399 A.2d 980
Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued February 21, 1979 —
Decided March 16, 1979.
Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Mr. John W. Trimble argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Trimble Master, attorneys).
Mr. Daniel P. Reynolds, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Benjamin D. Lambert, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the Appellate Division opinion, reported at 166 N.J. Super. 254 (1978). Only under limited circumstances, not here pertinent, may a municipal expenditure be made prior to an appropriation. See, e.g., Home Owners Construction Co. v. Borough of Glen Rock, 34 N.J. 305, 315-316 (1961); Essex Cty. Bd. of Taxation v. City of Newark 73 N.J. 69, 74 (1977).
For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 7.
For reversal — None.
Page 398
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…