924 A.2d 1191

IN THE MATTER OF ANGELA Y. WHITE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO. 01122000).

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
June 21, 2007.

ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-338, concluding that ANGELA Y.WHITE of LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, who was admitted to the bar of this, State in 2000, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year for violatin RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a crime that reflects adversely on a lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness and fitness), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And ANGELA Y. WHITE having been ordered to show cause why she should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANGELA Y. WHITE be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and until the further Order of the Court, effective July 10, 2007; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law unless and until the loan in the Gunter matter is paid in full, proof of which respondent shall submit with her application for reinstatement to practice; and it is further

ORDERED’ that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule 1:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC

Page 554

8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Over-sight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago