Nos. 007403-2005 and 000352-2006Tax Court of New Jersey.
Decided September 17, 2007
Christopher John Stracco (Day Pitney, LLP, attorneys), for plaintiff.
Garry J. Roettger (Skoloff Wolfe, attorneys), for defendant.
Opinion by SMALL, P.J.T.C.
LOCAL PROPERTY TAXATION — EXEMPTION — VIOLATION OF LOCAL ZONING ORDINANCE
Property used in violation of local zoning ordinance cannot qualify for tax exemption under N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6. The holdings in Byram Tp v.Western World, Inc., lll N.J. 222 (1988), and Cheyenne Corp. v. Tp. ofByram, 248 N.J. Super. 588 (App.Div. 1991), that land may not obtain farmland assessment where its actual use qualifies for such preferential tax treatment but that use of the land violates local zoning ordinances or restrictions, is applicable in the context of tax exemptions underN.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6.
(9 Pages) (Copying Fee and Postage $7.16)
Page 1
64 N.J.L. 99 THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR v. ALBERT J. ACKERMAN, DEFENDANT BELOW, PLAINTIFF…
SYLLABUS (This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.? It has been…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION (January 25, 2017) SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION, ESSEX COUNTY…
APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY STATE OF NEW JERSEY,…
811 A.2d 909 IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN C. LATINSKY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.Supreme Court…
669 A.2d 1378 GLORIA YUN, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF CHANG HAK YUN,…