MARTIN v. MAZZIOTTI, 20 N.J. Super. 503 (1952)

90 A.2d 70

PAUL MARTIN, MICHAEL GIULIANO, FRANK PETRUCCI AND JEAN FRATELLO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JULIA MAZZIOTTI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.Argued June 30, 1952 —
Decided July 10, 1952.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, STEIN and CLEARY.

Mr. Victor H. Miles argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. Charles Blume argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Colie in the Law Division, reported i 17 N.J. Super. 302 (Law Div. 1952).

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 90 A.2d 70

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago