MOCCO v. JERSEY CITY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, 196 N.J. 341 (2008)

953 A.2d 760

LORRAINE MOCCO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JERSEY CITY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND BRUNSWICK 9 ASSOCIATES, LLC, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
July 8, 2008.

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily modified to remand the matter to the Jersey City Board of Adjustment to reconsider Brunswick 9 Associates, LLC’s variance application and for specific findings regarding the positive and negative criteria without regard to whether “the subject site may have been improperly zoned.”

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 953 A.2d 760

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago