250 A.2d 129
Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued February 4, 1969 —
Decided February 18, 1969.
Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Mr. Lewis M. Holland argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Warren, Chasan, Leyner Holland, attorneys).
Mr. Geoffrey Gaulkin argued the cause for defendant, third-party plaintiff-respondent Vincent Krasnica (Messrs. Keale, Tarrant and Tarlton, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lynch, 94 N.J. Super. 228 (Cty. Ct. 1967), and in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 100 N.J. Super. 223 (App. Div. 1968).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.
For reversal — None.
Page 260
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…