140 A. 921
Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted October 28th, 1927.
Decided February 6th, 1928.
On appeal from the court of chancery.
Mr. J. Henry Harrison, for the receivers.
Messrs. Wall, Haight, Carey Hartpence, for the appellant Otto A. Lembeck.
Messrs. Fisk Fisk, for the appellant Ida L. Bowen.
Mr. Edward Maxson, for the respondent Samuel Lesser.
Mr. Merritt Lane, for Gustave W. Lembeck.
Mr. George J. Carr, for Eleanor Betz Howe and G. Arthur Betz.
PER CURIAM.
We have examined the record in this case with care and find the appeal devoid of merit.
The order appealed from is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Page 328
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…