HUDSON MANHATTAN R. CO. v. JERSEY CITY, 5 N.J. 434 (1950)

75 A.2d 923

HUDSON MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued October 2, 1950 —
Decided October 23, 1950.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. John Warren argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Aaron A. Melniker, Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour Dwyer, Mr. Nicholas S. Rago and Mr. Sydney L. Jacobs, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. John B. Graf, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON — 7.

For reversal — None.

Page 435

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 75 A.2d 923

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago