MACKOW v. KLOTZ, 167 N.J. 598 (2001)

772 A.2d 914

JERZY MACKOW, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. VOLKER KLOTZ, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. PAUL G. KOSTRO, APPELLANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 24, 2001.

ORDER
This matter having come before the Court on an appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-1(a)(1), and the Court having determined that the 65matter does not present a substantial constitutional question within the meaning of the Rule or applicable caselaw;

It is ORDERED that the within appeal is dismissed.

Page 599

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 772 A.2d 914

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago