N.J. BELL TELEPHONE CO. v. JERSEY CITY, 131 N.J.L. 571 (1944)

37 A.2d 115

NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE CO., PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY AND THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued February 2, 1944 —
Decided April 13, 1944.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported i 130 N.J.L. 364.

For the appellant, Harrison Roche Darby (Thomas Glynn Walker and Robert F. Darby, of counsel).

For the respondents, Edward P. Stout.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court, as supplemented by the opinion of this court in the case of New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v Town of Montclair, decided this day, 131 N.J.L. 564.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Page 572