SICKLEY BROTHERS v. MICHEL MOORE COMPANY, 109 N.J.L. 348 (1932)

162 A. 582

SICKLEY BROTHERS, RESPONDENT, v. MICHEL MOORE COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Submitted May 27, 1932 —
Decided October 17, 1932.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 606.

For the respondent, Riker Riker.

For the appellant, Jacob E. Max.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.