MATTER OF BELTRE, 119 N.J. 190 (1990)

574 A.2d 447

IN THE MATTER OF LUIS OSCAR BELTRE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
June 5, 1990.

ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board having recommended that LUIS OSCAR BELTRE, formerly of JERSEY CITY, who was

Page 191

admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, be publicly reprimanded for his failure to prosecute an appeal, in violation of RPC 1.1, RPC 1.3, and RPC 1.4, and having further recommended that LUIS OSCAR BELTRE be suspended for three months for: 1) practicing law in this State while on the ineligible list, in violation of RPC 5.5(a), 2) failing to maintain trust and business accounts in compliance with R. 1:21-6, 3) failing to meet the bona fide office requirements of R. 1:21-1, and failing to cooperate in the ethics proceedings, in violation o RPC 8.1(b), and the Office of Attorney Ethics having informed this Court that respondent has failed to cooperate in an ethics committee investigation of a grievance alleging that respondent has failed to satisfy a lien notwithstanding his receipt of escrow funds for that purpose; and good cause appearing,

It is ORDERED that the findings set forth in the two reports of the Disciplinary Review Board are hereby adopted and LUIS OSCAR BELTRE is suspended from the practice of law for three months, effective immediately and until further order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that any restoration of LUIS OSCAR BELTRE to the practice of law is subject to the outcome of the ethics proceedings yet pending against him; and it is further

ORDERED that LUIS OSCAR BELTRE be and hereby is restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs.

Page 192

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 574 A.2d 447

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago