Trust Co. 97 N.J. 1, 477 A.2d 806 (1984).

McMenamy v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 95 N.J. 139, 469 A.2d 920 (1983).

N.J. State Bar Ass’n v. N.J. Ass’n of Realtor Bds. 94 N.J. 449, 467 A.2d 577 (1983).

Joseph H. Reinfeld, Inc. v. Schieffelin Co. 94 N.J. 400, 466 A.2d 563 (1983).

N.J. State Bar Ass’n v. N.J. Ass’n. of Realtor Bds. 93 N.J. 470, 461 A.2d 1112 (1983).

In re Schedule of Rates for Barnert Memorial Hosp. 92 N.J. 31, 455 A.2d 469 (1983).

State, Dep’t of Law Pub. Safety, Div. of State Police v. State Troopers Fraternal Ass’n of N.J. 91 N.J. 464, 453 A.2d 176 (1982).

Michalko v. Cooke Color Chemical Corp. 91 N.J. 386, 451 A.2d 179 (1982).

General Assembly of N.J. v. Byrne 90 N.J. 376, 448 A.2d 438 (1982).

Broadway Maint. Corp. v. Rutgers, State Univ. 90 N.J. 253, 447 A.2d 906 (1982).

Pomanowski v. Monmouth County Bd. of Realtors 89 N.J. 306, 446 A.2d 83 (1982).

Uston v. Resorts Int’l Hotel, Inc. 89 N.J. 163, 445 A.2d 370 (1982).

Page 379

N.J. Civil Serv. Ass’n v. State, 88 N.J. 605, 443 A.2d 1070 (1982).

Gilbert v. Gladden, 87 N.J. 275, 432 A.2d 1351 (1981).

Haynes v. First Nat’l State Bank 87 N.J. 163, 432 A.2d 890 (1981).

Paul Kimball Hosp., Inc. v. Brick Twp. Hosp., Inc. 86 N.J. 429, 432 A.2d 36 (1981).

Brighton, Inc. v. Colonial First Nat’l Bank 86 N.J. 259, 430 A.2d 902 (1981).

GATX Terminals Corp. v. N.J. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot 86 N.J. 46, 429 A.2d 355 (1981).

Autotote, Ltd. v. N.J. Sports Exposition Autk 85 N.J. 363, 427 A.2d 55 (1981).

State v. Maguire, 84 N.J. 508, 423 A.2d 294 (1980).

Levine v. State Dep’t of Institutions Agencies 84 N.J. 234, 418 A.2d 229 (1980).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Estate of Simmons 84 N.J. 28, 417 A.2d 488 (1980).

In re Rabb, 83 N.J. 109, 415 A.2d 1168 (1980).

Salorio v. Glaser, 82 N.J. 482, 414 A.2d 943 (1980).

Gottfried v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. 82 N.J. 478, 414 A.2d 544 (1980).

Darrell v. Governing Body of Twp. of Clark 82 N.J. 426, 413 A.2d 610 (1980).

Calabrese v. Trenton State Coll. 82 N.J. 321, 413 A.2d 315 (1980).

Galligan v. Westfield Ctr. Serv., Inc. 82 N.J. 188, 412 A.2d 122 (1980).

Heirv. Degnan, 82 N.J. 109, 411 A.2d 194 (1980).

Cold Indian Springs Corp. v. Twp. of Ocean 81 N.J. 502, 410 A.2d 652 (1980).

In re Application of McCabe, 81 N.J. 462, 409 A.2d 1158 (1980).

Page 380

In re Mirabelli, 79 N.J. 597, 40 A.2d 1090 (1979).

State v. Cerbo, 78 N.J. 595, 397 A.2d 671 (1979).

Boyarin v. N.J. Tpk. Auth., 75 N.J. 434, 383 A.2d 117 (1978).

Creek Ranch, Inc. v. N.J. Tpk. Auth. 75 N.J. 421, 383 A.2d 110 (1978).

In re Fairfield Gen. Corp., 75 N.J. 398, 383 A.2d 98 (1978).

I AC, Ltd. v. Princeton Porsche-Audi 75 N.J. 379, 382 A.2d 1125 (1978).

Tumarkin v. First Nat’l State Bank 75 N.J. 373, 382 A.2d 1122 (1978).

K.S.B. Technical Sales v. N. Jersey Dist. Water Supply Comm’n of N.J., 75 N.J. 272, 381 A.2d 774 (1977).

State v. Smith, 75 N.J. 81, 379 A.2d 1275 (1977).

Lyons Farms Tavern, Inc. v. Mun. Bd. of Alcoholic Beverage Control of Newark, 68 N.J. 44, 342 A.2d 204 (1975).

State v. DiCarlo, 67 N.J. 321, 338 A.2d 809 (1975).

O’Connor v. Altus, 67 N.J. 106, 335 A.2d 545 (1975).

Cashen v. Spann, 66 N.J. 541, 334 A.2d 8 (1975).

La Stella v. Garcia Estates, Inc. 66 N.J. 297, 331 A.2d 1 (1975).

Scanlon v. Gen. Motors Corp., 65 N.J. 582, 326 A.2d 673 (1974).

Redding v. Burlington County Welfare Bd. 65 N.J. 439, 323 A.2d 477 (1974).

State v. Clark, 65 N.J. 426, 323 A.2d 470 (1974).

State v. Parmigiani 65 N.J. 154, 320 A.2d 161 (1974).

Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. The Cont’l Ins. Cos. 65 N.J. 152, 319 A.2d 732 (1974).

State v. Melvin, 65 N.J. 1, 319 A.2d 450 (1974).

Oglesby v. Am. Dredging Co., 64 N.J. 538, 318 A.2d 14 (1974).

Page 381

Torres v. Trenton Times Newspaper 64 N.J. 458, 317 A.2d 361 (1974).

State v. Carter, 64 N.J. 382, 316 A.2d 449 (1974).

Lipsit v. Leonard, 64 N.J. 276, 315 A.2d 25 (1974).

S. Ocean Landfill, Inc. v. Mayor of Ocean 64 N.J. 190, 314 A.2d 65 (1974).

State v. Hatch, 64 N.J. 179, 313 A.2d 797 (1973).

Parkinson v. J. S. Tool Co. 64 N.J. 159, 313 A.2d 609 (1974).

Dunellen Bd. of Educ. v. Dunellen Educ. Ass’n 64 N.J. 17, 311 A.2d 737 (1973).

Burlington County Coll. Faculty Ass’n v. Bd. of Trs. 64 N.J. 10, 311 A.2d 733 (1973).

State v. Dalonges, 64 N.J. 9, 31 A.2d 733 (1973).

Bd. of Educ. of Englewood v. Englewood Teachers Ass’n 64 N.J. 1, 311 A.2d 729 (1973).

In re Sgro, 63 N.J. 538, 310 A.2d 459 (1973).

In re Queenan, 61 N.J. 579, 297 A.2d 3 (1972).

In re the Petition of S. Lakewood Water Co. 61 N.J. 230, 294 A.2d 13 (1972).

Nisivoccia v. City of Newark, 60 N.J. 499, 291 A.2d 143 (1972).

Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v. Sills 60 N.J. 342, 289 A.2d 257 (1972).

Twp. Comm. of Morris v. Bd. of Educ. of Morris 60 N.J. 186, 287 A.2d 449 (1972).

State v. King, 59 N.J. 525, 284 A.2d 350 (1971).

Williams v. Williams, 59 N.J. 229, 281 A.2d 273 (1971).

Salerno v. McGraw-Edison Indus., 59 N.J. 129, 279 A.2d 835 (1971).

Manzo v. City of Plainfield, 59 N.J. 30, 279 A.2d 706 (1971).

Page 382

A B. Auto Stores of Jones St., Inc. v. City of Newark, 59 N.J. 5, 279 A.2d 693 (1971).

R.L. Mulliken, Inc. v. City of Englewood 59 N.J. 1, 279 A.2d 691 (1971).

Mickens v. Marascio, 58 N.J. 569, 279 A.2d 666 (1971).

Lander v. Vill. of S. Orange, 58 N.J. 509, 279 A.2d 633 (1971).

Wojcik v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Employment Sec 58 N.J. 341, 277 A.2d 529 (1971).

State v. Conyers, 58 N. J 123, 275 A.2d 721 (1971).

Capodanno v. Capodanno, 58 N.J. 113, 275 A.2d 441 (1971).

Rutgers v. Kugler, 58 N.J. 113, 275 A.2d 441 (1971).

Crescent Park Tenants Ass’n v. Realty Equities Corp. of N.Y., 58 N.J. 98, 27 A.2d433 (1971).

Miselly Masons, Inc. v. D.H. Overmyer Co. 58 N.J. 39, 274 A.2d 584 (1971).

Levin v. Twp. Comm. of Bridgewater 57 N.J. 506, 274 A.2d 1 (1971).

Risley v. Kirkman, 56 N.J. 464, 267 A.2d 50 (1970).

Am. B.D. Co. v. House of Seagrams, Inc. 56 N.J. 164, 265 A.2d 544 (1970).

Di Giovanni v. Pessel, 55 N.J. 188, 260 A.2d 510 (1970).

NJ State AFL-CIO v. Bryant, 55 N.J. 171, 260 A.2d 225 (1969).

Jackson v. Concord Co., 54 N.J. 113, 253 A.2d 793 (1969).

State v. Morse, 54 N.J. 32, 252 A.2d 723 (1969).

State v. Briley, 53 N.J. 498, 251 A.2d 442 (1969).

Willis v. Sec. Ins. Group, 53 N.J. 260, 250 A.2d 129 (1969).

Dep’t of Health v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 53 N.J. 248, 250 A.2d 11 (1969).

DeLorenzo v. Bd. of Review, 53 N.J. 143, 249 A.2d 68 (1969).

Page 383

In re Estate of Wallace, 53 N.J. 137, 249 A.2d 65 (1969).

Grubb v. Wyckoff, 52 N.J. 599, 247 A.2d 481 (1968).

Bergen v. Koppenal, 52 N.J. 478, 246 A.2d 442 (1968).

Koslow v. Mun. Council of Wayne, 52 N.J. 441, 245 A.2d 729 (1968).

State v. Magee, 52 N.J. 352, 245 A.2d 339 (1968).

Goldberg v. Traver, 52 N.J. 344, 245 A.2d 334 (1968).

65 McKinley Ave., Inc. v. City of E. Orange 52 N.J. 338, 245 A.2d 332 (1968).

City of E. Orange v. Palmer, 52 N.J. 329, 245 A.2d 327 (1968).

State v. Mathis, 52 N.J. 238, 245 A.2d 20 (1968).

Totten v. Gruzen, 52 N.J. 202, 245 A.2d 1 (1968).

Diamond v. N.J. Bell Tel. Co., 51 N.J. 594, 242 A.2d 622 (1968).

Oleyar v. Swift Co., 51 N.J. 470, 242 A.2d 321 (1968).

State v. Dent, 51 N.J. 428, 241 A.2d 833 (1968).

McLaughlin v. Bossing, 51 N.J. 410, 241 A.2d 450 (1968).

State v. Alvarado, 51 N.J. 375, 240 A.2d 677 (1968).

Cohen v. First Camden Nat’l Bank Trust Co. 51 N.J. 11, 237 A.2d 257 (1967).

Booth v. Bd. of Adjustment, Rockaway Twp. 50 N.J. 302, 234 A.2d 681 (1967).

In re Trust Estate of Moore, 50 N.J. 131, 232 A.2d 641 (1967).

Jackman v. Bodine, 50 N.J. 127, 232 A.2d 419 (1967).

B. v. 0., 50 N.J. 93, 232 A.2d 401 (1967).

State v. Krempecki, 50 N.J. 50, 231 A.2d 811 (1967).

State v. Bacsko, 50 N.J. 49, 231 A.2d 811 (1967).

State v. Oliver, 50 N.J. 39, 231 A.2d 805 (1967).

State v. Funicello, 49 N.J. 553, 231 A.2d 579 (1967).

Page 384

In re the Petition of the Erie-Lackawanna R.R. Co. 48 N.J. 567, 227 A.2d 129 (1967).

Jacobs v. Jacobs, 48 N.J. 361, 225 A.2d 570 (1966).

In re Estate of Burke, 48 N.J. 50, 222 A.2d 273 (1966).

In re Contempt of Carton, 48 N.J. 9, 222 A.2d 92 (1966).

Bayonne v. Palmer, 47 N.J. 520, 22 A.2d 741 (1966).

Bhd. of RR. Trainmen v. Cent. R.R. Co. of N.J. 47 N.J. 508, 221 A.2d 735 (1966).

Bd of RR. Trainmen v. Palmer, 47 N.J. 488, 221 A.2d 724 (1966).

In re Duckworth, 47 N.J. 235, 220 A.2d 110 (1966).

Devlin v. Nat’l Broad. Co., 47 N.J. 126, 219 A.2d 523 (1966).

Jaquith Co. v. Island Creek Coal Co. 47 N.J. 111, 219 A.2d 514 (1966).

McClintock v. Trenton, 47 N.J. 102, 219 A.2d 510 (1966).

Rubens v. Wiss Bldg. Assocs., 47 N.J. 53, 219 A.2d 176 (1966).

Garden State Dev. Co. v. Markowitz 47 N.J. 1, 218 A.2d 857 (1966).

State v. Pickles, 46 N.J. 542, 218 A.2d 609 (1966).

State v. Smith, 46 N.J. 510, 218 A.2d 147 (1966).

In re Presentment of the Essex County Grand Jury 46 N.J. 467, 217 A.2d 874 (1966).

Del. River Port Auth v. Hughes, 46 N.J. 451, 217 A.2d 865 (1966).

Highway Trailer Co. v. Donna Motor Lines, Inc. 46 N.J. 442, 217 A.2d 617 (1966).

State v. Cerce, 46 N.J. 387, 217 A.2d 319 (1966).

State v. Johnson, 46 N.J. 289, 216 A.2d 392 (1966).

Hallman v. State Parole Bd., 46 N.J. 279, 216 A.2d 387 (1966).

State v. Schultz, 46 N.J. 254, 216 A.2d 372 (1966).

State v. Portee, 46 N.J. 239, 216 A.2d 227 (1966).

Page 385

Ekalo v. Constructive Serv. Corp. of Am. 46 N.J. 82, 215 A.2d 1 (1965).

State v. Bisaccia, 45 N.J. 504, 213 A.2d 185 (1965).

State v. Contursi, 44 N.J. 422, 209 A.2d 829 (1965).

State v. Dennis, 43 N.J. 418, 204 A.2d 868 (1964).

State v. Tyson, 43 N.J. 411, 204 A.2d 864 (1964).

State v. LaFera, 42 N.J. 97, 199 A.2d 630 (1964).

Alberti v. Civil Serv. Comm’n, 41 N.J. 147, 195 A.2d 297 (1963).

In re Forgotson, 40 N.J. 581, 194 A.2d 233 (1963).

State v. Lanza, 39 N.J. 595, 190 A.2d 374 (1963).

State v. LaPierre, 39 N.J. 156, 188 A.2d 10 (1963).

U.S. Steel Corp. v. Dir, Div. of Taxation 38 N.J. 533, 186 A.2d 266 (1962).

Wiramal Corp. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 36 N.J. 201, 175 A.2d 631 (1961).

Levin v. Twp. of Livingston, 35 N.J. 500, 173 A.2d 391 (1961).

525 Main St. Corp. v. Eagle Roofing Co. 34 N.J. 251, 168 A.2d 33 (1961).

Deubel v. Kervick, 33 N.J. 568, 166 A.2d 561 (1960).

Bd. of Dirs. of Ajax Electrothermic Corp. v. First Nat’l Bank of Princeton, 33 N.J. 456, 165 A.2d 513 (1960).

Margaritell v. Caldwell Twp., 33 N.J. 453, 165 A.2d 298 (1960).

State v. Murray, 33 N.J. 393, 165 A.2d 161 (1960).

Steger v. Schellenger, 33 N.J. 293, 163 A.2d 377 (1960).

Dept of Mental Health of Kentucky v. Mullins 31 N.J. 598, 158 A.2d 527 (1960).

Ratsch v. Holderman, 31 N.J. 458, 158 A.2d 24 (1960).

Krauth v. Geller, 31 N.J. 270, 157 A.2d 129 (1960).

Graham v. Green, 31 N.J. 207, 156 A.2d 241 (1959).

Page 386

B.R. Waldron Sons Co. v. Venezia 31 N.J. 161, 155 A.2d 769 (1959).

Depew v. Twp. of Hillsborough, 31 N.J. 157, 155 A.2d 766 (1959).

Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc. 31 N.J. 44, 155 A.2d 90 (1959).

State v. McDonald, 30 N.J. 126, 152 A.2d 143 (1959).

Walter E. Heller Co. v. Hammond Appliance Co. 29 N.J. 589, 151 A.2d 537 (1959).

State v. Van Buren, 29 N.J. 548, 150 A.2d 649 (1959).

N.Y., Susquehanna W. R.R. Co. v. Bd. of Pub. Util. Comm’rs, 29 N.J. 513, 150 A.2d 656 (1959).

Napierkowski v. Twp. of Gloucester 29 N.J. 481, 150 A.2d 481 (1959).

Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River, 29 N.J. 468, 150 A.2d 34 (1959).

State v. West, 29 N.J. 327, 149 A.2d 217 (1959).

Franklin Discount Co. v. Ford, 27 N.J. 473, 143 A.2d 161 (1958).

Angermeier v. Borough of Sea Girt 27 N.J. 298, 142 A.2d 624 (1958).

Russo v. United States Trucking Corp. 26 N.J. 430, 140 A.2d 206 (1958).

The Cent. R.R. Co. of N.J. v. Neeld 26 N.J. 188, 139 A.2d 119 (1958).

The Cent. R.R. Co. of N.J. v. Neeld 26 N.J. 172, 139 A.2d 110 (1958).

Engelbretson v. Am. Stores, 26 N.J. 106, 139 A.2d 19 (1958).

Jorgensen v. Pa. R.R. Co., 25 N.J. 541, 138 A.2d 24 (1958).

Martin v. Bengue, Inc., 25 N.J. 359, 136 A.2d 626 (1957).

In re Application of the Del, Lackawanna W. R.R. Co., 25 N.J. 353, 136 A.2d 413 (1957).

Page 387

In re Application of the N.Y., Susquehanna W. R.R. Co., 25 N.J. 343, 136 A.2d 408 (1957).

Hertz Washmobile Sys. v. The Vill. of S. Orange 25 N.J. 207, 135 A.2d 524 (1957).

Auto-Rite Supply Co. v. Mayor Twp. Committeemen of Woodbridge, 25 N.J. 188, 135 A.2d 515 (1957).

Republic Factors, Inc. v. Carteret Work Uniforms 24 N.J. 525, 133 A.2d 6 (1957).

In re Estate of Dickerson, 24 N.J. 513, 132 A.2d 805 (1957).

Murray v. Hudson Dispatch, 24 N.J. 487, 132 A.2d 793 (1957).

Grofo Realty Co. v. City of Bayonne 24 N.J. 482, 132 A.2d 802 (1957).

Wagner v. The Mayor of Newark, 24 N.J. 467, 132 A.2d 794 (1957).

Stamato v. Agamie, 24 N.J. 309, 131 A.2d 745 (1957).

Kozesnik v. Twp. of Montgomery, 2A N.J. 154, 13 A.2d 1 (1957).

Minter v. Bendix Aviation Corp., 24 N.J. 128, 130 A.2d 809 (1957).

Consol. Police Firemen’s Pension Fund Comm’n v. City of Passaic, 23 N.J. 645, 130 A.2d 377 (1957).

Jacobs v. Rothstein, 23 N.J. 641, 130 A.2d 384 (1957).

Denbo v. Twp. of Moorestown, 23 N.J. 476, 129 A.2d 710 (1957).

Buzzone v. Hartford Accident Indem. Co. 23 N.J. 447, 129 A.2d 561 (1957).

Ford v. Reichert, 23 N.J. 429, 129 A.2d 439 (1957).

Ellenstein v. Herman Body Co., 23 N.J. 348, 129 A.2d 268 (1957).

Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Local No. AA9 of Int’l Union of Elec. Radio, 23 N.J. 170, 128 A.2d 457 (1957).

State v. Sperry Hutchinson Co. 23 N.J. 38, 127 A.2d 169 (1956).

Trs. of Princeton Univ. v. Trust Co. of N.J. 22 N.J. 587, 127 A.2d 19 (1956).

Page 388

Louis Schlesinger Co. v. Wilson, 22 N.J. 576, 127 A.2d 13 (1956).

Yanuzzi v. The Mayor of Spring Lake 22 N.J. 567, 126 A.2d 873 (1956).

In re Petition of Sheffield Farms Co. 22 N.J. 548, 126 A.2d 886 (1956).

First Nat’l Bank Trust Co. v. MacGarvie 22 N.J. 539, 126 A.2d 880 (1956).

Friedman v. Tappan Dev. Corp., 22 N.J. 523, 126 A.2d 646 (1956).

DeFazio v. Haven Sav. Loan Ass’n 22 N.J. 511, 126 A.2d 639 (1956).

Ledden v. Ehnes, 22 N.J. 501, 126 A.2d 633 (1956).

Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown 22 N.J. 482, 126 A.2d 323 (1956).

Adams Newark Theatre Co. v. City of Newark 22 N.J. 472, 126 A.2d 340 (1956).

Taylor v. N.J. Highway Auth, 22 N.J. 454, 126 A.2d 313 (1956).

Van Sweringen v. Van Sweringen, 22 N.J. 440, 126 A.2d 334 (1956).

Honey v. Brown, 22 N.J. 433, 126 A.2d 354 (1956).

Bank of Commerce v. Markakos, 22 N.J. 428, 126 A.2d 346 (1956).

Newark Publ’rs Ass’n v. Newark Typographical Union No. 103, 22 N.J. 419, 126 A.2d 348 (1956).

State v. Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 126 A.2d 161 (1956).

Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers Cosmetologists’ Int’l Union of Am., Local 687 v. Pollino 22 N.J. 389, 126 A.2d 194 (1956).

Krosnowski v. Krosnowski 22 N.J. 376, 126 A.2d 182 (1956).

Bailey v. Council of the Div. of Planning Dev. 22 N.J. 366, 126 A.2d 189 (1956).

Fifth St. Pier Corp. v. City of Hoboken 22 N.J. 326, 126 A.2d 6 (1956).

Page 389

State v. D’Ippolito, 22 N.J. 318, 126 A.2d 1 (1956).

Swede v. City of Clifton, 22 N.J. 303, 125 A.2d 865 (1956).

Loeb v. Peter F. Pasbjerg Co. 22 N.J. 95, 123 A.2d 522 (1956).

Latzoni v. City of Garfield, 22 N.J. 84, 123 A.2d 531 (1956).

A J. J.O. Pilar, Inc. v. Lister Corp. 22 N.J. 75, 123 A.2d 536 (1956).

Daly v. Daly, 21 N.J. 599, 123 A.2d 3 (1956).

Lindroth v. Christ Hosp., 21 N.J. 588, 123 A.2d 10 (1956).

Graybar Eke. Co. v. Mfrs. Cos. Co. 21 N.J. 517, 122 A.2d 624 (1956).

Gerber v. Bd. of Review, 20 N.J. 561, 120 A.2d 436 (1956).

Mahoney v. Nitroform Co., 20 N.J. 499, 120 A.2d 454 (1956).

In re the Sworn Application of Tiene 19 N.J. 149, 115 A.2d 543 (1955).

Lionel Corp. v. Grayson-Robinson Stores 15 N.J. 191, 104 A.2d 304 (1954).

In re Revision in Rates Filed by N.J. Power Light Co., 15 N.J. 82, 104 A.2d 1 (1954).

Beirn v. Morris, 14 N.J. 529, 103 A.2d 361 (1954).

Kagan v. Berman, 14 N.J. 467, 102 A.2d 765 (1954).

Herr v. Herr, 13 N.J. 79, 98 A.2d 55 (1953).

Greenspan v. Div. of Alcoholic Beverage Control 12 N.J. 456, 97 A.2d 413 (1953).

In re Application of Hardman for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, 12 N.J. 360, 96 A.2d 794 (1953).

Harker v. McKissock, 12 N.J. 310, 96 A.2d 660 (1953).

E.Ridgelawn Cemetery v. Winne, 11 N.J. 459, 94 A.2d 833 (1953).

In re Estate of Armour, 11 N.J. 257, 94 A.2d 286 (1953).

Page 390

Air-Way Branches, Inc. v. Bd. of Review 10 N.J. 609, 92 A.2d 771 (1952).

State v. Hardman, 10 N.J. 468, 92 A.2d 27 (1952).

Del, Lackawanna W. R.R. Co. v. City of Hoboken 10 N.J. 418, 91 A.2d 739 (1952).

State v. Meinken, 10 N.J. 348, 91 A.2d 721 (1952).

State v. Doto, 10 N.J. 318, 9 A.2d 337 (1952).

O’Neil v. Bilotta, 10 N.J. 308, 9 A.2d 231 (1952).

Schanerman v. Everett Carbin, Inc. 10 N.J. 215, 89 A.2d 689 (1952).

In re Application of Caruso, 10 N.J. 184, 89 A.2d 661 (1952).

Reinhardt v. Passaic-Clifton Nat’l Bank Trust Co., 9 N.J. 607, 89 A.2d 242 (1952).

Pub. Serv. Elec. Gas Co. v. Reading Co. 9 N.J. 606, 89 A.2d 242 (1952).

Savarese v. Pyrene Mfg. Co., 9 N.J. 595, 89 A.2d 237 (1952).

Fountain v. Fountain, 9 N.J. 558, 89 A.2d 8 (1952).

Holly v. Meyers Hotel Tavern, Inc. 9 N.J. 493, 89 A.2d 6 (1952).

Marchitto v. Cent. R.R. Co. of N.J. 9 N.J. 456, 88 A.2d 851 (1952).

State v. Shiren, 9 N.J. 445, 88 A.2d 601 (1952).

Delawanna Iron Metal Co. v. Albrecht 9 N.J. 424, 88 A.2d 616 (1952).

Schmidt v. Bd. of Adjustment of Newark 9 N.J. 405, 88 A.2d 607 (1952).

Hill v. Bor. of Collingswood, 9 N.J. 369, 88 A.2d 506 (1952).

In re Isserman, 9 N.J. 316, 88 A.2d 199 (1952).

Struyk v. Samuel Braen’s Sons, 9 N.J. 294, 88 A.2d 201 (1952).

Robison v. Robison, 9 N.J. 288, 88 A.2d 202 (1952).

Page 391

In re Isserman, 9 N.J. 269, 87 A.2d 903 (1952).

165 Augusta St., Inc. v. Collins, 9 N.J. 259, 87 A.2d 889 (1952).

Baron v. Peoples Nat’l Bank of Secaucus 9 N.J. 249, 87 A.2d 898 (1952).

Nichols v. Bd. of Educ. of Jersey City 9 N.J. 241, 87 A.2d 894 (1952).

Jaroszewski v. Cent. R.R. Co. of N.J. 9 N.J. 231, 87 A.2d 705 (1952).

Craster v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Newark 9 N.J. 225, 87 A.2d 721 (1952).

Frank v. Frank’s Inc., 9 N.J. 218, 87 A.2d 724 (1952).

Leeds v. Harrison, 9 N.J. 202, 87 A.2d 713 (1952).

State v. Pa. R.R. Co., 9 N.J. 194, 87 A.2d 709 (1952).

Scarborough Apartments, Inc. v. City of Englewood 9 N.J. 182, 87 A.2d 537 (1952).

Riverview Gardens, Section One, Inc. v. Bor. of N. Arlington, 9 N.J. 167, 87 A.2d 425 (1952).

Allegro v. Afton Vill. Corp., 9 N.J. 156, 87 A.2d 430 (1952).

Houston Petrol. Co. v. Auto. Prods. Credit Ass’n, Inc., 9 N.J. 122, 87 A.2d 319 (1952).

deVries v. The Evening Journal Ass’n 9 N.J. 117, 87 A.2d 317 (1952).

Januszewski v. Pub. Serv. Coordinated Transp. 9 N.J. 107, 87 A.2d 19 (1952).

Lakutis v. Greenwood, 9 N.J. 101, 87 A.2d 23 (1952).

Sokol v. Liebstein, 9 N.J. 93, 87 A.2d 1 (1952).

The Motorlease Corp. v. Mulroony, 9 N.J. 82, 86 A.2d 765 (1952).

Danek v. Hammer, 9 N.J. 56, 87 A.2d 5 (1952).

Meyer v. Bd. of Educ., 9 N.J. 46, 86 A.2d 761 (1952).

Strang v. S. Jersey Broad. Co., 9 N.J. 38, 86 A.2d 777 (1952).

Page 392

Tagliabue v. Twp. of N. Bergen, 9 N.J. 32, 86 A.2d 773 (1952).

In re Avis, 9 N.J. 27, 86 A.2d 771 (1952).

Flint Frozen Foods, Inc. v. Firemen’s Ins. Co. of Newark, 8 N.J. 606, 86 A.2d 673 (1952).

Flexmir, Inc. v. Lindeman Co. 8 N.J. 602, 86 A.2d 585 (1952).

In re the Accounting of the Executors of Koretzky 8 N.J. 506, 86 A.2d 238 (1951).

George Siegler Co. v. Norton, 8 N.J. 374, 86 A.2d 8 (1952).

Hoffman v. Hoffman, 8 N.J. 157, 84 A.2d 441 (1951).

AC. Schultes Sons v. Twp. of Haddon 8 N.J. 103, 83 A.2d 896 (1951).

Pa.-Reading Seashore Lines v. Bd. of Pub. Util. Comm’rs, 8 N.J. 85, 83 A.2d 774 (1951).

The Nat’l State Bank of Newark v. Stuart 8 N.J. 72, 83 A.2d 715 (1951).

Capone v. Norton, 8 N.J. 54, 83 A.2d 710 (1951).

Horsman Dolls, Inc. v. Unemployment Comp. Comm’n of N.J., 7 N.J. 541, 8 A.2d 177 (1951).

Cent. R.R. Co. of N.J. v. Dep’t of Pub. Utils. 7 N.J. 247, 81 A.2d 162 (1951).

State v. Janiec, 6 N.J. 608, 80 A.2d 94 (1951).

Weaver v. N.J. Dep’t of Civil Serv. 6 N.J. 553, 79 A.2d 305 (1951).

Shields v. The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. 6 N.J. 517, 79 A.2d 297 (1951).

Weaver v. Twp. of N. Bergen, 6 N.J. 475, 79 A.2d 286 (1951).

Employers Liab. Assurance Corp. v. Haidt 6 N.J. 471, 79 A. 2d 308 (1951).

Bankers Trust v. Bacot, 6 N.J. 426, 78 A.2d 904 (1951).

Seylaz v. Bennett, 5 N.J. 168, 74 A.2d 309 (1950).

Page 393

Wolff v. Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post U715 5 N.J. 143, 74 A.2d 253 (1950).

In re The Evening Journal Ass’n, 5 N.J. 142, 74 A.2d 303 (1950).

Brinn v. Mennen Co., 4 N.J. 610, 73 A.2d 541 (1950).

Sheild v. Welch, 4 N.J. 563, 73 A.2d 536 (1950).

Eberhard v. Eberhard, 4 N.J. 535, 73 A.2d 554 (1950).

Green’s Hotel v. Commercial Cos. Ins. Co. 4 N.J. 517, 73 A.2d 349 (1950).

Flexmir, Inc. v. Lindeman Co. 4 N.J. 509, 73 A.2d 243 (1950).

Truhlar v. Borough of E. Paterson 4 N.J. 490, 73 A.2d 163 (1950).

Kays v. Town of Newton, 4 N.J. 356, 73 A.2d 64 (1950).

Moses v. Edward H Ellis, Inc., 4 N.J. 315, 72 A.2d 856 (1950).

State v. Pierce, 4 N.J. 252, 72 A.2d 305 (1950).

Corson v. Keane, 4 N.J. 221, 72 A.2d 314 (1950).

Cresse v. Nuneville, 4 N.J. 128, 71 A.2d 715 (1950).

Nat’l Bank of N.J. v. Div. Tax Appeals 2 N.J. 570, 67 A.2d 458 (1949).

Jamouneau v. Div. of Tax Appeals, 2 N.J. 325, 66 A.2d 534 (1949).

Zanzonico v. Zanzonico, 2 N.J. 309, 66 A.2d 530 (1949).

Agnew v. Am. Ice Co., 2 N.J. 291, 66 A.2d 330 (1949).

Anschelewitz v. Belmar, 2 N.J. 178, 65 A.2d 825 (1949).

Wilber v. Owens, 2 N.J. 167, 65 A.2d 843 (1949).

Matawan Bank v. Matawan Tile Co., 2 N.J. 116, 65 A.2d 729 (1949).

Bruns v. Mattocks, 2 N.J. 83, 65 A.2d 745 (1949).

Steinbrugge v. Steinbrugge, 2 N.J. 77, 65 A.2d 606 (1949).

Pa. R.R. Co. v. N.J. State Aviation Comm’n 2 N.J. 64, 65 A.2d 61 (1949).

Williams v. Evenstein, 2 N.J. 60, 65 A.2d 521 (1949).

Page 394

Huber v. New England Tree Expert Co. 2 N.J. 53, 65 A.2d 514 (1949).

Handler v. Horns, 2 N.J. 18, 65 A.2d 523 (1949).

Isserman v. Isserman, 2 N.J. 1, 65 A.2d 508 (1949).

Marx v. Rice, 1 N.J. 574, 65 A.2d 48 (1949).

DeMuro v. Martini 1 N.J. 516, 64 A.2d 351 (1949).

Dujfcon Concrete Prods, v. Borough of Cresskill 1 N.J. 509, 64 A.2d 347 (1949).

N.J. Realty Title v. Div. of Tax Appeals 1 N.J. 496, 64 A.2d 341 (1949).

Dickerson v. Camden Trust Co., 1 N.J. 459, 64 A.2d 214 (1949).

Hoyt v. Orcutt, 1 N.J. 454, 64 A.2d 212 (1949).

Gallena v. Scott, 1 N.J. 430, 64 A.2d 77 (1949).

Cent. Hanover Bank Trust Co. v. Herbert 1 N.J. 426, 64 A. 2d 75 (1949).

Russo v. Wright Aeronautical Corp. 1 N.J. 417, 64 A.2d 71 (1949).

Town of Kearny v. Div. of Tax Appeals 1 N.J. 409, 64 A.2d 67 (1949).

Nixon v. Borough of Matawan, 1 N.J. 408, 64 A.2d 66 (1949).

Toth v. Bigelow, 1 N.J. 399, 64 A.2d 62 (1949).

State v. Hogan, 1 N.J. 375, 63 A.2d 886 (1949).

Miske v. Habay, 1 N.J. 368, 63 A.2d 883 (1949).

Taber v. State Bd. of Registration Examination in Dentistry of N.J., 1 N.J. 343, 63 A.2d 535 (1949).

Temple v. Clinton Trust Co., 1 N.J. 219, 62 A.2d 690 (1948).

Kaplan v. Meranus, 1 N.J. 219, 62 A.2d 689 (1948).

Rottinger v. Friedhof 1 N.J. 206, 62 A.2d 683 (1948).

New Jersey Bankers Ass’n v. Van Riper 1 N.J. 193, 62 A.2d 677 (1948).

Page 395

L. Bamberger Co. v. Div. of Tax Appeals 1 N.J. 151, 62 A.2d 389 (1948).

Nauman v. Cent. Lafayette Realty Co. 1 N.J. 124, 62 A.2d 218 (1948).

Atlas Fence Co. v. W. Ridgelavm Cemetery 1 N.J. 110, 62 A.2d 212 (1948).

Chipolone v. Mun. Council of Clifton 1 N.J. 93, 61 A.2d 896 (1948).

Oldfield v. N.J. Realty Co., 1 N.J. 63, 61 A.2d 767 (1948).

State v. Wester, 1 N.J. 58, 6 A.2d 746 (1948).

Lakewood Express Serv. v. Bd. of Pub. Util. Comm’rs 1 N.J. 45, 61 A.2d 730 (1948).

Sanders v. Jarka, 1 N.J. 36, 6 A.2d 641 (1948).

Spence v. Maier, 1 N.J. 36, 61 A.2d 590 (1948).

State v. Van Riper, 1 N.J. 14, 61 A.2d 503 (1948).

Appendix “BCompendium, of cases in which only six Justices participated

Comm. to Recall Robert Menendezfrom the Office of U.S. Senator v. Wells, 204 N.J. 79, 7 A.3d 720 (2010).

Alexander v. Seton Hall Univ., 204 N.J. 219, 8 A.3d 198 (2010).

In re Expungement Petition of D.H. 204 N.J. 7, 6 A.3d 421 (2010).

Lewis v. Harris, 202 N.J. 340, 997 A.2d 227 (2010).

Estate of Hanges v. Metro. Prop. Cos. Ins. Co. 202 N.J. 369, 997 A.2d 954 (2010).

State v. Basil, 202 N.J. 570, 998 A.2d 472 (2010).

Linden Bd. of Educ. v. Linden Educ. Ass’n ex rel. Mizichko, 202 N.J. 268, 997 A.2d 185 (2010).

Guido v. Duane Morris LLP, 202 N.J. 79, 995 A.2d 844 (2010).

Page 396

State v. CarvajaJ, 202 N.J. 214, 996 A.2d 1029 (2010).

Salzano v. N. Jersey Media Group Inc. 201 N.J. 500, 993 A.2d 778 (2010).

State v. Mai 202 N.J. 12, 993 A.2d 1216 (2010).

In re Gross, 202 N.J. 39, 994 A.2d 523 (2010).

City of Atl. City v. Trupos, 201 N.J. 447, 992 A.2d 762 (2010).

Reyes v. Egner, 201 N.J. 417, 991 A.2d 216 (2010).

In re Petition for Referendum on Trenton Ordinance 09-02, 201 N.J. 349, 990 A.2d 1109 (2010).

State v. McCabe, 201 N.J. 34, 987 A.2d 567 (2010).

Zabilowicz v. Kelsey, 200 N.J. 507, 984 A.2d 872 (2009).

Highland Lakes Country Club Cmty. Ass’n v. Nicastro, 201 N.J. 123, 988 A.2d 90 (2009).

In re State Grand Jury Investigation 200 N.J. 481, 983 A.2d 1097 (2009).

In re Attorney Gen. `s “Directive on Exit Polling: Media Non-partisan Pub. Interest Groups200 N.J. 283, 981 A.2d 64 (2009).

State v. Taccetta, 200 N.J. 183, 975 A.2d 928 (2009).

Pellicer ex rel. Pellicer v. St. Barnabas Hosp. 200 N.J. 22, 974 A.2d 1070 (2009).

Fernandez v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 199 N.J. 591, 974 A.2d 1031 (2009).

Berk Cohen Assocs. v. Borough of Clayton 199 N.J. 432, 972 A. 2d 1141 (2009).

Shore Orthopaedic Group, LLC v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc’y, 199 N.J. 310, 972 A.2d 381 (2009).

Lee v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 199 N.J. 251, 971 A.2d 1054 (2009).

G.H. v. Twp. of Galloway, 199 N.J. 135, 971 A.2d 401 (2009).

Leang v. Jersey City Bd. of Educ. 198 N.J. 557, 969 A.2d 1097 (2009).

Page 397

Twp. of W. Orange v. 769 Assocs. 198 N.J. 529, 969 A.2d 1080 (2009).

DEG, LLC v. Twp. of Fairfield, 198 N.J. 242, 966 A.2d 1036 (2009).

State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 965 A.2d 1181 (2009).

Bosland v. Warnock Dodge, Inc., 197 N.J. 543, 964 A.2d 741 (2009).

M.S. v. Millburn Police Dep’t, 197 N.J. 236, 962 A.2d 515 (2008).

Sroczynski v. Milek, 197 N.J. 36, 961 A.2d 704 (2008).

Borough of Glassboro v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 108, 197 N.J. 1, 960 A.2d 735 (2008).

Abbott ex rel. Abbott v. Burke, 196 N.J. 451, 956 A.2d 923 (2008).

In re Estate of Stockdale, 196 N.J. 275, 953 A.2d 454 (2008).

In re Taylor, 196 N.J. 162, 952 A.2d 1025 (2008).

N.J. Div. of Youth Family Servs. v. E.P. 196 N.J. 88, 952 A.2d 436 (2008).

Mason v. City of Hoboken, 196 N.J. 51, 951 A.2d 1017 (2008).

State v. Ingram, 196 N.J. 23, 95 A.2d 1000 (2008).

Amerada Hess Corp. v. Burlington County Planning Bd. 195 N.J. 616, 951 A.2d 970 (2008).

McMahon v. City of Newark, 195 N.J. 526, 951 A.2d 185 (2008).

Chubb Custom Ins. Co. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. 195 N.J. 231, 948 A.2d 1285 (2008).

Bedford v. Riello, 195 N.J. 210, 948 A.2d 1272 (2008).

State v. Rodriguez, 195 N.J. 165, 949 A.2d 197 (2008).

State v. Burr, 195 N.J. 119, 948 A.2d 627 (2008).

Sinclair v. Merck Co., 195 N.J. 51, 948 A.2d 587 (2008).

Cruz v. Cent. Jersey Landscaping, Inc. 195 N.J. 33, 947 A.2d 1228 (2008).

Page 398

Villa v. Short, 195 N.J. 15, 947 A.2d 1217 (2008).

Owens v. Feigin, 194 N.J. 607, 947 A.2d 653 (2008).

Romagnola v. Gillespie, Inc., 194 N.J. 596, 947 A.2d 646 (2008).

Rutgers Cos. Ins. Co. v. LaCroix 194 N.J. 515, 946 A.2d 1027 (2008).

Reilly v. AAA Mid Atl. Ins. Co. of N.J. 194 N.J. 474, 946 A.2d 564 (2008).

Wein v. Morris, 194 N.J. 364, 944 A.2d 642 (2008).

In re Alleged Improper Practice Under Section XI, Paragraph A(d) of the Port Auth. Labor Relations Instruction 194 N.J. 314, 944 A.2d 611 (2008).

Toll Bros. v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington 194 N.J. 223, 944 A.2d 1 (2008).

State v. Chun, 194 N.J. 54, 943 A.2d 114 (2008).

Oberhand v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 193 N.J. 558, 940 A.2d 1202 (2008).

State v. Shane, 193 N.J. 423, 939 A.2d 796 (2008).

In re Kivler, 193 N.J. 332, 939 A.2d 216 (2008).

State v. Froland, 193 N.J. 186, 936 A.2d 947 (2007).

State v. O’Neill, 193 N.J. 148, 936 A.2d 438 (2007).

Maglies v. Estate of Guy, 193 N.J. 108, 936 A.2d 414 (2007).

Northvale Bd. Of Educ. v. Northvale Educ. Ass’n 192 N.J. 501, 933 A.2d 596 (2007).

State v. Parks, 192 N.J. 483, 933 A.2d 586 (2007).

Pascack Valley Reg’l High Sch. Bd. of Educ. v. Pascack Valley Reg’l Support Staff Ass’n, 192 N.J. 489, 933 A.2d 589 (2007).

State v. Parks, 192 N.J. 483, 933 A.2d 586 (2007).

State v. Meyer, 192 N.J. 421, 930 A.2d 428 (2007).

D’Annunzio v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. 192 N.J. 110, 927 A.2d 113 (2007).

Page 399

In re Advisory Comm. on Prof’l Ethics Opinion 705 192 N.J. 46, 926 A.2d 839 (2007).

In re Herrmann, 192 N.J. 19, 926 A.2d 350 (2007).

State v. Williams, 192 N.J. 1, 926 A.2d 340 (2007).

State v. Francis, 191 N.J. 571, 926 A.2d 305 (2007).

State v. Clark, 191 N.J. 503, 924 A.2d 542 (2007).

Thurber v. City of Burlington, 191 N.J. 487, 924 A.2d 533 (2007).

State v. Jimenez, 191 N.J. 453, 924 A.2d 513 (2007).

In re Gordon, 191 N.J. 451, 924 A.2d 512 (2007).

In re Lead Paint Litig., 191 N.J. 405, 924 A.2d 484 (2007).

Raspa v. Office of Sheriff of County of Gloucester 191 N.J. 323, 924 A.2d 435 (2007).

In re Venezia, 191 N.J. 259, 922 A.2d 1263 (2007).

Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 191 N.J. 88, 922 A.2d 710 (2007).

Brenman v. Demello, 191 N.J. 18, 921 A.2d 1110 (2007).

State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 921 A.2d 954 (2007).

First Union Nat’l Bank v. Penn Salem Marina, Inc. 190 N.J. 342, 921 A.2d 417 (2007).

Toll Bros. v. Twp. of W. Windsor 190 N.J. 61, 918 A.2d 595 (2007).

Bd. of Educ. of Borough of Alpha, Warren County v. Alpha Educ. Assoc., 190 N.J. 34, 918 A.2d 579 (2006).

State v. Fortin, 189 N.J. 579, 917 A.2d 746 (2007).

State v. Fleischman, 189 N.J. 539, 917 A.2d 722 (2007).

T.H. v. Div. of Developmental Disabilities 189 N.J. 478, 916 A.2d 1025 (2007).

J.D.A. v. N.J. Dep’t of Corr., 189 N.J. 413, 915 A.2d 1041 (2007).

Carmona v. Resorts Int’l Hotel Inc. 189 N.J. 354, 915 A.2d 518 (2007).

Page 400

N.J. Div. of Youth Family Servs. v. MM 189 N.J. 261, 914 A.2d 1265 (2007).

Hodges v. Sasil Corp., 189 N.J. 210, 915 A.2d 1 (2007).

State v. Samuels, 189 N.J. 236, 914 A.2d 1250 (2007).

Davidson v. Slater, 189 N.J. 166, 914 A.2d 282 (2007).

State v. O’Hagen, 189 N.J. 140, 914 A.2d 267 (2007).

AA ex rel. B.A v. Attorney Gen. of N.J. 189 N.J. 128, 914 A.2d 260 (2007).

State v. Dispoto, 189 N.J. 108, 913 A.2d 791 (2007).

Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, Del 189 N.J. 1, 912 A.2d 88 (2006).

Wiese v. Dedhia, 188 N.J. 587, 91 A.2d 479 (2006).

In re Mathesius, 188 N.J. 496, 910 A.2d 594 (2006).

Lanco, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 188 N.J. 380, 908 A.2d 176 (2006).

State v. Mahoney, 188 N.J. 359, 908 A.2d 162 (2006).

In re T.T., 188 N.J. 321, 907 A.2d 416 (2006).

State v. Pierce, 188 N.J. 155, 902 A.2d 1195 (2006).

State v. Thomas, 188 N.J. 137, 902 A.2d 1185 (2006).

Hardmcke v. American Boy choir Sck 188 N.J. 69, 902 A.2d 900 (2006).

Marshall v. Klebanov, 188 N.J. 23, 902 A.2d 873 (2006).

N.J. Transit Bus Operations, Inc. v. Amalgamated Transit Union, 187 N.J. 546, 902 A.2d 209 (2006).

Infinity Broad, Corp. v. N.J. Meadowlands Comm’n 187 N.J. 212, 901 A.2d 312 (2006).

State v. Thomas, 187 N.J. 119, 900 A.2d 797 (2006).

Prado v. State, 186 N.J. 413, 895 A.2d 1154 (2006).

In re P.L. 2001, Chapter 362, 186 N.J. 368, 895 A.2d 1128 (2006).

Page 401

Fitzgerald v. Stanley Roberts, Inc. 186 N.J. 286, 895 A.2d 405 (2006).

Pasqua v. Council, 186 N.J. 127, 892 A.2d 663 (2006).

N.J. Lawyers’ Fund for Client Prot. v. Pace 186 N.J. 123, 892 A.2d 661 (2006).

State v. Gyori, 185 N.J. 422, 887 A.2d 156 (2005).

St Peter’s Univ. Hosp. v. Lacy, 185 N.J. 1, 878 A.2d 829 (2005).

Shankman v. State, 184 N.J. 187, 876 A.2d 269 (2005).

French v. Hernandez, 184 N.J. 144, 875 A.2d 943 (2005).

Serrano v. Serrano, 183 N.J. 508, 874 A.2d 1058 (2005).

DiProspero v. Perm, 183 N.J. 477, 874 A.2d 1039 (2005).

Murawski v. CNA Ins. Co., 183 N.J. 423, 874 A.2d 530 (2005).

Pinto v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co., 183 N.J. 405, 874 A.2d 520 (2005).

Schundler v. Donovan, 183 N.J. 383, 874 A.2d 506 (2005).

Mun. Council v. James, 183 N.J. 361, 873 A.2d 544 (2005).

Cumberland Mut Fire Ins. Co. v. Murphy 183 N.J. 344, 873 A.2d 534 (2005).

Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC 183 N.J. 234, 872 A.2d 783 (2005).

Nav-Its, Inc. v. Selective Ins. Co. 183 N.J. 110, 869 A.2d 929 (2005).

In re Harris, 182 N.J. 594, 868 A.2d 1011 (2005).

Price v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co., 182 N.J. 519, 867 A.2d 1181 (2005).

Moon v. Warren Haven Nursing Home 182 N.J. 507, 867 A.2d 1174 (2005).

State v. Branch, 182 N.J. 338, 865 A.2d 673 (2005).

Szczuvelek v. Harborside Healthcare Woods Edge 182 N.J. 275, 865 A.2d 636 (2005).

Abbott v. Burke, 182 N.J. 153, 862 A.2d 538 (2004).

Page 402

Info. Spectrum, Inc. v. The Hartford 182 N.J. 34, 860 A.2d 926 (2004).

Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc., 182 N.J. 1, 860 A.2d 435 (2004).

State v. Reddish, 181 N.J. 553, 859 A.2d 1173 (2004).

State v. Jarrells, 181 N.J. 538, 859 A.2d 451 (2004).

State v. Harris, 181 N.J. 391, 859 A.2d 364 (2004).

State v. Hodde, 181 N.J. 375, 858 A.2d 1126 (2004).

Casinelli v. Manglapus, 181 N.J. 354, 858 A.2d 1113 (2004).

Auto Lenders Acceptance Corp. v. Gentilini Ford, Inc. 181 N.J. 245, 854 A.2d 378 (2004).

Estate of Frankl v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Co 181 N.J. 1, 853 A.2d 880 (2004).

In re the Petition for Authorization to Conduct a Referendum on the Withdrawal of N. Haledon Sch. District from the Passaic County Manchester Reg’l High Sch. District 181 N.J. 161, 854 A.2d 327 (2004).

State v. Guenther, 181 N.J. 129, 854 A.2d 308 (2004).

Tarrv. Ciasulli 181 N.J. 70, 853 A.2d 921 (2004).

In re Keri, 181 N.J. 50, 853 A.2d 909 (2004).

State v. Moore, 181 N.J. 40, 853 A.2d 903 (2004).

State v. Pineiro, 181 N.J. 13, 853 A.2d 887 (2004).

Varsolona v. Breen Capital Servs. Corp. 180 N.J. 605, 853 A.2d 865 (2004).

State v. Brown, 180 N.J. 572, 853 A.2d 260 (2004).

State v. Bunch, 180 N.J. 534, 853 A.2d 238 (2004).

Dziewiecki v. Bakula, 180 N.J. 528, 853 A.2d 234 (2004).

N.J. Div. of Youth Family Servs. v. P.P. 180 N.J. 494, 852 A.2d 1093 (2004).

In re Freshwater Wetlands Prot. Act Rules 180 N.J. 478, 852 A.2d 1083 (2004).

Page 403

James v. Petitioners for Initiative Referendum Challenging Neward City Ordinance No. 6S FH 180 N.J. 456, 852 A.2d 192 (2004).

In re Freshwater Wetlands Prot. Act Rules 180 N.J. 415, 852 AM 167 (2004).

Univ. of Mass. Mem’l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Christodoulou 180 N.J. 334, 851 A.2d 636 (2004).

State v. Ways, 180 N.J. 171, 850 A.2d 440 (2004).

Comparato v. Schait, 180 N.J. 90, 848 A.2d 770 (2004).

Selective Ins. Co. of Am. v. Thomas 179 N.J. 616, 847 A.2d 578 (2004).

In re of the N.J. Individual Health Coverage Program’s Readoption of N.J.AC. 11:20-1 et seq. 179 N.J. 570, 847 AM 552 (2004).

State v. Cook, 179 N.J. 533, 847 A.2d 530 (2004).

Island Venture Assocs. v. N.J. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot 179 N.J. 485, 846 A.2d 1228 (2004).

Maw v. Advanced Clinical Communs., Inc. 179 N.J. 439, 846 A.2d 604 (2004).

Borteck v. Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland Perretti, LLP, 179 N.J. 246, 844 AM 521 (2004).

Craft v. Stevenson Lumber Yard, Inc. 179 N.J. 56, 843 A.2d 1076 (2004).

Verdicchio v. Ricca, 179 N.J. 1, 843 AM 1042 (2004).

State v. Fortin, 178 N.J. 540, 843 AM 974 (2004).

State v. Milne, 178 N.J. 486, 842 A.2d 140 (2004).

State v. P.H., 178 N.J. 378, 840 A.2d 808 (2004).

State v. Jenkins, 178 N.J. 347, 840 A.2d 242 (2004).

Macedo v. Delia Russo, 178 N.J. 340, 840 A.2d 238 (2004).

State v. Oliphant, 178 N.J. 245, 837 A.2d 1089 (2003).

In re Gallo, 178 N.J. 115, 835 A.2d 682 (2003).

Page 404

In re N.J. Individual Health Coverage Program’s Readoption of N.J.A.C. 11:20-1, 178 N.J. 106, 835 A.2d 321 (2003).

State v. Natale, 178 N.J. 51, 834 A.2d 1024 (2003).

State v. Greeley, 178 N.J. 38, 834 A.2d 1016 (2003).

State v. Artwell, 177 N.J. 526, 832 A.2d 295 (2003).

Jumpp v. City of Ventnor, 177 N.J. 470, 828 A.2d 905 (2003).

Lockley v. Dep’t of Corr., 177 N.J. 413, 828 A.2d 869 (2003).

State v. Holland, 176 N.J. 344, 823 A.2d 38 (2003).

Tischlerv. Watts, 177 N.J. 243, 827 A.2d 1036 (2003).

State v. Garron, 177 N.J. 147, 827 A.2d 243 (2003).

N.J. Transit Corp. v. Cat in the Hat, LLC 177 N.J. 29, 826 A.2d 690 (2003).

Hous. Auth. v. Suydam Investors, L.L.C. 177 N.J. 2, 826 A.2d 673 (2003).

Crippen v. Cent. Jersey Concrete Pipe Co. 176 N.J. 397, 823 A.2d 789 (2003).

Tomeo v. Thomas Whitesell Constr. Co. 176 N.J. 366, 823 A.2d 769 (2003).

State v. Holland, 176 N.J. 344, 823 A.2d 38 (2003).

Kosmowski v. ML City Med. Ctr., 175 N.J. 568, 818 A.2d 319 (2003).

Nisivoccia v. Glass Gardens, Inc. 175 N.J. 559, 818 A.2d 314 (2003).

Van Note-Harvey Assocs., P.C. v. Twp. of E. Hanover 175 N.J. 535, 816 A.2d 1041 (2003).

State v. Brooks, 175 N.J. 215, 814 A.2d 1051 (2002).

Mortara v. Cigna Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. 174 N.J. 566, 811 A.2d 404 (2002).

Lonegan v. State, 174 N.J. 435, 809 A.2d 91 (2002).

Page 405

Mattunri v. Bd. of Trs. of the Judicial Ret. Sys. 173 N.J. 368, 802 A.2d 496 (2002).

State v. Marshall, 173 N.J. 343, 801 A.2d 1142 (2002).

Couri v. Gardner, 173 N.J. 328, 801 A.2d 1134 (2002).

In re PSE G Shareholder Litigation 173 N.J. 258, 80 A.2d 295 (2002).

In re R.S., 173 N.J. 134, 801 A.2d 219 (2002).

In re Commitment of W.Z., 173 N.J. 109, 801 A.2d 205 (2002).

Viscik v. Fowler Equip. Co., 173 N.J. 1, 800 A.2d 826 (2002).

Balli/nger v. Del. River Port Autk 172 N.J. 586, 800 A.2d 97 (2002).

Abbott v. Burke, 172 N.J. 294, 798 A.2d 602 (2002).

Di Maria Constr. v. Interarch, 172 N.J. 182, 797 A.2d 137 (2002).

Starkey v. Estate of Nicolaysen, 172 N.J. 60, 796 A.2d 238 (2002).

O’Connell v. State, 171 N.J. 484, 795 A.2d 857 (2002).

Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. v. Simone 170 N.J. 438, 790 A.2d 157 (2002).

Bd. of Educ. of Englewood Cliffs v. Bd. of Educ. of Englewood, 170 N.J. 323, 788 A.2d 729 (2002).

Heher v. Smith, 170 N.J. 213, 785 A.2d 907 (2001).

Dep’t of Labor v. Pepsi-Cola Co. 170 N.J. 59, 784 A.2d 64 (2001).

Trinity Cemetery Ass’n v. Twp. of Wall 170 N.J. 39, 784 A.2d 52 (2001).

Campbell v. N.J. Racing Comm’n, 169 N.J. 579, 781 A.2d 1035 (2001).

State v. Fowlkes, 169 N.J. 387, 778 A.2d 422 (2001).

State v. Wade, 169 N.J. 302, 777 A.2d 346 (2001).

In re Williams, 169 N.J. 264, 777 A.2d 323 (2001).

State v. Sullivan, 169 N.J. 204, 777 A.2d 60 (2001).

Page 406

Zacarias v. Allstate Ins. Co., 168 N.J. 590, 775 A.2d 1262 (2001).

Palanque v. Lambert-Woolley, 168 N.J. 398, 774 A.2d 501 (2001).

Hubbard v. Reed, 168 N.J. 387, 774 A.2d 495 (2001).

Mahoney v. Podolnick, 168 N.J. 202, 773 A.2d 1102 (2001).

Do-Wop Corp. v. City of Rahway, 168 N.J. 191, 773 A.2d 706 (2001).

State v. Manzie, 168 N.J. 113, 773 A.2d 659 (2001).

Fink v. Thompson, 167 N.J. 551, 772 A.2d 386 (2001).

Christie v. Jeney, 167 N.J. 509, 772 A.2d 361 (2001).

State v. Rolex, 167 N.J. 447, 77 A.2d 1206 (2001).

Galik v. Clara Maass Med. Ctr., 167 N.J. 341, 771 A.2d 1141 (2001).

Allen v. Fauver, 167 N.J. 69, 768 A.2d 1055 (2001).

State v. Rumblin, 166 N.J. 550, 766 A.2d 1141 (2001).

State v. Johnson, 166 N.J. 523, 766 A.2d 1126 (2001).

In re Convery, 166 N.J. 298, 765 A.2d 724 (2001).

City Check Cashing v. Mfrs. Hanover Trust Co. 166 N.J. 49, 764 A.2d 411 (2001).

In re Samay, 166 N.J. 25, 764 A.2d 398 (2001).

In re Jackman, 165 N.J. 580, 761 A.2d 1103 (2000).

State v. Feaster, 165 N.J. 388, 757 A.2d 266 (2000).

State v. Harris, 165 N.J. 303, 757 A.2d 221 (2000).

State v. Morton, 165 N.J. 235, 757 A.2d 184 (2000).

In re Liquidation of Integrity Ins. Co. 165 N.J. 75, 754 A.2d 1177 (2000).

Cox v. RKA Corp., 164 N.J. 487, 753 A.2d 1112 (2000).

In re Pena, 164 N.J. 222, 753 A.2d 633 (2000).

Am. Trucking Ass’ns, Inc. v. State 164 N.J. 183, 752 A.2d 1286 (2000).

Page 407

In re Kelly, 164 N.J. 173, 752 A.2d 715 (2000).

Kurzke v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. 164 N.J. 159, 752 A.2d 708 (2000).

Beauchamp v. Amedio, 164 N.J. 111, 751 A.2d 1047 (2000).

Ventola v. N.J. Veteran’s Mem’l Home 164 N.J. 74, 751 A.2d 559 (2000).

Greenway Dev. Co. v. Borough of Paramus 163 N.J. 546, 750 A.2d 764 (2000).

Wymbs v. Twp. of Wayne, 163 N.J. 523, 750 A.2d 751 (2000).

In re Schwartz, 163 N.J. 501, 750 A.2d 88 (2000).

Wanetick v. Gateway Mitsubishi 163 N.J. 484, 750 A.2d 79 (2000).

Golden v. County of Union, 163 N.J. 420, 749 A.2d 842 (2000).

State v. Lark, 163 N.J. 294, 748 A.2d 1103 (2000).

In re Wright, 163 N.J. 133, 748 A.2d 103 (2000). 163 N.J. 16, 163 N.J. 95 (2000).

Gallagher v. Burdette-Tomlin Mem. Hosp. 163 N.J. 38, 747 A.2d 262 (2000).

Mancuso v. Neckles, 163 N.J. 26, 747 A.2d 255 (2000). State v. Burford 163 N.J. 16, 746 A.2d 998 (2000).

Aponte-Correa v. Allstate Ins. Co. 162 N.J. 318, 744 A.2d 175 (2000).

Blank v. City of Elizabeth, 162 N.J. 150, 742 A.2d 540 (1999).

Baker v. Nat’l State Bank, 161 N.J. 220, 736 A.2d 462 (1999).

In re Opinion 33 of the Comm. on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, 160 N.J. 63, 733 A.2d 478 (1999).

New Brunswick Cellular Tel. Co. v. Borough of S. Plainfield Bd. of Adjustment, 160 N.J. 1, 733 A.2d 442 (1999).

Gibson v. Callaghan, 158 N.J. 662, 730 A.2d 1278 (1999).

Eagan v. Boyarsky, 158 N.J. 632, 73 A.2d 28 (1999).

Page 408

Lowe v. Zarghami 158 N.J. 606, 731 A.2d 14 (1999).

In re Di Martini, 158 N.J. 439, 730 A.2d 346 (1999).

In re Hodge, 158 N.J. 289, 729 A.2d 1020 (1999).

R R Mktg., L.L.C. v. Broum-Forman Corp. 158 N.J. 170, 729 A.2d 1 (1999).

State v. Cromedy, 158 N.J. 112, 727 A.2d 457 (1999).

A v. B., 158 N.J. 51, 726 A.2d 924 (1999).

State v. Caliguiri 158 N.J. 28, 726 A.2d 912 (1999).

State v. Covell, 157 N.J. 554, 725 A.2d 675 (1999).

Spencer v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co. 156 N.J. 455, 720 A.2d 601 (1998).

Laufgas v. N.J Tpk. Autk, 156 N.J. 436, 720 A.2d 335 (1998).

State v. Nelson, 155 N.J. 487, 715 A.2d 281 (1998).

James v. Bessemer Processing Co. 155 N.J. 279, 714 A.2d 898 (1998).

State v. Smith, 155 N.J. 83, 713 A.2d 1033 (1998).

State v. Zeidell, 154 N.J. 417, 713 A.2d 401 (1998).

State v. Pennington, 154 N.J. 344, 712 A.2d 1133 (1998).

Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Admiral Ins. Co. 154 N.J. 312, 712 A.2d 1116 (1998).

Unisys Corp. v. Ins. Co. of N Am. 154 N.J. 217, 712 A.2d 649 (1998).

Pfizer, Inc. v. Employers Ins., 154 N.J. 187, 712 A.2d 634 (1998).

Trantino v. N.J. State Parole Bd. 154 N.J. 19, 711 A.2d 260 (1998).

Mehlman v. Mobil Oil Corp., 153 N.J. 163, 707 A.2d 1000 (1998).

State v. Dickey, 152 N.J. 468, 706 A.2d 180 (1998).

Marsh v. N.J. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot. 152 N.J. 137, 703 A.2d 927 (1997).

Page 409

County of Hudson v. Dep’t of Corr. 152 N.J. 60, 703 A.2d 268 (1997).

United Water Res. v. N. Jersey Dist. Water Supply Comm’n, 151 N.J. 497, 701 A.2d 434 (1997).

State v. Harvey, 151 N.J. 117, 699 A.2d 596 (1997).

GMC v. City of Linden, 151 N.J. 462, 700 A.2d 875 (1997).

State v. Villar, 150 N.J. 503, 696 A.2d 674 (1997).

N.J. Tpk. Auth. v. Am. Fed’n of State, County, Mun. Employees, Council 73, 150 N.J. 331, 696 A.2d 585 (1997).

Lemelledo v. Beneficial Mgmt. Corp. 150 N.J. 255, 696 A.2d 546 (1997).

In re Imbriani 149 N.J. 521, 694 A.2d 1030 (1997).

Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets 149 N.J. 496, 694 A.2d 1017 (1997).

Kiken v. Kiken, 149 N.J. 441, 694 A.2d 557 (1997).

Brock v. Pub. Serv. Elec. Gas Co. 149 N.J. 378, 693 A.2d 894 (1997).

Abbott by Abbott v. Burke, 149 N.J. 145, 693 A.2d 417 (1997).

Twp. of Voorhees v. N.J. Dep’t of Envtl. Prat. 149 N.J. 119, 693 A.2d 97 (1997).

In re Return of Weapons to J.W.D. 149 N.J. 108, 693 A.2d 92 (1997).

Bd. of Trs. of Operating Eng’rs Local 825 Fund Serv. Facilities v. L.B.S. Const. Co., 148 N.J. 561, 691 A.2d 339 (1997).

State v. Marshall, 148 N.J. 89, 690 A.2d 1 (1997).

Keddie v. Rutgers, 148 N.J. 36, 689 A.2d 702 (1997).

Whitaker v. DeVilla, 147 N.J. 341, 687 A.2d 738 (1997).

Ivaldi v. Ivaldi 147 N.J. 190, 685 A.2d 1319 (1996).

Del Tufo v. Twp. of Old Bridge, 147 N.J. 90, 685 A.2d 1267 (1996).

In re Registrant G.B., 147 N.J. 62, 685 A.2d 1252 (1996).

Page 410

State v. Medina, 147 N.J. 43, 685 A.2d 1242 (1996).

In re La Vigne, 146 N.J. 590, 684 A.2d 1362 (1996).

State v. Wallace, 146 N.J. 576, 684 A.2d 1355 (1996).

Strasenburgh v. Straubmuller, 146 N.J. 527, 683 A.2d 818 (1996).

In re Inquiry of Broadbelt, 146 N.J. 501, 683 A.2d 543 (1996).

State v. Hightower, 146 N.J. 239, 680 A.2d 649 (1996).

State v. Roach, 146 N.J. 208, 680 A.2d 634 (1996).

Kubis Perszyk Assocs. v. Sun Microsystems 146 N.J. 176, 680 A.2d 618 (1996).

Cohen v. Radio-Electronics Officers Union 146 N.J. 140, 679 A.2d 1188 (1996).

In re N.N., 146 N.J. 112, 679 A.2d 1174 (1996).

In re Registrant, C.A., 146 N.J. 71, 679 A.2d 1153 (1996).

In re D.C., 146 N.J. 31, 679 A.2d 634 (1996).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Licensed Bev. Ins. Exch., 146 N.J. 1, 679 A.2d 620 (1996).

Holgate Prop. Assocs. v. Twp. of Howell 145 N.J. 590, 679 A.2d 613 (1996).

State v. Womack, 145 N.J. 576, 679 A.2d 606 (1996).

R.C. Maxwell Co. v. Galloway Twp. 145 N.J. 547, 679 A.2d 141 (1996).

State v. Burns, 145 N.J. 509, 679 A.2d 121 (1996).

Gantes v. Kason Corp., 145 N.J. 478, 679 A.2d 106 (1996).

State v. G.S., 145 N.J. 460, 678 A.2d 1092 (1996).

Ahn v. Kim, 145 N.J. 423, 678 A.2d 1073 (1996).

Conklin v. Hannoch Weisman, 145 N.J. 395, 678 A.2d 1060 (1996).

Munoz v. N.J. Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Ass’n 145 N.J. 377, 678 A.2d 1051 (1996).

Page 411

Eagle Fire Prot. Corp. v. First Indem. of Am. Ins. Co., 145 N.J. 345, 678 A.2d 699 (1996).

State v. Chenique-Puey, 145 N.J. 334, 678 A.2d 694 (1996).

Lyn-Anna Props, v. Harborview Dev. Corp. 145 N.J. 313, 678 A.2d 683 (1996).

Brennan v. Orban, 145 N.J. 282, 678 A.2d 667 (1996).

Bd. of Educ. of Newark v. N.J. Dep’t of the Treasury 145 N.J. 269, 678 A.2d 660 (1996).

State v. Abronski, 145 N.J. 265, 678 A.2d 659 (1996).

State v. Knight, 145 N.J. 233, 678 A.2d 642 (1996).

State v. Gerns, 145 N.J. 216, 678 A.2d 634 (1996).

Prevratil v. Mohr, 145 N.J. 180, 678 A.2d 243 (1996).

State v. Kirk, 145 N.J. 159, 678 A.2d 233 (1996).

State v. Kittrell, 145 N.J. 112, 678 A.2d 209 (1996).

In re Univ. of Med. Dentistry of N.J. 144 N.J. 511, 677 A.2d 721 (1996).

State v. Jack, 144 N.J. 240, 676 A.2d 545 (1996).

Weiss v. Carpenter, 143 N.J. 420, 672 A.2d 1132 (1996).

Milos v. Exxon Co., U.S.A., 143 N.J. 333, 671 A.2d 120 (1996).

Pagano v. United Jersey Bank, 143 N.J. 220, 670 A.2d 509 (1996).

In re Beck, 143 N.J. 135, 669 A.2d 238 (1996).

Mazza v. Bd. of Trs., 143 N.J. 22, 667 A.2d 1052 (1995).

Vemest v. INA Underwriters Ins. Co. 142 N.J. 401, 662 A.2d 967 (1995).

Mortgagelinq Corp. v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., 142 N.J. 336, 662 A.2d 536 (1995).

Circle Chevrolet Co. v. Giordano, Halleran Ciesla, 142 N.J. 280, 662 A.2d 509 (1995).

State v. Harris, 141 N.J. 525, 662 A.2d 333 (1995).

Page 412

State v. Mejia, 141 N.J. 475, 662 A.2d 308 (1995).

Silverman v. Berkson, 141 N.J. 412, 661 A.2d 1266 (1995).

Martin v. Home Ins. Co., 141 N.J. 279, 661 A.2d 808 (1995).

Anzalone v. Westech Gear Corp., 141 N.J. 256, 661 A.2d 796 (1995).

Prudential Prop. Cos. Ins. Co. v. Monmouth County Mun. Joint Ins. Fund, 141 N.J. 235, 661 A.2d 785 (1995).

State v. Ball 141 N.J. 142, 661 A.2d 251 (1995).

Higg-A-Rella, Inc. v. County of Essex 141 N.J. 35, 660 A.2d 1163 (1995).

Young v. Schering Corp., 141 N.J. 16, 660 A.2d 1153 (1995).

Mitznerv. Lights 18, 140 N.J. 573, 660 A.2d 480 (1995).

In re Shelly, 140 N.J. 501, 659 A.2d 460 (1995).

Fiore v. Consol. Freightways, 140 N.J. 452, 659 A.2d 436 (1995).

In re Carton, 140 N.J. 330, 658 A.2d 1211 (1995).

State v. Berry, 140 N.J. 280, 658 A.2d 702 (1994).

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lanzaro 140 N.J. 244, 658 A.2d 282 (1995).

Gubernat v. Deremer, 140 N.J. 120, 657 A.2d 856 (1995).

State v. D.D.M., 140 N.J. 83, 657 A.2d 837 (1995).

Straum v. Canuso, 140 N.J. 43, 657 A.2d 420 (1995).

N.J. Steel Corp. v. Warburton, 139 N.J. 536, 655 A.2d 1382 (1995).

P.F. v. N.J. Div. of Developmental Disabilities 139 N.J. 522, 656 A.2d 1 (1995).

Petrillo v. Bachenberg, 139 N.J. 472, 655 A.2d 1354 (1995).

Turf Lawnmower Repair v. Bergen Record Corp. 139 N.J. 392, 655 A.2d 417 (1995).

Roberts v. Rich Foods, 139 N.J. 365, 654 A.2d 1365 (1995).

Page 413

In re Opinion No. 26 of the Comm. 139 N.J. 323, 654 A.2d 1344 (1995).

Gendek v. Poblete, 139 N.J. 291, 654 A.2d 970 (1995).

In re Guidone, 139 N.J. 272, 653 A.2d 1127 (1994).

State v. Nwobu, 139 N.J. 236, 652 A.2d 1209 (1995).

Rutgers Casualty Ins. Co. v. Vassas 139 N.J. 163, 652 A.2d 162 (1995).

Scotch Plains-Fanwood Bd. of Educ. v. Scotch Plains-Fanwood Educ. Ass’n, 139 N.J. 141, 651 A.2d 1018 (1995).

M. Alfieri Co. v. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot. Energy 138 N.J. 642, 651 A.2d 99 (1995).

Ledley v. William Penn Life Ins. Co. 138 N.J. 627, 651 A.2d 92 (1995).

Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co. 138 N.J. 437, 650 A.2d 974 (1994).

Abbamont v. Piscataway Twp. Bd. of Educ. 138 N.J. 405, 650 A.2d 958 (1994).

N.J. Coalition Against War in the Middle E. v. J.M.B. Realty Corp., 138 N.J. 326, 650 A.2d 757 (1994).

Murray v. Lawson, 138 N.J. 206, 649 A.2d 1253 (1994).

Rumbauskas v. Cantor, 138 N.J. 173, 649 A.2d 853 (1994).

Civalier by Civalier v. Estate of Trancucci 138 N.J. 52, 648 A.2d 705 (1994).

Cox v. Sears Roebuck Co., 138 N.J. 2, 647 A.2d 454 (1994).

Paul Revere Life Ins. Co. v. Haas 137 N.J. 190, 644 A.2d 1098 (1994).

Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co. v. Borough of Point Pleasant, 137 N.J. 136, 644 A.2d 598 (1994).

Feinberg v. N.J. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot 137 N.J. 126, 644 A.2d 593 (1994).

Page 414

In re Comm’r of Insurance’s Issuance of Orders A-92-189 A-92-212, 137 N.J. 93, 644 A.2d 576 (1994).

Costello v. Ocean County Observer 136 N.J. 594, 643 A.2d 1012 (1994).

N.J. Div. of Youth Family Servs. v. K.M. 136 N.J. 546, 643 A.2d 987 (1994).

State v. Robinson, 136 N.J. 476, 643 A.2d 591 (1994).

Caldwell v. Haynes, 136 N.J. 422, 643 A.2d 564 (1994).

Booker v. N.J. State Parole Bd. 136 N.J. 257, 642 A.2d 984 (1994).

State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158, 642 A.2d 401 (1994).

Dunphy v. Gregor, 136 N.J. 99, 642 A.2d 372 (1994).

Witkowski v. Thomas J. Upton, 136 N.J. 385, 643 A.2d 546 (1994).

State v. Vawter, 136 N.J. 56, 642 A.2d 349 (1994).

State v. Mortimer, 135 N.J. 517, 641 A.2d 257 (1994).

1530 Owners Corp. v. Borough of Fort Lee 135 N.J. 394, 640 A.2d 811 (1994).

CI.C Corp. v. Twp. of E. Brunswick 135 N.J. 121, 638 A.2d 812 (1994).

Brunswick Corp. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 135 N.J. 107, 638 A.2d 805 (1994).

De Vesa v. Dorsey, 134 N.J. 420, 634 A.2d 493 (1993).

Sears Mortgage Corp. v. Rose, 134 N.J. 326, 634 A.2d 74 (1993).

In re Essex County 1990 Judicial Budget Impasse 133 N.J. 408, 627 A.2d 1123 (1992).

Cupano v. Gluck, 133 N.J. 225, 627 A.2d 624 (1993).

In re Siegel, 133 N.J. 162, 627 A.2d 156 (1993).

Baldasarre v. Butler, 132 N.J. 278, 625 A.2d 458 (1993).

In re Annich, 130 N.J. 538, 617 A.2d 664 (1993).

Page 415

Twp. of Holmdel v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 130 N.J. 522, 617 A.2d 656 (1992).

Bernardsville Quarry v. Borough of Bernardsville 129 N.J. 221, 608 A.2d 1377 (1992).

In re Norton, 128 N.J. 520, 608 A.2d 328 (1992).

In re N.J.AC., 128 N.J. 442, 608 A.2d 288 (1992).

In re Opinion No. 24 of Comm. on Unauthorized Practice of Law, 128 N.J. 114, 607 A.2d 962 (1992).

Goyden v. State, 128 N.J. 54, 607 A.2d 622 (1992).

Jacob v. Norris, 128 N.J. 10, 607 A.2d 142 (1992).

Reg’l Recycling, Inc. v. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot. Energy, 127 N.J. 568, 606 A.2d 815 (1992).

State v. Cofield, 127 N.J. 328, 605 A.2d 230 (1992).

Ford Motor Co. v. Edison, 127 N.J. 290, 604 A.2d 580 (1992).

In re Collester, 126 N.J. 468, 599 A.2d 1275 (1992).

First Peoples Bank v. Medford, 126 N.J. 413, 599 A.2d 1248 (1991).

Rubanick v. Witco Chem. Corp., 125 N.J. 421, 593 A.2d 733 (1991).

State v. Apportionment Comm’n, 125 N.J. 375, 593 A.2d 710 (1991).

Gardner v. N.J. Pinelands Comm’n 125 N.J. 193, 593 A.2d 251 (1991).

Alexander’s Dep’t Stores v. Paramus 125 N.J. 100, 592 A.2d 1168 (1991).

Town of Morristown v. Woman’s Club of Morristown 124 N.J. 605, 592 A.2d 216 (1991).

Chattin v. Cape May Greene, 124 N.J. 520, 591 A.2d 943 (1991).

In re Breslow, 124 N.J. 386, 590 A.2d 1185 (1991).

Vasconi v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. 124 N.J. 338, 590 A.2d 1161 (1991).

Page 416

In re Lawson, 124 N.J. 280, 590 A.2d 1132 (1991).

In re Connor, 124 N.J. 18, 589 A.2d 1347 (1991).

In re Will of Ranney, 124 N.J. 1, 589 A.2d 1339 (1991).

Velasquez v. Franz, 123 N.J. 498, 589 A.2d 143 (1991).

Noble Oil Co. v. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot 123 N.J. 474, 588 A.2d 822 (1991).

Rodio v. Smith, 123 N.J. 345, 587 A.2d 621 (1991).

Weinisch v. Sawyer, 123 N.J. 333, 587 A.2d 615 (1991).

Davidson Bros. v. D. Katz Sons, Inc. 121 N.J. 196, 579 A.2d 288 (1990).

State v. Graff, 121 N.J. 131, 577 A.2d 1270 (1990).

State v. Hamm, 121 N.J. 109, 577 A.2d 1259 (1990).

In re Albert, 120 N.J. 698, 577 A.2d 507 (1990).

Nolan v. Lee Ho, 120 N.J. 465, 577 A.2d 143 (1990).

N.J. Div. of Youth Family Servs. v. J.B. 120 N.J. 112, 576 A.2d 261 (1990).

Tumpson v. Farina, 120 N.J. 55, 575 A.2d 1368 (1990).

State v. Launch, 120 N.J. 1, 575 A.2d 1340 (1990).

State v. Bigham, 119 N.J. 646, 575 A.2d 868 (1990).

State v. Pineda, 119 N.J. 621, 575 A.2d 855 (1990).

Olah v. Slobodian, 119 N.J. 119, 574 A.2d 411 (1990).

State v. Brown, 118 N.J. 595, 573 A.2d 886 (1990).

In re Adoption of N.J.AC, 118 N.J. 552, 573 A.2d 143 (1990).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. State 118 N.J. 336, 571 A.2d 957 (1990).

Perth Amboy Iron Works v. Am. Home Assurance Co., 118 N.J. 2A9, 571 A.2d 294 (1990).

In re Martin, 118 N.J. 239, 571 A.2d 288 (1990).

Page 417

Estate of Darrin v. Dir. of the Div. of Taxation 118 N.J. 193, 570 A.2d 958 (1989).

Freda v. Commercial Trust Co., 118 N.J. 36, 570 A.2d 409 (1990).

Innes v. Innes, 117 N.J. 496, 569 A.2d 770 (1990).

In re Librizzi 117 N.J. 481, 569 A.2d 257 (1990).

In re Whitmore, 117 N.J. 472, 569 A.2d 252 (1990).

State v. Downie, 117 N.J. 450, 569 A.2d 242 (1990).

Manasquan River Reg’l Sewerage Auth. v. Ocean County Utils. Auth., 117 N.J. 239, 566 A.2d 186 (1989).

Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp. 116 N.J. 739, 563 A.2d 31 (1989).

W.V. Pangborne Co. v. N.J. Dep’t of Transp. 116 N.J. 543, 562 A.2d 222 (1989).

Walker Rogge, Inc. v. Chelsea Title Guaranty Co., 116 N.J. 517, 562 A.2d 208 (1989).

Promaulayko v. Johns Manville Sales Corp. 116 N.J. 505, 562 A.2d 202 (1989).

In re C.V.S. Pharm. Wayne, 116 N.J. 490, 561 A.2d 1160 (1989).

State v. Lewis, 116 N.J. 477, 56 A.2d 1153 (1989).

State v. Hutchins, 116 N.J. 457, 561 A.2d 1142 (1989).

Decker v. Princeton Packet, Inc. 116 N.J. 418, 561 A.2d 1122 (1989).

In re Hunterdon County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders 116 N.J. 322, 561 A.2d 597 (1989).

Bd. of Educ. v. Deptford, 116 N.J. 305, 561 A.2d 589 (1989).

State v. McCoy, 116 N.J. 293, 561 A.2d 582 (1989).

Shackil v. Lederle Labs., Div. of Am. Cyanamid, Co. 116 N.J. 155, 561 A.2d 511 (1989).

Williams v. Dep’t of Human Servs. 116 N.J. 102, 561 A.2d 244 (1989).

Page 418

State v. Johnson, 116 N.J. 99, 561 A.2d 243 (1989).

Browning-Ferris Indus. v. Passaic 116 N.J. 83, 560 A.2d 1208 (1989).

State v. Odom, 116 N.J. 65, 560 A.2d 1198 (1989).

Pico v. State, 116 N.J. 55, 560 A.2d 1193 (1989).

Rahnefeld v. Security Ins. Co., 115 N.J. 628, 560 A.2d 670 (1989).

Accountemps Div. of Robert Half, Inc. v. Birch Tree Group, Ltd., 115 N.J. 614, 560 A.2d 663 (1989).

State v. Bolte, 115 N.J. 579, 560 A.2d 644 (1989).

State v. Pillot, 115 N.J. 558, 560 A.2d 634 (1989).

Urban League of Greater New Brunswick v. Carteret 115 N.J. 536, 559 A.2d 1369 (1989).

U7 Associates v. Miranda, 115 N.J. 522, 559 A.2d 1362 (1989).

In re Spagnoli 115 N.J. 504, 559 A.2d 1352 (1989).

In re Iulo, 115 N.J. 498, 559 A.2d 1349 (1989).

Graves v. Church Dwight Co. 115 N.J. 256, 558 A.2d 463 (1989).

Millison v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours Co. 115 N.J. 252, 558 A.2d 461 (1989).

In re Gold, 115 N.J. 239, 557 A.2d 1378 (1989).

State by Comm’r of Transp. v. Hess Realty Corp. 115 N.J. 229, 557 A.2d 1372 (1989).

Littman v. Gimello, 115 N.J. 154, 557 A.2d 314 (1989).

In re Ritger, 115 N.J. 50, 556 A.2d 1201 (1989).

In re State, 114 N.J. 316, 554 A.2d 1309 (1989).

Lower Main St. Assocs. v. N.J. Housing Mortg. Finan. Agency, 114 N.J. 226, 553 A.2d 798 (1989).

Moore v. Moore, 114 N.J. 147, 553 A.2d 20 (1989).

Friends of Governor Kean v. N.J. Election Law Enforcement Comm’n, 114 N.J. 33, 552 A.2d 612 (1989).

Page 419

La Polio v. Hospital Service Plan 113 N.J. 611, 552 A.2d 150 (1989).

Giardina v. Bennett, 111 N.J. 412, 545 A.2d 139 (1988).

In re Peia, 111 N.J. 318, 544 A.2d 838 (1988).

Byram Township v. Western World 111 N.J. 222, 544 A.2d 37 (1988).

In re Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage 111 N.J. 155, 543 A.2d 925 (1988).

NYT Cable TV v. Homestead at Mansfield 111 N.J. 21, 543 A.2d 10 (1988).

Hirsch v. Tushill, Ltd., 110 N.J. 644, 542 A.2d 897 (1988).

Aujero v. Cirelli, 110 N.J. 566, 542 A.2d 465 (1988).

Jansen v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc. 110 N.J. 363, 541 A.2d 682 (1988).

In re J.I.S. Industrial Service Co. Landfill 110 N.J. 101, 539 A.2d 1197 (1988).

In re Directive of the N.J. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot. 110 N.J. 69, 539 A.2d 1181 (1988).

Fuchilla v. Layman, 109 N.J. 319, 537 A.2d 652 (1988).

In re 1987 Essex County Judicial Budget Impasse 109 N.J. 89, 533 A.2d 961 (1987).

Riccio v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. 108 N.J. 493, 531 A.2d 717 (1987).

N.J. Builders Ass’n v. Bernards Twp. 108 N.J. 223, 528 A.2d 555 (1987).

Gauer v. Essex County Div. of Welfare 108 N.J. 140, 528 A.2d 1 (1987).

Kimmelman v. Henkels McCoy, Inc. 108 N.J. 123, 527 A.2d 1368 (1987).

Transamerica Ins. Co. v. Nat’l Roofing, Inc. 108 N.J. 59, 527 A.2d 864 (1987).

Page 420

Smith v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 108 N.J. 19, 527 A.2d 843 (1987).

State v. Mulcahy, 107 N.J. 467, 527 A.2d 368 (1987).

Vispisiano v. Ashland Chemical Co. 107 N.J. 416, 527 A.2d 66 (1987).

Barone v. Dep’t of Human Servs. 107 N.J. 355, 526 A.2d 1055 (1987).

Rivera v. Westinghouse Elevator Co. 107 N.J. 256, 526 A.2d 705 (1987).

In re Pleva, 106 N.J. 637, 525 A.2d 1104 (1987).

Ayers v. Jackson, 106 N.J. 557, 525 A.2d 287 (1987).

In re Scavone, 106 N.J. 542, 524 A.2d 813 (1987).

State v. Roberts, 105 N.J. 503, 523 A.2d 151 (1986).

Fields v. Hoffman, 105 N.J. 262, 520 A.2d 751 (1987).

In re Petition of Felmeister Isaacs 104 N.J. 515, 518 A.2d 188 (1986).

In re Skevin, 104 N.J. 476, 517 A.2d 852 (1986).

Yellow Page Consultants, Inc. v. Nat’l Tel. Directory Corp., 104 N.J. 387, 517 A.2d 393 (1986).

State v. Hodge, 104 N.J. 386, 517 A.2d 393 (1986).

Yellow Page Consultants, Inc. v. Nat’l Tel Directory Corp., 104 N.J. 372, 517 A.2d 384 (1986).

In re Litwin, 104 N.J. 362, 517 A.2d 378 (1986).

In re Orlando, 104 N.J. 344, 517 A.2d 139 (1986).

Dairy Stores, Inc. v. Sentinel Pub. Co. 104 N.J. 125, 516 A.2d 220 (1986).

Rivera v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. 104 N.J. 32, 514 A.2d 1296 (1986).

In re O’Gorman, 103 N.J. 700 (1986).

N.J. Div. of Youth Family Servs. v. AW 103 N.J. 591, 512 A.2d 438 (1986).

Page 421

Devlin v. Ocean City, 103 N.J. 587, 511 A.2d 1192 (1986).

Mack Paramus Co. v. Paramus, 103 N.J. 564, 511 A.2d 1179 (1986).

State, Dep’t of Envtl. Prot. v. Stavola 103 N.J. 425, 511 A.2d 622 (1986).

Mayes v. Jackson Twp. Rent Leveling Bd. 103 N.J. 362, 511 A.2d 589 (1986).

Veazey v. Doremus, 103 N.J. 244, 510 A.2d 1187 (1986).

Edgewater Inv. Assocs. v. Edgewater 103 N.J. 227, 510 A.2d 1178 (1986).

Schneider v. East Orange, 103 N.J. 115, 510 A.2d 1118 (1986).

Berman v. Valley Hospital, 103 N.J. 100, 510 A.2d 673 (1986).

Desai v. St. Barnabas Med. Ctr., 103 N.J. 79, 510 A.2d 662 (1986).

Christy v. Newark, 102 N.J. 598, 510 A.2d 22 (1986).

In re Brown, 102 N.J. 512, 509 A.2d 176 (1986).

Monmouth Chrysler-Plymouth v. Chrysler Corp. 102 N.J. 485, 509 A.2d 161 (1986).

Saunderlin v. E.I. Du Pont Co., 102 N.J. 402, 508 A.2d 1095 (1986).

Int’l Flavors Fragrances v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 102 N.J. 210, 507 A.2d 700 (1986).

In re Noonan, 102 N.J. 157, 506 A.2d 722 (1986).

In re Di Biasi 102 N.J. 152, 506 A.2d 719 (1986).

Automatic Merchandising Council v. Edison 102 N.J. 125, 506 A.2d 352 (1986).

Crowe v. De Gioia, 102 N.J. 50, 505 A.2d 591 (1986).

In re Mintz, 101 N.J. 527, 503 A.2d 290 (1986).

In re Yaccarino, 101 N.J. 342, 502 A.2d 3 (1985).

Pub. Serv. Elect. Gas Co. v. N.J. Dep’t of Envtl Prot, 101 N.J. 95, 501 A.2d 125 (1985).

Page 422

M.H.B. v. H.T.B., 100 N.J. 567, 498 A.2d 775 (1985).

F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris Plains 100 N.J. 418, 495 A.2d 1313 (1985).

In re Judges of Passaic County, 100 N.J. 352, 495 A.2d 848 (1985).

Abbott v. Burke, 100 N.J. 269, 495 A.2d 376 (1985).

Mochary v. Caputo, 100 N.J. 119, 494 A.2d 1028 (1985).

Delguidice v. N.J. Racing Com., 100 N.J. 79, 494 A.2d 1007 (1985).

Silent Hoist Crane Co. v. Dir, Div. of Taxation 100 N.J. 1, 494 A.2d 775 (1985).

State v. Rovito, 99 N.J. 581, 494 A.2d 309 (1985).

Greenberg v. Kimmelman, 99 N.J. 552, 494 A.2d 294 (1985).

In re Schwartz, 99 N.J. 510, 493 A.2d 1248 (1985).

In re O’Gorman, 99 N.J. 482, 493 A.2d 1233 (1985).

State v. Lightner, 99 N.J. 313, 491 A.2d 1273 (1985).

Glen Wall Assocs. v. Twp. of Wall 99 N.J. 265, 491 A.2d 1247 (1985).

Keyes Martin Co. v. Dir, Div. of Purchase Prop., 99 N.J. 244, 491 A.2d 1236 (1985).

State v. Priester, 99 N.J. 123, 49 A.2d 650 (1985).

Wright v. Bd. of Educ., 99 N.J. 112, 491 A.2d 644 (1985).

Rutherford Educ. Assoc., v. Bd. of Educ. 99 N.J. 8, 489 A.2d 1148 (1985).

Steinel v. Jersey City, 99 N.J. 1, 489 A.2d 1145 (1985).

Spring Motors Distribs. v. Ford Motor Co. 98 N.J. 555, 489 A.2d 660 (1985).

State v. Ingram, 98 N.J. 489, 488 A.2d 545 (1985).

Horsemen’s Benevolent Protective Assoc., N.J. Div. v. Atl. City Racing Assoc, 98 N.J. 445, 487 A.2d 707 (1985).

Williams v. Bd. of Educ., 98 N.J. 319, 486 A.2d 846 (1985).

Page 423

Mahwah v. Bergen County Bd. of Taxation 98 N.J. 268, 486 A.2d 818 (1985).

Kalman Floor Co. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc. 98 N.J. 266, 486 A.2d 334 (1985).

Hazen v. Div. of Med. Assistance Health Servs. 98 N.J. 82, 484 A.2d 670 (1984).

Merker v. Div. of Med. Assistance Health Servs., 98 N.J. 62, 484 A.2d 322 (1984).

In re Gold, 98 N.J. 53, 484 A. 2d 10 (1984).

Karcher v. Kean, 97 N.J. 483, 479 A.2d 403 (1984).

Burke v. Deiner, 97 N.J. 465, 479 A.2d 393 (1984).

Heaton v. Jersey Cent. Power Light Co. 97 N.J. 128, 478 A.2d 337 (1984).

Faherty v. Faiierty, 97 N.J. 99, 477 A.2d 1257 (1984).

In re Knox, 97 N.J. 64, 477 A.2d 1239 (1984).

Wunschel v. Jersey City, 96 N.J. 651, 477 A.2d 329 (1984).

Lizak v. Faria, 96 N.J. 482, 476 A.2d 1189 (1984).

Mobay Chem. Corp. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 96 N.J. 407, 476 A.2d 758 (1984).

Fedders Fin. Corp. v. Dir, Div. of Taxation 96 N.J. 376, 476 A.2d 741 (1984).

AckeH v. Keystone Auto. Ins. Co. 96 N.J. 372, 476 A.2d 269 (1984).

Clendaniel v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co. 96 N.J. 361, 476 A.2d 263 (1984).

Belrnar v. Cipolla, 96 N.J. 199, 475 A.2d 533 (1984).

Nash v. Bd. of Adjustment, 96 N.J. 97 474 A. 2d 241 (1984).

Bowen v. Bowen, 96 N.J. 36, 473 A.2d 73 (1984).

Singer v. State, 95 N.J. 487, 472 A.2d 138 (1984).

Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399, 47 A.2d 405 (1984).

Page 424

Baumann v. Marinaro, 95 N.J. 380, 471 A.2d 395 (1984).

State v. Hodge, 95 N.J. 369, 471 A.2d 389 (1984).

Matthews v. Bay Head Improv. Ass’n 95 N.J. 306, 471 A.2d 355 (1984).

In re Labendz, 95 N.J. 273, 471 A.2d 21 (1984).

In re Friedland, 95 N.J. 167, 470 A.2d 1 (1984).

In re Sugarman, 95 N.J. 7, 468 A.2d 424 (1983).

State, Dept. of Envtl. Prot. v. Ventron Corp. 94 N.J. 473, 468 A.2d 150 (1983).

In re Egg Harbor Assocs. (Bay shore Ctr.) 94 N.J. 358, 464 A.2d 1115 (1983).

Crema v. N.J. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot 94 N.J. 286, 463 A.2d 910 (1983).

OBrien v. Muskin Corp., 94 N.J. 169, 463 A.2d 298 (1983).

Town Tobacconist v. Kimmelman, 94 N.J. 85, 462 A.2d 573 (1983).

In re Application of Matthews, 94 N.J. 59, 462 A.2d 165 (1983).

In re Infinito, 94 N.J. 50, 462 A.2d 160 (1983).

Foldi v. Jeffries, 93 N.J. 533, 461 A.2d 1145 (1983).

Marzocca v. Ferone, 93 N.J. 509, 461 A.2d 1133 (1983).

Ross v. Canino, 93 N.J. 402, 461 A.2d 585 (1983).

Siller v. Hartz Mountain Assocs. 93 N.J. 370, 461 A.2d 568 (1983).

Lichtman v. Bd. of Educ., 93 N.J. 362, 461A 2d 158 (1983).

Vesley v. Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 93 N.J. 323, 460 A.2d 1057 (1983).

State v. Guerra, 93 N.J. 146, 459 A.2d 1159 (1983).

State v. Apostolis, 93 N.J. 143, 459 A.2d 1158 (1983).

State v. Valencia, 93 N.J. 126, 459 A.2d 1149 (1983).

Berko v. Freda, 93 N.J. 81, 459 A.2d 663 (1983).

Page 425

Maietta v. N.J. Racing Comm’n, 93 N.J. 1, 459 A.2d 295 (1983).

In re Vincenti 92 N.J. 591, 458 A.2d 1268 (1983).

State v. Balthrop, 92 N.J. 542, 457 A.2d 1152 (1983).

State by Comm’r of Transp. v. Silver 92 N.J. 507, 457 A.2d 463 (1983)

Manalapan Holding Co. v. Planning Bd. of Hamilton 92 N.J. 466, 457 A.2d 441 (1983).

Perm v. Pirozzi, 92 N.J. 446, 457 A.2d 431 (1983).

Dugan v. Dugan, 92 N.J. 423, 457 A.2d 1 (1983).

Cogliati v. Ecco High Frequency Corp. 92 N.J. 402, 456 A.2d 524 (1983).

Mirza v. Filmore Corp., 92 N.J. 390, 456 A.2d 518 (1983).

Gayet v. Gayet, 92 N.J. 149, 456 A.2d 102 (1983).

Callen v. Sherman’s, Inc., 92 N.J. 114, 455 A.2d 1102 (1983).

In re Yengo, 92 N.J. 9, 455 A.2d 457 (1983).

Zigmont v. Bd. of Trs., 91 N.J. 580, 453 A.2d 1333 (1983).

Selfv. Bd. of Review, 91 N.J. 453, 453 A.2d 170 (1982).

Starhs v. Hosp. Serv. Plan, Inc. 91 N.J. 433, 453 A.2d 159 (1982).

Shapiro v. Essex County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders 91 N.J. 430, 453 A.2d 158 (1982).

Tantum v. Binz, 91 N.J. 426, 452 A.2d 667 (1982).

In re Carrigan, 91 N.J. 421, 452 A.2d 206 (1982).

In re Hudson Judicial Budget Impasse 91 N.J. 412, 452 A.2d 202 (1982).

AA Mastrangelo, Inc. v. Comm’r of Dep’t of Envtl. Prot., 90 N.J. 666, 449 A.2d 516 (1982).

In re Polk, 90 N.J. 550, 449 A.2d 7 (1982).

In re Sackman, 90 N.J. 521, 448 A.2d 1014 (1982).

Page 426

Belle v. United Hospital Med. Ctr. 90 N.J. 444, 448 A.2d 473 (1982).

Jordan v. Horsemen’s Benevolent Prot. Ass’n 90 N.J. 422, 448 A.2d 462 (1982).

In re Application of Boardwalk Regency Corp. for Casino License, 90 N.J. 361, 447 A.2d 1335 (1982).

In re the Application of Martin, 90 N.J. 295, 447 A.2d 1290 (1982).

Crowe v. De Gioia, 90 N.J. 126, 447 A.2d 173 (1982).

In re Appeal of Certain Sections of Uniform Administrative Procedure Rules, 90 N.J. 85, 447 A.2d 151 (1982).

Spiewak v. Bd. of Educ., 90 N.J. 63, 447 A.2d 140 (1982).

In re Hughes, 90 N.J. 32, 446 A.2d 1208 (1982).

In re Bricker, 90 N.J. 6, 446 A.2d 1195 (1982).

In re Goldstaub, 90 N.J. 1, 446 A.2d 1192 (1982).

Barry M. Dechtman, Inc. v. Sidpaul Corp. 89 N.J. 547, 446 A.2d 518 (1982).

Rivera v. Gerner, 89 N.J. 526, 446 A.2d 508 (1982).

Lyon v. Barrett, 89 N.J. 294, 445 A.2d 1153 (1982).

Butler v. Acme Markets, Inc., 89 N.J. 270, 445 A.2d 1141 (1982).

N.J. Ass’n for Retarded Citizens v. N.J. Dep’t of Human Servs., 89 N.J. 234, 445 A.2d 704 (1982).

MacMillan v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 89 N.J. 216, 445 A.2d 397 (1982).

On Petition for Review of Opinion U75 of Advisory Comm. on Prof’l Ethics DR2-102(c), 89 N.J. 74, 444 A.2d 1092 (1982).

Estate of Colquhoun v. Estate of Colquhoun 88 N.J. 558, 443 A.2d 1045 (1982).

In re Advisory Comm. on Profl Ethics Opinion No. 447 86 N.J. 473, 432 A.2d 59 (1981).

In re Barrett, 88 N.J. 450, 443 A.2d 678 (1982).

Page 427

In re Brawn, 88 N.J. 443, 443 A.2d 675 (1982).

In re Nigohosian, 88 N.J. 308, 442 A.2d 1007 (1982).

Camden v. Skokowski, 88 N.J. 304, 44 A.2d 741 (1982).

Passaic v. Local Finance Bd. of Dep’t of Community Affairs, 88 N.J. 293, 441 A.2d 736 (1982).

Worthington v. Fauver, 88 N.J. 183, 440 A.2d 1128 (1982).

McGlynn v. N.J. Pub. Broad. Auth. 88 N.J. 112, 439 A.2d 54 (1981).

Gormley v. Lan, 88 N.J. 26, 438 A.2d 519 (1981).

In re Quinn, 88 N.J. 10, 438 A.2d 321 (1981).

Saginario v. Attorney Gen., 87 N.J. 480, 435 A.2d 1134 (1981).

Eden v. Conrail, 87 N.J. 467, 435 A.2d 556 (1981).

Renz v. Penn Cent. Corp., 87 N.J. 437, 435 A.2d 540 (1981).

Freund v. Cello film Props., Inc. 87 N.J. 229, 432 A.2d 925 (1981).

In re Opinion 452 of Advisory Comm. on Prof I Ethics 87 N.J. 45, 432 A.2d 829 (1981).

Francis v. United Jersey Bank, 87 N.J. 15, 432 A.2d 814 (1981).

Student Pub. Interest Research Group v. Byrne 86 N.J. 592, 432 A.2d 507 (1981).

Westfield Ctr. Serv. v. Cities Serv. Oil Co. 86 N.J. 453, 432 A.2d 48 (1981).

In re Smock, 86 N.J. 426, 432 A.2d 34 (1981).

Trainor v. Santana, 86 N.J. 403, 432 A.2d 23 (1981).

Nieves v. Bruno Sherman Corp., 86 N.J. 361, 431 A.2d 826 (1981).

Ramirez v. Amsted Indus., Inc., 86 N.J. 332, 431 A.2d 811 (1981).

In re Bd. of Educ. of Trenton, 86 N.J. 327, 431 A.2d 808 (1981).

495 Corp. v. N.J. Ins. Underwriting Assoc 86 N.J. 159, 430 A.2d 203 (1981).

In re Education Law Ctr., Inc., 86 N.J. 124, 429 A.2d 1051 (1981).

Page 428

Corbo v. Crutchlow, 86 N.J. 68, 429 A.2d 574 (1981).

Lally v. Copygraphics, 85 N.J. 668, 428 A.2d 1317 (1981).

Unemployed-Employed Council, Inc. v. Horn 85 N.J. 646, 428 A.2d 1305 (1981).

Aetna Ins. Co. v. Gilchrist Bros., Inc. 85 N.J. 550, 428 A.2d 1254 (1981).

Maslonka v. Hermann, 85 N.J. 533, 428 A.2d 504 (1981).

State v. Maguire, 84 N.J. 508, 423 A.2d 294 (1980).

Stubbs v. Sec. Consumer Disc. Co. 85 N.J. 353, 426 A.2d 1014 (1981).

Bally Mfg. Corp. v. N.J. Casino Control Comm’n 85 N.J. 325, 426 A.2d 1000 (1981).

Onderdonk v. Presbyterian Homes of N.J. 85 N.J. 171, 425 A.2d 1057 (1981).

Amiano v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 85 N.J. 85, 424 A.2d 1179 (1981).

Clear TV Cable Corp. v. Bd. of Pub. Util. Comm’rs 85 N.J. 30, 424 A.2d 1151 (1981).

Green v. Bittner, 85 N.J. 1, 424 A.2d 210 (1980).

Klimko v. Rose, 84 N.J. 496, 422 A.2d 418 (1980).

Fire Guard Sprinkler Corp. v. Manolio 84 N.J. 485, 421 A.2d 592 (1980).

Lieberman v. Employers Ins. of Wausau 84 N.J. 325, 419 A.2d 417 (1980).

State v. Lawn King, Inc., 84 N.J. 179, 417 A.2d 1025 (1980).

Jersey Shore Med. Center-Fitkin Hosp. v. Estate of Baum, 84 N.J. 137, 417 A.2d 1003 (1980).

Quick Chek Food Stores v. Springfield 83 N.J. 438, 416 A.2d 840 (1980).

Clark v. Degnan, 83 N.J. 393, 416 A.2d 816 (1980).

Page 429

In re Final Determination of Local Finance Bd. 83 N.J. 389, 416 A.2d 814 (1980).

Rubin v. Glaser, 83 N.J. 299, 416 A.2d 382 (1980).

Korelnia v. Bd. of Trs., 83 N.J. 163, 416 A.2d 308 (1980).

Lepis v. Lepis, 83 N.J. 139, 416 A.2d 45 (1980).

In re Health Care Administration Bd. 83 N.J. 67, 415 A.2d 1147 (1980).

State v. Mangold, 82 N.J. 575, 414 A.2d 1312 (1980).

Newark v. Natural Res. Council, Dep’t Envtl. Prot 82 N.J. 530, 414 A.2d 1304 (1980).

State v. Czachor, 82 N.J. 392, 413 A.2d 593 (1980).

Plainfield v. Pub. Serv. Elec. Gas Co. 82 N.J. 245, 412 A.2d 759 (1980).

Fernandez v. Selected Risks Ins. Co. 82 N.J. 236, 412 A.2d 755 (1980).

In re the Revision of Rates filed by Toms River Water Co. Increasing its Rates for Water Serv. 82 N.J. 201, 412 A.2d 430 (1980).

Levin v. Twp. of Parsippany-Troy Hills 82 N.J. 174, 411 A.2d 704 (1980).

Helmsley v. Borough of Fort Lee, 82 N.J. 128, 41 A.2d 203 (1980).

State v. Williams, 81 N.J. 498, 410 A.2d 251 (1980).

State in Interest of W.E.C., 81 N.J. 442, 409 A.2d 798 (1979).

In re Fusciello, 81 N.J. 307, 406 A.2d 1316 (1979).

In re Kaufman, 81 N.J. 300, 406 A.2d 972 (1979).

State v. Rowe, 81 N.J. 296, 406 A.2d 169 (1978).

State v. Howery, 80 N.J. 563, 404 A.2d 632 (1979).

Sheeran v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 80 N.J. 548, 404 A.2d 625 (1979).

Van Horn v. City of Trenton, 80 N.J. 528, 404 A.2d 615 (1979).

Page 430

State v. Wein, 80 N.J. 491, 404 A.2d 302 (1979).

Palamarg Realty Co. v. Rehac, 80 N.J. 446, 404 A.2d 21 (1979).

State v. Taylor, 80 N.J. 353, 403 A.2d 889 (1979).

State v. Garfole, 80 N.J. 350, 403 A.2d 888 (1979).

In re Reisdorf, 80 N.J. 319, 403 A.2d 873 (1979).

In re Arbitration Between Grover Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., 80 N.J. 221, 403 A.2d 448 (1979).

White Birch Realty Corp. v. Gloucester Twp. Mun. Utils. Auth., 80 N.J. 165, 402 A.2d 927 (1979).

City of Newark v. County of Essex 80 N.J. 143, 402 A.2d 916 (1979).

Costa v. Josey, 79 N.J. 535, 40 A.2d 526 (1979).

In re Lambertville Rates v. N.J. Bd. Pub. Util. Commr’s, 79 N.J. 449, 401 A.2d 211 (1979).

Alampi v. Sussman, 79 N.J. 442, 400 A.2d 1200 (1979).

Tevis v. Tevis, 79 N.J. 422, 400 A.2d 1189 (1979).

Twp. of Tewksbury v. Jersey Cent. Power Light Co., 79 N.J. 398, 400 A.2d 60 (1979).

City of Bayonne v. Port Jersey Corp. 79 N.J. 367, 399 A.2d 649 (1979).

State v. Lynch, 79 N.J. 327, 399 A.2d 629 (1979).

State v. Trent, 79 N.J. 251, 398 A.2d 1271 (1979).

Driscoll v. Bd. of Educ. of Clifton 79 N.J. 126, 398 A.2d 90 (1979).

Gloucester Twp. Mun. Auth. v. Garden State Water Co. 79 N.J. 87, 398 A.2d 71 (1979).

State v. Hernandez, 78 N.J. 541, 397 A.2d 328 (1979).

In re Netchert, 78 N.J. 445, 396 A.2d 1118 (1979).

Carrino v. Novotny, 78 N.J. 355, 396 A.2d 561 (1979).

Gilborges v. Wallace, 78 N.J. 342, 396 A.2d 338 (1978).

Page 431

Helmsley v. Borough of Fort Lee, 78 N.J. 200, 394 A.2d 65 (1978).

In re Estate of Margow, 77 N.J. 316, 390 A.2d 591 (1978).

Ambassador Ins. Co. v. Montes, 76 N.J. 411, 388 A.2d 603 (1978).

Conklin v. Davi, 76 N.J. 468, 388 A.2d 598 (1978).

State v. Thomas, 76 N.J. 344, 387 A.2d 1187 (1978).

In re Fidek, 76 N.J. 340, 387 A.2d 1185 (1978).

State v. Crumedy, 76 N.J. 319, 387 A.2d 357 (1978).

State v. Sands, 76 N.J. 127, 386 A.2d 378 (1978).

Nat’l, Newark Essex Bank v. Am. Ins. Co. 76 N.J. 64, 385 A.2d 1216 (1978).

In re Estate of Lange, 75 N.J. 464, 383 A.2d 1130 (1978).

Sabat v. Fedders Corp., 75 N.J. 444, 383 A.2d 421 (1978).

In re Ippolito, 75 N.J. 435, 383 A.2d 117 (1978).

State v. Jenkins, 75 N.J. 392, 383 A.2d 95 (1978).

State v. Quinones, 75 N.J. 391, 383 A.2d 95 (1978).

Ballou v. State Dep’t of Civil Serv. 75 N.J. 365, 382 A.2d 1118 (1978).

In re Vasser, 75 N.J. 357, 382 A.2d 1114 (1978).

State v. Sims, 75 N.J. 337, 382 A.2d 638 (1978).

In re Weishoff, 75 N.J. 326, 382 A.2d 632 (1978).

In re Stout, 75 N.J. 321, 382 A.2d 630 (1978).

Doe v. City of Trenton, 75 N.J. 137, 380 A.2d 703 (1977).

Scherer v. Hyland, 75 N.J. 127, 380 A.2d 698 (1977).

In re Conti, 75 N.J. 114, 380 A.2d 691 (1977).

State v. Zarinsky, 75 N.J. 101, 380 A.2d 685 (1977).

Hyland v. Ranone, 75 N.J. 97, 380 A.2d 274 (1977).

Evans-Aristocrat Indus., Inc. v. Newark 75 N.J. 84, 380 A.2d 268 (1977).

Page 432

State v. Grossmick, 75 N.J. 48, 379 A.2d 453 (1977).

State v. Middleton, 75 N.J. 47, 379 A.2d 453 (1977).

State v. Williams, 75 N.J. 1, 379 A.2d 233 (1977).

In re Holder, 74 N.J. 581, 379 A.2d 220 (1977).

Polillo v. Deane, 74 N.J. 562, 379 A.2d 211 (1977).

Common Cause v. N.J. Election Law Enforcement Comm’n 74 N.J. 231, 377 A.2d 643 (1977).

City of Philadelphia v. State of N.J., Dep’t of Envtl Prot, 73 N.J. 562, 376 A.2d 888 (1977).

State v. Rodriguez, 73 N.J. 463, 375 A.2d 659 (1977).

Serv. Armament Co. v. Hyland, 70 N.J. 550, 362 A.2d 13 (1976).

Gero v. Cutler, 66 N.J. 443, 332 A.2d 593 (1975).

King v. S. Jersey Nat’l Bank, 66 N.J. 161, 330 A.2d 1 (1974).

P.T. L. Constr. Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 169, 66 N.J. 97, 328 A.2d 603 (1974).

In re Sabatino, 65 N.J. 548, 324 A.2d 20 (1974).

In re BUM, 65 N.J. 539, 324 A.2d 15 (1974).

Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Ins. Co. of Am. 65 N.J. 474, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).

State v. De Santis, 65 N.J. 462, 323 A.2d 489 (1974).

State v. Souss, 65 N.J. 453, 323 A.2d 484 (1974).

LeCompte v. State, 65 N.J. 447, 323 A.2d 481 (1974).

The Singer Co. v. Gardner, 65 N.J. 403, 323 A.2d 457 (1974).

State v. Johnson, 65 N.J. 388, 323 A.2d 450 (1974).

State v. Twp. of S. Hackensack, 65 N.J. 377, 322 A.2d 818 (1974).

Civic S. Factors Corp. v. Bonat, 65 N.J. 329, 322 A.2d 436 (1974).

Strzelecki v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp. 65 N.J. 314, 322 A.2d 168 (1974).

Akridge v. Barres, 65 N.J. 266, 321 A.2d 230 (1974).

Page 433

Rooney v. McEachern, 65 N.J. 256, 321 A.2d 225 (1974).

Rothman v. Rothman, 65 N.J. 219, 320 A.2d 496 (1974).

Painter v. Painter, 65 N.J. 196, 320 A.2d 484 (1974).

Chalmers v. Chalmers, 65 N.J. 186, 320 A.2d 478 (1974).

Scalingi v. Scalingi, 65 N.J. 180, 320 A.2d 475 (1974).

In re Abrams, 65 N.J. 172, 320 A.2d 471 (1974).

N.J. State Policemen’s Benevolent Ass’n v. Morristown 65 N.J. 160, 320 A.2d 465 (1974).

State v. Perry, 65 N.J. 45, 319 A.2d 474 (1974).

State v. Spivey, 65 N.J. 21, 319 A.2d 461 (1974).

M. Zerman Realty Bldg. Corp. v. Borough of Westwood, 64 N.J. 590, 319 A.2d 441 (1974).

N.J. Tpk. Employees’ Union v. N.J. Tpk. Auth. 64 N.J. 579, 319 A.2d 224 (1974).

State v. Leverette, 64 N.J. 569, 319 A.2d 219 (1974).

State v. Spano, 64 N.J. 566, 319 A.2d 217 (1974).

Kissil v. Beneficial Life Ins. Co. 64 N.J. 555, 319 A.2d 67 (1974).

Ramac Explosives, Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 64 N.J. 551, 319 A.2d 65 (1974).

Rossnagle v. Copra, 64 N.J. 549, 318 A.2d 20 (1974).

D.H.M. Indus., Inc. v. Cent. Port Warehouses, Inc. 64 N.J. 548, 31 A.2d19 (1974).

In re Application of Nat’l Broad. Co. 64 N.J. 476, 317 A.2d 695 (1974).

State v. Dorsey, 64 N.J. 428, 316 A.2d 689 (1974).

Bruno v. Mundy, 64 N.J. 337, 316 A.2d 425 (1974).

DiOrio v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co., 63 N.J. 597, 311 A.2d 378 (1973).

Dwyer v. Skyline Apartments, Inc. 63 N.J. 577, 311 A.2d 1 (1973).

State v. Foye, 63 N.J. 534, 309 A.2d 897 (1973).

Page 434

In re Spritzer, 63 N.J. 532, 309 A.2d 745 (1973).

State in Interest of ABM, 63 N.J. 531, 309 A.2d 617 (1973).

Davenport v. Apportionment Comm’n of N.J. 63 N.J. 433, 308 A.2d 3 (1973).

Cali v. State Comm’n of Investigation 63 N.J. 310, 307 A.2d 90 (1973).

State v. Farrow, 61 N.J. 434, 294 A.2d 873 (1972).

Garden State Farms, Inc. v. Mathis 61 N.J. 406, 294 A.2d 713 (1972).

State v. Madden, 61 N.J. 377, 294 A.2d 609 (1972).

Borough of Neptune City v. Borough of Avon-by-the-Sea 61 N.J. 296, 294 A.2d 47 (1972).

State v. Kelly, 61 N.J. 283, 294 A.2d 41 (1972).

Ass’n Group Life, Inc. v. Catholic War Veterans of the U.S., 61 N.J. 150, 293 A.2d 382 (1972).

State v. Carluccio, 61 N.J. 125, 293 A.2d 369 (1972).

Young v. Bd. of Health of Somerville 61 N.J. 76, 293 A.2d 164 (1972).

State v. Falco, 60 N.J. 570, 292 A.2d 13 (1972).

State v. Fuchs, 60 N.J. 564, 292 A.2d 10 (1972).

Sadofski v. Williams, 60 N.J. 385, 290 A.2d 143 (1972).

Bryan Constr. Co. v. Employers’ Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 60 N.J. 375, 290 A.2d 138 (1972).

N.J. Builders, Owners Managers Ass’n v. Blair 60 N.J. 330, 288 A.2d 855 (1972).

Pennsylvania v. Kervick, 60 N.J. 289, 288 A.2d 289 (1972).

State v. Trantino, 60 N.J. 176, 287 A.2d 177 (1972).

Rutgers v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142, 286 A.2d 697 (1972).

In re Bloom, 60 N.J. 113, 286 A.2d 497 (1972).

Page 435

State v. Lee, 60 N.J. 53, 286 A.2d 52 (1972).

State v. Blount, 60 N.J. 23, 286 A.2d 36 (1972).

Clayton v. Kervick, 59 N.J. 583, 285 A.2d 11 (1971).

State v. Gray, 59 N.J. 563, 285 A.2d 1 (1971).

State v. Brown, 59 N.J. 539, 286 A.2d 33 (1971).

In re the Application of “X” for a permit to Carry a Pistol or Revolver, 59 N.J. 533, 284 A.2d 530 (1971).

Meredith v. Mercer County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders 59 N.J. 530, 284 A.2d 529 (1971).

State v. Bonano, 59 N.J. 515, 284 A.2d 345 (1971).

Trap Rock Indus., Inc. v. Kohl, 59 N.J. 471, 284 A.2d 161 (1971).

Sliger v. R.H. Macy Co., 59 N.J. 465, 283 A.2d 904 (1971).

State v. Holland, 59 N.J. 451, 283 A.2d 897 (1971).

Bears v. Wallace, 59 N.J. 444, 283 A.2d 740 (1971).

State v. Thompson, 59 N.J. 396, 283 A.2d 513 (1971).

State v. Perry, 59 N.J. 383, 283 A.2d 330 (1971).

In re Londa, 59 N.J. 378, 283 A.2d 328 (1971).

State v. Graham, 59 N.J. 366, 283 A.2d 321 (1971).

In re Shamy, 59 N.J. 321, 282 A.2d 402 (1971).

In re Shamy, 59 N.J. 319, 282 A.2d 401 (1971).

N.J. Tpk. Auth. v. Tootle, 59 N.J. 308, 282 A.2d 39 (1971).

Stewart v. Stewart, 59 N.J. 301, 282 A.2d 35 (1971).

Panas v. N.J. Natural Gas Co., 59 N.J. 255, 281 A.2d 520 (1971).

Kirsch Holding Co. v. Borough of Manasquan 59 N.J. 241, 281 A.2d 513 (1971).

In re the Estate of Conway, 59 N.J. 221, 280 A.2d 189 (1971).

In re Frkdland, 59 N.J. 209, 280 A.2d 183 (1971).

Feuchtbaum v. Constantini, 59 N.J. 167, 280 A.2d 161 (1971).

Page 436

State v. Burt, 59 N.J. 156, 279 A.2d 850 (1971).

O’Brien v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. 59 N.J. 114, 279 A.2d 827 (1971).

McGlone v. Corbi, 59 N.J. 86, 279 A.2d 812 (1971).

Essex County Welfare Bd. v. Philpott 59 N.J. 75, 279 A.2d 806 (1971).

State v. Bisaccia, 58 N.J. 586, 279 A.2d 675 (1971).

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. Twp. of Bernards, 58 N.J. 585, 279 A.2d 674 (1971).

John F. Kennedy Mem’l Hosp. v. Heston 58 N.J. 576, 279 A.2d 670 (1971).

Jenkins v. The Twp. of Morris Sch. Dist. 58 N.J. 483, 279 A.2d 619 (1971).

Twp. of Woodbridge v. Tyson Corp. 58 N.J. 439, 279 A.2d 97 (1971).

Gen. Inv. Corp. v. Angelina 58 N.J. 396, 278 A.2d 193 (1971).

In re Annaloro, 58 N.J. 387, 277 A.2d 880 (1971).

Jersey City Redev. Agency v. Kugler 58 N.J. 374, 277 A.2d 873 (1971).

Carbone v. Cortlandt Realty Corp. 58 N.J. 366, 277 A.2d 542 (1971).

In re Cohen, 58 N.J. 362, 277 A.2d 540 (1971).

Grotsky v. Grotsky, 58 N.J. 354, 277 A.2d 535 (1971).

Ishmal v. Div. of Alcoholic Beverage Control 58 N.J. 347, 277 A.2d 532 (1971).

Donadio v. Cunningham, 58 N.J. 309, 277 A.2d 375 (1971).

State v. Shack, 58 N.J. 297, 277 A.2d 369 (1971).

Rodriguez v. Rosenblatt, 58 N.J. 281, 277 A.2d 216 (1971).

Avdel Corp. v. Mecure, 58 N.J. 264, 277 A.2d 207 (1971).

Wilson v. Flowers, 58 N.J. 250, 277 A.2d 199 (1971).

Page 437

Monks v. N.J. State Parole Bd., 58 N.J. 238, 277 A.2d 193 (1971).

State v. Vassalluzzo, 58 N.J. 227, 276 A.2d 860 (1971).

Murray v. Michalak, 58 N.J. 220, 276 A.2d 857 (1971).

State v. Smith, 58 N.J. 202, 276 A.2d 369 (1971).

State v. DeBonis, 58 N.J. 182, 276 A.2d 137 (1971).

Motyka v. McCorkle, 58 N.J. 165, 276 A.2d 129 (1971).

In re Pernetti, 58 N.J. 157, 275 A.2d 739 (1971).

Ciurciu v. Modell’s Shoppers World Unishop Inc. 58 N.J. 155, 275 A.2d 737 (1971).

Mercadante v. City of Paterson, 58 N.J. 112, 275 A.2d 440 (1971).

State v. Clark, 58 N.J. 72, 275 A.2d 137 (1971).

Khalaf v. Khalaf 58 N.J. 63, 275 A.2d 132 (1971).

Foosaner v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 58 N.J. 57, 275 A.2d 129 (1971).

Mudge v. Di Nolo, 58 N.J. 55, 274 A.2d 809 (1971).

Alfred Vail Mut. Ass’n v. Bor. of Shrewsbury 58 N.J. 40, 274 A.2d 801 (1971).

Whitmyer Bros. v. Doyle, 58 N.J. 25, 274 A.2d 577 (1971).

Jenkins v. Twp. of Morris Sch. Dist. 58 N.J. 1, 274 A.2d 281 (1971).

Sharpe v. Sharpe, 57 N.J. 468, 273 A.2d 572 (1971).

Flaxman v. Flaxman, 57 N.J. 458, 273 A.2d 567 (1971).

Crudup v. Marrero, 57 N.J. 353, 273 A.2d 16 (1971).

In re Brown, 57 N.J. 322, 272 A.2d 757 (1971).

State v. Rowe, 57 N.J. 293, 271 A.2d 897 (1970).

In re Rigg, 57 N.J. 288, 271 A.2d 714 (1970).

State v. Braxton, 57 N.J. 286, 271 A.2d 713 (1970).

Yerzy v. Levine, 57 N.J. 234, 271 A.2d 425
(1970).

Page 438

Bor. of Point Pleasant Beach v. J.C Williams Co. 57 N.J. 147, 270 A.2d 275 (1970).

Butler v. Bonner Barnewall, Inc. 56 N.J. 567, 267 A.2d 527 (1970).

Walck v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp. 56 N.J. 533, 267 A.2d 508 (1970).

In re Lewandowski, 56 N.J. 380, 267 A.2d 5 (1970).

State v. Reed, 56 N.J. 354, 266 A.2d 584 (1970).

State v. Profaci, 56 N.J. 346, 266 A.2d 579 (1970).

Terminal Warehouse of N.J., Inc. v. Phoenix Ins. Co. 56 N.J. 314, 266 A.2d 297 (1970).

In re Conwy, 56 N.J. 279, 266 A.2d 279 (1970).

State v. Beckett, 56 N.J. 267, 266 A.2d 273 (1970).

Baugh v. Thomas, 56 N.J. 203, 265 A.2d 675 (1970).

Perrine v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. 56 N.J. 120, 265 A.2d 521 (1970).

State v. Cary, 56 N.J. 16, 264 A.2d 209 (1970).

Hammond v. The Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co. 56 N.J. 7, 264 A.2d 204 (1970).

Zamel v. Port of NY. Auth., 56 N.J. 1, 264 A.2d 201 (1970).

State v. Johnson, 55 N.J. 331, 261 A.2d 662 (1970).

Tooley’s Truck Stop, Inc. v. Chrisanthopouls 55 N.J. 231, 260 A.2d 845 (1970).

Ingannamorte v. Kings Super Markets, Inc. 55 N.J. 223, 260 A.2d 841 (1970).

Farley v. $168,400.97, 55 N.J. 31, 259 A.2d 201 (1969).

Dolson v. Anastasia, 55 N.J. 2, 258 A.2d 706 (1969).

Smith v. Twp. of Livingston, 54 N.J. 525, 257 A.2d 698 (1969). Indep. Electrians Elec. Contractors’Ass’n of N.J. v. N.J. Bd. of Exam. 54 N.J. 466, 256 A.2d 33 (1969).

Page 439

Jacobs v. N.J. State Highway Auth. 54 N.J. 393, 255 A.2d 266 (1969).

Mannillo v. Gorski, 54 N.J. 378, 255 A.2d 258 (1969).

Harr v. Allstate Ins. Co., 54 N.J. 287, 255 A.2d 208 (1969).

State v. Manley, 54 N.J. 259, 255 A.2d 193 (1969).

State v. Owens, 54 N.J. 153, 254 A.2d 97 (1969).

Lopez v. N.J. Bell Tel Co., 54 N.J. 129, 253 A.2d 802 (1969).

The City of E. Orange v. Twp. of Livingston 54 N.J. 96, 253 A.2d 546 (1969).

Surina v. Gilbert, 54 N.J. 68, 253 A.2d 465 (1969).

Coleman v. Steinberg, 54 N.J. 58, 253 A.2d 167 (1969).

State v. Gardner, 54 N.J. 37, 252 A.2d 726 (1969).

Summer v. Teaneck, 53 N.J. 548, 251 A.2d 761 (1969).

Higgins v. Am. Soc’y of Clinical Pathologists 53 N.J. 547, 251 A.2d 760 (1969).

Kligman v. Lautman, 53 N.J. 517, 251 A.2d 745
(1969).

Ettin v. Ava Truck Leasing, Inc. 53 N.J. 463, 251 A.2d 278 (1969).

Handleman v. Marwen Stores Corp. 53 N.J. 404, 251 A.2d 122 (1969).

State v. DiRienzo, 53 N.J. 360, 251 A.2d 99 (1969).

Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc., 53 N.J. 344, 250 A.2d 747 (1969).

Bowler v. Fid. Cos. Co. of NY. 53 N.J. 313, 250 A.2d 580 (1969).

Bronfman v. Greene, 53 N.J. 306, 250 A.2d 577 (1969).

In re Thompson, 53 N.J. 276, 250 A.2d 393 (1969).

State v. Gerardo, 53 N.J. 261, 250 A.2d 130 (1969).

State v. Cary, 53 N.J. 256, 250 A.2d 15 (1969).

Young v. Steinberg, 53 N.J. 252, 250 A.2d 13 (1969).

State v. Allen, 53 N.J. 250, 250 A.2d 12 (1969).

Page 440

In re Estate of Caliguire, 53 N.J. 182, 249 A.2d 577 (1969).

Dziedzic v. St. John’s Cleaners Shirt Launderers, Inc., 53 N.J. 157, 249 A.2d 382 (1969).

Jackson v. Muhlenberg Hosp., 53 N.J. 138, 249 A.2d 65 (1969).

In re of the Right of the Grand Jury to Order Prod, of Records of Addonizio, 53 N.J. 107, 248 A.2d 531 (1968).

Div. of Pensions v. Lindeman, 53 N.J. 70, 248 A.2d 427 (1968).

Miehl v. Darpino, 53 N.J. 49, 247 A.2d 878 (1968).

Kram v. Kram, 52 N.J. 545, 247 A.2d 316 (1968).

State v. Simmons, 52 N.J. 538, 247 A.2d 313 (1968).

West v. MacDonald, 52 N.J. 536, 247 A.2d 129 (1968).

State v. Obstein, 52 N.J. 516, 247 A.2d 5 (1968).

Gittleman v. Cent. Jersey Bank Trust Co. 52 N.J. 503, 246 A.2d 713 (1968).

State v. Jacques, 52 N.J. 481, 246 A.2d 444 (1968).

In re Logan, 52 N.J. 475, 246 A.2d 441 (1968).

Scott v. Town of Bloomfield, 52 N.J. 473, 246 A.2d 129 (1968).

In re Estate of Kish, 52 N.J. 454, 246 A.2d 1 (1968).

State v. Mayberry, 52 N.J. 413, 245 A.2d 481 (1968).

State v. Whittle, 52 N.J. 407, 245 A.2d 367 (1968).

State v. Zelichowski, 52 N.J. 377, 245 A.2d 351 (1968).

Longridge Builders, Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Princeton 52 N.J. 348, 245 A.2d 336 (1968).

Howell v. Rosecliff Realty Co., Inc. 52 N.J. 313, 245 A.2d 318 (1968).

Dubil v. Labate, 52 N.J. 255, 245 A.2d 177 (1968).

Ritt v. Ritt, 52 N.J. 177, 244 A.2d 497 (1968).

Rest. Enters., Inc. v. Sussex Mut. Ins. Co. 52 N.J. 73, 243 A.2d 808 (1968).

Page 441

David v. Strelecki 51 N.J. 563, 242 A.2d 371 (1968).

New Market Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Fellows 51 N.J. 419, 241 A.2d 633 (1968).

Lopez v. N.J. Bell Tel. Co., 51 N.J. 362, 240 A.2d 670 (1968).

Conway v. Mister Softee, Inc., 51 N.J. 254, 239 A.2d 241 (1968).

Williams v. Smith, 51 N.J. 161, 238 A.2d 457 (1968).

Windsor Contracting Corp. v. Budny 51 N.J. 5, 236 A.2d 885 (1967).

Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. Johnson 50 N.J. 528, 236 A.2d 843 (1967).

Walsh v. Hill, 50 N.J. 523, 236 A.2d 604 (1967).

In re Buehrer, 50 N.J. 501, 236 A.2d 592 (1967).

In re Brown, 50 N.J. 435, 236 A.2d 142 (1967).

Bollerer v. Elenberger, 50 N.J. 428, 236 A.2d 138 (1967).

Allen v. Strelecki 50 N.J. 410, 236 A.2d 129 (1967).

Patusco v. Prince Macaroni Inc., 50 N.J. 365, 235 A.2d 465 (1967).

O’Neill v. State Highway Dep’t of N.J. 50 N.J. 307, 235 A.2d 1 (1967).

Kohl v. Mayor of Fair Lawn, 50 N.J. 268, 234 A.2d 385 (1967).

Joffe v. Joffe, 50 N.J. 265, 234 A.2d 232 (1967).

Greenberg v. Pickle Prods. Co., 50 N.J. 263, 234 A.2d 231 (1967).

Biruk v. Wilson, 50 N.J. 253, 234 A.2d 225 (1967).

State v. Anderson, 50 N.J. 252, 234 A.2d 225 (1967).

Zentz v. Toop, 50 N.J. 250, 234 A.2d 96 (1967).

Unico v. Owen, 50 N.J. 101, 232 A.2d 405 (1967).

State v. Boykins, 50 N.J. 73, 232 A.2d 141 (1967).

Russell v. Princeton Labs., Inc., 50 N.J. 30, 231 A.2d 800 (1967).

State v. Sinclair, 49 N.J. 525, 231 A.2d 565 (1967).

Page 442

Legion Manor, Inc. v. Mun. Council of Wayne 49 N.J. 420, 231 A.2d 201 (1967).

Commercial Union Ins. Co. of NY. v. Burt Thomas-Aitken Constr. Co., 49 N.J. 389, 230 A.2d 498 (1967).

B.W. King, Inc. v. Town of W. New York 49 N.J. 318, 230 A.2d 133 (1967).

State v. Franklin, 49 N.J. 286, 229 A.2d 657 (1967).

In re Estate of Spano, 49 N.J. 263, 229 A.2d 645 (1967).

State v. Visconti, 49 N.J. 241, 229 A.2d 633 (1967).

State v. Campisi, 49 N.J. 238, 229 A.2d 631 (1967).

In re Complaint of Bhd. of R.R. Trainmen 49 N.J. 174, 229 A.2d 505 (1967).

Carteret Props, v. Variety Donuts, Inc. 49 N.J. 116, 228 A.2d 674 (1967).

Titus v. Lindberg, 49 N.J. 66, 228 A.2d 65 (1967).

N.J. Soc’y for the Prevention of the Cruelty to Animals v. Bd. of Educ. of E. Orange, 49 N.J. 15, 227 A.2d 506 (1967).

Chamberlain v. Sturma, 48 N.J. 556, 226 A.2d 834 (1967).

Miles v. Parrish, 48 N.J. 554, 226 A.2d 833 (1967).

State v. Amsted Indus., 48 N.J. 544, 226 A.2d 715 (1967).

Wells v. Brown, 48 N.J. 378, 225 A.2d 697 (1966).

Munoz Realty Corp. v. Borough of Verona 48 N.J. 360, 225 A.2d 569 (1966).

Gerhardt v. Continental Ins. Co. 48 N.J. 291, 225 A.2d 328 (1966).

Kunzler v. Hoffman, 48 N.J. 277, 225 A.2d 321 (1966).

Theobald v. Kenney’s Suburban House, Inc. 48 N.J. 203, 225 A.2d 10 (1966).

State v. Farmer, 48 N.J. 145, 224 A.2d 481 (1966).

Long v. Sutherland-Backer Co., 48 N.J. 134, 224 A.2d 321 (1966).

Page 443

Hoy v. Capelli, 48 N.J. 81, 222 A.2d 649 (1966).

Caputzal v. The Lindsay Co., 48 N.J. 69, 222 A.2d 513 (1966).

In re Estate of Morton, 48 N.J. 42, 222 A.2d 185 (1966).

Koribanics v. Bd. of Educ. of Clifton 48 N.J. 1, 222 A.2d 87 (1966).

Jurman v. Samuel Braen, Inc., 47 N.J. 586, 222 A.2d 78 (1966).

Petrozzino v. Monroe Calculating Mach. Co. 47 N.J. 577, 222 A.2d 73 (1966).

Donald S. Hubsch, Co. v. Sullivan 47 N.J. 556, 222 A.2d 12 (1966).

Commercial Cleaning Corp. v. Sullivan 47 N.J. 539, 222 A.2d 4 (1966).

Ench v. Mayor of Pequannock Twp. 47 N.J. 535, 222 A.2d 1 (1966).

State v. Vigliano, 47 N.J. 504, 221 A.2d 733 (1966).

State v. Hill, 47 N.J. 490, 221 A.2d 725 (1966).

J.R. Christ Constr. Co. v. Willete Assocs. 47 N.J. 473, 221 A.2d 538 (1966).

State v. Mathis, 47 N.J. 455, 221 A.2d 529 (1966).

State v. Patterson, 47 N.J. 450, 221 A.2d 526
(1966).

State v. Gill, Al N.J. 441, 221 A.2d 521 (1966).

Ace Stone, Inc. v. Twp. of Wayne 47 N.J. 431, 221 A.2d 515 (1966).

Wollerman v. Grand Union Stores, Inc. 47 N.J. 426, 221 A.2d 513 (1966).

State v. Cook, 47 N.J. 402, 221 A.2d 212 (1966).

State v. Baldwin, 47 N.J. 379, 221 A.2d 199
(1966).

In re the Estate of Fleming, 47 N.J. 367, 221 A.2d 193 (1966).

Town of Bloomfield v. The Academy of Med. of N.J. 47 N.J. 358, 221 A.2d 15 (1966).

Page 444

State v. Tate, 47 N.J. 352, 221 A.2d 12 (1966).

Moan v. Coombs, 47 N.J. 348, 221 A.2d 10
(1966).

Cramer v. Betchner, 47 N.J. 345, 221 A.2d 9
(1966).

State v. Balles, 47 N.J. 331, 221 A.2d 1 (1966).

City of E. Orange v. Palmer, 47 N.J. 307, 220 A.2d 679 (1966).

J.W. Sparks Co. v. Gallos, 47 N.J. 295, 220 A.2d 673 (1966).

State v. Roberts, 47 N.J. 286, 220 A.2d 416 (1966).

State v. Miller, 47 N.J. 273, 220 A.2d 409 (1966).

Garcia v. Morales, 47 N.J. 269, 220 A.2d 198 (1966).

Hous. Auth. of Long Branch v. Valentino 47 N.J. 265, 220 A.2d 196 (1966).

Beneficial Fin. Co. of Newark v. Daloisio 47 N.J. 263, 220 A.2d 195 (1966).

In re Monmouth Consol. Water Co. 47 N.J. 251, 220 A.2d 189 (1966).

State v. Washington, 47 N.J. 244, 220 A.2d 185 (1966).

Carroll v. Camden, 47 N.J. 238, 220 A.2d 111 (1966).

Raroha v. Earle Fin. Corp., 47 N.J. 229, 220 A.2d 107 (1966).

Billerman v. Basiak, 47 N.J. 226, 220 A.2d 105 (1966).

O’Keefe v. Dunn, 47 N.J. 210, 219 A.2d 872 (1966).

Ort v. Taylor-Wharton Co., 47 N.J. 198, 219 A.2d 866 (1966).

City of Garfield v. Borough of E. Paterson 47 N.J. 195, 219 A.2d 865 (1966).

Assocs. Discount Corp. v. Palmer 47 N.J. 183, 219 A.2d 858 (1966).

State v. Rosengard, 47 N.J. 180, 219 A.2d 857 (1966).

Stellmah v. Hunterdon Coop. G.L.F. Serv., Inc. 47 N.J. 163, 219 A.2d 616 (1966).

Page 445

Mazza v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bridgeton 47 N.J. 161, 219 A.2d 615 (1966).

State v. Zurawski, 47 N.J. 160, 219 A.2d 614 (1966).

Sahulcik v. Reed, 47 N.J. 156, 219 A.2d 612 (1966).

Groberv. Kahn, 47 N.J. 135, 219 A.2d 601 (1966).

Bd. of Trs. of the Pub. Employees’ Ret. Sys. v. Bd. of Freeholders of Warren, 47 N.J. 132, 219 A.2d 526 (1966).

Aladits v. Simmons Co., 47 N.J. 115, 219 A.2d 517 (1966). Fitzgerald v. Palmer 47 N.J. 106, 219 A.2d 512 (1966).

Twp. of Greenwich v. Gloucester County Bd. of Taxation, 47 N.J. 95, 219A2d507 (1966).

Falcone v. Middlesex County Med. Soc’y 47 N.J. 92, 219 A.2d 505 (1966).

State v. Herman, 47 N.J. 73, 219 A.2d 413 (1966).

In re Bureau of Water Supply Application 47 N.J. 65, 219 A.2d 409 (1966).

Hall v. Alampi, 47 N.J. 60, 219 A.2d 330 (1966).

Maladowitz v. Coley, 47 N.J. 55, 219 A.2d 177 (1966).

Belth v. Anthony Ferrante Son, Inc. 47 N.J. 38, 219 A.2d 168 (1966).

Clover Hill Swimming Club, Inc. v. Goldsboro 47 N.J. 25, 219 A.2d 161 (1966).

Hardy v. Ruhnke, 47 N.J. 10, 218 A.2d 861 (1966).

Bitting v. Willett, 47 N.J. 6, 218 A.2d 859 (1966).

Garden State Farms, Inc. v. Hoffman 46 N.J. 595, 218 A.2d 637 (1966).

Soronen v. Olde Milford Inn, Inc. 46 N.J. 582, 218 A.2d 630 (1966).

Thomas v. Bd. of Educ. of Morris 46 N.J. 581, 218 A.2d 630 (1966).

Page 446

Kerney v. Kahn, 46 N.J. 535, 218 A.2d 403 (1966).

Semanishin v. Metro. Life Ins. Co. 46 N.J. 531, 218 A.2d 401 (1966).

State v. Sheppard, 46 N.J. 526, 218 A.2d 156 (1966).

Bd. of Educ. of Morristown v. Palmer 46 N.J. 522, 218 A.2d 153 (1966).

State v. Cormier, 46 N.J. 494, 218 A.2d 138 (1966).

Pingry Corp. v. Twp. of Hillside 46 N.J. 457, 217 A.2d 868 (1966).

State v. Hutchins, 46 N.J. 439, 217 A.2d 616 (1966). State v. Daniels 46 N.J. 428, 217 A.2d 610 (1966).

State v. Williams, 46 N.J. 427, 217 A.2d 609 (1966).

State v. Sullivan, 46 N.J. 420, 217 A.2d 452 (1966).

State v. Loray, 46 N.J. 417, 217 A.2d 450 (1966).

State v. Rush, 46 N.J. 399, 217 A.2d 441 (1966).

Mager v. United Hosps. of Newark 46 N.J. 398, 217 A.2d 325 (1966).

Biglin v. Town of W. Orange, 46 N.J. 367, 217 A.2d 135 (1966).

Garden State Dairies of Vineland, Inc. v. Sills 46 N.J. 349, 217 A.2d 126 (1966).

State v. Taylor, 46 N.J. 316, 217 A.2d 1 (1966).

State v. Wolf, 46 N.J. 301, 216 A.2d 586 (1966).

Steffenauer v. Mytelka Rose, Inc. 46 N.J. 299, 216 A.2d 585 (1966).

Holden v. Bd. of Educ. of Elizabeth 46 N.J. 281, 216 A.2d 387 (1966).

State v. Green, 46 N.J. 192, 215 A.2d 546 (1965).

State v. Harvin, 46 N.J. 151, 215 A.2d 352 (1965).

McGee v. Bd. of Trs. of Pub. Employees’ Ret. Sys. 45 N.J. 576, 214 A.2d 21 (1965).

Page 447

Maiorino v. Weco Prods. Co., 45 N.J. 570, 214 A.2d 18 (1965).

Harbor Tank Storage, Co. v. LoMuscio 45 N.J. 539, 214 A.2d 1 (1965).

State v. Farmer, 45 N.J. 520, 213 A.2d 249 (1965).

F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Dir. of Div. of Taxation 45 N.J. 466, 213 A. 2d 1 (1965).

Pringle v. N.J. Dep’t of Civil Serv. 45 N.J. 329, 212 A.2d 360 (1965).

Del. River Bay Auth. v. Int’l Org. of Masters, Mates Pilots, 45 N.J. 138, 211 A.2d 789 (1965).

Dep’t of Mental Hygiene v. Judd, 45 N.J. 46, 211 A.2d 198 (1965). State v. Blair 45 N.J. 43, 211 A.2d 196 (1965).

State v. Trantino, 45 N.J. 37, 211 A. 2d 193
(1965).

Schults v. Bd. of Educ. of Teaneck 45 N.J. 2, 210 A.2d 762 (1965).

Bron v. Weintraub, 45 N.J. 1, 210 A.2d 762 (1965).

State v. Lanzo, 44 N.J. 560, 210 A.2d 613 (1965).

Misani v. Ortho Pharm. Corp., 44 N.J. 552, 210 A.2d 609 (1965).

Clark v. Judge, 44 N.J. 550, 210 A.2d 415 (1965).

State v. Bindhammer, 44 N.J. 372, 209 A.2d 124 (1965).

State v. LeVien, 44 N.J. 323, 209 A.2d 97 (1965).

405 Monroe Co. v. Asbury Park, 44 N.J. 322, 208 A.2d 803 (1965).

Hudson County Nat’l Bank v. Provident Inst, for Sav. in Jersey City, 44 N.J. 282, 208 A.2d 409 (1965).

State v. Blanchard, 44 N.J. 195, 207 A.2d 681 (1965).

Gangemi v. Rosengard, 44 N.J. 166, 207 A.2d 665 (1965).

State v. Kain, 44 N.J. 148, 207 A.2d 541 (1965).

Schipper v. Levitt Sons, Inc. 44 N.J. 70, 207 A.2d 314 (1965). George v. Great E. Food Prods., Inc., 44 N.J. 44, 207 A.2d 161 (1965).

Page 448

In re Peacock, 43 N.J. 443, 204 A.2d 882 (1964).

Campi v. Aikins, 43 N.J. 319, 204 A.2d 345 (1964).

State v. Romeo, 43 N.J. 188, 203 A.2d 23 (1964).

State v. Coolack, 43 N.J. 14, 202 A.2d 422 (1964).

Farmer v. State, 42 N.J. 579, 202 A.2d 173 (1964).

Amelchenko v. Bor. of Freehold, 42 N.J. 541, 201 A.2d 726 (1964).

Safeway Trails, Inc. v. Bd. of Pub. Util. Comm’rs 42 N.J. 525, 201 A.2d 717 (1964).

State v. Pemberton, 42 N.J. 424, 201 A.2d 538 (1964).

Raleigh Fitkin-Paul Morgan Mem’l Hosp. v. Anderson 42 N.J. 421, 201 A.2d 537 (1964).

State v. Burnett, 42 N.J. 377, 201 A.2d 39 (1964).

Brown v. Kelly, 42 N.J. 362, 200 A.2d 781 (1964).

State v. Scharfstein, 42 N.J. 354, 200 A.2d 777 (1964).

In re Garofone, 42 N.J. 244, 200 A.2d 101 (1964).

State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146, 199 A.2d 809 (1964).

State v. Kline, 42 N.J. 135, 199 A.2d 650 (1964).

State v. Brown, 41 N.J. 590, 198 A.2d 441 (1964).

Safeway Trails, Inc. v. Furman, 41 N.J. 467, 197 A.2d 366 (1964).

In re Trust under the Will of Arens 41 N.J. 364, 197 A.2d 1 (1964).

State v. Feffer, 41 N.J. 271, 196 A.2d 238 (1963).

State v. Hudson County News Co., 41 N.J. 247, 196 A.2d 225 (1963).

Hudson County News Co. v. Sills, 41 N.J. 220, 195 A.2d 626 (1963).

State v. Reynolds, 41 N.J. 163, 195 A.2d 449 (1963).

State v. Loray, 41 N.J. 131, 195 A.2d 289 (1963).

Page 449

Port of NY. Auth. v. Hackensack Water Co. 41 N.J. 90, 195 A.2d 1 (1963).

City of E. Orange v. The Bd. of Water Comm’rs 41 N.J. 6, 194 A.2d 459 (1963).

In re Kamp, 40 N.J. 588, 194 A.2d 236 (1963).

State v. Di Modica, 40 N.J. 404, 192 A.2d 825 (1963).

City of E. Orange v. Bd. of Water Comm’rs of E. Orange, 40 N.J. 334, 191 A.2d 747 (1963).

State v. Guido, 40 N.J. 191, 191 A.2d 45 (1963).

State v. Margo, 40 N.J. 188, 191 A.2d 43 (1963).

Sanitary Vendors, Inc. v. Byrne, 40 N.J. 157, 190 A.2d 876 (1963).

State v. Miller, 39 N.J. 552, 189 A.2d 710 (1963).

State v. Bertone, 39 N.J. 356, 188 A.2d 599 (1963).

Esso Standard Oil, Co. v. Holderman 39 N.J. 355, 188 A.2d 599 (1963).

Caldaro v. Ferber, 39 N.J. 314, 188 A.2d 576 (1963).

Handleman v. Cox, 39 N.J. 95, 187 A.2d 708 (1963).

Jersey City Merchants Council v. City of Jersey City 39 N.J. 42, 186 A.2d 684 (1962).

Mayer v. Fairlawn Jewish Ctr., 38 N.J. 549, 186 A.2d 274 (1962).

Am. Mercury Ins. Co. v. Bifulco, 38 N.J. 530, 186 A.2d 112 (1962).

Blanch v. Mayor of Magnolia, 38 N.J. 484, 185 A.2d 862 (1962).

Raymond v. Cregar, 38 N.J. 472, 185 A.2d 856 (1962).

In re Belluscio, 38 N.J. 355, 184 A.2d 864 (1962).

Beverly Sewerage Auth. v. Delanco Sewerage Auth. 38 N.J. 354, 184 A.2d 864 (1962).

Gellenthin v. J. D., Inc., 38 N.J. 341, 184 A.2d 857 (1962).

Bd. of Educ. of Asbury Park v. Hoek 38 N.J. 213, 183 A.2d 633 (1962).

Page 450

Boiler Beverages, Inc. v. Davis, 38 N.J. 138, 183 A.2d 64 (1962).

State v. Fischer, 38 N.J. 40, 183 A.2d 11 (1962).

Roselle v. City of E. Orange, 37 N.J. 462, 181 A.2d 751 (1962).

Hohl v. Twp. of Readington, 37 N.J. 271, 181 A.2d 150 (1962).

In re Bluestein, 37 N.J. 167, 179 A.2d 744 (1962).

Graham v. City of Asbury Park, 37 N.J. 166, 179 A.2d 520 (1962).

Crane v. Borough of Essex Fells, 36 N.J. 544, 178 A.2d 196 (1962).

Walnut Realty Co. v. Dir. of Div. of Taxation 36 N.J. 365, 177 A.2d 745 (1962).

N.J. Tpk. Auth. v. City of Jersey City 36 N.J. 332, 177 A.2d 539 (1962).

City of Clifton v. Zweir, 36 N.J. 309, 177 A.2d 545 (1962).

Cohen v. Kaminetsky, 36 N.J. 276, 176 A.2d 483 (1961).

Bechlerv. Parsekian, 36 N.J. 242, 176 A.2d 470 (1961).

State v. Moffa, 36 N.J. 219, 176 A.2d 1 (1961).

Shaw v. Mayor of Wayne, 35 N.J. 595, 174 A.2d 474 (1961).

Dixon v. Holley Smith, 35 N.J. 594, 174 A.2d 477 (1961).

Graham v. Twp. of Edison, 35 N.J. 537, 173 A.2d 403 (1961).

Abeles v. Adams Eng’g Co., 35 N.J. 411, 173 A.2d 246 (1961).

Pieretti v. Mayor of Bloomfield, 35 N.J. 382, 173 A.2d 296 (1961).

In re Pub. Serv. Elec. Gas Co. 35 N.J. 358, 173 A.2d 233 (1961).

Ross Sys. v. Linden Dari-Delite, Inc. 35 N.J. 329, 173 A.2d 258 (1961).

State v. Hudson County News Co., 35 N.J. 284, 173 A.2d 20 (1961).

In re the Schedule Filed by Hackensack Water Co. 35 N.J. 239, 172 A.2d 651 (1961).

State v. Forcella, 35 N.J. 168, 171 A.2d 649 (1961).

State v. La Fera, 35 N.J. 75, 171 A.2d 311 (1961).

Page 451

Long v. handy, 35 N.J. 44, 171 A.2d 1 (1961).

Mazzilli v. Accident Cas. Ins. Co. of Winterthur, 35 N.J. 1, 170 A.2d 800 (1961).

Falcone v. Middlesex Co. Med. Soc’y 34 N.J. 582, 170 A.2d 791 (1961).

State v. Puckett, 34 N.J. 574, 170 A.2d 437 (1961).

State v. Reed, 34 N.J. 554, 170 A.2d 419 (1961).

State v. Horton, 34 N.J. 518, 170 A.2d 1 (1961).

Howard Sav. Inst. v. Peep, 34 N.J. 494, 170 A.2d 39 (1961).

Kievit v. Loyal Protective Life Ins. Co. 34 N.J. 475, 170 A.2d 22 (1961).

Paxton v. Misiuk, 34 N.J. 453, 170 A.2d 16 (1961).

Mover v. Dwelling Managers Co., 34 N.J. 440, 170 A.2d 35 (1961).

Goodlet v. Goodman, 34 N.J. 358, 169 A.2d 140 (1961).

In re Stoldt, 34 N.J. 355, 169 A.2d 138 (1961).

Dept of Health v. Roselle, 34 N.J. 331, 169 A.2d 153 (1961).

Home Owners Constr. Co. v. Borough of Glen Rock 34 N.J. 305, 169 A.2d 129 (1961).

State v. DiPaolo, 34 N.J. 279, 168 A.2d 401 (1961).

In re Bell, 34 N.J. 277, 168 A.2d 201 (1961).

In re Mattera, 34 N.J. 259, 168 A.2d 38 (1961).

Weeks v. City of Newark, 34 N.J. 250, 168 A.2d 11 (1961).

City of Bayonne v. Dougherty, 34 N.J. 240, 168 A.2d 37 (1961).

Messner v. County of Union, 34 N.J. 233, 167 A.2d 897 (1961).

The Port of N.Y. Auth. v. Baumann 34 N.J. 171, 167 A.2d 623 (1961).

The Port of N.Y. Auth. v. Heming, 34 N.J. 144, 167 A.2d 609 (1961).

Sanzari v. Rosenfeld, 34 N.J. 128, 167 A.2d 625 (1961).

Page 452

U.S. Wire Cable Corp. v. Ascher Corp. 34 N.J. 121, 167 A.2d 633 (1961).

Black v. Town of Montclair, 34 N.J. 105, 167 A.2d 388 (1961).

State v. Steenback, 34 N.J. 89, 167 A.2d 397 (1961).

Perri v. Kisselbach, 34 N.J. 84, 167 A.2d 377 (1961).

Fried v. Kervick, 34 N.J. 68, 167 A.2d 380 (1961).

In re the Alleged Unethical Conduct of West 34 N.J. 61, 167 A.2d 396 (1961).

State v. Begyn, 34 N.J. 35, 167 A.2d 161 (1961).

In re the Appeals of Rents 2124 Atl. Ave., Inc. 34 N.J. 21, 166 A.2d 763 (1961).

Melchionne v. City of Newark, 34 N.J. 16, 166 A.2d 761 (1961).

State v. Holley, 34 N.J. 9, 166 A.2d 758 (1961).

McKenzie v. Brixite Mfg. Co., 34 N.J. 1, 166 A.2d 753 (1961).

State v. Walker, 33 N.J. 580, 166 A.2d 567 (1960).

State v. Zelinski 33 N.J. 561, 166 A.2d 383 (1960).

Reilly v. Ozzard, 33 N.J. 529, 166 A.2d 360 (1960).

In re the Trust Established under Article Seventh of the Last Will Testament of Armour, 33 N.J. 517, 166 A.2d 376 (1960).

Indem. Ins. Co. of N.A. v. Metro. Cos. Ins. Co. of NY., 33 N.J. 507, 166 A.2d 355 (1960).

Matits v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. 33 N.J. 488, 166 A.2d 345 (1960).

Grosso v. City of Paterson, 33 N.J. 477, 166 A.2d 161 (1960).

Tua v. Modern Homes, Inc., 33 N.J. 476, 165 A.2d 798 (1960).

Kasiski v. Int’l Paper Co., 33 N.J. 473, 166 A.2d 167 (1960).

Eliasz v. Broadway Bank Trust Co. 33 N.J. 470, 166 A.2d 166 (1960).

State v. Schneider, 33 N.J. 451, 165 A.2d 299 (1960).

Page 453

N.J. Mortgage Inv. Co. v. Dorsey 33 N.J. 448, 165 A.2d 297 (1960).

Lubliner v. Bd. of Alcoholic Beverage Control for Paterson, 33 N.J. 428, 165 A.2d 163 (1960).

Nusbaum v. Newark Morning Ledger Co. 33 N.J. 419, 165 A.2d 177 (1960).

Borough of Fanwood v. Rocco, 33 N.J. 404, 165 A.2d 183 (1960).

State v. Wolak, 33 N.J. 399, 165 A.2d 174 (1960).

Picker v. City of Bayonne, 33 N.J. 390, 165 A.2d 182 (1960).

State v. Kehr, 33 N.J. 381, 164 A.2d 747 (1960).

State v. Konigsberg, 33 N.J. 367, 164 A.2d 740 (1960).

State v. Rosania, 33 N.J. 267, 163 A.2d 139 (1960).

Vill. of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen County Bd. of Taxation, 33 N.J. 262, 163 A.2d 144 (1960).

In re the Alleged Unethical Conduct of Patton 33 N.J. 96, 162 A.2d 567 (1960).

Passaic Valley Sewerage Comm’rs v. Geo. M. Brewster Son, Inc., 32 N.J. 595, 161 A.2d 503 (1960).

Dudley v. Victor Lynn Lines, Inc. 32 N.J. 479, 161 A.2d 479 (1960).

Chary v. First Sav. Loan Ass’n of Little Falls 32 N.J. 418, 161 A.2d 65 (1960).

Henningsen v. Bloomfleld Motors, Inc. 32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69 (1960).

State v. Corbo, 32 N.J. 273, 160 A.2d 625 (1960).

City of Trenton v. Fowler-Thome Co. 32 N.J. 256, 160 A.2d 131 (1960).

Two Guys from Harrison, Inc. v. Furman 32 N.J. 199, 160 A.2d 265 (1960).

Schwartz v. Borough of Stockton, 32 N.J. 141, 160 A.2d 1 (1960).

Page 454

State v. Jenkins, 32 N.J. 109, 160 A.2d 25 (1960).

Stoelting v. Hauck, 32 N.J. 87, 159 A.2d 385 (1960).

In re the Alleged Error in the Preparation of the Ballot for the Recall Election in Hackensack 31 N.J. 592, 158 A.2d 505 (1960).

Schlemm v. Schlemm, 31 N.J. 557, 158 A.2d 508 (1960).

Vill. of Loch Arbour v. Ocean Twp. 31 N.J. 539, 158 A.2d 332 (1960).

Levitt Sons, Inc. v. Div. against Discrimination in the State Dept of Educ., 31 N.J. 514, 158 A.2d 177 (1960).

Sunset Beach Amusement Corp. v. Belk 31 N.J. 445, 158 A.2d 35 (1960).

O’Donnell v. The Chosen Bd. of Freeholders of Morris 31 N.J. 434, 158 A.2d 1 (1960).

Vill. of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen County Bd. of Taxation, 31 N.J. 420, 157 A.2d 829 (1960).

City of Passaic v. Passaic County Bd. of Taxation 31 N.J. 413, 157 A.2d 825 (1960).

Greenberg v. Owens, 31 N.J. 402, 157 A.2d 689 (1960).

Kohlerv. Cobb, 31 N.J. 369, 157 A.2d 681 (1960).

Miele v. McGuire, 31 N.J. 339, 157 A.2d 306 (1960).

Brennan v. Byrne, 31 N.J. 333, 157 A.2d 303 (1960).

Cetrulo v. Byrne, 31 N.J. 320, 157 A.2d 297 (1960).

Radio Taxi Serv., Inc. v. Lincoln Mut. Ins. Co. 31 N.J. 299, 157 A.2d 319 (1960).

Newman v. Borough of Fair Lawn, 31 N.J. 279, 157 A.2d 314 (1960).

In re the Appeals of Rents 2124 Atl. Ave., Inc. 31 N.J. 266, 156 A.2d 700 (1959).

State v. Marchand, 31 N.J. 223, 156 A.2d 245 (1959).

Page 455

The Trs. of Columbia Univ. v. Jacobsen 31 N.J. 221, 156 A.2d 251 (1959).

In re Application of Pa. Newark R.R. Co. 31 N.J. 146, 155 A.2d 761 (1960).

McClain v. Bd. of Educ. City of Woodbury 30 N.J. 567, 154 A.2d 569 (1959).

Konya v. Twp. of Readington, 30 N.J. 556, 154 A.2d 580 (1959).

Brundage v. Twp. of Randolph, 30 N.J. 555, 154 A.2d 581 (1959).

In re the Application of Smigelski 30 N.J. 513, 154 A.2d 1 (1959).

Greenberg v. Stanley, 30 N.J. 485, 153 A.2d 833 (1959).

Andrews v. Bd. of Adjustment, 30 N.J. 245, 152 A.2d 580 (1959).

Elizabeth Fed. Sav. Loan Ass’n v. Howell 30 N.J. 190, 152 A.2d 359 (1959).

Indep. Dairy Workers Union of Hightstown v. Milk Drivers Dairy Employees Local No. 680, 30 N.J. 173, 152 A.2d 331 (1959).

In re Probate of Alleged Will of McDougall 29 N.J. 586, 151 A.2d 540 (1959).

Kozesnik v. Twp. of Montgomery, 29 N.J. 584, 151 A.2d 537 (1959).

Dittmar v. Continental Cos. Co., 29 N.J. 532, 150 A.2d 666 (1959).

Carolyn Schnurer, Inc. v. Stein, 29 N.J. 498, 150 A.2d 490 (1959).

Kervick v. Bontempo, 29 N.J. 469, 150 A.2d 34 (1959).

Wilomay Holding Co. v. McCoy, 29 N.J. 466, 150 A.2d 33 (1959).

Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co. v. A P Trucking Corp., 29 N.J. 455, 149 A.2d 595 (1959).

Spencer v. Recreation Comm’n of N. Plainfield 29 N.J. 450, 149 A.2d 593 (1959).

Sans v. Ramsey Golf Country Club, Inc. 29 N.J. 438, 149 A.2d 599 (1959).

Genovay v. Fox, 29 N.J. 436, 149 A.2d 212 (1959).

DiMicele v. Gen. Motors Corp., 29 N.J. 427, 149 A.2d 223 (1959).

Page 456

Giacobbe v. Gassert, 29 N.J. 421, 149 A.2d 214 (1959).

Oliver v. Russo, 29 N.J. 418, 149 A.2d 213 (1959).

Minery v. Fenton, 29 N.J. 409, 149 A.2d 245 (1959).

Arthur Venneri Co. v. Paterson Hous. Auth. 29 N.J. 392, 149 A.2d 228 (1959).

Coleman v. Newark Morning Ledger Co. 29 N.J. 357, 149 A.2d 193 (1959).

State v. Roller, 29 N.J. 339, 149 A.2d 238 (1959).

Dvorkin v. Twp. of Dover, 29 N.J. 303, 148 A.2d 793 (1959).

Cow Brokerage, Inc. v. Rickard, 29 N.J. 295, 148 A.2d 817 (1959).

Eagle Truck Transp., Inc. v. Bd. of Review 29 N.J. 280, 148 A.2d 822 (1959).

Grundlehner v. Dangler, 29 N.J. 256, 148 A.2d 806 (1959).

Egan v. Erie R.R. Co., 29 N.J. 243, 148 A.2d 830 (1959).

River Dev. Corp. v. Liberty Corp. 29 N.J. 239, 148 A.2d 721 (1959).

Ennis v. Petry, 29 N.J. 236, 148 A.2d 722 (1959).

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Howell 29 N.J. 116, 148 A.2d 145 (1959).

Slurzberg v. Bayonne, 29 N.J. 106, 148 A.2d 171 (1959).

Daily v. Somberg, 28 N.J. 372, 146 A.2d 676 (1958).

Bober v. Indep. Plating Corp., 28 N.J. 160, 145 A.2d 463 (1958).

Salitan v. Magnus, 28 N.J. 20, 145 A.2d 10 (1958).

Simmel v. N.J. Coop. Co., 28 N.J. 1, 143 A.2d 521 (1958).

State v. Butler, 27 N.J. 560, 143 A.2d 530 (1958).

N.J. Tpk. Auth. v. Bowley, 27 N.J. 549, 143 A.2d 558 (1958).

Wall v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Jersey City 27 N.J. 545, 143 A.2d 569 (1958).

Krieger v. City of Jersey City, 27 N.J. 535, 143 A.2d 564 (1958).

Page 457

State v. Lanza, 27 N.J. 516, 143 A.2d 571 (1958).

Yeomans v. City of Jersey City, 27 N.J. 496, 143 A.2d 174 (1958).

City of Passaic v. Passaic County Bd. of Taxation 27 N.J. 467, 142 A.2d 858 (1958).

State v. Smith, 27 N.J. 433, 142 A.2d 890 (1958).

Palmer v. Kingsley, 27 N.J. 425, 142 A.2d 833 (1958).

Wollen v. Borough of Fort Lee, 27 N.J. 408, 142 A.2d 881 (1958).

Frank Rizzo, Inc. v. Alatsas, 27 N.J. 400, 142 A.2d 861 (1958).

Wilson v. City of Long Branch, 27 N.J. 360, 142 A.2d 837 (1958).

State v. Emery, 27 N.J. 348, 142 A.2d 874 (1958).

Commercial Trust Co. of N.J. v. Barnard 27 N.J. 332, 142 A.2d 865 (1958).

Betz v. Dir. of Div. of Motor Vehicles 27 N.J. 324, 142 A.2d 632 (1958).

State v. Samurine, 27 N.J. 322, 142 A.2d 612 (1958).

State v. Giardina, 27 N.J. 313, 142 A.2d 609 (1958).

State v. Salerno, 27 N.J. 289, 142 A.2d 636 (1958).

Trugman v. Reichenstein, 27 N.J. 280, 142 A.2d 618 (1958).

Joseph v. Passaic Hosp. Ass’n, 26 N.J. 557, 141 A.2d 18 (1958).

Woodside Homes, Inc. v. Town of Morristown 26 N.J. 529, 141 A.2d 8 (1958).

Ricciardi v. Marcalus Mfg. Co., 26 N.J. 445, 140 A.2d 215 (1958).

Michaels v. Brookchester, Inc., 26 N.J. 379, 140 A.2d 199 (1958).

Wilkins v. Zelichowski, 26 N.J. 370, 140 A.2d 65 (1958).

State v. Manney, 26 N.J. 362, 140 A.2d 74 (1958).

Zimmer v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. 26 N.J. 339, 139 A.2d 754 (1958).

City of Hoboken v. Jarka Corp., 26 N.J. 336, 139 A.2d 737 (1958).

Page 458

In re the Payment of Unclaimed Deposits in the Superior Court of N.J. to the State Treasurer 26 N.J. 299, 139 A.2d 569 (1958).

Bornstein v. Metro. Bottling Co. 26 N.J. 263, 139 A.2d 404 (1958).

Oldfield v. Stoeco Homes, Inc., 26 N.J. 246, 139 A.2d 291 (1958).

Pub. Util. Constr. Gas Appliance Workers of N.J., Local No. 274 v. Pub. Serv. Elec. Gas Co. 26 N.J. 145, 139 A.2d 1 (1958).

In re the Estate of Fera, 26 N.J. 131, 139 A.2d 23 (1958).

State v. Gorga, 26 N.J. 113, 138 A.2d 833 (1958).

Biglioli v. Durotest Corp., 26 N.J. 33, 138 A.2d 529 (1958).

Four-G Corp. v. Ruta, 25 N.J. 503, 138 A.2d 18 (1958).

Twp. of Howell v. Sagorodny, 25 N.J. 502, 138 A.2d 13 (1958).

Faas v. Zink, 25 N.J. 500, 138 A.2d 42 (1958).

Wytupeck v. City of Camden, 25 N.J. 450, 136 A.2d 887 (1957).

In re Micklus, 25 N.J. 443, 136 A. 2d 772
(1957).

State v. Mucci, 25 N.J. 423, 136 A.2d 761 (1957).

Baker v. Normanoch Ass’n, Inc., 25 N.J. 407, 136 A.2d 645 (1957).

State v. Fid. Union Trust Co., 25 N.J. 387, 136 A.2d 636 (1957).

In re Town of West N.Y., 25 N.J. 377, 136 A.2d 654 (1957).

In re Application of Freygang, 25 N.J. 357, 136 A.2d 625 (1957).

The Hous. Auth. of Union City v. Commonwealth Trust Co., 25 N.J. 330, 136 A.2d 401 (1957).

The Twp. of Hillside v. Sternin, 25 N.J. 317, 136 A.2d 265 (1957).

State v. Laird, 25 N.J. 298, 135 A.2d 859 (1957).

Vargas v. A.H. Bull Steamship Co. 25 N.J. 293, 135 A.2d 857 (1957).

State v. Ruggiero, 25 N.J. 292, 135 A.2d 859 (1957).

In re Quinn, 25 N.J. 284, 135 A.2d 869 (1957).

Morris v. MacNab, 25 N.J. 271, 135 A.2d 657 (1957).

Page 459

In re Incorp. of the Vill. of Loch Arbour 25 N.J. 258, 135 A.2d 663 (1957).

N.J. Zinc Co. v. Bd. of Review, 25 N.J. 235, 135 A.2d 496 (1957).

Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. Bd. of Review, 25 N.J. 221, 135 A.2d 489 (1957).

State v. Wingler, 25 N.J. 161, 135 A.2d 468 (1957).

Howard v. Harwood’s Rest. Co., 25 N.J. 72, 135 A.2d 161 (1957).

Bogert v. Twp. of Washington, 25 N.J. 57, 135 A.2d 1 (1957).

Judson v. Peoples Bank Trust Co., 25 N.J. 17, 134 A.2d 761 (1957).

Gangemi v. Berry, 25 N.J. 1, 134 A.2d 1 (1957).

O’Rourke v. Bd. of Review, 24 N.J. 607, 133 A.2d 333 (1957).

John A. Roebling’s Corp. v. Bodrog 24 N.J. 604, 133 A.2d 331 (1957).

Watson v. U.S. Rubber Co., 24 N.J. 598, 133 A.2d 328 (1957).

Teichler v. Curtiss-Wright Corp. 24 N.J. 585, 133 A.2d 320 (1957).

State v. Manney, 24 N.J. 571, 133 A.2d 313 (1957).

Lokar v. Church of the Sacred Heart 24 N.J. 549, 133 A.2d 12 (1957).

Jardine Estates v. Koppel, 24 N.J. 536, 133 A.2d 1 (1957).

In re White, 24 N.J. 521, 132 A.2d 777 (1957).

County of Essex v. Hindenlang, 24 N.J. 517, 132 A.2d 807 (1957).

Jantausch v. Borough of Verona, 24 N.J. 326, 131 A.2d 881 (1957).

State v. Cooper, 24 N.J. 261, 131 A.2d 756
(1957).

Leers v. Green, 24 N.J. 239, 131 A.2d 781 (1957).

Gilligan v. Int’l Paper Co., 24 N.J. 230, 131 A.2d 503 (1957).

Neeld v. Giroux, 24 N.J. 224, 131 A.2d 508 (1957).

Lettieri v. State Bd. of Med. Exam’rs 24 N.J. 199, 131 A.2d 518 (1957).

Page 460

Bauer v. 141-149 Cedar Lane Holding Co. 24 N.J. 139, 130 A.2d 833 (1957).

Salvemini v. Giblin, 24 N.J. 123, 130 A.2d 842 (1957).

Mara v. Twp. of Parsippany-Troy Hills 24 N.J. 113, 130 A.2d 828 (1957).

Kearny v. Div. of Tax Appeals, 24 N.J. 90, 130 A.2d 845 (1957).

Twp. of N. Bergen v. Div. of Tax Appeals 24 N.J. 89, 130 A.2d 842 (1957).

Fisch v. Manger, 24 N.J. 66, 130 A.2d 815 (1957).

State v. Dunphy, 24 N.J. 10, 130 A.2d 606 (1957).

N.J. Highway Auth. v. Ellis, 24 N.J. 1, 130 A.2d 601 (1957).

Walker v. Stanhope, 23 N.J. 657, 130 A.2d 372 (1957).

Lavino v. Lavino, 23 N.J. 635, 130 A.2d 369 (1957).

The Del, Lackawanna W. R.R. Co. v. Neeld 23 N.J. 561, 130 A.2d 6 (1957).

Bassett v. Neeld, 23 N.J. 551, 130 A.2d 1 (1957).

Hartman v. City of Brigantine, 23 N.J. 530, 129 A.2d 876 (1957).

State v. Curcio, 23 N.J. 521, 129 A.2d 871 (1957).

State v. Campisi 23 N.J. 513, 129 A.2d 880 (1957).

State v. Culver, 23 N.J. 495, 129 A.2d 715 (1957).

Gibraltar Factors Corp. v. Slapo 23 N.J. 459, 129 A.2d 567 (1957).

In re the Estate of Talmage, 23 N.J. 205, 128 A.2d 681 (1957).

Rockhill v. Twp. of Chesterfield 23 N.J. 117, 128 A.2d 473 (1957).

Indep. Dairy Workers Union of Hightstown v. Milk Drivers Dairy Employees Local No. 680, 23 N.J. 85, 127 A.2d 869 (1956).

Gundaker Cent. Motors, Inc. v. Gassert 23 N.J. 71, 127 A.2d 566 (1956).

Kielb v. Johnson, 23 N.J. 60, 127 A.2d 561 (1956).

Page 461

Asbury Park Press, Inc. v. City of Asbury Park 23 N.J. 50, 127 A.2d 401 (1956).

Giles v. Gassert, 23 N.J. 22, 127 A.2d 161 (1956).

Braue v. Fleck, 23 N.J. 1, 127 A.2d 1 (1956).

Gray v. Cholodenko, 22 N.J. 602, 127 A.2d 12 (1956).

Alboum v. City of Newark, 22 N.J. 571, 126 A.2d 885 (1956).

State v. Kollarik, 22 N.J. 558, 126 A.2d 875 (1956).

State v. Cerce, 22 N.J. 236, 125 A.2d 689 (1956).

State v. Novak, 22 N.J. 231, 125 A.2d 521 (1956).

Koch v. Borough of Seaside Heights, 22 N.J. 218, 125 A.2d 402 (1956).

N.J. State Bar Assn. v. N. N.J. Mortgage Assocs. 22 N.J. 184, 123 A.2d 498 (1956).

Russo v. The Governor of N.J., 22 N.J. 156, 123 A.2d 482 (1956).

Brogan v. The Passaic Daily News 22 N.J. 139, 123 A.2d 473 (1956).

Highway Holding Co. v. Yarn Eng’g Corp. 22 N.J. 119, 123 A.2d 511 (1956).

Martell v. Lane, 22 N.J. 110, 123 A.2d 541 (1956).

State v. Leibowitz, 22 N.J. 102, 123 A.2d 526 (1956).

State v. Chernachowicz, 22 N.J. 83, 123 A.2d 526 (1956).

Farone v. Habel, 22 N.J. 66, 123 A.2d 506 (1956).

State v. Smith, 22 N.J. 59, 123 A.2d 369 (1956).

Richman v. Ligham, 22 N.J. 40, 123 A.2d 372 (1956).

Richman v. Neuberger, 22 N.J. 28, 123 A.2d 217 (1956).

Lippman v. Ostrum, 22 N.J. 14, 123 A.2d 230 (1956).

Martin v. Haycock, 22 N.J. 1, 123 A.2d 223 (1956).

Guill v. The Mayor of Hoboken, 21 N.J. 574, 122 A.2d 881 (1956).

Korff v. GG Corp., 21 N.J. 558, 122 A.2d 889 (1956).

Page 462

Gilligan v. Int’l Paper Co., 21 N.J. 557, 122 A.2d 888 (1956).

State v. Roberts, 21 N.J. 552, 123 A.2d 1 (1956).

Leonard v. Werger, 21 N.J. 539, 122 A.2d 777 (1956).

Fantony v. Fantony, 21 N.J. 525, 122 A.2d 593 (1956).

Hart v. Neeld, 21 N.J. 479, 122 A.2d 611 (1956).

Vacca v. Stika, 21 N.J. 471, 122 A.2d 619 (1956).

Paterson Publ’g Co. v. N.J. Bell Tel. Co. 21 N.J. 460, 122 A.2d 599 (1956).

State v. Petrolia, 21 N.J. 453, 122 A.2d 639 (1956).

Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Indem, Ins. Co. of N. Am. 21 N.J. 439, 122 A.2d 604 (1956).

Bogue Elec. Co. v. Bd. of Review of the Div. of Employment Sec, 21 N.J. 431, 122 A.2d 615 (1956).

State v. Radowitz, 21 N.J. 428, 122 A.2d 512 (1956).

State v. Richter, 21 N.J. 421, 122 A.2d 502 (1956).

Roselle v. Wright, 21 N.J. 400, 122 A.2d 506 (1956).

Eureka Printing Co. v. Div. of Employment Sec 21 N.J. 383, 122 A.2d 345 (1956).

Alexander v. N.J. Power Light Co. 21 N.J. 373, 122 A.2d 339 (1956).

In re the Probate of the Alleged Will of Hale 21 N.J. 284, 121 A.2d 511 (1956).

Mortensen v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Employment Sec 21 N.J. 242, 121 A.2d 539 (1956).

In re Greenberg, 21 N.J. 213, 121 A.2d 520 (1956).

Klotz v. Lee, 21 N.J. 148, 121 A.2d 369 (1956).

De Marco v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen 21 N.J. 136, 121 A.2d 396 (1956).

Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y of the U.S. v. Kretzschmar, 21 N.J. 129, 121 A.2d 8 (1956).

Page 463

Sanders v. Cuba R.R. Co., 21 N.J. 78, 120 A.2d 849 (1956).

Nat’l-Ben Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. Camden Trust Co. 21 N.J. 16, 120 A.2d 754 (1956).

Trecartin v. Mahony-Troast Constr. Co. 21 N.J. 1, 120 A.2d 733 (1956).

Rogo v. Mahwah Realty Co., 20 N.J. 527, 120 A.2d 433 (1956).

Bowenv. Olesky, 20 N.J. 520, 120 A.2d 461 (1956).

Newberry v. Walsh, 20 N.J. 484, 120 A.2d 242 (1956).

State v. Haines, 20 N.J. 438, 120 A.2d 118 (1956).

Gilbert v. Town of Irvington, 20 N.J. 432, 120 A.2d 114 (1956).

Armstrong v. Francis Corp., 20 N.J. 320, 120 A.2d 4 (1956).

Untermann v. Untermann, 19 N.J. 507, 117 A.2d 599 (1955).

In re the Probate of Rittenhouse Will 19 N.J. 376, 117 A.2d 401 (1955).

State v. Hozer, 19 N.J. 301, 116 A.2d 193 (1955).

Palkoski v. Garcia, 19 N.J. 175, 115 A.2d 539 (1955).

In re Klaisz, 19 N.J. 145, 115 A.2d 537 (1955).

Silverstein v. Keane, 19 N.J. 1, 115 A.2d 1 (1955).

Giumarra v. Harrington Heights, Inc. 18 N.J. 548, 114 A.2d 720 (1955).

In re Palmisano, 18 N.J. 497, 114 A.2d 553 (1955).

Terminal Constr. Corp. v. Bergen County Hackensack River Sanitary Sewer Dist. Auth., 18 N.J. 294, 113 A.2d 787 (1955).

Melone v. Jersey Cent. Power Light Co. 18 N.J. 163, 113 A.2d 13 (1955).

Turco Prods., Inc. v. Hydrocarbon Chems., Inc. 18 N.J. 130, 113 A.2d 5 (1955).

State v. Hotel Bar Foods, Inc., 18 N.J. 115, 112 A.2d 726 (1955).

Page 464

Hampton v. Hampton Holding Co., 17 N.J. 431, 111 A.2d 761 (1955).

Dolan v. DeCapua, 16 N.J. 599, 109 A.2d 615 (1954).

Spagnuolo v. Bonnet, 16 N.J. 546, 109 A.2d 623 (1954).

City of Trenton v. Lenzner, 16 N.J. 465, 109 A.2d 409 (1954).

Stanley Co. of Am. v. Hercules Powder Co. 16 N.J. 295, 108 A.2d 616 (1954).

Moskowitz v. Herman, 16 N.J. 223, 108 A.2d 426 (1954).

In re Estate of Breckwoldt, 16 N.J. 222, 108 A.2d 431 (1954).

Bohn v. Hudson Manhattan R.R. Co. 16 N.J. 180, 108 A.2d 5 (1954).

Battaglia v. Norton, 16 N.J. 171, 108 A.2d 1 (1954).

In re Messano, 16 N.J. 142, 106 A.2d 537 (1954).

Behrman v. Egan, 16 N.J. 97, 106 A.2d 284 (1954).

Murphy v. Kelly, 15 N.J. 608, 105 A.2d 841 (1954).

In re Genser, 15 N.J. 600, 105 A.2d 829 (1954).

In re Estate of Hoagland, 15 N.J. 592, 105 A.2d 825 (1954).

Mazza v. Cavicchia, 15 N.J. 498, 105 A.2d 545 (1954).

Di Miceli v. State Parole Bd., 15 N.J. 446, 105 A.2d 525 (1954).

Schlossberg v. Jersey City Sewerage Auth. 15 N.J. 360, 104 A.2d 662 (1954).

Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Pellecchia 15 N.J. 162, 104 A.2d 288 (1954).

Repub. of China v. Pong-Tsu Mow, 15 N.J. 139, 104 A.2d 322 (1954).

Zeliff v. Sabatino, 15 N.J. 70, 104 A.2d 54 (1954).

Port of NY. Auth. v. Twp. of Weehawken 14 N.J. 570, 103 A.2d 603 (1954).

Zieper v. Zieper, 14 N.J. 551, 103 A.2d 366 (1954).

Page 465

Ajamian v. Schlanger, 14 N.J. 483, 103 A.2d 9 (1954).

La Salle v. La Pointe, 14 N.J. 476, 102 A.2d 761 (1954).

Ristan v. Frantzen, 14 N.J. 455, 102 A.2d 614 (1954).

State v. Link, 14 N.J. 446, 102 A.2d 609 (1954).

Lehman v. Anderson, 14 N.J. 340, 102 A.2d 385 (1954).

Spoerl v. Twp. of Pennsauken, 14 N.J. 186, 101 A.2d 855 (1954).

In re the Probate of the Last Will Testament of Davis, 14 N.J. 166, 101 A.2d 521 (1953).

C.B. Snyder Realty Co. v. The Nat’l Newark Essex Banking Co. of Newark, 14 N.J. 146, 101 A.2d 544 (1953).

City of Jersey City v. Liggett Myers Tobacco Co., 14 N.J. 112, 101 A.2d 555 (1953).

AM Trading Corp. v. Pa. R.R. Co. 13 N.J. 516, 100 A.2d 513 (1953).

Leith v. Horgan, 13 N.J. 467, 100 A.2d 175 (1953).

Krauss v. A M. Karagheusian, Inc. 13 N.J. 447, 100 A.2d 277 (1953).

Campbell Soup Co. v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Employment Sec, 13 N.J. 431, 100 A.2d 287 (1953).

Seller v. Robinson, 13 N.J. 307, 99 A.2d 422 (1953).

Citizens to Protect Pub. Funds v. Bd. of Educ. of Parsippany-Troy Hills, 13 N.J. 172, 98 A.2d 673 (1953).

A.P. Smith Mfg. Co. v. Barlow, 13 N.J. 145, 98 A.2d 581 (1953).

State v. Bogen, 13 N.J. 137, 98 A.2d 295 (1953).

Joseph Toker Co. v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. 12 N.J. 608, 97 A.2d 598 (1953).

N.J. Bell Tel. Co. v. State, 12 N.J. 568, 97 A.2d 602 (1953).

State v. Pometti, 12 N.J. 446, 97 A.2d 399 (1953).

State v. Congro, 12 N.J. 378, 97 A.2d 10 (1953).

Page 466

Holloway v. Twp. of Pennsauken, 12 N.J. 371, 97 A.2d 141 (1953).

Seitz v. Seitz, 12 N.J. 368, 97 A.2d 152 (1953).

U.S. Fid. Guar. Co. v. Davis 12 N.J. 365, 97 A.2d 161 (1953).

In re Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Cohen, 12 N.J. 362, 96 A.2d 794 (1953).

Bondar v. Simmons Co., 12 N.J. 361, 96 A.2d 795 (1953).

Busch v. Plews, 12 N.J. 352, 96 A.2d 761 (1953).

Bucino v. Malone, 12 N.J. 330, 96 A.2d 669 (1953).

Atl. N. Airlines, Inc. v. Schmmmer 12 N.J. 293, 96 A.2d 652 (1953).

State v. Otis Elevator Co., 12 N.J. 1, 95 A.2d 715 (1953).

Household Fin. Corp. v. Gaffney, 11 N.J. 576, 95 A.2d 412 (1953).

Family Fin. Corp. v. Gaffney, 11 N.J. 565, 95 A.2d 407 (1953).

Johnson Johnson v. Weissbard 11 N.J. 552, 95 A.2d 403 (1953).

Hoffman-LaRoche Inc. v. Weissbard 11 N.J. 541, 95 A.2d 398 (1953).

Johnson Johnson v. Charmley Drug Co. 11 N.J. 526, 95 A.2d 391 (1953).

Nat’l Sur. Corp. v. Barth, 11 N.J. 506, 95 A.2d 145 (1953).

Williamson v. Berger, 11 N.J. 500, 95 A.2d 150 (1953).

Lavigne v. Family Children’s Soc’y of Elizabeth 11 N.J. 473, 95 A.2d 6 (1953).

State v. Janiec, 11 N.J. 397, 94 A.2d 666 (1953).

Yanow v. Seven Oaks Park, Inc., 11 N.J. 341, 94 A.2d 482 (1953).

Martin v. Mazziotti, 11 N.J. 287, 94 A.2d 325 (1953).

United Avertising Corp. v. Bor. of Raritan 11 N.J. 144, 93 A.2d 362 (1952).

In re Pillo, 11 N.J. 8, 93 A.2d 176 (1952).

Page 467

Lake Waterloo Corp. v. Kestenbaum 10 N.J. 525, 92 A.2d 478 (1952).

Atl. Cos. Ins. Co. v. Bingham, 10 N.J. 460, 92 A.2d 1 (1952).

Miller v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson 10 N.J. 398, 91 A.2d 729 (1952).

Henderson v. Henderson, 10 N.J. 390, 91 A.2d 747 (1952).

Long v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson 10 N.J. 380, 91 A.2d 724 (1952).

State v. Carbone, 10 N.J. 329, 91 A.2d 571 (1952).

Neylon v. Ford Motor Co., 10 N.J. 325, 91 A.2d 569 (1952).

In re the Application of Wellhofer 10 N.J. 321, 91 A.2d 338 (1952).

Magnolia Dev. Co. v. Coles, 10 N.J. 223, 89 A.2d 664 (1952).

Midler v. Heinowitz, 10 N.J. 123, 89 A.2d 458 (1952).

Brinkmann v. Urban Realty Co., 10 N.J. 113, 89 A.2d 394 (1952).

Talty v. Bd. of E due. of the Sch. Dist. of Hoboken 10 N.J. 69, 89 A.2d 391 (1952).

State v. Bartell 10 N.J. 9, 89 A.2d 394 (1952).

Rexon v. Bd. of Adjustment of Haddonfield 10 N.J. 1, 89 A.2d 233 (1952).

Mayflower Indus. v. Thor Corp., 9 N.J. 605, 89 A.2d 242 (1952).

In re Miller, 9 N.J. 594, 89 A.2d 255 (1952).

Pyatt v. Mayor of Dunellen, 9 N.J. 548, 89 A.2d 1 (1952).

Bor. of Little Ferry v. Bergen County Sewer Auth. 9 N.J. 536, 89 A.2d 18 (1952).

Hodgson v. Pohl, 9 N.J. 488, 89 A.2d 24 (1952).

In re Application of Kershner, 9 N.J. 471, 88 A.2d 849 (1952).

In re Application of Domako, 9 N.J. 443, 88 A.2d 606 (1952).

State v. Ballard, 9 N.J. 402, 88 A.2d 537 (1952).

Page 468

Reimann v. Monmouth Consol Water Co. 9 N.J. 134, 87 A.2d 325 (1952).

Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Twp. of Ocean 9 N.J. 64, 87 A.2d 9 (1952).

Jelinek v. Sotak, 9 N.J. 19, 86 A.2d 684 (1952).

Rapp v. Pub. Serv. Coordinated Tramp. 9 N.J. 11, 86 A.2d 676 (1952).

Klaiber v. Frank, 9 N.J. 1, 86 A.2d 679 (1952).

Neylon v. Ford Motor Co., 8 N.J. 586, 86 A.2d 577 (1952).

Haines v. Burlington County Bridge Comm’n 8 N.J. 539, 86 A.2d 236 (1952).

Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co. 8 N.J. 433, 86 A.2d 201 (1952).

Massari v. Accurate Bushing Co., 8 N.J. 299, 85 A.2d 260 (1951). Leary v. Gledhill 8 N.J. 260, 84 A.2d 725 (1951).

Speakman v. Mayor of N Plainfield, 8 N.J. 250, 84 A.2d 715 (1951).

Klein v. Millside Farms, Inc., 8 N.J. 240, 84 A.2d 705 (1951).

Hughes v. Eisner, 8 N.J. 228, 84 A.2d 626 (1951).

Boss v. Allen Home Improvement Co. 8 N.J. 219, 84 A.2d 720 (1951).

Washington Constr. Co. v. Spinella 8 N.J. 212, 84 A.2d 617 (1951).

Mueller v. Technical Devices Corp. 8 N.J. 201, 84 A.2d 620 (1951).

City of Newark v. Fischer, 8 N.J. 191, 84 A.2d 547 (1951).

Fairclough v. Baumgartner, 8 N.J. 187, 84 A.2d 545 (1951).

Swanson v. Swanson, 8 N.J. 169, 84 A.2d 450 (1951).

Chasis v. Tumulty, 8 N.J. 147, 84 A.2d 445 (1951).

Hansen v. Eagle-Picher Lead Co., 8 N.J. 133, 84 A.2d 281 (1951).

Nat’l Sur. Corp. v. Barth, 8 N.J. 121, 84 A.2d 1 (1951).

Page 469

Guar. Trust Co. of N.Y. v. First Nat’l Iron Bank of Morristown, 8 N.J. 112, 84 A.2d 6 (1951).

In re Estate of Gillies, 8 N.J. 88, 83 A.2d 889 (1951).

Hester v. Miller, 8 N.J. 81, 83 A.2d 773 (1951).

Ganger v. Moffett, 8 N.J. 73, 83 A.2d 769 (1951).

Fred J. Brotherton, Inc. v. Kreielsheimer 8 N.J. 66, 83 A.2d 707 (1951).

Seward v. Natural Gas Co. of N.J., 8 N.J. 45, 83 A.2d 716 (1951).

Bazinsky v. Conklin, 8 N.J. 40, 83 A.2d 705 (1951).

Milk Drivers Dairy Employees, Local 680, of the Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters v. Shore Dairies, Inc. 8 N.J. 32, 83 A.2d 609 (1951).

The Cent. R.R. Co. of N.J. v. Dir., Div. of Tax Appeals, 8 N.J. 15, 83 A.2d 527 (1951).

In re Estate of McFeely, 8 N.J. 9, 83 A.2d 524 (1951).

Shimp v. Pa. R.R. Co., 8 N.J. 1, 83 A.2d 521 (1951).

State v. Alexander, 7 N.J. 585, 83 A.2d 441 (1951).

Fid. Union Trust Co. v. Margetts, 7 N.J. 556, 82 A.2d 191 (1951).

City of Jersey City v. Dep’t of Civil Serv. 7 N.J. 509, 81 A.2d 777 (1951).

Farris v. Farris Eng’g Corp., 7 N.J. 487, 81 A.2d 731 (1951).

City of Newark v. N.J. Tpk. Auth. 7 N.J. 377, 81 A.2d 705 (1951).

Atanasio v. Silverman, 7 N.J. 278, 81 A.2d 492 (1951).

In re Estate of Goldstein, 7 N.J. 270, 81 A.2d 361 (1951).

Steiker v. Philadelphia Nat’l Ins. Co. 7 N.J. 159, 81 A.2d 10 (1951).

Panko v. Flintkote Co., 7 N.J. 55, 80 A.2d 302 (1951).

Wright v. Vogt, 7 N.J. 1, 80 A.2d 108 (1951).

Stewart v. Norton, 6 N.J. 591, 80 A.2d 111 (1951).

Page 470

Seire v. Police Fire Pension Comm’n of Orange 6 N.J. 586, 80 A.2d 97 (1951).

Westerdale v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp. 6 N.J. 571, 80 A.2d 91 (1951).

Neel v. Ball, 6 N.J. 546, 79 A.2d 459 (1951).

Morin v. Becker, 6 N.J. 457, 79 A.2d 29 (1951).

Petersen v. Falzarano, 6 N.J. 447, 79 A.2d 50 (1951).

Crummy v. Horni, 6 N.J. 396, 78 A.2d 896 (1951).

Staedlerv. Staedler, 6 N.J. 380, 78 A.2d 896 (1951).

Massari v. Einsiedler, 6 N.J. 303, 78 A.2d 572 (1951).

Jamouneau v. Local Gov’t Bd., 6 N.J. 281, 78 A.2d 553 (1951).

O’Loughlin v. O’Loughlin, 6 N.J. 170, 78 A.2d 64 (1951).

Lawes v. Lynch, 6 N.J., 76 A.2d 885 (1950).

Alburger v. Crane, 5 N.J. 573, 76 A.2d 812 (1950).

Fischer v. Twp. of Bedminster, 5 N.J. 534, 76 A.2d 673 (1950).

City of Newark v. Yeskel, 5 N.J. 313, 74 A.2d 883 (1950).

State v. Standard Oil Co., 5 N.J. 281, 74 A.2d 565 (1950).

Stretch v. Watson, 5 N.J. 268, 74 A.2d 597 (1950).

Dransfield v. Citizens Cos. Co. of N.Y. 5 N.J. 190, 74 A.2d 304 (1950).

Pirozzi v. Acme Holding Co. of Pater son 5 N.J. 178, 74 A.2d 297 (1950).

Grobart v. Grobart, 5 N.J. 161, 74 A.2d 294 (1950).

State v. Schmieden 5 N.J. 40, 74 A.2d 290 (1950).

Mueller v. Seaboard Commercial Corp. 5 N.J. 28, 73 A.2d 905 (1950).

James v. Fed. Ins. Co., 5 N.J. 21, 73 A.2d 720 (1950).

State v. De Paolo, 5 N.J. 1, 73 A.2d 564 (1950).

Duff v. Trenton Beverage Co., 4 N.J. 595, 73 A.2d 578 (1950).

Page 471

In re Fox, 4 N.J. 587, 73 A.2d 575 (1950).

Lumund v. Bd. of Adjustment of Rutherford 4 N.J. 577, 73 A.2d 545 (1950).

Farley v. Manning, 4 N.J. 571, 73 A.2d 551 (1950).

Clark v. Am. Can Co., 4 N.J. 527, 73 A.2d 342 (1950).

Bertsch v. Small Invs., Inc., 4 N.J. 520, 73 A.2d 346 (1950).

Lohsen v. Borough of Keansburg, 4 N.J. 498, 73 A.2d 177 (1950).

State v. Bunk, 4 N.J. 482, 73 A.2d 245 (1950).

State v. Bunk, 4 N.J. 461, 73 A.2d 249 (1950).

Allisot v. Fed. Shipbldg. Drydock Co. 4 N.J. 445, 73 A.2d 153 (1950).

Hirsch v. Phily, 4 N.J. 408, 73 A.2d 173 (1950).

Robinson v. Hodge, 4 N.J. 397, 73 A.2d 158 (1950).

Anderson v. Modica, 4 N.J. 383, 73 A.2d 49 (1950).

State v. Jones, 4 N.J. 374, 72 A.2d 872 (1950).

City of Camden v. S. Jersey Port Comm’n 4 N.J. 357, 73 A.2d 55 (1950).

State v. Garford Trucking, Inc., 4 N.J. 346, 72 A.2d 851 (1950).

Katz v. Farber, 4 N.J. 333, 72 A.2d 862 (1950).

Kopak v. Poker, 4 N.J. 327, 72 A.2d 869 (1950).

Young v. Sabol, 4 N.J. 309, 72 A.2d 846 (1950).

Raab v. Am. Cos. Co., 4 N.J. 303, 72 A.2d 848 (1950).

Bd. of Health of Weehawken v. N.Y. Cent. R.R. Co. 4 N.J. 293, 72 A.2d 511 (1950).

Volenti v. Bd. of Review of UCC of N.J. 4 N.J. 287, 72 A.2d 516 (1950).

Morsey v. Erie, 4 N.J. 276, 72 A.2d 303 (1950).

Hofer v. Carina, 4 N.J. 244, 72 A.2d 335 (1950).

Page 472

McKinney v. Pub. Sew. Interstate Transp. Co. 4 N.J. 229, 72 A.2d 326 (1950).

State v. Jones, 4 N.J. 207, 72 A.2d 322 (1950).

Mead v. Wiley Methodist Episcopal Church 4 N.J. 200, 72 A.2d 183 (1950).

Callahan v. Nat’l Lead Co., 4 N.J. 150, 72 A.2d 187 (1950).

Brass v. Todd, 4 N.J. 132, 71 A.2d 891 (1950).

Handlon v. Town of Belleville, 4 N.J. 99, 71A 2d 624 (1950).

Van Inwegen v. Van Inwegen, 4 N.J. 46, 71 A.2d 340 (1950).

Schroeder v. Zink, 4 N.J. 1, 71 A.2d 321
(1950).

City of Newark v. Fischer, 3 N.J. 488, 70 A.2d 733 (1950).

Kuiken v. Simonds, 3 N.J. 480, 70 A.2d 740 (1950).

Ward v. Keenan, 3 N.J. 298, 70 A.2d 77 (1949).

Ross v. Orr, 3 N.J. 277, 69 A.2d 730 (1949).

Granahan v. Celanese Corp., 3 N.J. 187, 69 A.2d 572 (1949).

Weinstein v. Swartz, 3 N.J. 80, 68 A.2d 865 (1949).

Temple v. Starch Trucking Co., 3 N.J. 42, 68 A.2d 828 (1949).

Giordano v. City Comm’n of Newark 2 N.J. 585, 67 A.2d 454 (1949).

Seawell v. MacWithey, 2 N.J. 563, 67 A.2d 309 (1949).

Lawler v. Lawler, 2 N.J. 527, 66 A.2d 855 (1949).

Peff v. Peff, 2 N.J. 513, 67 A.2d 161 (1949).

Westfield Airport, Inc. v. Middlesex-Union Airport Co., 2 N.J. 486, 67 A.2d 173 (1949).

Seiken v. Todd Dry Dock, Inc., 2 N.J. 469, 67 A.2d 131 (1949).

Rogers v. Courier Post Co., 2 N.J. 393, 66 A.2d 869 (1949).

Kaufman v. Pa. R.R. Co., 2 N.J. 318, 66 A.2d 527 (1949).

Bingenheimer v. Bingenheimer, 2 N.J. 284, 66 A.2d 327 (1949).

Page 473

Beh v. Breeze Corp., 2 N.J. 279, 66 A.2d 156 (1949).

Esposito v. Lazar, 2 N.J. 257, 66 A.2d 172 (1949).

Brown v. Brown, 2 N.J. 252, 66 A.2d 154 (1949).

A Hollander Son, Inc. v. Imperial Fur Blending Corp., 2 N.J. 235, 66 A.2d 319 (1949).

Lott v. Delmar, 2 N.J. 229, 66 A.2d 25 (1949).

Burlington County Trust Co. v. Di Castelcicala 2 N.J. 214, 66 A.2d 164 (1949).

Hussong v. Fox, 2 N.J. 209, 66 A.2d 38 (1949).

State v. Vigorito, 2 N.J. 185, 65 A.2d 841 (1949).

Seibold v. Lake. Intervale Corp., 2 N.J. 153, 65 A.2d 848 (1949).

Grobart v. Soc’y for Establishing Useful Mfrs. 2 N.J. 136, 65 A.2d 833 (1949).

Alper v. Alper, 2 N.J. 105, 65 A.2d 737 (1949).

In re Alper, 2 N.J. 104, 65 A.2d 736 (1949).

Franklin v. Franklin, 2 N.J. 103, 65 A.2d 665 (1949).

Lobek v. Gross, 2 N.J. 100, 65 A.2d 744 (1949).

Cody v. Fitzgerald, 2 N.J. 93, 65 A.2d 750 (1949).

Goodwillie v. City of Bayonne, 2 N.J. 88, 65 A.2d 742 (1949).

Royal Blue Coaches v. Del. River Coach Lines Inc., 2 N.J. 73, 65 A.2d 264 (1949).

Casriel v. King, 2 N.J. 45, 65 A.2d 514 (1949).

Kimberley Sch. v. Town of Montclair 2 N.J. 28, 65 A.2d 500 (1949).

National House Farms Ass’n, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Oakland, 2 N.J. 11, 65 A.2d 518 (1949).

Evans v. Rosenberg, 1 N.J. 590, 65 A.2d 55 (1949).

In the Matter of Morris Wesler, 1 N.J. 573, 64 A.2d 880 (1949).

Temple v. Clinton Trust Co., 1 N.J. 568, 64 A.2d 880 (1949).

Page 474

Arezzi v. Cutrale, 1 N.J. 566, 64 A.2d 612 (1949).

McCarter v. McGregor, 1 N.J. 558, 64 A.2d 449 (1949).

Capozzoli v. Capozzoli, 1 N.J. 540, 64 A.2d 440 (1949).

Tonti v. Chadmck, 1 N.J. 531, 64 A.2d 436 (1949).

Tissot v. Flashner Realty Co., 1 N.J. 529, 64 A.2d 435 (1949).

Capozzi v. Capozzi 1 N.J. 523, 64 A.2d 433 (1949).

Riverton Country Club v. Thomas, 1 N.J. 508, 64 A.2d 347 (1948).

Wolk v. Widlansky, 1 N.J. 491, 64 A.2d 230 (1949).

Vanderbach v. Vollinger, 1 N.J. 481, 64 A.2d 225 (1949).

Morrissey v. Morrissey, 1 N.J. 448, 64 A. 2d 209 (1949).

In the Matter of Application for Dissolution 1 N.J. 437, 64 A.2d 80 (1949).

Kelley v. N Morris Realty Co., 1 N.J. 421, 64 A.2d 73 (1949).

Cline v. Kurzweil, 1 N.J. 407, 64 A.2d 66 (1949).

In the Matter of Estate of Bumsted 1 N.J. 386, 64 A.2d 55 (1949).

Wickwire v. Church, 1 N.J. 384, 64 A.2d 55 (1949).

Taylor v. Phox Bus Co., 1 N.J. 367, 63 A.2d 882 (1949).

Newton Trust Co. v. Chambers, 1 N.J. 366, 63 A.2d 882 (1949).

Lutz v. Ryno, 1 N.J. 363, 63 A.2d 881 (1949).

Robinson v. Hodge, 1 N.J. 357, 63 A.2d 804 (1949).

Lott v. Lott, 1 N.J. 356, 63 A.2d 705 (1949).

Coyle v. Erie R.R. Co., 1 N.J. 350, 63 A.2d 702 (1949).

Earlin v. Mors, 1 N.J. 336, 63 A.2d 531 (1949).

Vanagas v. Vanagas, 1 N.J. 335, 63 A.2d 531 (1949).

Interstate Sanitation Comm’n v. Twp. of Weekawken 1 N.J. 330, 63 A.2d 528 (1949).

Lasasso v. Lasasso, 1 N.J. 324, 63 A.2d 526 (1949).

Robertson v. Hackensack Trust Co. 1 N.J. 304, 63 A.2d 515 (1949).

Page 475

Erie R.R. Co. v. State Dep’t of Tax Fin. 1 N.J. 298, 63 A.2d 268 (1949).

Akrep v. Akrep, 1 N.J. 268, 63 A.2d 253 (1949).

Realty Affairs v. Mem’l Dev. Co., 1 N.J. 263, 63 A.2d 251 (1949).

Kress v. Kress, 1 N.J. 257, 62 A.2d 881 (1949).

Heuer v. Rubin, 1 N.J. 251, 62 A.2d 812 (1949).

Atanasio v. Silverman, 1 N.J. 245, 62 A.2d 809 (1949).

Bachman Chocolate Mfg. Co. v. Lehigh Warehouse Transp. Co., 1 N.J. 239, 62 A.2d 806 (1949).

In the Matter of Stein, 1 N.J. 228, 62 A.2d 801 (1949).

Taylor v. City of Hackensack, 1 N.J. 211, 62 A.2d 686 (1948).

Schwartz v. Rothman, 1 N.J. 206, 62 A.2d 684 (1948).

Skislak v. Cont’l Mining Smelting Corp. 1 N.J. 167, 62 A.2d 397 (1948).

Mesce v. Gradone, 1 N.J. 159, 62 A.2d 394 (1948).

Fleischer v. James Drug Stores, 1 N.J. 138, 62 A.2d 383 (1948).

Schlenk v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. 1 N.J. 131, 62 A.2d 380 (1948).

Hyman v. Mutter, 1 N.J. 124, 62 A.2d 221 (1948).

Bead Chain Mfg. Co. v. Smith, 1 N.J. 118, 62 A.2d 215 (1948).

DeRidderv. DeRidder, 1 N.J. 116, 62 A.2d 215 (1948).

Ferraiuolo v. Manno, 1 N.J. 105, 62 A.2d 141 (1948).

Gray v. Bradley, 1 N.J. 102, 62 A.2d 139 (1948).

Ebling Brewing Co. v. Heirloom Inc. 1 N.J. 71, 61 A.2d 885 (1948).

Scharf v. Recorder’s Court, 1 N.J. 59, 61 A.2d 765 (1948).

Cofone v. Cofone, 1 N.J. 58, 61 A.2d 751 (1948).

Pfeiffer v. Pfeiffer, 1 N.J. 55, 61 A.2d 736 (1948).

Page 476

DeDonis v. DeDonis, 1 N.J. 43, 61 A.2d 729 (1948).

Smith v. Hrzich, 1 N.J. 1, 61 A.2d 497 (1948).

Appendix “C Compendium of cases in which a Superior Court Judge was assigned to serve on the Supreme Court in order to constitute a quorum of five

In re Election Law Enforcement Comm’n Advisory Opinion No. 01-2008, 201 N.J. 254, 989 A.2d 1254 (2010) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Wilson v. Brown, 198 N.J. 473, 968 A.2d 1189 (2009) (2 judges temporarily assigned).

Hirl ex rel. Hirl v. Bank of Am., N. Am. 198 N.J. 318, 967 A.2d 284 (2009) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Piermount Iron Works, Inc. v. Evanston Ins. Co. 197 N.J. 432, 963 A.2d 818 (2009) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Opinion 39 of Comm. on Attorney Adver 197 N.J. 66, 961 A.2d 722 (2008) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Honeywell Int’l Inc. v. Travelers Cos. Sur. Co. 196 N.J. 82, 951 A.2d 1036 (2008) (2 judges temporarily assigned).

Rosen v. Smith Barney, Inc., 195 N.J. 423, 950 A.2d 205 (2008) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Cooper Univ. Hosp. v. Jacobs, 191 N.J. 125, 922 A.2d 731 (2007) (2 judges temporarily assigned).

Wilson v. General Motors Corp., 190 N.J. 336, 921 A.2d 414 (2007) (2 judges temporarily assigned).

Asbury Park Bd. of Educ. v. N.J. Dep’t of Educ. 180 N.J. 113, 849 A.2d 160 (2004) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Asbury Park Bd. of Educ. v. N.J. Dep’t of Educ. 180 N.J. 109, 849 A.2d 158 (2004) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Wright v. State, 169 N.J. 422, 778 A.2d 443 (2001) (2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 477

In re Registrant M.F., 169 N.J. 45, 776 A.2d 780 (2001) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Trantino v. State Parole Bd., 167 N.J. 619, 772 A.2d 926 (2001) (2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Maryland, 167 N.J. 471, 771 A.2d 1220 (2001) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Trantino v. N.J. State Parole Bd. 166 N.J. 113, 764 A.2d 940 (2001) (2 judges temporarily assigned).

Amerada Hess Corp. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 107 N.J. 307, 526 A.2d 1029 (1987) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Exxon Corp. v. Hunt, 97 N.J. 526, 481 A.2d 271 (1984) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Krakauer, 81 N.J. 32, 404 A.2d 1137 (1979) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

N.J. State P.B.A., Local 29 v. Town of Irvington 80 N.J. 271, 403 A.2d 473 (1979) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

City of Atl. City v. Laezza, 80 N.J. 255, 403 A.2d 465 (1979) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Revision of Rates by Redi-Flo Corp. 76 N.J. 21, 384 A.2d 1086 (1978) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

S.E.W. Friel Co. v. N.J. Tpk. Auth. 73 N.J. 107, 373 A.2d 364 (1977) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Conda, 72 N.J. 229, 370 A.2d 16 (1977) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Borland v. Bayonne Hosp., 72 N.J. 152, 369 A.2d 1 (1977) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Sears, 71 N.J. 175, 364 A.2d 777 (1976) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Dunne v. Fireman’s Fund Am. Ins. Co. 69 N.J. 244, 353 A.2d 508 (1976) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 478

State v. Jester, 68 N.J. 87, 342 A.2d 850 (1975) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Davis, 68 N.J. 69, 342 A.2d 841 (1975) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Ruiz, 68 N.J. 54, 342 A.2d 833 (1975) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Avant v. Clifford 67 N.J. 496, 341 A.2d 629 (1975) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Brinkmann, 67 N.J. 385, 340 A.2d 657 (1975) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Empire Mut. Ins. Co. v. Melburg, 67 N.J. 139, 336 A.2d 483 (1975) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Caruso, 67 N.J. 44, 335 A.2d 10 (1975) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Quaremba v. Allan, 67 N.J. 1, 334 A.2d 321 (1975) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Nash, 64 N.J. 464, 317 A.2d 689 (1974) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

White v. Atl. City Press, 64 N.J. 128, 313 A.2d 197 (1973) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Blasi 64 N.J. 71, 312 A.2d 146 (1973) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Blasi 64 N.J. 51, 312 A.2d 135 (1973) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Redinger, 64 N.J. 41, 312 A.2d 129 (1973) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Rogers v. State, 64 N.J. 40, 312 A.2d 129 (1973) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Giagnacovo v. Beggs Bros., 64 N.J. 32, 311 A.2d 745 (1973) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 479

In re State in Interest of D.S., 63 N.J. 541, 310 A.2d 460 (1973) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Munger, 63 N.J. 514, 309 A.2d 205 (1973) (2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Application of the Ins. Rating Bd. 63 N.J. 413, 307 A.2d 604 (1973) (2 judges temporarily assigned).

Telesnick v. City of Newark, 63 N.J. 221, 306 A.2d 435 (1973) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Rector v. Rector, 62 N.J. 577, 303 A.2d 881 (1973) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Barney’s Furniture Warehouse of Newark, Inc. v. City of Newark, 62 N.J. 456, 303 A.2d 76 (1973) (2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Lair, 62 N.J. 388, 301 A. 2d 748
(1973) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Russo v. Teachers’ Pension Annuity Fund 62 N.J. 142, 299 A.2d 697 (1973) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Farrell v. Votator, 62 N.J. Ill, 29 A.2d 394 (1973) (2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. McDavitt, 62 N.J. 36, 297 A.2d 849 (1972) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Harris v. State, 61 N.J. 585, 297 A.2d 561 (1972) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Draughn, 61 N.J. 515, 296 A.2d 68 (1972) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Affiliated Distillers Brands Corp. v. Sills 56 N.J. 251, 265 A. 2d 809 (1970) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Puryear, 52 N.J. 81, 243 A.2d 812 (1968) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Isko v. Planning Bd. of Twp. of Livingston 51 N.J. 162, 238 A.2d 457 (1968) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 480

Williams v. Bituminous Cos. Corp. 51 N.J. 146, 238 A.2d 177 (1968) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Mason v. Civil Serv. Comm’n, 51 N.J. 115, 238 A.2d 161 (1968) (1 judge temporarily assigned).

Appendix “DCompendium of cases in which, in the absence of a quorum of at least five Supreme Court Justices, more Superior Court Judges were assigned than were needed to meet the quorum requirements

E. Dickerson Son, Inc. v. Ernst Young, LLP, 179 N.J. 500, 846 A.2d 1237 (2004) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Casino Licensees, 138 N.J. 1, 647 A.2d 454 (1993) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Rudbart v. N. Jersey Dist. Water Supply Comm’n 127 N.J. 344, 605 A.2d 681 (1992) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Cheng Lin Wang v. Allstate Ins. Co. 125 N.J. 2, 592 A.2d 527 (1991) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 121 N.J. 69, 577 A.2d 1239 (1990) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 109 N.J. 201, 536 A.2d 243 (1988) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Exxon Corp. v. Hunt, 109 N.J. 110, 534 A.2d 1 (1987) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Ridgewood v. Bolger Found., 104 N.J. 337, 517 A.2d 135 (1986) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Application of Madin/Lord Land Dev. Int’l 103 N.J. 689, 512 A.2d 490 (1986) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Atlantic City Racing Ass’n v. Attorney Gen. 98 N.J. 535, 489 A.2d 165 (1985) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Petition of Jersey Cent. Power Light Co. 85 N.J. 520, 428 A.2d 498 (1981) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 481

State v. Helton, 72 N.J. 169, 369 A.2d 10 (1977) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Goss v. Allen, 70 N.J. 442, 360 A.2d 388 (1976) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

U.S. Trust Co. of N.Y. v. State, 69 N.J. 253, 353 A.2d 514 (1976) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Fearick, 69 N.J. 32, 350 A.2d 227 (1976) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Abrahams v. Civil Serv. Comm’n of N.J. 65 N.J. 61, 319 A.2d 483 (1974) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Hausman v. Dept of Insts. Agencies 64 N.J. 202, 314 A.2d 362 (1974) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Brady, 64 N.J. 100, 312 A.2d 505 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Mayflower Sec. Co. v. Bureau of Sec 64 N.J. 85, 312 A.2d 497 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Hinds v. N.J. State Bd. of Bar Exam’rs 64 N.J. 59, 312 A.2d 139 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Allan-Deane Corp. v. Twp. of Bedminster 63 N.J. 591, 311 A.2d 177 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Nathan Miriam Barnert Mem’l Hosp. Ass’n v. Young, 63 N.J. 578, 311 A.2d 1 (1972) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Alaimo v. Burdge, 63 N.J. 574, 310 A.2d 730 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Polcaro v. City of E. Orange, 63 N.J. 548, 310 A.2d 463 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Smith, 63 N.J. 547, 310 A.2d 463 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Motter v. E. State Plumbing Util. Lines, Inc. 63 N.J. 545, 310 A.2d 462 (1972) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 482

Smith v. Twp. of Hazlet, 63 N.J. 523, 309 A.2d 210 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Estate of Lambert, 63 N.J. 448, 308 A.2d 11 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Knight, 63 N.J. 187, 305 A.2d 793 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Data Access Sys., Inc. v. State, 63 N.J. 158, 305 A.2d 427 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Peace, 63 N.J. 127, 305 A.2d 410 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Fair Lawn Educ. Ass’n, 63 N.J. 112, 305 A.2d 72 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Meadowlands Reg’l Redev. Agency v. State 63 N.J. 35, 304 A.2d 545 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Rosenfeld, 62 N.J. 594, 303 A.2d 889 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Brown, 62 N.J. 588, 303 A.2d 886 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Krieger v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 62 N.J. 423, 302 A.2d 129 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

S.S. O. Corp. v. Twp. of Bernards Sewerage Auth 62 N.J. 369, 301 A.2d 738 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Beckworth v. N.J. State Parole Bd. 62 N.J. 348, 301 A.2d 727 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Hous. Auth. of City of ML City v. Atl. City Exposition, Inc., 62 N.J. 322, 301 A.2d 441 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. La Porte, 62 N.J. 312, 301 A.2d 146 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Caicco v. Toto Bros., Inc., 62 N.J. 305, 301 A.2d 143 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 483

State Troopers Fraternal Ass’n, Inc. v. State 62 N.J. 302, 301 A.2d 141 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Miscavage, 62 N.J. 294, 301 A.2d 136 (1973) (3 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Zimmelman, 62 N.J. 279, 301 A.2d 129 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

City of Millville v. Cumberland County Bd. of Taxation, 62 N.J. 278, 300 A. 2d 849 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Haase v. N. Hudson Scrap Iron Corp. 62 N.J. 263, 300 A.2d 561 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Freedom Fin. Co. v. Berry, 62 N.J. 256, 300 A.2d 341 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Sports Complex in the Hackensack Meadowlands 62 N.J. 248, 300 A. 2d 337 (1973) (3 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Ceva v. Twp. of River Vale, 62 N.J. 245, 300 A.2d 151 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Brody v. City of Millville, 62 N.J. 244, 300 A.2d 150 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Muzio v. Krauzer, 62 N.J. 243, 300 A.2d 150 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Thornton v. Chamberlain Mfg. Corp. 62 N.J. 235, 300 A.2d 146 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Nieder v. Royal Indem. Ins. Co., 62 N.J. 229, 300 A.2d 142 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Twp. of Willingboro v. Burlington County Bd. of Taxation, 62 N.J. 203, 300 A.2d 129 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Dessel v. Dessel, 62 N.J. 141, 299 A.2d 409 (1973) (3 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 484

In re La Duca, 62 N.J. 133, 299 A.2d 405 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Cooke v. Yarrington, 62 N.J. 123, 299 A.2d 400 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Kelly v. Sterr, 62 N.J. 105, 299 A.2d 390 (1973) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Bierman, 62 N.J. 91, 299 A.2d 89 (1973) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Theurer, 62 N.J. 64, 298 A.2d 72 (1972) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Willett Holding Co., 62 N.J. 59, 298 A.2d 69 (1972) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Polk v. Cherry Hill Apartments, Inc. 62 N.J. 55, 298 A.2d 68 (1972) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. N.J. Nat’l Bank Trust Co. 62 N.J. 50, 298 A.2d 65 (1972) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Parkview Vill. Assocs. v. Bor. of Collingswood 62 N.J. 21, 297 A.2d 842 (1972) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Catto v. Schnepp, 62 N.J. 20, 297 A.2d 841 (1972) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Lena v. Ensley, 62 N.J. 19, 297 A.2d 841 (1972) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Vaclavicek v. Olejarz, 61 N.J. 581, 297 A.2d 3 (1972) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Dixon v. Dixon, 61 N.J. 578, 297 A.2d 2 (1972) (4 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

J.H.M. Realty Corp. v. Town of Belleville 61 N.J. 577, 297 A.2d 2 (1972) (3 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Brooks v. City of Orange, 61 N.J. 576, 297 A.2d 1 (1972) (3 Justices + 3 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 485

Barkley v. Foster Estates, Inc., 61 N.J. 576, 297 A.2d 1 (1972) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Green v. City of Newark, 61 N.J. 460, 295 A.2d 201 (1972) (4 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Appendix “ECompendium of cases in which, although there already was a quorum of at least five Supreme Court Justices, a Superior Court Judge or Judges nevertheless were assigned “to serve temporarily in the Supreme Court.

Rowe v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 189 N.J. 615, 917 A.2d 767 (2007) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Maimone v. City of Ml City, 188 N.J. 221, 903 A.2d 1055 (2006) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Arthur, 184 N.J. 307, 877 A.2d 1183 (2005) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Bd. of Educ. v. N.J. Dep’t of Educ. 183 N.J. 264, 872 A.2d 1052 (2005) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Camden Bd. of Educ. v. Alexander 181 N.J. 187, 854 A.2d 342 (2004) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Am. Trucking Ass’ns v. State, 180 N.J. 377, 852 A.2d 142 (2004) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Bunalski v. Twp. of Irvington, 180 N.J. 161, 849 A.2d 1070 (2004) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Hernandez v. Montville Twp. Bd. of Educ. 179 N.J. 81, 843 A.2d 1091 (2004) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Knorr v. Smeal, 178 N.J. 169, 836 A.2d 794 (2003) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Ferreira v. Rancocas Orthopedic Assocs. 178 N.J. 144, 836 A.2d 779 (2003) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

McNeil v. Legislative Apportionment Comm’n 177 N.J. 364, 828 A.2d 840 (2003) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 486

Sojourner A. v. N.J. Dep’t of Human Servs. 177 N.J. 318, 828 A.2d 306 (2003) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

McNeil v. Legislative Apportionment Comm’n of N.J. 176 N.J. 484, 825 A.2d 1124 (2003) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

AS. v. S.E.W., 175 N.J. 588, 818 A.2d 1270 (2003) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Watson v. City of E. Orange, 175 N.J. 442, 815 A.2d 956 (2003) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Mendez, 175 N.J. 201, 814 A.2d 1043 (2002) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

McQueen v. Brown, 175 N.J. 200, 814 A.2d 1042 (2002) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Darby, 174 N.J. 509, 809 A.2d 138 (2002) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Sopko v. Slackman (in Re Estate of Roccamonte) 174 N.J. 381, 808 A.2d 838 (2002) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Breslin, 171 N.J. 235, 793 A.2d 645 (2002) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Registrant J.G., 169 N.J. 304, 777 A.2d 891 (2001) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Passaic County Utils. Auth. 164 N.J. 270, 753 A.2d 661 (2000) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

R.F. v. Abbott Labs., 162 N.J. 596, 745 A.2d 1174 (2000) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Timmendequas, 161 N.J. 515, 737 A.2d 55 (1999) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Baxt v. Liloia, 155 N.J. 190, 714 A.2d 271 (1998) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Integrity Ins. Co., 147 N.J. 128, 685 A.2d 1286 (1996) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 487

Hawkins v. Harris, 141 N.J. 207, 661 A.2d 284 (1995) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

D’Agostino v. Johnson Johnson 133 N.J. 516, 628 A.2d 305 (1993) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Bd. of Educ. Of Englewood Cliffs v. Bd. of Educ. of Tenafly, 132 N.J. 327, 625 A.2d 483 (1993) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Instructional Sys. v. Computer Curriculum Corp. 130 N.J. 324, 614 A.2d 124 (1992) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Kelly v. Alstores Realty Corp., 130 N.J. 313, 613 A.2d 1163 (1992) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State, Dept. of Envtl. Prot. v. Signo Trading Int’l 130 N.J. 51, 612 A.2d 932 (1992) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Perini Corp. v. Create Bay Hotel Casino, Inc. 129 N.J. 479, 610 A.2d 364 (1992) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Advisory Comm. on Prof I Ethics Opinion 621 128 N.J. 577, 608 A.2d 880 (1992) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Bendix Corp. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation 125 N.J. 20, 592 A.2d 536 (1991) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

T E Indus. v. Safety Light Corp. 123 N.J. 371, 587 A.2d 1249 (1991) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Carr v. Carr, 120 N.J. 120 N.J. 336, 57 A.2d 872 (1990) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Petition for Rulemaking, 117 N.J. 311, 566 A.2d 1154 (1989) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

D’Agostino v. Johnson Johnson, Inc. 115 N.J. 491, 559 A.2d 420 (1989) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Tate, 102 N.J. 64, 505 A.2d 941 (1986) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Salorio v. Glaser, 93 N.J. 447, 461 A.2d 1100 (1983) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 488

Beshada v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp. 90 N.J. 191, 447 A.2d 539 (1982) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Fenwick Mack, Inc. v. A Tomae Sons, Inc., 79 N.J. 590, 401 A.2d 1087 (1979) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Surgent, 79 N.J. 529, 401 A.2d 522 (1979) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Beckmann, 79 N.J. 402, 400 A.2d 792 (1979) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Greenberg v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 79 N.J. 399, 400 A.2d 60 (1979) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Di Orio v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co., 79 N.J. 257, 398 A.2d 1274 (1979) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Ercolano, 79 N.J. 25, 397 A.2d 1062 (1979) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Slockbower, 79 N.J. 1, 397 A.2d 1050 (1979) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Stefanelli, 78 N.J. 418, 396 A.2d 1105 (1979) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Ridgefield Park Educ. Assoc. v. Ridgefield Park Bd. of Educ., 78 N.J. 144, 393 A.2d 278 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Red Bank Reg’l Educ. Assoc. v. Red Bank Reg’l High Sch. Bd. of Educ., 78 N.J. 122, 393 A.2d 267 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Twp. of W. Windsor v. Public Employment Relations Comm’n, 78 N.J. 98, 393 A.2d 255 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. State Supervisory Employees Assoc 78 N.J. 54, 393 A.2d 233 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Galloway Twp. Bd. of Educ. v. Galloway Twp. Assoc. of Educ. Secretaries, 78 N.J. 1, 393 A.2d 207 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 489

Counties v. Trenton State Coll., 77 N.J. 590, 392 A.2d 1205 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Mingo, 77 N.J. 576, 392 A.2d 590 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Gorton v. Reliance Ins. Co., 77 N.J. 563, 391 A.2d 1219 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Hinfey v. Matawan Reg’l Bd. of Educ. 77 N.J. 514, 391 A.2d 899 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Snow, 77 N.J. 459, 391 A.2d 478 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Garden State Farms, Inc. v. Mayor Louis Bay, II 77 N.J. 439, 390 A.2d 1177 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Karlin v. Weinberg, 77 N.J. 408, 390 A.2d 1161 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Robbiani v. Burke, 77 N.J. 383, 390 A.2d 1149 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Vornado, Inc. v. Hyland, 77 N.J. 347, 390 A.2d 606 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Kaczmarek v. N.J. Tpk. Auth., 77 N.J. 329, 390 A.2d 597 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Fields, 77 N.J. 282, 390 A.2d 574 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Barone v. Harra, 77 N.J. 276, 390 A.2d 571 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Daaleman v. Elizabethtown Gas Co. 77 N.J. 267, 390 A.2d 566 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Young, 77 N.J. 245, 390 A.2d 556 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Weathers v. Hartford Ins. Group, 77 N.J. 228, 390 A.2d 548 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 490

Massa v. Laing, 77 N.J. 227, 390 A.2d 547 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Advisory Opinion, 77 N.J. 199, 390 A.2d 118 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Cashen v. Spann, 77 N.J. 138, 389 A.2d 969 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Resnick v. E. Brunswick Twp. Bd. of Educ. 11 N.J. 88, 389 A.2d 944 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Peper v. Princeton Univ. Bd. of Trs., 11 N.J. 55, 389 A.2d 465 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

N.J. Bank v. Palladino, 11 N.J. 33, 389 A.2d 454 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. P.T. L. Constr. Co., 11 N.J. 20, 389 A.2d 448 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Elberon Bathing Co. v. Ambassador Ins. Co., 11 N.J. 1, 389 A.2d 439 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

The Penwag Property Co. v. Landau 76 N.J. 595, 388 A.2d 1265 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Owens v.CR Waste Material, 76 N.J. 584, 388 A.2d 977 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Maros v. Transam. Ins. Co., 76 N.J. 572, 388 A. 2d 971 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Muschette v. The Gateway Ins. Co. 76 N.J. 560, 388 A. 2d 964 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Napoli v. Eld, 76 N.J. 524, 388 A.2d 946 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Malloy v. State, 76 N.J. 515, 388 A.2d 622 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Anastasi, 76 N.J. 510, 388 A.2d 620 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 491

Potter v. Finch Sons, 76 N.J. 499, 388 A.2d 614 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Garfole, 76 N.J. 445, 388 A.2d 587 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Miller, 76 N.J. 392, 388 A.2d 218 (1978) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

White v. Violent Crimes Comp. Board 76 N.J. 368, 388 A.2d 206 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Talcott v. H. Corenzwit Co. 76 N.J. 305, 387 A.2d 350 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Burd v. N.J. Tel. Co., 76 N.J. 284, 386 A.2d 1310 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Div. 5W v. Mercer County Improvement Auth 76 N.J. 245, 386 A.2d 1290 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Keesal, 76 N.J. 227, 386 A.2d 854 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Nero v. Hyland, 76 N.J. 213, 386 A.2d 846 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Jones, 76 N.J. 208, 386 A.2d 844 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Duvin v. State, 76 N.J. 203, 386 A.2d 842 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Cepeda v. Cumberland Eng’g Co., 76 N.J. 152, 386 A.2d 816 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Makwinski v. State, 76 N.J. 87, 385 A.2d 1227 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Charles Inv. Corp., 76 N.J. 86, 385 A.2d 1227 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Palmieri, 76 N.J. 51, 385 A.2d 856 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 492

In re Di Sabato, 76 N.J. 46, 385 A.2d 234 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Dolan, 76 N.J. 1, 384 A.2d 1076 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Albano, 75 N.J. 509, 384 A.2d 144 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Miriam Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Perth Amboy, 75 N.J. 508, 384 A.2d 143 (1978) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Nat’l Newark Essex Bank v. Hous. Auth. of Newark, 75 N.J. 497, 384 A.2d 138 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Grinchis, 75 N.J. 495, 384 A.2d 137 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Bonafield, 75 N.J. 490, 383 A.2d 1143 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Palmieri, 75 N.J. 488, 383 A.2d 1142 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Estate of Houghton, 75 N.J. 462, 383 A.2d 713 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Sanner v. Gov’t Employees Ins. Co. 75 N.J. 460, 383 A.2d 429 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Eisenberg, 75 N.J. 454, 383 A.2d 426 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State in re Interest of G.T., 75 N.J. 378, 382 A.2d 1124 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Thomas v. McGrath, 75 N.J. 372, 382 A.2d 1121 (1978) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Gonzalez, 75 N.J. 181, 380 A.2d 1128 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Dolan v. Tenafly, 75 N.J. 163, 380 A.2d 1119 (1977) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 493

Planned Parenthood of New York City v. State 75 N.J. 49, 379 A.2d 841 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Fobe Assoc. v. Mayor of Demarest 74 N.J. 519, 379 A.2d 31 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Pascack Ass’n, Ltd. v. Mayor of Washington 74 N.J. 470, 379 A.2d 6 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Sommer v. Kridel, 74 N.J. 446, 378 A.2d 767 (1977) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Toscano, 74 N.J. 421, 378 A.2d 755 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Corbitt, 74 N.J. 379, 378 A.2d 235 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Twp. of Franklin v. Bd. of Educ. of the N. Hunterdon Reg’l High Sch, 74 N.J. 345, 378 A.2d 218 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Doe v. Downey, 74 N.J. 196, 377 A.2d 626 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Manning Eng’g, Inc. v. Hudson County Park Comm’n 74 N.J. 113, 376 A.2d 1194 (1977) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Valle v. N Jersey Auto. Club, 74 N.J. 109, 376 A.2d 1192 (1977) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Bakers Basin Realty Co. 74 N.J. 103, 376 A.2d 1189 (1977) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

United Rental Equip. Co. v. Aetna Life Casualty, Ins. Co., 74 N.J. 92, 376 A.2d 1183 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Lueder, 74 N.J. 62, 376 A.2d 1169 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Langeveld v. L.R.Z.H. Corp., 74 N.J. 45, 376 A.2d 931 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 494

Atl. City v. Block C-11, Lot 11, 74 N.J. 34, 376 A.2d 926 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Twp. of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10 74 N.J. 1, 376 A.2d 909 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Petition to Compel Testimony of Tuso 73 N.J. 575, 376 A.2d 895 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Piscataway Assoc. v. Twp. of Piscataway 73 N.J. 546, 376 A.2d 527 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Fox Enters., Inc. v. Twp. of Piscataway 73 N.J. 545, 376 A.2d 526 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Ganger v. Ganger, 73 N.J. 538, 376 A.2d 523 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Vinegra, 73 N.J. 484, 376 A.2d 150 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Public Serv. Elec. Gas Co. v. Twp. of Woodbridge, 73 N.J. 474, 375 A.2d 1165 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Kruger v. Kruger, 73 N.J. 464, 375 A.2d 659 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Ansede v. Nat’l Gypsum Co., 73 N.J. 444, 375 A.2d 649 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Motor Club Fire Cos. Co. v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co. 73 N.J. 425, 375 A.2d 639 (1977) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Lyle, 73 N.J. 403, 375 A.2d 629 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Palko v. Palko, 73 N.J. 395, 375 A.2d 625 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Leonardis, 73 N.J. 360, 375 A.2d 607 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Pucillo Sons, Inc. v. Mayor of New Milford 73 N.J. 349, 375 A.2d 602 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 495

State v. Cohen, 73 N.J. 331, 375 A.2d 259 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Wooten, 73 N.J. 317, 374 A.2d 1204 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Suspension of Heller, 73 N.J. 292, 374 A.2d 1191 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Loring, 73 N.J. 282, 374 A.2d 466 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Rabb, 73 N.J. 272, 374 A.2d 461 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Makowski, 73 N.J. 265, 374 A.2d 458 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Passaic Cty. Probation Officers’ Ass’n v. Cty. of Passaic, 73 N.J. 247, 374 A.2d 449 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State in Interest of M.S., 73 N.J. 238, 374 A.2d 445 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Baskerville, 73 N.J. 230, 374 A.2d 441 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Alston, 73 N.J. 228, 374 A.2d 31 (1977) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Canola, 73 N.J. 206, 374 A.2d 20 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Conklin v. City of E. Orange, 73 N.J. 198, 373 A.2d 996 (1977) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Approved Finance Co. v. Schaub, 73 N.J. 193, 373 A.2d 994 (1977) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Shamy, 73 N.J. 187, 373 A.2d 655 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Beek v. Ohio Cos. Ins. Co., 73 N.J. 185, 373 A.2d 654 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 496

State v. Twp. of Washington, 73 N.J. 182, 373 A.2d 652 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

N.J. Tpk. Auth. v. Twp. of Washington 73 N.J. 180, 373 A.2d 652 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Monmouth Med. Ctr. v. City of Long Branch 73 N.J. 179, 373 A.2d 651 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Allen, 73 N.J. 132, 373 A.2d 377 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Higgins v. The Advisory Comm. on Prof I Ethics 73 N.J. 123, 373 A.2d 372 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Mattice, 73 N.J. 103, 372 A.2d 1104 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Peoples Nat’l Bank of N.J. v. Fowler 73 N.J. 88, 372 A.2d 1096 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Richardson, 73 N.J. 82, 372 A.2d 1093 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Moron, 73 N.J. 79, 372 A.2d 1092 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Mollozzi, 73 N.J. 76, 372 A.2d 611 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Essex County Bd. of Taxation v. City of Newark 73 N.J. 69, 372 A.2d 607 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Adoption of J by J A, 73 N.J. 68, 372 A.2d 607 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Biancardi v. Waldwick Bd. of Educ. 73 N.J. 37, 372 A.2d 304 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Land, 73 N.J. 24, 372 A.2d 297 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

English v. Coll. of Med. Dentistry of N.J. 73 N.J. 20, 372 A.2d 295 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 497

In re Hyra, 73 N.J. 18, 372 A.2d 294 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Twp. of Wayne v. Kosoff 73 N.J. 8, 372 A.2d 289 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Twp. of Springfield v. Pedersen, 73 N.J. 1, 372 A.2d 286 (1977) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Oakwood at Madison, Inc. v. Twp. of Madison 72 N.J. 481, 371 A.2d 1192 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Parelli v. Dep’t of Civil Serv. of N.J. 72 N.J. 480, 371 A.2d 285 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Shear, 72 N.J. 474, 371 A.2d 282 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Power, 72 N.J. 452, 371 A.2d 58 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Yengo, 72 N.J. 425, 371 A.2d 41 (1977) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Inganamort v. Borough of Fort Lee 72 N.J. 412, 371 A.2d 34 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Boys’ Club of Clifton, Inc. v. Twp. of Jefferson 72 N.J. 389, 371 A.2d 22 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Cirelli v. Ohio Cos. Ins. Co., 72 N.J. 380, 371 A.2d 17 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Fenwick v. Kay Am. Jeep, Inc., 72 N.J. 372, 371 A.2d 13 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Carlsen v. Carlsen, 72 N.J. 363, 371 A.2d 8 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Smith v. Smith, 72 N.J. 350, 371 A.2d 1 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Penn. Mfrs.’ Assoc. Ins. Co. v. Gov’t Employees Ins. Co., 72 N.J. 348, 370 A.2d 855 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 498

State v. Powers, 72 N.J. 346, 370 A.2d 854 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Abrams, 72 N.J. 342, 370 A.2d 852 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Vreeland v. Byrne, 72 N.J. 292, 370 A.2d 825 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Schaad v. Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Ass’n 72 N.J. 237, 370 A.2d 449 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Bates v. Gambino, 72 N.J. 219, 370 A.2d 10 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Mikkelsen v. N.L. Indus., 72 N.J. 209, 370 A.2d 5 (1977) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Salierno v. Micro Stamping Co., 72 N.J. 205, 370 A.2d 3 (1977) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

McBride v. City of All. City, 72 N.J. 201, 370 A.2d 1 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Knight, 72 N.J. 193, 369 A.2d 913 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Plamfield v. Courier News, 72 N.J. 171, 369 A.2d 513 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Hardt, 72 N.J. 160, 369 A.2d 5 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Ableman, 72 N.J. 145, 368 A.2d 356 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Metro, 72 N.J. 143, 368 A.2d 355 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Diamond, 72 N.J. 139, 368 A.2d 353 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Morris, 72 N.J. 135, 367 A.2d 1172 (1977) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 499

Sorentino v. Family Children’s Soc’y of Elizabeth, 72 N.J. 127, 367 A.2d 1168 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Guardianship of Dotson, 72 N.J. 112, 367 A.2d 1160 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Twp. of Marlboro v. Village Water Co. 72 N.J. 99, 367 A.2d 1153 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Estate of Lingle, 72 N.J. 87, 367 A.2d 878 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Sec. Ins. Co. of Hartford 72 N.J. 63, 367 A.2d 864 (1976) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Lige v. Town of Montclair, 72 N.J. 5, 367 A.2d 833 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Levinsohn, 72 N.J. 1, 367 A.2d 431 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Schultz, 71 N.J. 590, 367 A.2d 423 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Remsden v. Dependable Ins. Co., 71 N.J. 587, 367 A.2d 421 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Logan, 71 N.J. 583, 367 A.2d 419 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Brown, 71 N.J. 578, 367 A.2d 417 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Fariello, 71 N.J. 552, 366 A.2d 1313 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Lamb, 71 N.J. 545, 366 A.2d 981 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Meerwarth v. Meerwarth, 71 N.J. 541, 366 A.2d 979 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Bd. of Educ. Twp. of Little Egg Harbor v. Bd. of Educ. Twp. of Galloway, 71 N.J. 537, 366 A.2d 977 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 500

City of Jersey City v. Jersey City Parking Auth. 71 N.J. 492, 366 A.2d 648 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Doe v. Bridgeton Hosp. Ass’n, 71 N.J. 478, 366 A.2d 641 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Sapp, 71 N.J. 476, 366 A.2d 334 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Overlook Terrace Mgmt. Corp. v. Rent Control Bd. of W. N. Y., N.J., 71 N.J. 451, 366 A.2d 321 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Jones v. Buford, 71 N.J. 433, 365 A.2d 1364 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Franklin, 71 N.J. 425, 365 A.2d 1361 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Gallo Asphalt Co. v. Sagner, 71 N.J. 405, 365 A.2d 932 (1976) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Humble Oil Ref. Co. v. Borough of Englewood Cliffs, 71 N.J. 401, 365 A.2d 929 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Pratts, 71 N.J. 399, 365 A.2d 928 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Milligan, 71 N.J. 373, 365 A.2d 914 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Lyons, 71 N.J. 371, 365 A.2d 913 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Leitenberger v. Olt Bros., 71 N.J. 370, 365 A.2d 713 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Vill. of S. Orange v. Alden Corp. 71 N.J. 362, 365 A.2d 469 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Nichols, 71 N.J. 358, 365 A.2d 467 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

City of N. Wildwood v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Wildwood 71 N.J. 354, 365 A.2d 465 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 501

Motor Club Fire Cos. Co. v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co. 71 N.J. 352, 365 A.2d 195 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Gosselin v. Nat’l Aviation Underwriters 71 N.J. 351, 365 A.2d 194 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Crittenden v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp. 71 N.J. 349, 365 A.2d 193 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Hous. Auth. of Newark v. Norfolk Realty Co. 71 N.J. 314, 364 A.2d 1052 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Panzino v. Cont’l Can Co., 71 N.J. 298, 364 A.2d 1043 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Taxpayers Ass’n of Weymouth Twp. v. Weymouth Twp. 71 N.J. 249 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Shepard v. Woodland Twp. Comm. Planning Bd. 71 N.J. 230, 364 A.2d 1005 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Berger v. State, 71 N.J. 206, 364 A.2d 993 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Ditri, 71 N.J. 173, 364 A.2d 545 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Talbot, 71 N.J. 160, 364 A.2d 9 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Manning Eng’g, Inc. v. Hudson County Park Comm’n 71 N.J. 145, 364 A.2d 1 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Moran v. Napolitano, 71 N.J. 133, 363 A.2d 346 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Fox v. Passaic Gen. Hosp., 71 N.J. 122, 363 A.2d 341 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Leonardis, 71 N.J. 85, 363 A.2d 321 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Christener, 71 N.J. 55, 362 A.2d 1153 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 502

Pascucci v. Vagott, 71 N.J. 40, 362 A.2d 566 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Application of Saddle River 71 N.J. 14, 362 A.2d 552 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Sayko, 71 N.J. 8, 362 A.2d 549 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Alston, 71 N.J. 1, 362 A.2d 545 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Harris, 70 N.J. 586, 362 A.2d 32 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Humane Soc’y of U.S. v. N.J. Fish Game Council, 70 N.J. 565, 362 A.2d 20 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Yanhko v. Fane, 70 N.J. 528, 362 A.2d 1 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State in Interest of D.G.W., 70 N.J. 488, 361 A.2d 513 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Allen, 70 N.J. 474, 361 A.2d 5 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Breslin v. N.J. Investors, Inc., 70 N.J. 466, 361 A.2d 1 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Estate of Widenmeyer, 70 N.J. 458, 360 A.2d 396 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Semi-Metals, Inc. v. Pinter Bros. 70 N.J. 437, 360 A.2d 385 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Estate of Lehner, 70 N.J. 434, 360 A.2d 383 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Recktschaffer, 70 N.J. 395, 360 A.2d 362 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Stein, 70 N.J. 369, 360 A.2d 347 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 503

Guerrero v. Burlington County Mem’l Hosp. 70 N.J. 344, 360 A.2d 334 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Rusignuolo v. Orechio, 70 N.J. 330, 360 A.2d 326 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Brewer, 70 N.J. 329, 360 A.2d 326 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Jansco v. Waldron, 70 N.J. 320, 360 A.2d 321 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Hudson Circle Serv. Ctr., Inc. v. Kearny 70 N.J. 289, 359 A.2d 862 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Schweizer v. Elm Div. of Colt Indus. 70 N.J. 280, 359 A.2d 857 (1976) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Newman v. Chase, 70 N.J. 254, 359 A.2d 474 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Mihranian, Inc. v. Padula, 70 N.J. 252, 359 A.2d 473 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

B. Jeselshon, Inc. v. City of Atl. City 70 N.J. 238, 358 A.2d 797 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Logan, 70 N.J. 222, 358 A.2d 787 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Smith, 70 N.J. 213, 358 A.2d 782 (1976) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Szima, 70 N.J. 196, 358 A.2d 773 (1976) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Tumminello, 70 N.J. 187, 358 A.2d 769 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State in Interest of R.G. W., 70 N.J. 185, 358 A.2d 473 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Callahan, 70 N.J. 178, 358 A.2d 469 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 504

Robinson v. Cahill, 70 N.J. 155, 358 A.2d 457 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Patrolman’s Benevolent Ass’n of Montclair, Local No. 53 v. Montclair, 70 N.J. 130, 358 A.2d 180 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Deatore, 70 N.J. 100, 358 A.2d 163 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Alston, 70 N.J. 95, 358 A.2d 161 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Frank H. Taylor Son, Inc. v. Shepard 70 N.J. 93, 357 A.2d 765 (1976) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Citizens Bank Trust Co. v. Glaser 70 N.J. 72, 357 A.2d 753 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Best, 70 N.J. 56, 356 A.2d 385 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Quintan, 70 N.J. 10, 355 A.2d 647 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Germain v. Cool-Rite Corp., 70 N.J. 1, 355 A.2d 642 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Trap Rock Indus., Inc. v. Sagner 69 N.J. 599, 355 A.2d 636 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Cattani v. Bd. of Trs., Police Firemen’s Ret. Sys., 69 N.J. 578, 355 A.2d 625 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. J. O., 69 N.J. 574, 355 A.2d 195 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Retz v. Twp. of Saddle Brook, 69 N.J. 563, 355 A.2d 189 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Robinson v. Cahill, 69 N.J. 449, 355 A.2d 129 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Breslin v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 69 N.J. 435, 354 A.2d 635 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 505

State v. Carter, 69 N.J. 420, 354 A.2d 627 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Wurtzel v. Falcey, 69 N.J. 401, 354 A.2d 617 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Thermo Contracting Corp. v. Bank of N.J. 69 N.J. 352, 354 A.2d 291 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re McAlevy, 69 N.J. 349, 354 A.2d 289 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State in Interest of N.L., 69 N.J. 342, 354 A.2d 286 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Dunbar, 69 N.J. 333, 354 A.2d 281 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Hurd, 69 N.J. 316, 354 A.2d 78 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Horn. Auth. of Newark v. West, 69 N.J. 293, 354 A.2d 65 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Pastore, 69 N.J. 292, 354 A.2d 65 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Dresner v. Carrara, 69 N.J. 237, 353 A.2d 505 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Spano, 69 N.J. 231, 353 A.2d 97 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Repp, 69 N.J. 222, 352 A.2d 260 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Riley, 69 N.J. 217, 352 A.2d 257 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Valentine, 69 N.J. 205, 351 A.2d 751 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Egan, 69 N.J. 201, 351 A.2d 748 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 506

In re Gaulkin, 69 N.J. 185, 351 A.2d 740 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Robinson v. CahiU, 69 N.J. 133, 351 A.2d 713 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Bak-A-Lum Corp. v. Alcoa Bldg. Prods., Inc. 69 N.J. 123, 351 A.2d 349 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Witentz, 69 N.J. 121, 351 A.2d 347 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Becker, 69 N.J. 118, 351 A.2d 346 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Hughes, 69 N.J. 116, 351 A.2d 345 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Jersey Cent. Power Light Co. 69 N.J. 102, 351 A.2d 337 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Bd. of Educ. of Manasquan v. State 69 N.J. 92, 351 A.2d 17 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Ades v. Mayor of Deal Borough, 69 N.J. 86, 351 A.2d 14 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Hickey, 69 N.J. 69, 350 A.2d 483 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Twp. of Ewing v. King, 69 N.J. 67, 350 A.2d 482 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Lends, 69 N.J. 64, 350 A.2d 480 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Zeitler, 69 N.J. 61, 350 A.2d 479 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Jenkins v. Rainner, 69 N.J. 50, 350 A.2d 473 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re April, 69 N.J. 44, 350 A.2d 234 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 507

In re Barnett, 69 N.J. 41, 350 A.2d 232 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Lucarello, 69 N.J. 31, 350 A.2d 226 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Rizzo, 69 N.J. 28, 350 A.2d 225 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Cunningham v. Department of Civil Service 69 N.J. 13, 350 A.2d 58 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Davis v. Pecorino, 69 N.J. 1, 350 A.2d 51 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Troy Hills Vill. v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Twp. Council, 68 N.J. 604, 350 A.2d 34 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Brunetti v. New Milford, 68 N.J. 576, 350 A.2d 19 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Hutton Park Gardens v. Town Council of W. Orange 68 N.J. 543, 350 A.2d 1 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned). State v. Bryant 68 N.J. 532, 348 A.2d 786 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Gibson, 68 N.J. 499, 348 A.2d 769 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Hackensack Meadowlands Dev. Comm’n v. Mun. Sanitary Landfill Auth., 68 N.J. 451, 348 A.2d 505 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Prof’l Ass’n v. Salary Adjustment Comm. 68 N.J. 444, 347 A.2d 793 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Strickland, 68 N.J. 440, 347 A.2d 358 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Hartford Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co. 68 N.J. 430, 347 A.2d 353 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Twp. of Millbum v. Pitt, 68 N.J. 424, 346 A.2d 601 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 508

Davis v. Heil, 68 N.J. 423, 346 A.2d 405 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Tamburro, 68 N.J. 414, 346 A.2d 401 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Tri-Terminal Corp. v. Borough of Edgewater 68 N.J. 405, 346 A.2d 396 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Cipriano, 68 N.J. 398, 346 A.2d 393 (1976) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Chase, 68 N.J. 392, 346 A.2d 89 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Parker, 68 N.J. 390, 346 A.2d 88 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Braitman v. Overlook Terrace Corp. 68 N.J. 368, 346 A.2d 76 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Johnson, 68 N.J. 349, 346 A.2d 66 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Lemken, 68 N.J. 348, 346 A.2d 65 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Kleinwaks, 68 N.J. 328, 345 A.2d 793 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Kern, 68 N.J. 325, 345 A.2d 321 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Woliner v. Woliner, 68 N.J. 324, 344 A.2d 781 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Oxfeld v. N.J. State Bd. of Educ. 68 N.J. 301, 344 A.2d 769 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Bonnet v. Nat’l Emblem Ins. Co., 68 N.J. 287, 344 A.2d 321 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Fruchter, 68 N.J. 286, 344 A.2d 320 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 509

State v. Krol, 68 N.J. 236, 344 A.2d 289 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Catena v. Seidl 68 N.J. 224, 343 A.2d 744 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

N.J. Ass’n of Indep. Ins. Agents v. Hosp. Sew. Plan of N.J., 68 N.J. 213, 343 A.2d 739 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re of the Application for the Commitment of Geraghty to the N.J. Neuro-Psychiatric Inst., 68 N.J. 209, 343 A.2d 737 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Skulski v. Nolan, 68 N.J. 179, 343 A.2d 721 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Pinkney v. State, 68 N.J. 178, 343 A.2d 721 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Katz v. Twp. of Howell, 68 N.J. 125, 343 A.2d 417 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Washington Market Enters., Inc. v. Trenton 68 N.J. 107, 343 A.2d 408 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Schoor Assocs. v. Holmdel Heights Constr. Co. 68 N.J. 95, 343 A.2d 401 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Zygmaniak v. Kawasaki Motors Corp. 68 N.J. 94, 343 A.2d 97 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

County of Monmouth v. Wissell, 68 N.J. 35, 342 A.2d 199 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Kenny, 68 N.J. 17, 342 A.2d 189 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Herbstman v. Eastman Kodak Co., 68 N.J. 1, 342 A.2d 181 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Perwin, 67 N.J. 594, 342 A.2d 178 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Acken v. Campbell, 67 N.J. 585, 342 A.2d 172 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 510

State v. Gledhill, 67 N.J. 565, 342 A.2d 161 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Tenore v. Nu Car Carriers, Inc., 67 N.J. 466, 341 A.2d 613 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Savoie, 67 N.J. 439, 341 A.2d 598 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Arndt, 67 N.J. 432, 341 A.2d 596 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Knoble v. Waterfront Comm’n of N.Y. Harbor 67 N.J. 427, 341 A.2d 593 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Greenberg v. Martini 67 N.J. 426, 341 A.2d 339 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Gross, 67 N J. 419, 341 A.2d 336 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

McMullen v. Conforti Eisele, Inc. 67 N.J. 416, 341 A.2d 334 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Terminal Constr. Corp. v. Atl. County Sewerage Auth. 67 N.J. 403, 341 A.2d 327 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Del Mauro, 67 N.J. 400, 341 A.2d 325 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Brown v. Lins Pharmacy, 67 N.J. 392, 341 A.2d 321 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Mezzacca, 67 N.J. 387, 340 A.2d 658 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Robinson v. Cahill, 67 N.J. 333, 339 A.2d 193 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Sweeney v. Pruyne, 67 N.J. 314, 338 A.2d 193 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Anderson v. Somberg, 67 N.J. 291, 338 A.2d 1 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 511

State v. Norflett, 67 N.J. 268, 337 A.2d 609 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Godfrey, 67 N.J. 267, 337 A.2d 371 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

hind v. Schmid, 67 N.J. 255, 337 A.2d 365 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Clayton v. Freehold Twp. Bd. of Edue. 67 N.J. 249, 337 A.2d 361 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Murdoch v. Taluba, 67 N.J. 248, 337 A.2d 361 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Miller, 67 N.J. 229, 337 A.2d 36 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Davis, 67 N.J. 222, 337 A.2d 33 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Gray, 67 N.J. 144, 336 A.2d 486 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Mullen, 67 N.J. 134, 336 A.2d 481 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Dobbins v. Bd. of Educ. of Henry Hudson Reg’l Sch. 67 N.J. 69, 335 A.2d 23 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Katz v. Twp. of Howell, 67 N.J. 51, 335 A.2d 14 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Lewis, 67 N.J. 47, 335 A.2d 12 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Thompson, 67 N.J. 26, 335 A.2d 1 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re D’Auria, 67 N.J. 22, 334 A.2d 332 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Famularo, 67 N.J. 20, 334 A.2d 331 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 512

Divan Builders v. Planning Bd. of Wayne 66 N.J. 582, 334 A.2d 30 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Cianciotto v. Milstein, 66 N.J. 581, 334 A.2d 29 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. McBride, 66 N.J. 577, 334 A.2d 27 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Spinks, 66 N.J. 568, 334 A.2d 23 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Jones, 66 N.J. 563, 334 A.2d 20 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Carroll, 66 N.J. 558, 334 A.2d 17 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Bicanich, 66 N.J. 557, 334 A.2d 17 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Philipchuk v. Int’l Ass’n of Bridge, Structural Ornamental Iron Workers, 66 N.J. 539, 334 A.2d 7 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Moore v. Local Union No. m, 66 N.J. 527, 334 A.2d 1 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Jones, 66 N.J. 524, 333 A.2d 529 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Gregory, 66 N.J. 510, 333 A.2d 257 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Bd’s Investigation of Tel. Companies 66 N.J. 476, 333 A.2d 4 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Newark v. Essex County Bd. of Taxation 66 N.J. 474, 333 A.2d 3 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Trenton v. Mercer County Bd. of Taxation 66 N.J. 470, 333 A.2d 1 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Wright, 66 N.J. 466, 332 A.2d 606 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 513

Moraca v. Ford Motor Co., 66 N.J. 454, 332 A.2d 599 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Aleman, 66 N.J. 451, 332 A.2d 597 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Brody v. Overlook Hosp, 66 N.J. 448, 332 A. 2d 596 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Levine v. Haddon Hall Hotel, 66 N.J. 415, 332 A.2d 193 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Dissicini 66 N.J. 411, 331 A.2d 618 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Fleisher, 66 N.J. 398, 331 A.2d 611 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Rockoff 66 N.J. 394, 331 A.2d 609 (1975) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Borough of Collingswood v. Ringgold 66 N.J. 350, 331 A.2d 262 (1975) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Am. Fed’n of State, County, Mun. Employees, Council No. 73 v. State, 66 N.J. 295, 330 A.2d 593 (1975) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Motor Club of Am. Ins. Co. v. Phillips 66 N.J. 277, 330 A.2d 360 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Hackensack Trust Co. v. Alvarez, 66 N.J. 275, 330 A.2d 359 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Fosgate v. Corona, 66 N.J. 268, 330 A.2d 355 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Small v. Rockfeld, 66 N.J. 231, 330 A.2d 335 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Vaccaro, 66 N.J. 151, 329 A.2d 555 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Brown, 66 N.J. 146, 329 A.2d 340 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 514

Pappas v. Santiago, 66 N.J. 140, 329 A.2d 337 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Finkle, 66 N.J. 139, 329 A.2d 65 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Schnell v. Twp. of Millburn, 66 N.J. 137, 328 A.2d 624 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Paul v. Baltimore Upholstering Co. 66 N.J. 111, 328 A.2d 610 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Piscataway Apt Ass’n v. Twp. of Piscataway 66 N.J. 106, 328 A.2d 608 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Horbal v. McNeil, 66 N.J. 99, 328 A.2d 604 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Pleasure Bay Apartments v. City of Long Branch 66 N.J. 79, 328 A.2d 593 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Ass’n of N.J. State Coll. Faculties v. N.J. Bd. of Higher Educ., 66 N.J. 72, 328 A.2d 235 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Guterman v. Gnterman, 66 N.J. 69, 328 A.2d 233 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Turco, 66 N.J. 50, 327 A.2d 668 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Catena v. Seidl, 66 N.J. 32, 327 A.2d 658 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Goldklang v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 66 N.J. 7, 326 A.2d 688 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Miller, 65 N.J. 580, 326 A.2d 65 (1974) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

McCann v. Biss, 65 N.J. 301, 322 A.2d 161 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

AMG Assocs. v. Twp. of Springfield 65 N.J. 101, 319 A.2d 705 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 515

Ryan v. Mayor of Demarest, 64 N.J. 593, 319 A.2d 442 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Barbato v. Alsan Masonry Concrete, Inc. 64 N.J. 514, 318 A.2d 1 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Cmty. Distributors, Inc. 64 N.J. 479, 317 A.2d 697 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Weintraub v. Krobatsch, 64 N.J. 445, 317 A.2d 68 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Jamison, 64 N.J. 363, 316 A.2d 439 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Singleton v. Consol. Freightways Corp. 64 N.J. 357, 316 A.2d 436 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Ass’n of N.J. State Coll. Faculties v. N.J. Bd. of Higher E due, 64 N.J. 338, 316 A.2d 425 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Petlin Assocs. v. Twp. of Dover, 64 N.J. 327, 316 A.2d 1 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Collins v. Uniroyal, Inc., 64 N.J. 260, 315 A.2d 16 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Prof’l Ass’n of N.J. Dep’t of Educ. 64 N.J. 231, 315 A.2d 1 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Tirone, 64 N.J. 222, 314 A.2d 601 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Phillips v. Quik-Snap Printing Corp. 64 N.J. 216, 314 A.2d 370 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Male v. Renda Contracting Co., 64 N.J. 199, 314 A.2d 361 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Foont-Freedenfeld Corp. v. Electro-Protective Corp. 64 N.J. 197, 314 A.2d 68 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Louf, 64 N.J. 172, 313 A.2d 793 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 516

State v. Flint, 64 N.J. 170, 313 A.2d 615 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Teller v. Major Sales, Inc., 64 N.J. 143, 313 A.2d 205 (1974) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Manco v. Town of Irvington, 64 N.J. 142, 313 A.2d 204 (1974) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Daly, 64 N.J. 122, 313 A.2d 194 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Campisi, 64 N.J. 120, 313 A.2d 193 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Bulman v. McCrane, 64 N.J. 105, 312 A.2d 857 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Freeman, 64 N.J. 66, 312 A.2d 143 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Ricciardi v. Aniero Concrete Co., 64 N.J. 60, 312 A.2d 139 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Suffness v. Dock Watch Quarry Pit, Inc. 63 N.J. 594, 311 A.2d 377 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Schramm v. Arsenal Esso Station, 63 N.J. 593, 311 A.2d 178 (1973) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Leon v. Bd. of Review, 63 N.J. 590, 311 A.2d 177 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

F.S. Donahue, Santo Co. v. Kugler 63 N.J. 572, 310 A.2d 729 (1972) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Mountain Hill Properties, Inc. v. Twp. Comm. of Middletown, 63 N.J. 571, 310 A.2d 729 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Pietkun, 63 N.J. 549, 310 A.2d 464 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Earl W. Calloway, Inc. v. Sand Castle, Inc. 63 N.J. 544, 310 A.2d 461 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 517

Weening v. Weening, 63 N.J. 543, 310 A.2d 461 (1972) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Madewell, 63 N.J. 506, 309 A.2d 201 (1973) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

The Passaic Daily News v. Blair, 63 N.J. 474, 308 A.2d 649 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Benito v. Gambino, 63 N.J. 460, 308 A.2d 17 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Wilbely, 63 N.J. 420, 307 A.2d 608 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Biederman, 63 N.J. 396, 307 A.2d 595 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Busik v. Levine, 63 N.J. 351, 307 A.2d 571 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Bow Arrow Manor, Inc. v. Town of W. Orange 63 N.J. 335, 307 A.2d 563 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Zanchi v. S K Constr. Co., 63 N.J. 331, 307 A.2d 561 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Singer v. State, 63 N.J. 319, 307 A.2d 94 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Caribe Hilton Hotel v. Toland, 63 N.J. 301, 307 A.2d 85 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Chambers, 63 N.J. 287, 307 A.2d 78 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Rainear v. C.J. Rainear Co., Inc. 63 N.J. 276, 307 A.2d 72 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Bankston, 63 N.J. 263, 307 A.2d 65 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Kimley v. Whittaker, 63 N.J. 235, 306 A.2d 443 (1973) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 518

Triano v. Carbon Steel Prods. Corp. 63 N.J. 226, 306 A.2d 437 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Gotsch v. Gotsch, 63 N.J. 217, 306 A.2d 433 (1973) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Colsey, 63 N.J. 210, 306 A.2d 72 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Saulnier, 63 N.J. 199, 306 A.2d 67 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Robinson v. Cahill, 63 N.J. 196, 306 A.2d 65 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Ruvoldt v. Nolan, 63 N.J. 171, 305 A.2d 434 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc., 63 N.J. 130, 305 A.2d 412 (1973) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Schroeder v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County, 63 N.J. 124, 305 A.2d 409 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Scull, 63 N.J. 108, 305 A.2d 70 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Hornyak v. The Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co. 63 N.J. 99, 305 A.2d 65 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Sarbone, 63 N.J. 94, 304 A.2d 734 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Hoffman, 63 N.J. 69, 304 A.2d 721 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Lane v. Universal Stevedoring Co. 63 N.J. 20, 304 A.2d 537 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Tramutola v. Bortone, 63 N.J. 9, 304 A.2d 197 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Winters v. City of Jersey City, 63 N.J. 7, 304 A.2d 196 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 519

Trap Rock Indus., Inc. v. Kohl, 63 N.J. 1, 304 A.2d 193 (1973) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Brooks v. Pa. Mfrs. Ass’n Ins. Co. 62 N.J. 583, 303 A.2d 884 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Stern v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 62 N.J. 582, 303 A.2d 883 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Gorecki v. United Excavating Co. 62 N.J. 576, 303 A.2d 585 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Green, 62 N.J. 547, 303 A.2d 312 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Inganamort v. Borough of Fort Lee 62 N.J. 521, 303 A.2d 298 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Robinson v. Cahill, 62 N.J. 473, 303 A.2d 273 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Mason v. City of Paterson, 62 N.J. 471, 303 A.2d 84 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Sheffield, 62 N.J. 441, 303 A.2d 68 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Staten, 62 N.J. 435, 303 A.2d 65 (1973) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Spielman, 62 N.J. 432, 302 A.2d 529 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Zahorian v. Russell Fitt Real Estate Agency 62 N.J. 399, 301 A.2d 754 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Loring, 62 N.J. 336, 301 A.2d 721 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Lopez v. Swyer, 62 N.J. 267, 300 A.2d 563 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co. 62 N.J. 155, 299 A.2d 704 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 520

Tiop. of Chester v. Panicucci, 62 N.J. 94, 299 A.2d 385 (1973) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Brown, v. Heymann, 62 N.J. 1, 297 A.2d 572 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Lambert v. Fishermen’s Dock Coop. 61 N.J. 596, 297 A.2d 566 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Colonial Oaks W., Inc. v. Twp. of E. Brunswick 61 N.J. 560, 296 A.2d 653 (1972) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Wicks v. Cent. R.R. Co. of N.J., 61 N.J. 553, 296 A.2d 649 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Andretta, 61 N.J. 544, 296 A.2d 644 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Swinton v. Gregory Steel Welding Fabricating Co., 61 N.J. 538, 296 A.2d 641 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Hyett, 61 N.J. 518, 296 A.2d 306 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Mercer Council #4 v. Alloway, 61 N.J. 516, 296 A.2d 305 (1972) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Mechs. Nat’l Bank of Burlington County v. Brady 61 N.J. 514, 296 A.2d 68 (1972) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Kennedy, 61 N.J. 509, 296 A.2d 65 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Russell v. Salem Tramp. Co., 61 N.J. 502, 295 A.2d 862 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Poteet, 61 N.J. 493, 295 A.2d 857 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

James v. Francesco, 61 N.J. 480, 295 A.2d 633 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re Bregg, 61 N.J. 476, 295 A.2d 360 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Page 521

Kernor v. N.J. Bell Tel. Co., 61 N.J. 470, 295 A.2d 356 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

Camarco v. City of Orange, 61 N.J. 463, 295 A.2d 353 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

In re McGinnis, 61 N.J. 459, 295 A.2d 201 (1972) (5 Justices + 2 judges temporarily assigned).

State v. Franklin, 52 N.J. 386, 245 A.2d 356 (1968) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Meeker v. Meeker, 52 N.J. 59, 243 A.2d 801 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Borough of Wildwood Crest v. Masciarella 51 N.J. 352, 240 A.2d 665 (1968) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Gallicchio, 51 N.J. 313, 240 A.2d 166 (1968) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Mills, 51 N.J. 277, 240 A.2d 1 (1968) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Mulero, 51 N.J. 224, 238 A.2d 682 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Richardson Eng’g Co. v. Rutgers, 51 N.J. 207, 238 A.2d 673 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Higgins v. Am. Soc’y of Clinical Pathologists 51 N.J. 191, 238 A.2d 665 (1968) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Belleville Chamber of Commerce v. Town of Belleville 51 N.J. 153, 238 A.2d 181 (1968) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick 51 N.J. 130, 238 A.2d 169 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Lomarch Corp. v. Mayor of Englewood 51 N.J. 108, 237 A.2d 881 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Carroll, 51 N.J. 102, 237 A.2d 878 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 522

Vassilakis v. Glen Falls Ins. Co. 51 N.J. 96, 237 A.2d 875 (1968) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Cooper v. Gov’t Employees Ins. Co. 51 N.J. 86, 237 A.2d 870 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Giangrasso v. Dean Floor Covering, Co. 51 N.J. 80, 237 A.2d 866 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Bowers v. Camden Fire Ins. Ass’n, 51 N.J. 62, 237 A.2d 857 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Application of Frank for Issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus, 51 N.J. 47, 237 A.2d 617 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Roche v. Floral Rental Corp., 51 N.J. 26, 237 A.2d 265 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. McKinlay, 51 N.J. 25, 237 A.2d 264 (1968) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. James, 51 N.J. 10, 237 A.2d 257 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Green v. Buck Bros. Co., 51 N.J. 6, 236 A.2d 885 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Blumenfeld v. Rust Craft Greeting Cards, Inc. 51 N.J. 1, 236 A.2d 883 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Marsello v. Barnett, 50 N.J. 577, 236 A.2d 869 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Red Devil Tools v. Tip Top Brush Co. 50 N.J. 563, 236 A.2d 861 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Conway, 50 N.J. 525, 236 A.2d 841 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

In re Block, 50 N.J. 494, 236 A.2d 589 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Foley v. Ulrich, 50 N.J. 426, 236 A.2d 137 (1967) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Page 523

G.P. Putnam’s Sons v. Calissi, 50 N.J. 397, 235 A.2d 893 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Twp. of Hamilton v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders 50 N.J. 394, 235 A.2d 891 (1967) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Betenbaugh v. Princeton Hosp., 50 N.J. 390, 235 A.2d 889 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Moe, 50 N.J. 386, 235 A.2d 678 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Baird, 50 N.J. 376, 235 A.2d 673 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

State v. Zucconi, 50 N.J. 361, 235 A.2d 193 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Loeb v. Loeb, 50 N.J. 343, 235 A.2d 20 (1967) (5 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Rivera v. Green Giant Co., 50 N.J. 284, 234 A.2d 393 (1967) (6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned).

Appendix “F Affirmed by equally divided courtper curiam opinion only

Hazen v. Div. of Med. Assistance Health Servs. 98 N.J. 82, 484 A.2d 670 (1984).

Merker v. Div. of Med. Assistance Health Servs. 98 N.J. 62, 484 A.2d 322 (1984).

Vesley v. Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 93 N.J. 323, 460 A.2d 1057 (1983).

State v. Barbossa, 75 N.J. 517, 384 A.2d 497 (1978).

Motor Club Fire Cos. Co. v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co. 71 N.J. 352, 365 A.2d 195 (1976).

Di Costanzo v. Matthews Constr. Co. 58 N.J. 159, 275 A.2d 740 (1971).

Seilerv. Robinson, 13 N.J. 307, 99 A.2d 422 (1953).

Page 524

State v. Bartell 10 N.J. 9, 89 A.2d 394 (1952).

Vanagas v. Vanagas, 1 N.J. 335, 63 A.2d 531 (1949).

Affirmed by equally divided courtbrief per curiam opinion with concurring and dissenting opinions

Reyes v. Egner, 201 N.J. 417, 991 A.2d 216 (2010).

Northvale Bd. of Educ. v. Northvale Educ. Ass’n 192 N.J. 501, 933 A.2d 596 (2007).

Cumberland Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Murphy 183 N.J. 344, 873 A.2d 534 (2005).

State v. Mamie, 168 N.J. 113, 773 A.2d 659 (2001).

Anzalone v. Westech Gear Corp., 141 N.J. 256, 661 A.2d 796 (1995).

De Vesa v. Dorsey, 134 N.J. 420, 634 A.2d 493 (1993).

Manasquan River Reg’l Sewerage Auth. v. Ocean County Utils. Auth., 117 N.J. 239, 566 A.2d 186 (1989).

Graves v. Church Dwight Co., Inc. 115 N.J. 256, 558 A.2d 463 (1989).

NYT Cable TV v. Homestead at Mansfield 111 N.J. 21, 543 A.2d 10 (1988).

M.H.B. v. H.T.B., 100 N.J. 567, 498 A.2d 775 (1985).

State v. Crumedy, 76 N.J. 319, 387 A.2d 357 (1978).

Neylon v. Ford Motor Co., 10 N.J. 325, 91 A.2d 569 (1952) (two concurring opinions and one dissenting opinion).

Affirmed by equally divided courtper curiam opinion or order with only a dissenting opinion Lewis v. Harris, 202 N.J. 340, 997 A.2d 227 (2010).

Costa v. Josey, 79 N.J. 535, 401 A.2d 526
(1979).

State v. Wooten, 73 N.J. 317, 374 A.2d 1204 (1977).

Page 525

Trap Rock Industries, Inc. v. Sagner 69 N.J. 599, 355 A.2d 636 (1976).

Murray v. Michalak, 58 N.J. 220, 276 A.2d 857 (1971).

Full per curiam opinion on issues where “Court is unanimous” with separate concurring and dissenting opinions

A.B. v. Y.Z., 184 N.J. 599, 878 A.2d 807 (2005)

Szczuvelek v. Harborside Healthcare Wood Edge, 182 N.J. 275, 865 A.2d 636 (2005).

State v. G.V., 162 N.J. 252, 744 A.2d 137 (2000).

Majority opinion with concurrence/dissent on fewer than entire majority; on point of disagreement Appellate Division affirmed by an equally divided court

State v. Basil, 202 N.J. 570, 998 A.2d 472 (2010) (6-0 on Parts I, II and IV of opinion; 3-3 on Part III of opinion).

Abbamont v. Ptscataway Twp. Bd. of Educ. 138 N.J. 405, 650 A.2d 958 (1994) (Abbamont I) (6-0 on all issues save for punitive damages; 3-3 on punitive damages issues; format: majority w/concurring
dissenting opinion).

Salzano v. N. Jersey Media Group 201 N.J. 500, 993 A.2d 778 (2010) (majority with 3 justices concurring in result only, with separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part).

Justice HOENS, dubitante.[1]

Today, through the use of concurring and abstaining opinions, the members of this Court have taken up an issue of constitutional

Page 526

dimension. Although I join in the reasoning of the Court on the merits of the dispute which serves as the vehicle for others to air their constitutional debate, I am compelled to separately express my doubts, and they are grave doubts, about the constitutional positions advanced in both the concurring and abstaining opinions.

The concurring opinion is steeped in history drawn from an examination of practices utilized by many Chief Justices of this Court that have not before been questioned. Although that foundation lends strong support to the conclusion that the concurring members of this Court have reached, it seems to require that one read our Constitution’s word “necessary” in Article VI, section II, paragraph 1, to mean something closer to expedient, or useful, or, in the opinion’s own words, “appropriate” under the circumstances. See ante
at 364, 9 A.3d at 909 (Rabner, C.J., concurring). The concurring opinion, therefore, expresses a view that I doubt is fully consistent with the ordinary meaning of “necessary,” which is the word that the Constitution’s Framers actually chose to define when the appointment power may be exercised. That it would be helpful to have another person assigned so as to assist in shouldering this Court’s heavy load is true; that it is necessary in any sense of that word is dubious at best.

Page 527

On the other hand, the absolutist view expressed by my abstaining colleague, who also points to historical practices of the Court, reads the word “necessary” as if it is solely related to the circumstance in which the Court, lacking a quorum, otherwise could not act at all. That reading of the language brooks no possibility that the Framers vested more general authority in the Chief Justice to act as he deems fit to ensure that the functions of the judiciary are carried out. Although perhaps closer to the meaning of the word “necessary,” that position is, to say the least, at odds with well-respected decisions of this Court describing the Judiciary’s role and its authority. See, e.g., Winberry v. Salisbury 5 N.J. 240, 244, 74 A.2d 406 (1950) (expressing breadth of power of, and recognizing weighty responsibility imposed on, the judiciary); N.J. Const, art. VI, §I, ¶ 1 (vesting judicial power generally). The abstaining opinion, by offering a rigid and narrowly constrained view of the authority granted to the Judiciary generally, and to the Chief Justice in particular, seems to be inconsistent with what the Framers must have intended to be the power vested in the third co-equal branch of government.

I would not write separately save for what I see as the true constitutional crisis that is looming, and that could, and in my view should, be avoided entirely. The simple fact is that while the authors of the two opinions refer to numerous historical examples that each sees as demonstrating the lightness of their individual views about the ability to exercise, or the restraint in exercising, the temporary assignment power, both of them miss the larger point. Many, and perhaps the majority, of our opinions are not decided by fewer than a full complement of Justices, and many, if not the great majority, are not decided by a single vote. That being so, for the most part the addition of any judge through a temporary assignment will be functionally irrelevant.

But that will not always be so. Indeed, the day will surely come when members of this Court, duly nominated by the Governor and found qualified through the exercise of the power of advice and consent of the Senate, and who are sufficient in number to

Page 528

constitute a quorum, will cast votes that would result in one outcome, only to find instead that their decision, solely because of the addition of the temporarily assigned judge, will be thwarted when that added vote forces the opposite result.

That would be the case if six of those duly nominated, confirmed, and appointed Justices split three votes to three, the result of which would be an affirmance by an evenly divided Court, but if the assigned judge casts a vote that instead causes a reversal. It would also be the case if a bare quorum of five of the duly nominated, confirmed, and appointed Justices participated and voted, with a majority of three favoring reversal, but if the addition of the assigned judge’s vote created the even split that resulted instead in an affirmance. In either situation, the vote of the assigned judge will not only matter, but will be outcome-determinative. In those circumstances, the assigned judge’s input will cause an outcome that a constitutionally sufficient quorum of this Court would otherwise not have reached.

I write to express my doubts about the wisdom of forging a path that will inevitably lead to results of such questionable constitutionality when the only apparent reason for the temporary assignment of a judge is to have someone help the others to carry the Court’s heavy workload. Whether for convenience, or expedience, or even out of a sincere desire to ensure that justice flows from this Court smoothly and efficiently, I doubt it falls into the category of necessity.

I choose, however, not to join in the absolutist view of my abstaining colleague. I make that choice not because his reasoning on the merits of the question is lacking, but because, in the final analysis, the Constitution vests the power to make the temporary assignment in the Chief Justice rather than in the Court as a whole. As such, it is a matter not ordinarily open to debate among other members of the Court. Only because the members of the Court have found it appropriate to voice their views on the subject do I write to express my doubts about the

Page 529

choice that the Chief Justice has made. Such is the traditional role and purpose of the separate opinion dubitante.
For affirmance in part/reversal in part/remandment
— Chief Justice RABNER, and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, HOENS, and STERN — 6.

Opposed — None.

Abstaining — Justice RIVERA-SOTO — 1.

[1] The dubitante opinion, although an uncommon one, is not unknown in this State’s history. See Pintard v. Davis, 21 N.J.L. 632, 635 (E. A. 1846) (Randolph, J., dubitante) (expressing reservations about Court’s conclusions); see also Hinchly v. Machine, 15 N.J.L. 476, 478 (Sup.Ct. 1836) (recording, by notation, Ryerson, J., dubitante); In re Lippincolt, 8 N.J.L. 88, 89 (Sup.Ct. 1825) (recording, by notation, Justice Ford dubitante). It is an opinion form that has been used historically by a Justice to express serious doubt or to record a disagreement that the author believed was significant enough to express but nonetheless fell short of dissent for some reason. See
Lon L. Fuller, Anatomy of the Law 147 (1968) (describing the opinion form as “the epitome of the common law spirit”); Jason J. Czarnezki, The Dubitante Opinion, 39 Akron L.Rev. 1, 2 (2006) (tracing historical roots to colonial America). It was used, albeit infrequently, by two members of the United States Supreme Court, namely Justice William O. Douglas, see Case-Swayne Co. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc., 389 U.S. 384, 403, 88 S.Ct. 528, 536-37, 19 L.Ed.2d 621, 633 (1967) (Douglas, J., dubitante) (commenting that Court should not have addressed a matter not raised and not so free of doubt as to be correctly decided), and Justice Felix Frankfurter, see Radio Corp. of Am. v. United States, 341 U.S. 412, 421 71 S.Ct. 806, 810, 95 L.Ed. 1062, 1071 (1951) (Frankfurter, J., dubitante) (observing that because he is “not alone in entertaining doubts about this case they had better be stated”), precisely for the purpose of expressing their misgivings about the wisdom or the correctness of the Court’s decision.
jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 9 A.3d 882

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago