MATTER OF McCARTHY, 119 N.J. 437 (1990)

575 A.2d 434

IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN P. McCARTHY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
June 20, 1990.

Page 438

ORDER
STEPHEN P. McCARTHY of BAYONNE, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1954, having been convicted of distribution of a controlled dangerous substance in violation of N.J.S.A. 24:21-19(a)(1) and obtaining a controlled dangerous substance by misrepresentation, fraud, forgery, deception or subterfuge in violation of N.J.S.A. 24:21-22(a)(3), and having been temporarily suspended from the practice of law by this Court’s order of March 16, 1988,

And the Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court recommending that respondent’s suspension from the practice of law be deemed sufficient discipline for his conduct and that respondent accompany any application for his reinstatement to practice with medical and psychiatric proofs of his fitness to practice law,

And STEPHEN P. McCARTHY having failed to appear or otherwise respond to this Court’s order to show cause as to why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the suspension of STEPHEN P. McCARTHY from the practice of law, pursuant to this Court’s order of March 16, 1988, is deemed to be appropriate discipline for his criminal conviction; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent accompany any application for restoration to the practice of law pursuant to Rule 1:20-11(h) with medical and psychiatric proofs of his fitness to practice law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law until such time as he is restored to the practice of law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

Page 439

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of these proceedings.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 575 A.2d 434

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago