N.J., c., FERRY CO. v. HACKENSACK IMP. COM., 107 N.J.L. 535 (1931)

154 A. 769

NEW JERSEY AND HUDSON RIVER RAILWAY AND FERRY COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE HACKENSACK IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION, RESPONDENT.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted October 31, 1930 —
Decided April 17, 1931.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 8 N.J. Mis. R. 390.

For the appellant, Frank Bergen and William H. Speer.

For the respondent, Walter G. Winne.

Page 536

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, J. 11.

For reversal — None.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 154 A. 769

Recent Posts

State v. Ackerman, 64 N.J.L. 99 (1899)

64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…

3 years ago

ROYSTER v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, No. 075926 (N.J. 1/17/2017) [SLIP COPY]

SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…

9 years ago

PEARSON v. DMH2 LLC, No. C-151-15 (N.J. Super. 1/25/2017) [SLIP COPY]

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…

9 years ago

STATE v. ELLISON, No. 01-06-2563-I (N.J. Super. 1/13/2017) [SLIP COPY]

  APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…

9 years ago

IN THE MATTER OF LATINSKY, 175 N.J. 66 (2002)

811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…

9 years ago

YUN v. FORD MOTOR CO., 143 N.J. 162 (1996)

669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…

9 years ago