MATTER OF BOK, 109 N.J. 633 (1987)

538 A.2d 808

In the Matter of DAVID S. BOK, an attorney at law.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
December 1, 1987.

DISCIPLINARY MATTERS ORDER
This matter having been heard by this Court on the return date of the Court’s Order of November 10, 1987, directing that DAVID S. BOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, show cause why the immediate suspension and restraints imposed by Order of this Court should not continue pending the final disposition of the ethics complaints pending against him and further 2) why the funds restrained from disbursement by this Order should not be transferred by the banks who are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund and DAVID S. BOK having made no appearance on the return date of this Court’s Order to show cause and good cause appearing;

Page 634

It is ORDERED that the temporary suspension of DAVID S. BOK from the practice of law is continued until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that any funds presently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by DAVID S. BOK pursuant to R.
1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement and shall be transmitted to the financial institutions who are the present custodians of such funds to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics continue to take such protective action, pursuant to R. 1:20-11(c), as may be appropriate, with respect to the files, records, practice and trust assets of DAVID S. BOK wherever situate, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID S. BOK continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that DAVID S. BOK continue to comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 538 A.2d 808

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago