839 A.2d 886
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
January 28, 2004.
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-174, concluding that the law firm of BOLDEN and COKER, P.C., ofPHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, should be reprimanded for violating RPC
5.5(a) (unauthorized practice of law), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that the law firm of BOLDEN and COKER, P.C., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the law firm of BOLDEN and COKER, P.C., reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Page 325
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…