MATTER OF JOHNSON, 115 N.J. 654 (1989)

560 A.2d 675

In the Matter of HUBERT JOHNSON, an attorney at law.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
April 19, 1989.

DISCIPLINARY MATTERS ORDER
This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board that HUBERT JOHNSON formerly of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973 and suspended from the practice of law on December 16, 1982, be reinstated to the practice of law, subject to his fulfillment of certain conditions, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HUBERT JOHNSON shall be restored to the practice of law on the further order of this Court after he submits proof of his enrollment in and satisfactory completion of the five core courses in basic legal education offered by the Institute for Continuing Legal Education; and it is further

ORDERED that in the event of respondent’s restoration to the practice of law:

1. Respondent’s practice is to be under the supervision of an attorney approved for respondent’s proctorship by the Office of Attorney Ethics, with the terms and conditions of the proctorship to be established by the Office of Attorney Ethics in accordance with Administrative Guideline No. 28;

2. Respondent shall pay the costs incurred in the disciplinary proceedings in $300 monthly payments, the payments to begin on the first of the calendar month following his reinstatement to the practice of law;

3. Respondent shall submit proofs of his enrollment in and satisfactory completion of the balance of the Skills and Methods

Page 655

Course within two years of his reinstatement to the practice of law; and it is further

ORDERED that pending his restoration to the practice of law, respondent shall continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law and shall continue to comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 560 A.2d 675

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago