Categories: New Jersey Supreme Court Opinions

RUGALA v. NEW JERSEY INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, 131 N.J. 110 (1993)

618 A.2d 348

PAUL RUGALA, ANNA RUGALA AND ANTHONY J. POLAKAS, PLAINTIFFS, v. NEW JERSEY INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND J. RICHARD FERRY, DEFENDANT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.Argued October 26, 1992 —
Decided January 26, 1993.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Lars S. Hyberg argued the cause for appellant (McAllister, Westmoreland, Vesper Schwartz, attorneys).

Thomas A. Shovlin argued the cause for respondent (Riley, Di Camillo Shovlin, attorneys).

Page 111

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brochin’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 131 N.J. Super. 139, 618 A.2d 352
(1992).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — None.

jdjungle