KUMPA v. PAGE, 178 N.J. Super. 589 (1981)

429 A.2d 1073

ALBERT KUMPA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NELSON E. PAGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND DENNIS MULVIHILL, SECRETARY OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BERGEN AND MICHAEL LUKACH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.Argued March 27, 1981 —
Decided March 27, 1981.

Appeal from Superior Court, Law Division.

Page 590

Before Judges ALLCORN, MICHELS and MILMED.

J. Sheldon Cohen argued the cause for appellant (Schneider, Cohen, Solomon DiMarzio, attorneys).

Donald A. Caminiti argued the cause for respondent Albert Kumpa (Breslin Breslin, attorneys).

Frank R. Gioia appeared for respondent Board of Education of the Township of North Bergen.

No one appeared on behalf of the remaining respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by ALLCORN, P.J.A.D.

It is conceded that the petition of nomination for Nelson E. Page as a candidate for the Board of Education of the Township of North Bergen contains the signatures of only ten persons, the minimum required by N.J.S.A. 18A:14-9. It also is conceded that one of said signers has been convicted of a crime which disenfranchises him and which thus renders him not a qualified voter of the school district and thus ineligible to sign the petition, as required by N.J.S.A. 18A:14-10.

Although, after notice of the defect, appellant obtained additional signatures of qualified voters, the pertinent statute does not permit such defect to be cured. N.J.S.A. 18A:14-12
provides:

When a nominating petition is found to be defective excepting as to the number of signatures, the secretary of the board shall forthwith notify the

Page 591

candidate of the defect and the date when the ballots will be printed and the candidate indorsing the petition may amend the same in form or substance, but not to add signatures, so as to remedy the defect at any time prior to said date. [Emphasis supplied]

Accordingly, the judgment of the Law Division is affirmed.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago