SODEN v. PUBLIC SERVICE TRANSPORTATION CO., 103 N.J.L. 713 (1927)

137 A. 918

CLARA G. SODEN, RESPONDENT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Court of Errors and Appeals.Argued February 7, 1927 —
Decided May 16, 1927.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J.L. Mis. R. 817.

Page 714

For the appellant, James O. Boyd.

For the respondent, Joseph H. Edgar.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, KALISCH, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, DEAR, JJ. 5.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, KATZENBACH, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 5.