241 A.2d 236
Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued March 19, 1968 —
Decided April 1, 1968.
On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 97 N.J. Super. 391, 235 A.2d 211.
Mr. George J. Kenny argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell Foley, attorneys).
Mr. Clifford W. Starrett argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Schenck, Price, Smith King, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.
For reversal — None.
Page 406
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…