197 A. 44
Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court.Argued October 29th, 1937.
Decided February 10th, 1938.
On appeal from the court of chancery.
Mr. Leo E. Duff (Mr. Louis Bort, of counsel), for the appellant.
Mr. Harold E. Watson (Mr. Milton Rosenblum, of counsel), for the respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The proofs, carefully examined, abundantly support the findings of the learned advisory master from whose decree dismissing the appellant’s petition for annulment the present appeal is taken.
The decree will be affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Page 230
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…