PLANNED PARENTHOOD v. HACKENSACK, 14 N.J. Tax 171 (1993)


PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF BERGEN COUNTY, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF HACKENSACK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Tax Court of New Jersey.Submitted November 29, 1993.
Decided December 23, 1993.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Tax Court, Bergen County.

Before Judges BAIME and CONLEY.

Donald J. Lenner, attorney for appellant (Mr. Lenner, on the brief).

Wells, Garofalo, Jaworski Liebman, attorneys for respondent (James E. Jaworski, on the letter-brief).

Page 172

PER CURIAM.

The City of Hackensack appeals a judgment entered by Judge Joseph C. Small, J.T.C., that plaintiff was entitled to an exemption for properties it owns pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6. The rationale for the exemption is set forth in Judge Small’s cogent and comprehensive written September 30, 1992 opinion. We agree with his conclusion that the exemption is warranted under the moral and mental improvement section of N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6. It is, thus, not necessary for us to consider or express any view on the judge’s interpretation of the statute that in order to qualify for an exemption a moral and mental improvement organization or a charitable organization must use their property solely for the purpose for which they have been organized.

We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Small’s written opinion of September 30, 1992.