IN THE MATTER OF HAZEL, 169 N.J. 475 (2001)

779 A.2d 423

IN THE MATTER OF SCOTT RINE HAZEL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Decided September 7, 2001

ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-260 concluding that by way of reciprocal discipline SCOTT RINE HAZEL of STATE COLLEGE, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, and who has been administratively ineligible to practice law in New Jersey since September 20, 1993, pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, should be suspended from the practice of law for an indefinite period of time on the basis of respondent’s suspension in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for violating the terms of his probationary practice as ordered by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania;

And the Disciplinary Review Board further having concluded that respondent should not be eligible for reinstatement to practice in New Jersey until he is restored to the practice of law in Pennsylvania;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that SCOTT RINE HAZEL is suspended from the practice of law for an indefinite period of time and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that no petition for reinstatement be submitted by respondent until such time as respondent in reinstated to the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

Page 476

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 779 A.2d 423

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago